Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

American coup d'etat?


Guest Sheri-xo

Recommended Posts

Guest Sheri-bi

In the next 20 years, I expect to see an American coup d'etat. The economy will continue to generate mostly low paying jobs. The safety net will continue to shrink. The gap between the rich and poor will continue to grow and the middle class will get smaller. A charismatic progressive will win a presidential election and attempt to tax the rich at high rates. The rich will turn to the military (by then an even more extreme right wing organization) and depose the president. The American experiment in democracy will be over.

Too bleak?

Link to comment
  • Admin

Not bleak, but a good plot for your first novel.

Not all the rich are that right wing, and the idea of the rich being the source of all evil has been disproved many times during my life time. You actually sound more than a little 60's with that analysis, which was common before the time of JFK. Oh well, the joys of my youth.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

You forget that America was started by rich liberals in an era of haves and have nots with precious little middle class, If ever there was going to be an end to democracy here it would have been during the great depression or in the riots of the 60s I believe,

As a person who grew up in a wealthy liberal household with heavy political involvement and a degree I could have separated in to two when I graduated (Changes in the my university policy my last semester) one of which was Political Science I believe that in many ways we are more actually democratic than at any time in our history..

I also believe the cultural context of the American people would prevent any sort of coup d'etat. Nor is our military of the mindset that would lend itself to that.

I'm not saying that democracy will last forever or that we can't crumble from within but we are a much tougher and more resiliant people than most realize.

It could and has happened elsewhere with a dufferent cultural and political heritage but not here. Just doesn't fit the American psyche.

Johnny

Johnny

Link to comment
Guest ~Brenda~

My worry is for the world at large. I doubt that a coup will appear here in the US limited by only American concerns.

If a coup was ever contemplated it would be the result of radicals or the desperation of those who lost everything because the world shifted dramatically.

We are all headed for a world wide economic collapse far greater than ever seen before in the history of human kind. It wont be in the next 20 years, it will happen in less than five.

When the Euro falls so will all other economies.

The real fundamental issue is this...

All current economies are structured from a time where the thought that economic growth is infinite so betting on the future was the norm. This has led us into a futures and debt driven world economy. The reality is the the world is a closed environment wit limitations. What this means is that world economic growth has a limit. It is not infinite. Consequently, the futures betting will have to stop and the current worldwide debt will default. This is inevitable as the world adjusts to a a finite growth economy.

Unfortunately, this fundamental shift in economy and governments will be painful to the scale of a worldwide revolution in thought.

Brenda

Link to comment
Guest MsGsptlsnz

In the past I have argued in favor of a military coup followed by the establishment of a monarchy composed of the families of retired Generals and Admirals. Dispensing with the facade of democracy and cutting the averge person out of politics. The idea has it's good points. No more elections means no more money in politics. No more elections means an end to the divisive nature of the right vs left spectrum. If it was clear to everyone that their views would never have any effect on the governing of the nation then people wouldn't bother with hating their poltical opposites. If anything it would clean up the AM band of the radio real quick!

I don't see much of a down side to such a plan, after all most americans don't vote with their heads, they vote with thier hearts for candidates that move them emotionaly. Which creates a government that is trying to make people feel good. No one is willing to make hard choices because they don't want to lose their jobs. They got elected on promices based on our emotional desires.

How would this affect our issues? Well, by and large politicians ignore us now because we don't have the billions to buy thier votes. I doubt that would change much if elections went away. So at least it wouldn't be worse. Who knows, if we weren't perceived as a voting block for one side of the aisle maybe the other side wouldn't bother hating us so much. Things could improve. Also judging by our numbers in the military and former military community we might get the first out of the closet cross dresser in the White House. That would be nifty.

Link to comment
  • Admin

Meh, that is the least of our worries. One third of the country, including all of the eastern seabord, will be under water in 20 years anyway. if I lived in Florida, I'd be selling my property cheap.

Me, I'm going to start a houseboat business. :D

HUGS

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest Sheri-bi

Things have changed greatly since the 60's. America use to be ruled by a coalition of Democrats and moderate Republicans. They both accepted (in varying degrees) Social Security, Medicare and labor unions. (Dwight Eisenhower in 1955: "The Public Health Service, the Children's Bureau of the Social Security Administration, and the Food and Drug Administration are skilled and vigilant guardians of our nation's health." What a socialist!) Conservative Republicans, like Barry Goldwater, although noisy, had little power. That's all changed. Conservatives pushed out the moderate Republicans and have attacked the foundations of the previous consensus. Conservatives want to return to a mythical past where each community took care of the poor, lame, blind and elderly; where unfettered job creators grew the economy and all benefited; where the gold standard prevented inflation and made the economy pure; and religious values preempted things like homosexuality and abortion. Conservatives have also pushed the notion of America's exceptionalism which justifies the neocon strategy of military intervention to reshape the world.

The military has also changed. Until recently, there was a course for military officers at Joint Forces Staff College in Norfolk, Va. which portrayed the US as at war with Islam. It suggested that the US might have to destroy the Islamic holy cities of Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia without regard for civilian deaths, following World War II precedents of the nuclear attack on Hiroshima, Japan, or the allied firebombing of Dresden, Germany. When the course became public knowledge, it was shut down and repudiated. However, shutting down the course doesn't mean that the officer corps, especially the younger officers, don't think like this. I've talked to young officers who think exactly like this. I believe that the military has begun to reflect the conservative rejection of multiculturalism and sees the federal government as a force for socialism.

Although there are a lot of rich "liberals" like Soros who are active in politics, they do not have the fire in the belly and the zeal of the Koch Brothers and Sheldon Adelson. Rich conservatives are contributing to Republican superpacs at much higher numbers. Rich liberals think that superpacs are influencing politics too much. They are correct, but rich conservatives don't care about democracy--money is free speech and corporations are people. If negative ads can win elections, then they want to make sure they run the most ads. The end justifies the means. Also it makes good financial sense. Romney is promising to lower corporate taxes and abolish capital gains and inheritance taxes. That more than justifies huge contributions.

Would rich conservatives go so far as to stage a coup d'etat? Maybe not today, but we are moving in that direction. Would the military join them? Maybe not today, but we are moving in that direction. Although theses scenarios are the stuff of novels and Hollywood films, they are also the stuff of history.

Link to comment

Hi Sheri,

I do have to applaud your thoughts. Thank you.

A few years ago, a Russian premier predicted the fall and breakup of the US in about 10 years. And with the shrill language between the reds and the blues, and the states they control, it's highly concievable.

Yup! It could be a bumpy ride. Good Luck to us all!

Love, Megan

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 162 Guests (See full list)

    • AllieJ
    • Breezy Victor
    • Ivy
    • SamC
    • MaryEllen
    • Betty K
    • April Marie
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,023
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Delaney
    Newest Member
    Delaney
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dillon
      Dillon
    2. Kaylee888
      Kaylee888
    3. lily100
      lily100
      (39 years old)
    4. Luce
      Luce
      (44 years old)
    5. Luke.S
      Luke.S
  • Posts

    • violet r
      I use my  chosen name online and when ever I can. I play some online game and only go by that name. That is how everyone there know me. Yes it does feel great to be called the name you prefer. 
    • Breezy Victor
      I was ten years old when my mom walked in on me frolicking around my room dressed up in her bra, panties, and some pantyhose. I had been doing this in the privacy of my bedroom for a little while now so I had my own little stash box I kept full of different panties, bras, etc ... of hers. My mom's underwear was so easy for me to come by and she was a very attractive woman, classy, elegant. Well when she walked in on me, she looked at me with disgust and said to me... "If I wanted to run around like mommy's little girl instead of mommy's little boy, then she was going to treat me like mommy's little girl."  She left my bedroom after telling me NOT to change or get dressed or anything and returned with a few of her work skirts and blouses and such. She made me model off her outfits for her and I have to admit ... I LOVED EVERY SECOND OF IT. I felt so sexy, and feminine. And she knew I loved it.  She told me we can do this every weekend if I'd like. It would be OUR little secret. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      The usual social ways, of course.  Taking care of my partners and stepkids, being involved in my community.  That makes me feel good about my role.   As for physical validation and gender... probably the most euphoric experience is sex.  I grew up with my mother telling me that my flat and boyish body was strange, that my intersex anatomy was shameful, that no man would want me. So experiencing what I was told I could never have is physical proof that I'm actually worth something.  
    • KathyLauren
      <Moderator hat on>  I think that, at this point we need to get the thread back onto the topic, which is the judge's ruling on the ballot proposition.  If there is more to be said on the general principles of gendered spaces etc., please discuss them, carefully and respectfully, in separate threads. <Moderator hat off>
    • Abigail Genevieve
      People who have no understanding of transgender conditions should not be making policy for people dealing with it. Since it is such a small percentage of the population, and each individual is unique, and their circumstances are also unique, each situation needs to be worked with individually to see that the best possible solution is implemented for those involved. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No.  You are getting stuck on one statement and pulling it out of context.   Trans kids have rights, but so do non-trans kids.  That conflict is best worked out in the individual situation. 
    • MaeBe
      I get the concept, I believe. You're trying to state that trans kids need to or should be excluded from binary gender spaces and that you acknowledge that answers to accommodate those kids may not be found through policy. I disagree with the capability of "penetration" as being the operative delimiter in the statement, however. I contest this statement is poorly chosen at best and smacks of prejudice at worst. That it perpetuates certain stereotypes, whether that was the intent or not.   Frankly, all kids should have the right to privacy in locker rooms, regardless of gender, sexuality, or anatomy. They should also have access to exercise and activities that other kids do and allow them to socialize in those activities. The more kids are othered, extracted, or barred from the typical school day the more isolated and stigmatized they become. That's not healthy for anyone, the excluded for obvious reasons and the included for others--namely they get to be the "haves" and all that entails.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Context.  Read the context.  Good grief.
    • MaeBe
      Please don't expect people to read manifold pages of fiction to understand a post.   There was a pointed statement made, and I responded to it. The statement used the term penetration, not "dissimilar anatomy causing social discomfiture", or some other reason. It was extended as a "rule" across very different social situations as well, locker and girl's bedrooms. How that term is used in most situations is to infer sexual contact, so most readers would read that and think the statement is that we "need to keep trans girl's penises out of cis girls", which reads very closely to the idea that trans people are often portrayed as sexual predators.   I understand we can't always get all of our thoughts onto the page, but this doesn't read like an under-cooked idea or a lingual short cut.
    • Ashley0616
      I shopped online in the beginning of transition. I had great success with SHEIN and Torrid!
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Have you read the rest of what I wrote?   Please read between the lines of what I said about high school.  Go over and read my Taylor story.  Put two and two together.   That is all I will say about that.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      "I feel like I lost my husband," Lois told the therapist,"I want the man I married." Dr. Smith looked at Odie, sitting there in his men's clothing, looking awkward and embarrassed. "You have him.  This is just a part of him you did not know about. Or did not face." She turned to Odie,"Did you tear my wedding dress on our wedding night?" He admitted it.  She had a whole catalog of did-you and how-could you.  Dr. Smith encouraged her to let it all out. Thirty years of marriage.  Strange makeup in the bathroom.  The kids finding women's laundry in the laundry room. There was reconciliation. "What do we do now?" Dr. Smith said they had to work that out.  Odie began wearing women's clothing when not at work.  They visited a cross-dressers' social club but it did not appeal to them.  The bed was off limits to cross dressing.  She had limits and he could respect her limits.  Visits to relatives would be with him in men's clothing.    "You have nail polish residue," a co-worker pointed out.  Sure enough, the bottom of his left pinky nail was bright pink  His boss asked him to go home and fix it.  He did.   People were talking, he was sure, because he doubted he was anywhere as thorough as he wanted to be.  It was like something in him wanted to tell everyone what he was doing, and he was sloppy.   His boss dropped off some needed paperwork on a Saturday unexpectedly and found Odie dressed in a house dress and wig.  "What?" the boss said, shook his head, and left.  None of his business.   "People are talking," Lois said. "They are asking about this," she pointed to his denim skirt. "This seems to go past or deeper than cross dressing."   "Yes.  I guess we need some counseling."  And they went.
    • April Marie
      You look wonderful!!! A rose among the roses.
    • Ashley0616
      Mine would be SHEIN as much as I have bought from them lol.
    • MaeBe
      This is the persistence in thinking of trans girls as predators and, as if, they are the only kind of predation that happens in locker rooms. This is strikingly close to the dangerous myth that anatomy corresponds with sexuality and equates to gender.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...