Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Confused About Transition


Guest roxanne22

Recommended Posts

Guest roxanne22

I have struggled with this question for a very long time. I have been a follower of Buddhist practices for over 15 years. It has given me much insight into my life, my problems, and allowed me to find the courage to face reality. I am a recovering alcoholic and drug addict with now over 25 years of continuous sobriety. But it has only been in the last 10 years that I have slowly understood the true meaning of my transgender path. I have tried to deny being transgender through suicide attempts, drugs and alcohol and when that didn't work, I tried therapy and anti-depressants. But finally this year, I have been able to break through the denial, quilt and shame that I have always felt for not being the man I was supposed to be. I was an actor, pretending to be a man, when inside my heart was the essence of a woman. After growing up denying the pain and shame I felt, it took a long time and a wonderful therapist to help me embrace and love my true female essence.

So this brings me to my inner conflict. My Buddhist teachings tell me I must overcome my unhealthy desires and attachments, in order to reach peace and wisdom. I have come to the conclusion that I am undeniably transgender. But now the question is do I transition? Is the desire to transition an unhealthy desire? Or will it be a positive change that will help me become a more wise, compassionate human being? I dream of having the body of a woman and of being accepted as a woman. But is representing myself as a woman to the world really that important? This body will die someday but as long I am true to my essence, the body is of little meaning, other than to provide me life as a human.

So my struggle is to find the Middle way. I am far from being ready for transition, as I have only told one other person other than my therapist about being transgender. And I fear the consequences of transition, specifically the possible loss of those I love, especially my daughter. My therapist tells me to climb the mountain, not knowing how high it is or how far I have to go. Just keep climbing and don't look down. I would just like to hear some other thoughts, ideas or experiences.

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

My answer is a personal one, possibly applicable only to me.

I worked a year at least, to understand clearly that I am a woman, always have been, am now, will always be one. I also believe I have essentially a female soul. I admit that the soul may not be gendered, but my soul apparently goes toward the female principal, at least in my past lives. This current 'male' incarnation is for a purpose. Perhaps I need balance, perhaps I am recovering principals that I have not been using in the past and need to have. I remember many lives as myself - and they were as a female. I have very few rememberances as a male, but of course, we don't recall all our existances.

As to transition in this incarnation? I suspect I am being allowerd to revert to my true being in this later part of my life, havin accmplished what I was to do.

So I have no conflict - what I am doing is not only allowed, but proper action... after my revelations on what I REALLY am, and what is REALLY going on.

Lizzy

Link to comment
Guest JaniceW

I would propose this question, is the incongruity of your body and mind interfering with your ability to focus on achieving enlightenment? If that answer is yes then, what can you do to resolve that incongruity so it no longer interferes?

Link to comment

To the best of my knowledge and in a very over simplified explanation Buddhism is a series of teachings with each being necessary for the ultimate goal of enlightenment.

Conflict is one of the great distractions from ever achieving enlightenment and transgendered is a huge distraction.

How can you obtain enlightenment while you are still fighting to maintain a you that is false, transitioning in my way of interpreting the teachings would be considered the logical and actually essential step to get you back onto the true path.

Peace and enlightenment are not contrary to transitioning as a matter of fact the main goal of transitioning is inner peace so it is on your path to enlightenment already.

People tend to think of transitioning as a purely physical need - it is not, it has physical, emotional and mental needs attached - you must clear your mind of all confusion to ever reach your goals.

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment
Guest Annaemo

I would propose this question, is the incongruity of your body and mind interfering with your ability to focus on achieving enlightenment? If that answer is yes then, what can you do to resolve that incongruity so it no longer interferes?

I like the Buddhist idea that we are always progressing towards enlightenment. I felt that when I became aware of my transition that I had taken a big step towards enlightenment. At the same time a flood of knowledge appeared in front of me and it was such a great feeling for a few weeks. If I explained to a therapist and they told me I would have to return to my former male self, I'd say thats impossible because either he is gone or did not exist in the first place. Its as if you were to die and return to a previous life as an animal. I don't think this would make sense in Buddhist teachings although I'm not an expert. I also feel its amazing that some can transition while still living! When I was younger I expected to die and be reborn as a woman but I see that wasn't the way is was supposed to happen :).

Link to comment
Guest roxanne22

Thanks so much to all who replied to my post. This is the first time I have reached out for help, other than from my therapist. I have always known from my days of addiction recovery that it is essential to learn from those who have walked the path ahead of you. Not sure why I waited so long to do this. Just fear, I guess. I really appreciate the acceptance of my confusion. I have looked over this site and really like what I have found. I look forward to learning and listening. So far, all that you have said has been relevant to my experience. I too thought I would just die and hopefully be reborn female. But directing a rebirth through the bardot of death takes great skill. I am not close to achieving that level of expertise. And I have searched and tried to find the true reasons why I want to transition. I too see my current condition as a possible obstacle in my path to achieve enlightenment. Transition would have a tremendous impact on my life and the lives of those I care about. But I trust in my path and I know I cannot turn back or deny my true nature, knowing what I now know. Again, I am very happy for all the responses and wish you a great peace.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I would ask in what way could or would a need to transition be considered an unhealthy desire?

I see it as a re-alignment. Bringing mismatched parts of the body that cannot function properly at odds into harmony. And because this mismatch also profoundly affects how we are able to express ourselves and be true to ourselves in our lives it creates an enormous imbalance. If living in a male body causes negative emotions and behaviors then it is something that needs to be resolved. How you need to resolve it is a personal and individual thing.

John

Link to comment
Guest JazzySmurf

Dear roxanne22,

The merit of actions, intentions, and desires arises from the motivations or attitudes behind each. Therefore, it is important to first examine these motivations or attitudes. If the motivation is born out of ordinary aspirations such as wanting wealth, fame, glamor, or even seeking enlightenment as an end in and of itself, then such is not the path of the teachings. If one takes on the attitude to reduce suffering and bring happiness to all beings everywhere, then, as the Tibetan master Patrul Rinpoche writes,

[...] skillful means will permeate your positive actions, and you will have set out on the path of great beings.

This is why he writes

What makes an action good or bad?

Not how it looks, nor whether it is big or small,

But the good or evil motivations behind it.

The desire to transition is, a priori, neither healthy nor unhealthy, as it does not take on an inherent existence independent of thought. What influences its merit are your attitudes and motivations. Will you seek to transition for ordinary reasons such as wanting wealth, fame, glamor, or even seeking enlightenment as an end in and of itself? Or, can you envision a way in which you can use your transition for the benefit of all beings?

To further meditate on how to apply the Dharma to one's life, including the process of transitioning, it is important to critically analyze all the teachings that you receive. Equally important is to not accept without critical analysis the teachings of others, whether it comes from a seemingly ordinary person, a realized teacher, or even the Buddha himself. The Buddha, as written about his earthly existence, even gave teachings that may appear contradictory; this is why it is important to deepen one's insight to appreciate the wisdom of meritorious teachings. As the American poet Mary Oliver writes

I don't know exactly what a prayer is.

I do know how to pay attention [...]

Tell me, what is it you plan to do

with your one wild and precious life?

Have a wonderful day.

Heather

ps: The Patrul Rinpoche quote is from his text The Words of My Perfect Teacher and the Mary Oliver quote is from her poem The Summer Day.

Link to comment
  • 1 year later...
Guest The Avatar

The question is more like "Why?"

You COULD NOT transition because you are attached to your physical body.

You COULD transition because you are attached to your physical body.

You COULD NOT transition because you believe it will bring you closer to spiritual balance.

You COULD transition because it will bring you closer to spiritual balance.

Either way you are asking a question of yourself that has many reasonings.

Your spirit is far more than a body.I think this is one of those things where you have to ask for advice not so much from others but from a deeper self. You don't have to transition any more than anyone else has to not transition.

I say climb that mountain. Literally. Go out and find a place where you can let yourself go so to speak. Meditate on it. The answer you find yourself at peace with is the most powerful answer you could receive. None of us know you or your life as well as you do. Part of putting that inner conflict to rest is finding it yourself.

I see nothing wrong with either decision. What worries me is whether or not you're at peace with the decision.

Link to comment
Guest vtphoenix

The Druids had a saying: "Once one recognizes the truth, one is then bound by its laws."

Now that you know you're a woman, how can you deny that essence?

The Druids also said this, and it's my favorite quote of all time I think: "Three things which strengthen a person to stand against the whole world: seeing the quality and beauty of truth, seeing beneath the cloak of falsehood, and seeing to what ends truth and falsehood come."

My whole life, I've sought out enlightenment, I never felt close to achieving it until I embraced this path.

I see lessons in everything.

In the movie, "Men Who Stare At Goats," there is an awesome idea, that of "optimum trajectory." Klooney's character explains it thusly: "Your life is like a river. If you're aiming for a goal that isn't your destiny, you will always be swimming against the current."

In the movie, "The Matrix," Morpheus says to Neo, "There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path."

We walk our life's path toward our destiny, whether we understand it or not, and if we wander off the path, away from our destiny, life guides us back, much the same way that the actors in "The Truman Show" keep Truman trapped in his small world. Synchronistic events pop up like signposts to tell us to go back, this is not the way. We can rail against these things as though they are infringing on our sense of free will but it is not some outside agency that is forcing us down our path. The cause of all these obstacles, or on a deeper level the perceiving of these things AS obstacles, comes from within. Which means it is not God telling us that we have gone astray, it is our own conscience.

There is one view, that our conscience is the eye of God in the heart of humankind, but there is another view, the Pandeist view, that the Universe and God are synonymous. In that view, we are not struggling to reunite WITH God, but are living components OF God. I find this second view particularly beautiful and appealing because we don't need to cleanse our desires to bring us closer to a sameness with everyone else, instead we can embrace our desires as different ways to experience the Universe.

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...
Guest notajanedoe

Do no harm. Do the least harm.

Simple enough priorities for a Buddhist to keep in mind. One follows the other, the second made necessary given the imperfect understanding of most living things.

But if you don't 'do' anything? Consider: is the inaction itself causing harm? Bowing one's head can be as dangerous as striking with one's fist, can it not?

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 94 Guests (See full list)

    • Betty K
    • Adrianna Danielle
    • VickySGV
    • Timi
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...