Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

A Couple Of Questions


Guest Avery F

Recommended Posts

Guest Avery F

Hello everybody,

I have a couple of spirituality-related questions, and I wonder if any of you can help me with them.

The first is this: when people ask me what religion I follow, I say I'm an agnostic. However, there seems to be considerable disagreement about what an agnostic actually is. Some people think it's a person who doesn't believe in a deity, but admits that the non-existence of a deity cannot be disproved. Others think it has nothing to do with religion at all, but is merely the state of being unsure about any subject. My own belief is that it's impossible to know whether a deity exists or not, and that being an atheist or a theist is simply a matter of believing one way or another, without proof. I personally choose not to believe either way, but remain equally open to the existence or non-existence of a deity (or deities). So, what exactly would one call this?

The second is a more personal situation I'm currently dealing with. As I've said above, I'm an agnostic... or whatever it's called... All the members of my immediate family, however, are atheists (or atheistic agnostics, if you want to get technical...). That is, they admit it's impossible to prove whether or not a deity exists, but they choose to believe that one does not. That's fine with me - I don't really care what anyone believes as long as they don't try and push their beliefs on me. The problem is that my family often mocks people who do believe in a deity. I've asked them not to do so, but they have so far refused to acquiesce. My mum in particular claims that religion is a coping mechanism used only by those people who can't deal with the real world. In my opinion, that's rubbish - more than half of the people in the world believe in some deity or another, and I can't believe that ALL of them are unable to deal with reality! I think religion is a valid opinion on spirituality, just as atheism is, and everyone should be able to believe whatever they like. I find the things my family says about religious people hurtful and ignorant - especially since I know a bunch of really brilliant people who happen to be religious, and my family is basically saying they're all weak. So, the issue is, what the bleep can I do about my family's comments?

Jeez, this turned out to be one novel of a post. If you actually read it all, thanks a lot for being patient!

Link to comment
Guest April63

Well how rude of your family! As a very religious person I'm so... offended! ... Not really. I'm not offended at all. I am saddened that your family acts and believes that way, and I hope that they can find a way to not be so judgmental and to be more more open to the possibilities. For me, I just tend to ignore this type of thing. When people don't understand my beliefs, I try to correct them, but if a person just won't listen or try to understand, I just have to partially ignore it and not let it bother me. I will still talk and try to explain things to that person, but not to the point that I m overexerting my energy for the cause.

As for the agnostic thing, I don't really think the definition of this is to overly important. In some cases, a name is just a label, although in others, it can be more signifying. I don't believe an agnostic is trying to make any statements with the name, unlike a Christian, for example, which may be trying to make the statements of love, charity, and obviously faith in Christ. Although if you insist, I believe you are an example of an agnostic. But you probably could use the word as an adjective and apply it to any particular subject, if it is used without such a context or in the context of faith, it should describe a person like yourself: leaning neither one way or the other.

Hope this helps :)

Link to comment

Well said April!!

Also, a very good friend of mine always reminds me, You can't control other people's behavior, you can only control/change yours.Soley

Link to comment
Guest lisa49

Beliefs are a personal thing. Many things as far as empirical evidence are concerned are unknown as well as difficult to communicate, each has individual experience with it. Things like spiritual feelings, the metaphysical, the soul, religious feelings, etc. are not concrete.

No one or belief has a monopoly on morals, ethics, virtue or good. You do not need a deity or religion to be humane and live a good life. You can have dialectic discussion with all sorts of people without taking each other's beliefs personally or let their ideas manipulate your emotions. Since the whole subject is subjective each has an opinion. It is only when physical harm is asserted that conversation has pasted the limit.

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
Guest Puppy Girl

I know what you mean- my dad is a "militant atheist", as in, an atheist who thinks non-atheists are being delusional and that everyone should abandon religion in all its forms. I was raised that way, but it never worked for me. I went off to college, got my own opinions (that being open-minded and tolerant of religions is best), and came home for a Thanksgiving break. We were driving across the state to visit relatives, and he started God-bashing. I actually stood up for myself, even though he was being such a jerk about it that I was in tears before I had gotten my point across. He fell silent and seemed confused by my reaction. It seemed to make him think. Now I'm a Buddhist and, frankly, in no hurry to tell him about that.

I don't want my dad to change his beliefs at all, but it'd be nice if he wasn't determined that everyone should believe the same things he does. I think the best you can do with anyone like that is try to explain how you feel, and if they continue on as they always have, just ignore them if they try to include you in future religion-bashing. Some people don't want to listen, and arguing with them gets you nowhere, except more upset.

Hope that helps.

-Puppy Girl

Link to comment
Guest Avery F

Thanks for replying, everyone. I appreciate your input, because this is sort of a befuddling issue for me to deal with. I've heard all sorts of horror stories about evangelical religious folks hating on atheists, but very few about it going the other way around (probably because it's my family telling most of the stories)... so I'm not sure how to deal with it, I guess.

April: yes, I suppose you're right. I am letting it get to me rather too much. It's just that so many really nice people I know are religious, including my wonderful, very dear best friend, and hearing the things my family says is like hearing them insulting these people personally.

Soley: wise words, certainly - and you know, even though it would be easier at times if one could control the actions and opinions of those around them, a lot of the interest would go out of life :)

Lisa: yeah, I know what you mean, and maybe I am taking it too hard. It's not like my family is threatening to go out and attack religious people, or anything. Still, it's like when some religious folks go around saying that atheists have no morals, because they don't believe in a god - that is to say, it's both totally ridiculous and very insulting, both to atheists and to people who know atheists.

Puppy Girl: I'm sorry your dad is that way, although it's comforting to know that there are other people out there who've had this same problem. It was really great of you to stand up for your beliefs, and I hope it helped your dad re-think his opinion of religious folks. Maybe in time I can help my family to do the same.

Again, thanks for the replies,

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

Puppy Girl says it like I feel. I have my own spirituality, and I will explain when asked. I am rarely asked - because all want me to believe (or not believe) as they do. SILLY

My partner and I are very different in how we view the idea of a higher power, yet we pretty much see the world in the same way. So it's a matter of a comfort zone. When something good happens, I always say something like 'thank the GOD you don't believe in...' and she laughs.

Actually I believe in a CREATOR, but oooops.... you didn't ask.

Bottom line? It's what get's you through your life, your privilege to believe or not.

Just me

Lizzy

That didn't answer anything! AUGGGGH

Link to comment

Kia Ora Avery,

Quote "So, the issue is, what the bleep can I do about my family's comments?"

:rolleyes: Why should you 'have' to do anything? The problem is theirs...

And what Lisa said Quote "You can have dialectic discussion with all sorts of people without taking each other's beliefs personally or let their ideas manipulate your emotions!"

Metta Zenda :)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 130 Guests (See full list)

    • tracy_j
    • Breanne_O
    • AllieJ
    • VickySGV
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...