Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

How Do You Feel About Laser. Experience Anyone?


Guest oogie292

Recommended Posts

I started with laser to get rid of the dark hair, i had 10 sessions last year, i just completed a year of electrolysis to remove the white/gray hairs and any dark ones that came back, i still have at least another year to finish off the neck hairs, i barely have to shave my face, my neck i still do.

If you have a dark beard shadow, laser will remove the shadow faster so you do not have to worry about it, but laser is not listed as permanent, electrolysis is.

Paula

Link to comment
Guest Lady.Violette

If you have a dark beard shadow, laser will remove the shadow faster so you do not have to worry about it, but laser is not listed as permanent, electrolysis is.

Paula

Very weird Paula, the site Im reading from says the opposite. That Laser is permanent and electro isn't.

So whats the deal?

(SOURCE)

Link to comment
  • Admin

The jury is still out for me and laser. I've gone through 7 sessions, and feel like the density of hair has been reduced at least 50

per cent, but not sure if it will get to 100 per cent, 80, 70, or what. I'm sure I'll have some white hairs to get rid of through

electro, but I think its been a good investment to start with LHR.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
  • Admin

Very weird Paula, the site Im reading from says the opposite. That Laser is permanent and electro isn't.

So whats the deal?

(SOURCE)

My understanding of the treatments is the same as Paula's. In general, electrolysis is supposed to be more permanent.

Don't forget, Violette, that the source for your info is an LHR company. They are not exactly unbiased on the subject.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest Lady.Violette

My understanding of the treatments is the same as Paula's. In general, electrolysis is supposed to be more permanent.

Don't forget, Violette, that the source for your info is an LHR company. They are not exactly unbiased on the subject.

Carolyn Marie

Well, yes. :P

That is true hihi

Link to comment
Guest JackieP

I constantly check on this as I hate electro - having to let hair grow prior, pain and swelling etc.,

but so far, info from non biased sites still show electro as the only permanent solution.

I should add, that even requires going over the same area more than once to get rid of growth permanently !

Link to comment
Guest miss kindheart

I went and did two laser sessions on my face, and it removed quite a bit of my facial hair.

There is only one place where I live that does it, and their machine broke down :( and after a long time they told me they didn't think they were gonna get it fixed.

I did lots of research and found that IPL (Intense pulsed light) Is now considered better than laser.

They also have a machine called Elight now, it is IPL+RF (radio frequency)

I ended up buying one, and am not sorry I did.

I have used it on my whole Body except mt head hair, and forearms.

It will do so many things ^_^

I do still have a few gray hair that I need to get removed by electrolysis though.

:wub: vanna

Link to comment
Guest Kayliegh

I have had four sessions of laser and a year of electro. The laser did get rid of 70% of the dark hairs - unfortunalty, I have many platinum blond hairs as well!

The electro takes a while and is painful. My electrologist started on the sides of my face before HRT and that went smoothly (no pun intended, but now she is doing the upper lip, chin and neck and it is not easy to bare!

If your facial hair is all dark, go with laser. The stragglers you can get with electro.

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
Guest Miss_Construe

The place I went here in Colorado (North-West suburb or Denver to be precise) was really great.

They explained that the FDA has only approved Laser hair removal for 'reduction' and not 'removal'. They pretty much explained everything I have read about laser hair removal, and a few tidbits to make the most of the experience. The sensation isn't exactly a york peppermint patty, but so far I am satisfied. Can tell you more in a few more sessions.

Link to comment
Guest StaceyC

I had really thick facial hair, i'd get a 1 o'clock shadow and have to shave twice a day sometimes. Anyway I've finished my 6th session of laser on my face and neck. A bit painful but a HUGE improvement. My beard is not a 100% gone yet. Probably about 90%. I'm guessing I'll need another 2 or 3 treatments. I'm not sure about it being permanent. I've heard the same as the other posts. But I my intention is to use the laser to get most of it as quickly as possible. It Then follow up with electro later as needed later. Your hair grows in cycles and it only kills the hair that is actively growing which is why it takes so many treatments regardless of you method.

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
Guest Krisina

So what do folks normally do then get the lase for a year, say 6 sessions, then switch over to electrolysis?

Laser being permanent hair reduction, and thinning of the beard. Is that to imply the hair won't grow back? That what ever hair has responded to the treatment is considered the hair reduction.

Trying to plan how I should go about this. Going to the laser treatments every 5 or 6 weeks I guess to get the next growth cycles of hair.

My preference if I could afford it would be electrolysis e3000 b

Link to comment

Krisina, i had 10 laser sessions, afrer the 7th laser session my dark hairs were just about gone, however being older i had allot of gray/white hairs that laser does not eliminate, so in addition to laser i started electrolysis, in the 17 months i have been doing electrolysis some dark hairs have returned and are being taken care of.

In my opinion if you have dark facial hair do laser first, it gave me a huge boost in confidence as far as passing, then finish the rest off with electrolysis.

Paula

Link to comment

I have had very little electrolysis because of extremely delicate skin I require a lower power than most want to use but I have a couple of small scars from those early treatments so when I need the clean up I am going to research the place I am going to use very carefully.

As to laser not being permanent I would look to the sources - Electro is 'old school' and accepted as being permanent while laser is the 'new kid on the block' so it has to fight for acceptance in a field where the 'old guard' is not really looking for new ideas.

An example of this sort of thing is the fact that after Dr.McGinn had opened her Papillon Center near Philadelphia the American Medical Association recognized Dr. Bowers as being the only Transsexual performing the SRS, why is that - Dr. Bowers is an MD (their schools) and Dr.McGinn is an OD (Osteopathic - the enemy camp) - rather petty and actually misinformation from a trusted orginazation.

I am having 5 laser sessions - number 3 is today, I am having good results and the operator is increasing the intensity on each session as the hairs are getting lighter in color and I have been exposed to the laser more - it is working well for me but the only reason that I decided to try was I had a coupon for 5 treatments on one area (my chin) for $99 - I had to try it!

We will see what happens to the lighter hairs, my technician says that it varies by individual but for some with pretty light skin (like me) a lot of the hairs with any color at all will be removed.

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment
Guest Arielle

I love this idea

As to laser not being permanent I would look to the sources - Electro is 'old school' and accepted as being permanent while laser is the 'new kid on the block' so it has to fight for acceptance in a field where the 'old guard' is not really looking for new ideas.

Laser so far is working fine for me after 7 sessions. No it doesn't work for everyone, and the laser I'm having used on me is Alexandrite (currently the most advanced by FDA standards), and uses FM to make sure that the follicles die. The FDA won't say laser is permanent until some standard is met that I don't have knowledge of.

Sort of makes me wonder why laser (besides the above quote) is looked at so poorly when many many women have parts of their bodies done everyday and most of the time have no complaints if they follow the rather simple guidelines. No I can't go in the sun like I used to (not that I really used to anyway), but it doesn't bother me either. I wear more sunblock (all of us should), and keep hydrated. Right now with how hair is removed, you give up speed to keep the ability to tan. Or you do the opposite.

Laser destroys the melanin in the skin which is how you tan. I also know a woman in the same city as me whose had laser done 5 years ago when it was much newer and more expensive and not quite as good as it is now, and she has no complaints about the results.

Link to comment
Guest Krisina

Thanks for your posting posting oogie292 and everyone that responded too explaining stuff for me too.

Arielle postings are interesting. I didn't realize That the laser destroys the Melinin innthe skin that is what tans the skin. I wonder how long after laser treatments are done you can begin to tan again?

Paula ult's posting was interesting in that she said some dark hairs had returned, and that they were being treated with electrolysis.

Link to comment

I thought I would look to see if there was anything new in the discussion of laser hair removal. It appears that there is nothing new which is sad to say. Always I see:

1) Plenty of testimonials by people undergoing laser treatments or to recently have finished them where they claim great results.

2) Claims that new technology has resolved the problems of the past.

3) No testimonials from people who completed laser treatements many years earler.

Not having regrowth for a few months or even 6 months after treament doesn't mean much as far as permanent. There is no question that short term time frames laser can be effective plus or minue the light hairs. The question is about the long term. The permanence issue is about what happens years after. The complaint about laser has been the signficant regrowth that occurs a few years after the laser treatments are stopped.

I been hearing the new technology cliam resolving the past issues for over 10 years now. Where are the people who made the claim 5 years ago now to tell us that yes they didn't have significant regrowth?

The lack of testimonials by people who had their last laser treatment 3 years ago who are agreeing that it is permanent is, well interesting.

I know many who had laser (including myself). We all are essentially of the same opinion, yes it helped, but much of it came back after a few years.

A friend finished getting laser treatmetns in the past year. In 5 years either she will be able to say, yes it was permanent for her, or maybe her experience will be more typical. She is a near perfect candidate with pale skin and black hair so if anyone will have good results it will be her.

The best I come up with on laser is:

a.) Great for some quick results. So definitely good for a start even if long term all the hairs need to be eventually done with electro.

b.) Electro needed for lighter hairs and to deal with the regrowth over time.

c.) It probably knocks out a third of the hairs long term so may even be worthwhile from a absolute cost standpoint.

I am hoping things will change and technology will solve the problems. It is certainly much easier.

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...
Guest Miss_Construe

The FDA is reported (by my laser tech) to have approved LHR for ~80% hair reduction. Their website may have some information. FDA Laser Facts

I also checked Consumer Reports

This site seems to compare some things Comparison from Vendor

I think suppliers would have information about FDA approval publicly available. According to the wording from the FDA they sites who manufacture the lasers (and the practitioners) can not claim hair reduction or removal unless the device is approved. However, the regrowth watch period is only 'longer than the treatment period.' That would indicate after treatment has ceased (which is what the FDA would stipulate, and require clear documentation of). Theoretically hair wouldn't grow back unless a hormonal change disrupted the steady state growth cycle.

While looking through the libraries online database I noticed that there is studies for laser hair reduction/ removal that nuance the wavelengths and do histological studies to determine the actual impacts on the follicle and the remaining tissue of the skin. Should be interesting. I don't really feel like doing it right now, but Google Scholar should have some of those articles (including at least abstracts) or even the manufacturers (Lots of places try to be sciencie about their products).

Hope that gives you some new information/ things to look into/ help deciding.

</3

jamie

Link to comment

Laser is fast and cheaper... BUT there are a lot of yahoo's running around performing it. Make sure whoever you go to actually knows what they are doing. They can easily cause problems by zapping you with too high of settings or doing the same spot too much (and the results can actually cause scars!).

There are also things like intense light pulse treatments for body hair. Not really lasers, but they do a pretty good job of killing hair (at first you do it once every 2 weeks...and then down to months between treatments...and finally only needing it like once a year as upkeep). Again, you can end up burning the skin if you don't do it right or the machine malfunctions (this happened to me, the machine broke and little red crazy itchy bumps popped up all over... which left scarring on my legs, looks like tons of permanent bug bites o.O).

But, as long as you are careful or are getting it done by someone who knows their job... you should be ok. Take precautions and do the test patches first and all that other stuff.

For the face, laser tends to get rid of the darker hairs easier and faster, but you still need electrolysis for the white ones.

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

Sadly, neither LASER nor Electrolysis are 100% successful.

Sally is using a 5 session LASER session and although she says she has results, her blond beard looks about the same to me after three sessions, but I cannot tell. The process is more complicated than most people think. Yet it seems quick. Her having electrolysis in the same area would be about $250, and may have had about the same results. She would have been paying about $750 - but she had a coupon.

Her beard is about average,

My beard is near non-existent (heritage) so I opted for electrolysis. I did my eyebrows and my mustache area - about 12 sessions at $55 each. It took about 80% off permanently. I would have been going back for about at least 20 more sessions (remember, not much beard) to get all my face done. I ran out of $$$... So that would have been about $1700. I think most spend at least $3000 or more - electrolysis. And it is not 100% - as the hair on the face tends to cycle every 7 years or so.

Either way - hair removal goes on for a long time.

I won't use LASER, a personal choice, unless they get it perfected. Electrolysis is primarily designed for lighter work on natal women, but I have a tolerance for pain and needles, so I will probably go back.

My option

Lizzy

Link to comment

Not having a tolerance for pain and needles and having scared from my first electrolysis session, I am going with the laser on this 5 visit coupon - it has pretty much removed the dark hairs in the first three sessions, each time she is raising the power level to get a bit more as my skin is developing a resistance to the laser - the first time she did a test and thought it was a bit more red than she liked so she backed it down - she has told me that for some extremely pale individuals like myself that a lot of lighter hairs will also be effected (but she has started widening the area covered so that I will not just be throwing away these last two sessions.

My next session is in one hour - got to go get ready.

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment
Guest little_sephy

I've recently gotten a laser treatment, and I'm due for another 3 so far. Managed to get a great deal, I ended up only paying $585 up front for 4 laser sessions on all areas of my face and neck, including sideburns. It was kinda painful at first, but honestly it wasn't too rough. The WORST pain comes from the lip region...that can be kind of unbearable i did cry a little bit lol but it was sooooo worth it, even after just 1 laser session about 90% of my shadow just dissapeared after all the dead hairs started to shed off. I think laser is pretty effective for anyone looking for really quick results, and any hairs left over you can always get electrolysis for! Anyway, that's just my 2 cents :P

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 138 Guests (See full list)

    • VickySGV
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...