Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

My first laser consultation


Guest sienna

Recommended Posts

Guest sienna

I went to my first laser consultation this afternoon! The place seemed nice and has a deal (seems to be ongoing) with 3 areas for the price of 1. Face and neck are 1 area. The other 2 areas I'm considering are chest and stomach area. The package is for 6 sessions at $279 a piece (so a little over $1600 when it's done). They said they wanted to be honest with me up front (and not just take my money) that some of my facial hair had light blond and some slight reddish hairs mixed with dark. I already knew that the laser really only affects the dark hairs. She said everyone is different and people can typically expect 60 -90% reduction with laser. With my facial hair she said I would be closer to the 60% reduction range so I would have to decide if that was worth $1600 to me. She also said that touchups could be needed afterward that would be extra -- I think $89 each. Even hinted that possibly 3 years down the road that touchups might be needed. That's the main thing that seemed odd... Is that possible? They use a Candela GentleLase machine for caucasian skin types. and GentleYag for darker skin. I agreed to a test patch. She ended up doing several for free to give me a sense of what it felt like. She first set it to a 16 (and then a sample 20 on one area) and did a test on my wrist, hand, lower neck, back of neck, and stomach. It wasn't too bad actually. The GentleLase machine shoots a cooling mist which masked the prick pretty well especially on the lower 16 setting. It didn't leave any marks but I could smell the singed hair and felt it slightly. Ewww! I asked about qualifications and supposedly everyone who is hired must have a Texas Radiation Board certification. I also had mentioned I was trans in talking to her and she said that a patient in the other room earlier was trans as well who had recently started hormones to transition and was getting some things done too.

I was wondering if these things I was told seemed like things I should hear, or if there is something I should be leary about? Do you think a 60% reduction estimate is reasonable?

I also talked to them about microderm abrasion as they had a living social special -- one treatment $39 (regularly $99). She did a free sample of that on one of my wrists as well as a test. That seemed totally doable I think for my face. She said that around 6 treatments spaced every 2 weeks could help minimize pores and smooth my skin significantly. Has anyone had this done?

Let me know what you think! thanks! :)

Sienna

Link to comment
Guest Lizzie McTrucker

My laser tech has made no mention at all about touch ups later on down the road.

There was another place I looked at, a chain of LHR places, that offered free touch ups for life after you're done with your treatments. I thought it was a little odd that one would need to go back later down the road to get areas re-zapped. I always thought the point of LHR was to have permanent hair removal, not temporary hair removal.

Link to comment
Guest KarenLyn

I wish I could remember what type of laser was used for my treatments. I paid $1600 for 6 treatments and it's been close to 15 years now and I have not needed a touch up. I do still have touch up electrolysis but that is for those white hairs that laser can't get.

Karen

Link to comment
Guest Stormrider2112

My laser tech has made no mention at all about touch ups later on down the road.

There was another place I looked at, a chain of LHR places, that offered free touch ups for life after you're done with your treatments. I thought it was a little odd that one would need to go back later down the road to get areas re-zapped. I always thought the point of LHR was to have permanent hair removal, not temporary hair removal.

I believe that they can only legally advertise as "Permanent Hair Reduction," not "Permanent Hair Removal." FDA claims and whatnot. Also, that would cover you from their booboos, as if laser can get it, laser should get it.
Link to comment
Guest Sarahwr

Thanks for this topic.

I have had two consultations for laser treatment and on each occassion the inference has been that I should save my money.

Now my scalp hair is very grey and laser isn't good with light or red hair.

About 3 weeks ago I approached another clinic run by a TS and she was actually hopeful that she could at least rid me of my "shadow".

She did confirm light hair cannot be dealt with by laser but any sort of hope for me is positive.

I also understand Laser treatment is not permanent hair removal as it is with electrolysis.

I shall watch further replies with interest.

Best wishes,

SarahW

XXX

Link to comment
Guest Nova Maria

Laser works best with dark hair and light skin.

I would caution you against a package of six. Most people respond the most within 3 to 5 treatments as far as I've heard. You might be wasting some money if you pay for six.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 185 Guests (See full list)

    • MaryEllen
    • elizamichellex
    • April Marie
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,023
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Delaney
    Newest Member
    Delaney
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dillon
      Dillon
    2. Kaylee888
      Kaylee888
    3. lily100
      lily100
      (39 years old)
    4. Luce
      Luce
      (44 years old)
    5. Luke.S
      Luke.S
  • Posts

    • April Marie
      Stunning, as always, Maddee!! I love those boots.
    • VickySGV
      I am glad your schools are flush with excess spending money, but that is not the situation here in CA.  Back in 1978 an Initiative and Referendum law was passed that limited property taxes severely and basically cut funding from Property Taxes to pennies of the amounts needed to even minimally fund school districts.  Even the U.S. Supreme Court which upheld the law on Federal and Constitutional grounds nevertheless wryly commented in its decision that the state electorate had lost its collective mind in enacting the law.  Our schools are funded through the State's General Fund which receives other tax sources for creating the entire state budget. The General Fund and the legislature try to give  adequate funding  to the primary and secondary school districts as well as college districts and other obligations all from the same limited funds. There are also strict limits on assessing property taxes that actually prevent them from paying for other services directly affecting property ownership which is their proper place, and so even property related services come from our General Fund. Your property tax money seems to be ear-marked for schools which is wonderful and I hope they use it according to your thoughts, but as said we have a different problem out here in CA.  I love my state but do recognize its short comings.  Point of information, the tax law that is creating problems came from the same small area of the state as the proposed referendum on Trans Youth. 
    • VickySGV
      The numbers of those negatively affected are significant and discouraging, but the good news is that "over half" of Trans youth live in safe states, and such states do exist.
    • Maddee
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Seems like a reasonable agreement.  Seattle stays out of Texas, Texas stays out of Seattle.  Weird that the Seattle hospital had a business license in Texas... 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Seems to me the time and cost is already being spent....on lawsuits.  And schools are absolutely flush with cash, at least around here.  They get enough property taxes, they need to learn appropriate use of funds.  Buy a few less computers and a few more bathrooms, and spend less time on athletics and I'd bet you a hamburger that the issue would be solved in a year.   To me, it seems like the whole bathroom thing is like lancing a boil or a cyst.  A sharp initial pain, and done. People are just resistant to doing it.      I think I could solve most of it...but politicians get too much press off of this to want it solved.   1.  Universal use of individual, gender-neutral, private bathrooms 2.  Universal use of individual, gender-neutral, private spaces for changing athletic clothes 3.  Emphasize co-ed rather than gendered sports.  Focus on physical activity, good sportsmanship, and having FUN.  Lifelong enjoyment, not just competition. 4.  Ban for-profit athletic programs at highschool and college levels, and ban betting/gambling related to athletic programs at educational institutions. 5.  Affirm parental rights consistently, rather than treating it like a salad bar.  That means permitting gender-affirming healthcare with parental consent, AND prohibiting schools keeping secrets from parents.  Adopt the "paperwork principle."  If it is on paper, parents 100% have a right to know about it and be informed on paper, including names/pronouns if such are documented.  If it is verbal only, it is informal enough to be overlooked or discussed verbally if needed.
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.texastribune.org/2024/04/22/texas-trans-health-care-investigation-seattle/     Carolyn Marie
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/transgender-louisianans-say-ve-lost-ally-governors-seat-rcna149082     Carolyn Marie
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/2024-anti-trans-legislation/     Carolyn Marie
    • Carolyn Marie
      It would work better, but the issue will always be time and cost, unless a school district is building a new school.  Districts everywhere are short on infrastructure funds, so it's not a realistic solution in most cases.   Carolyn Marie
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I have always thought that the solution to the bathroom question (as well as improved bathroom quality/privacy for everybody) would be individual, gender-neutral, locking bathrooms.  Not this wacky thing we insist on doing with stalls.  It wouldn't take much more space, really.  And it might actually work better.  Ever notice how there's often a line at the door of the women's room, but plenty of free space in the men's?  Yet the men's and women's bathrooms are usually of equal size/capacity? 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I'm going to have to stop staying up so late at night...  Its after midnight, so technically morning.  So, Good Morning, y'all.   I got to go to work with my husband for the last two days.  I'm working on the graphics stuff for his company, so he said that nobody would really mind if I hang out.  I usually stay home, but its kind of nice to be somewhere different for a little while.  I spent part of the day at one of the company's installation sites... beautiful weather, so I worked on my laptop sitting under a tree.  And I learned something new - it is amazing how electrical wires are installed underground.  They're put in PVC tubes, and actually pulled through.  By hand!  Apparently a machine would risk breaking the wires somehow, so I watched a line of men literally playing tug-of-war with hundreds of feet of wire.  It was like something out of an old movie - my husband leading a call/response work chant and everybody pulling in a rhythm.    It does give me a bit of self-doubt, though.  Like, if that's what "real men" are doing... maybe I'm a poor-quality imitation
    • Betty K
      Can I just say quickly re the bathroom question, how come no-one ever seems to suggest building more gender-neutral toilets? 
    • Betty K
      With the onslaught of bills targeting trans kids in the US and the current attempt to radically curtail gender-affirming treatment for kids in the UK I think you could just as easily ask why are things so hard for trans kids. Given the volatile political situation around them, I am pleased to hear there are still services attempting to help them.
    • KayC
      @Mia Marie I agree that it seems most of the focus is on Trans Youth.  And maybe that is in part because of protecting Trans Youth from the political environment, and to give them a chance to transition at an earlier age.  Many of our generation have been cloistered for most of our lives by societal exceptions and I think that has made it more difficult to be Visible ... until Now. So I guess my answer is ... Be Visible and seek out, or even start, support groups in your local area.  Planned Parenthood does provide Gender Affirming Care and therapy in most U.S. regions (and they take Medicare!). 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...