Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Personal Hair Removal Machines


Guest oogie292

Recommended Posts

Guest oogie292

I have heard of people buying their own electrology or lazer machines and I just wanted others opinions. I have heard of things like the elight and the No!No but I really wanted personal reviews. Although I dont want to know about epilators. Too painful!

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter

I have heard of people buying their own electrology or lazer machines and I just wanted others opinions. I have heard of things like the elight and the No!No but I really wanted personal reviews. Although I dont want to know about epilators. Too painful!

You know, I never bothered to look into it, because I always assumed the machines were ridiculously expensive, but I just did a little browsing and they're actually quite affordable. I might have to do a little more research, the possibility is a little intriguing.

If you're looking into a personal machine though, I wouldn't bother with the laser equipment. It's not going to be permanent. Even professional laser treatments aren't technically permanent hair removal. If you go this route, go with the electrolysis system, just make sure you practice in non visible areas for a while before moving to your face, because the risk of scarring is very real, whether you use the probe type or not.

Thanks for inspiring me to look into this. Maybe I'll get good at it and I can help out some of the local girls lol. It offends me that permanent hair removal is so bloody expensive.

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

Weird - I almost forgot this. I made my own electrolysis machine (not recommended) and it worked! But I would not use it on my face because of the fear of scars. I did remove a lot of hair on my knuckles and toes. It was permanent - but... I got scared and stopped - and it took so much time.

well...

HRT did the same thing 20 years later, without the risk.

I donno - would that be the same risk with the 'home' personal electrolysis machines? Scaring?

Lizzy

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter

Weird - I almost forgot this. I made my own electrolysis machine (not recommended) and it worked! But I would not use it on my face because of the fear of scars. I did remove a lot of hair on my knuckles and toes. It was permanent - but... I got scared and stopped - and it took so much time.

well...

HRT did the same thing 20 years later, without the risk.

I donno - would that be the same risk with the 'home' personal electrolysis machines? Scaring?

Lizzy

There is risk of scarring, but the Vector machine doesn't use a needle, and if you follow their advice the risk is minimal. I'm very seriously considering this. I think the pain would be more than worth it, and I'd just practice for a while somewhere other than my face to make sure I know what settings to use for my hair etc. Honestly, hair removal costs have really been depressing me and I've been scared that it might hold me back for a long time, but this kind of gives me a bit of hope. $200.00 for the machine plus the cost of gel and electrode resupply. Sounds a heck of a lot better than $100.00 an hour :D

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

Sally has one of the machines that uses the gel, no needles. I asked if she would talk on that.

My machine I used had a needle. It would 'bubble' the hair follicle, and that was how you knew it worked. I used Sally's machine, but with the electrified tweezers option. It seemed to work somewhat, but it is so time consuming!

Lizzy

Link to comment

There is a machine called Forever Free and it is said to use radio waves - it does not hurt and it does work but the drawbacks are the time consumtion if using the electric tweeers (one minute on each hair) or the expense if you are using the pads, one inch square and you can use one three times (three minutes at a time).

The machine is about $99 and the pads run around thirty for a pack of 18.

It seemed to work when I was patient enough to use it - I will probably start up again because the dark hairs are almost gone and this works on any color.

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter

There is a machine called Forever Free and it is said to use radio waves - it does not hurt and it does work but the drawbacks are the time consumtion if using the electric tweeers (one minute on each hair) or the expense if you are using the pads, one inch square and you can use one three times (three minutes at a time).

The machine is about $99 and the pads run around thirty for a pack of 18.

It seemed to work when I was patient enough to use it - I will probably start up again because the dark hairs are almost gone and this works on any color.

Love ya,

Sally

The vector works on exactly the same principle as professional equipment, and uses the same level of electrical current, just without the needle. It can take anywhere from 7 to 35 seconds per hair, depending on the setting you use, and is supposed to be "almost" painless. It's $200. I think I might just get one.

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

The answer can be controversial. Your mileage may vary (YMMV) is applicable here.

My experience - which may not be typical, is the HRT causes body hair (except the beard, underarm and pubic hair) to virtually disappear, which then is replaced by a 'peach fuzz' covering. It took about two years for me.

The controversial part is the other three areas seems to have had hair growth drastically slowed. I pull my facial hair out with tweezers as it is very sparse. I once did this daily (the facial hair) now once a week. The hair is about a third of what it was two years ago. I will still have electrolysis, will probably need it to be perfectly smooth, but its not a big deal anymore. I already had electrolysis on my eyebrows and mustache areas.

The part about 'white' or 'light' hair, only seems to be a concern if you chose LASER.

I hope this helps.

Lizzy

oh oh oh

Sounds a heck of a lot better than $100.00 an hour

The cost is half that.

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter

The answer can be controversial. Your mileage may vary (YMMV) is applicable here.

My experience - which may not be typical, is the HRT causes body hair (except the beard, underarm and pubic hair) to virtually disappear, which then is replaced by a 'peach fuzz' covering. It took about two years for me.

The controversial part is the other three areas seems to have had hair growth drastically slowed. I pull my facial hair out with tweezers as it is very sparse. I once did this daily (the facial hair) now once a week. The hair is about a third of what it was two years ago. I will still have electrolysis, will probably need it to be perfectly smooth, but its not a big deal anymore. I already had electrolysis on my eyebrows and mustache areas.

The part about 'white' or 'light' hair, only seems to be a concern if you chose LASER.

I hope this helps.

Lizzy

oh oh oh

Sounds a heck of a lot better than $100.00 an hour

The cost is half that.

I'm told it varies from 60-100 per hour. I haven't actually asked at any of the local places yet. There are only about 3 different ones in my area, if memory serves. In any case, it's a LOT of money, particularly when it takes something like weekly sessions for over a year to clear your face.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

WARNING, WARNING, DANGER WILL ROBINSON!!! I STRONGLY RECCOMEND AGAINST HOME ELCTROLYSIS!!!

I bought the vector home electrolysis system in 06 to supplement my laser treatments. First of all Laser did not work at all for me. Within a month after my 10th treatment all my hair was back, thick as ever. This might play a role as to the resilience of my body hair but topical treatments do not work for me.

I was out of work, and couldn't find it because of my thick facial hair. With nothing better to do I spent whole days using this machine. Divide the area of which my facial hair covers into 4 sections and I could do 1/4th of the total area it covered in 8 to 10 hours. Sometimes a little more. I did this for 4 months. Also did my knuckles, hands, and feet.

It did not work. The only lasting effect is that my face is extremely sensitive and shaving is excruciating. Also my facial hair grows in black as night, except on my moustace area it grows in thick, coarse blonde/white. It was black prior to using this machine.

The gel, even when used in a tiny drop will spread over a small area and the whole area will get zapped. I used setting 4 to 6. Anything else was just too painful even for the short amount of time they say and I was trying to prevent scarring, yet my whole face got covered in burn marks and it looked almost like bad acne scars. It healed okay but the redness lasted almost 2 years and when I shaved it looked scarred and bright red so I couldn't even shave to have no facial hair and if I did I had to use LOTS of make up to cover not only the hair but the redness. Five years later and I think my face has pretty much recovered but now I don't know how my skin will react to professional electrolysis. I wasted so much time and money on this and my experiences were horrible with no results. Not to mention I could clear my face in 4 days and by the 7th it was ready to be done again. News hairs start to grow in within 2 days, at least for me they did. I was off HRT at this time though.

I believe it even says on Wikipedia under electrolysis that the galvanized tweezer method does not work.

Don't allow yourself to be fooled. I would wait for someone to post who has used the tweezers and had success before I made a final decision. Also the pads are a scam and definitely do not work.

Don't try to take "the easy way" out. Go to a professional and do it right and safely. You only get one face and it is not worth it to risk causing scarring.

If you do use it, go slow, be safe, and try clearing a small patch to test.

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter

WARNING, WARNING, DANGER WILL ROBINSON!!! I STRONGLY RECCOMEND AGAINST HOME ELCTROLYSIS!!!

I bought the vector home electrolysis system in 06 to supplement my laser treatments. First of all Laser did not work at all for me. Within a month after my 10th treatment all my hair was back, thick as ever. This might play a role as to the resilience of my body hair but topical treatments do not work for me.

I was out of work, and couldn't find it because of my thick facial hair. With nothing better to do I spent whole days using this machine. Divide the area of which my facial hair covers into 4 sections and I could do 1/4th of the total area it covered in 8 to 10 hours. Sometimes a little more. I did this for 4 months. Also did my knuckles, hands, and feet.

It did not work. The only lasting effect is that my face is extremely sensitive and shaving is excruciating. Also my facial hair grows in black as night, except on my moustace area it grows in thick, coarse blonde/white. It was black prior to using this machine.

The gel, even when used in a tiny drop will spread over a small area and the whole area will get zapped. I used setting 4 to 6. Anything else was just too painful even for the short amount of time they say and I was trying to prevent scarring, yet my whole face got covered in burn marks and it looked almost like bad acne scars. It healed okay but the redness lasted almost 2 years and when I shaved it looked scarred and bright red so I couldn't even shave to have no facial hair and if I did I had to use LOTS of make up to cover not only the hair but the redness. Five years later and I think my face has pretty much recovered but now I don't know how my skin will react to professional electrolysis. I wasted so much time and money on this and my experiences were horrible with no results. Not to mention I could clear my face in 4 days and by the 7th it was ready to be done again. News hairs start to grow in within 2 days, at least for me they did. I was off HRT at this time though.

I believe it even says on Wikipedia under electrolysis that the galvanized tweezer method does not work.

Don't allow yourself to be fooled. I would wait for someone to post who has used the tweezers and had success before I made a final decision. Also the pads are a scam and definitely do not work.

Don't try to take "the easy way" out. Go to a professional and do it right and safely. You only get one face and it is not worth it to risk causing scarring.

If you do use it, go slow, be safe, and try clearing a small patch to test.

Everyone has different skin and different hair. The company that makes the vector makes no secret of that fact, and they don't claim perfect results for everyone. It does work for many people, when used correctly. I've read user reviews on many sites and forums, and the majority were more than satisfied with the results, though like you, many had no success or were dissatisfied with the process. The galvanized tweezer method will not work without the aid of a conductive material, as the hairs are not themselves conductive, but that's what the gel is for, and the science behind it is sound.

Certainly, anyone would do well to consider carefully before going this route, but it shouldn't be discounted entirely. As long as one is fully aware of the risks and prepared to take suitable precautions, it's a viable option.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 130 Guests (See full list)

    • VickySGV
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...