Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

The LDS temple. Ordinance that stops trans


Guest (Lightsider)

Recommended Posts

Guest (Lightsider)

One of the things about the temple is a particular ordinance. This is part of the endowment process.

The reason this is important to the Mormon Trans experience is because it requires a level of nudity. You only wear a thin apron over your shoulders around your neck and comes down below the knees. The sides are wide open.

A temple worker will touch each part of body and give it a blessing. This includes your pelvic area. The reason this is important is so that Mormon Trans realize where another barrier is that keeps them from full membership and truly seen as equals. If the person is pre-op this would be a problem as there is a clear MALE and FEMALE side to the temple. If there is anything that would prevent the Mormon Trans from blending as their target gender regardless of Operative status this would cause big problems.

If you are male, a male temple worker blesses you. If you Female you have a female worker bless you. Interestingly enought this is the only place in the Mormon church where women weild the priesthood.

The Temple is strongly geared towards male or female. Nothing in between is recognized. Even androgenous members would encounter a problem here and might feel uncomfortable because they would have to be blessed as either a male or female and recieve a new name that is either MALE or FEMALE.

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...
Guest Xeriis

The Temple is strongly geared towards male or female.

It is geared towards male and female, but there is no nudity or anything else that is posted. Just wanted to clarify a little.

Link to comment
  • Admin

Actually Nicole had been admitted to the Utah Temple and taken part in rites there years before acting on her GD and had personal knowledge of things that do happen. She says "element" which would fit into the rites that Joseph Smith brought into the Mormon faith system. Not full nudity, but symbolic approximations.

Link to comment
Guest Xeriis

Ah, I see. I have also been to the temple a number of times in the past (though not in the past few years). I can see what she was saying and I'm simply saying the picture she paints is much different from that of my experiences.

Link to comment
Guest Jenn348

One of the things about the temple is a particular ordinance. This is part of the endowment process.

The reason this is important to the Mormon Trans experience is because it requires a level of nudity. You only wear a thin apron over your shoulders around your neck and comes down below the knees. The sides are wide open.

A temple worker will touch each part of body and give it a blessing. This includes your pelvic area. The reason this is important is so that Mormon Trans realize where another barrier is that keeps them from full membership and truly seen as equals. If the person is pre-op this would be a problem as there is a clear MALE and FEMALE side to the temple. If there is anything that would prevent the Mormon Trans from blending as their target gender regardless of Operative status this would cause big problems.

If you are male, a male temple worker blesses you. If you Female you have a female worker bless you. Interestingly enought this is the only place in the Mormon church where women weild the priesthood.

The Temple is strongly geared towards male or female. Nothing in between is recognized. Even androgenous members would encounter a problem here and might feel uncomfortable because they would have to be blessed as either a male or female and recieve a new name that is either MALE or FEMALE.

I don't know where you are getting your information, but it isn't from a reliable source.

Yep, no nudity. The temple worker doesn't touch the pelvic area, only part of the leg or part of the stomach. The apron stays on the entire time and nobody ever sees anything they shouldn't. Many genetic women are told to fear this process, but my wife came back out wondering what all of the hype was about.

As for the new name, it's not really a name in the normal sense of the word. People don't use it like a name. I don't feel it right to go any further into detail, but I can tell you it's not really a name.

An important LDS belief is that we existed in a pre-earth life and our spirits were male or female. There is nothing in the teachings to preclude the idea that a male body could house a female spirit accidentally through a birth defect. In fact, the idea of the fall supports that mistakes can and do happen. If you read my other posts, you'll see that the church leadership is coming around on this issue. There are trans people who are considered worthy and go to the temple in their proper gender role (the one they actually want to be!).

People who believe they are sexless or that their spirit doesn't have a gender/sex, nobody is forcing them to be a Mormon. If their beliefs don't match ours, they are free to worship elsewhere as they please. See D&C 134.

Personally, I know my spirit is female and I am correct to strive to live my proper gender role. I know this from my own personal prayer. Just as Joseph Smith did, I asked God about it. For anybody reading this, don't take my word or anybody else's word (good or bad) about Mormonism. Ask God for yourself!

Link to comment
Guest Xeriis

One of the biggest disagreements I had was that 'pelvic area' was specifically mentioned, but not accurate at all. Anyone that has been to the temple knows that by saying 'pelvic area' it is purposely misleading and leads one to paint a picture that is highly sexualized when it is not. This is only one thing I want to correct, there are many, many others.

To those who wish to know about the basic principles and beliefs about what happens in the temple, there is a 40 or so page pamphlet put out by the church about the temples ("Preparing for the Temple" I think it's called, but I am not sure). Mostly members read this, but it is generally available to all. If studied ahead of time the temple is not an overwhelming or weird experience at all.

There are many things in life where we know the general principles, but never go into detail or ask others to share their personal experiences. Examples of a few are sexuality, your 'first time' and cis-female related items. Thinking of these, people are likely to talk about it a little among themselves, but often change topics or say much less with 'an outsider' around. Generally we think of these things as extremely personal or 'sacred'. This is no different for the temple. You would be more comfortable hearing about any of those issues in my life (and would gladly recount such if someone 'Must know' if I am serious), than I would be about sharing my temple experience. I do not feel we are 'keeping this a secret' from younger people or kids. They can read about it in the pamphlet, and similar resources, and learn most everything they will want to know. After family or friend has been to the temple, I am more than willing to share my experiences with them there, but generally not before or elsewhere.

An important LDS belief is that we existed in a pre-earth life and our spirits were male or female. There is nothing in the teachings to preclude the idea that a male body could house a female spirit accidentally through a birth defect. In fact, the idea of the fall supports that mistakes can and do happen. If you read my other posts, you'll see that the church leadership is coming around on this issue. There are trans people who are considered worthy and go to the temple in their proper gender role (the one they actually want to be!).

Sometimes one reason couples are unable to have children is that the woman actually has a xy chromosome, but for whatever reason her body still developed to where it is. It is reassuring to know that a genetically cis-male can have fully functional female organs, although not have children. I have also wondered about these couples in the church as it means there are two genetically cis-males together, but many never even know it. I was happy to find another opinion on the matter.

I also feel like Jenn348 and look forward to living in my proper gender role.

Link to comment
Guest Jenn348

One of the biggest disagreements I had was that 'pelvic area' was specifically mentioned, but not accurate at all. Anyone that has been to the temple knows that by saying 'pelvic area' it is purposely misleading and leads one to paint a picture that is highly sexualized when it is not. This is only one thing I want to correct, there are many, many others.

To those who wish to know about the basic principles and beliefs about what happens in the temple, there is a 40 or so page pamphlet put out by the church about the temples ("Preparing for the Temple" I think it's called, but I am not sure). Mostly members read this, but it is generally available to all. If studied ahead of time the temple is not an overwhelming or weird experience at all.

There are many things in life where we know the general principles, but never go into detail or ask others to share their personal experiences. Examples of a few are sexuality, your 'first time' and cis-female related items. Thinking of these, people are likely to talk about it a little among themselves, but often change topics or say much less with 'an outsider' around. Generally we think of these things as extremely personal or 'sacred'. This is no different for the temple. You would be more comfortable hearing about any of those issues in my life (and would gladly recount such if someone 'Must know' if I am serious), than I would be about sharing my temple experience. I do not feel we are 'keeping this a secret' from younger people or kids. They can read about it in the pamphlet, and similar resources, and learn most everything they will want to know. After family or friend has been to the temple, I am more than willing to share my experiences with them there, but generally not before or elsewhere.

An important LDS belief is that we existed in a pre-earth life and our spirits were male or female. There is nothing in the teachings to preclude the idea that a male body could house a female spirit accidentally through a birth defect. In fact, the idea of the fall supports that mistakes can and do happen. If you read my other posts, you'll see that the church leadership is coming around on this issue. There are trans people who are considered worthy and go to the temple in their proper gender role (the one they actually want to be!).

Sometimes one reason couples are unable to have children is that the woman actually has a xy chromosome, but for whatever reason her body still developed to where it is. It is reassuring to know that a genetically cis-male can have fully functional female organs, although not have children. I have also wondered about these couples in the church as it means there are two genetically cis-males together, but many never even know it. I was happy to find another opinion on the matter.

I also feel like Jenn348 and look forward to living in my proper gender role.

I think it really goes to show that there is no physical measurement somebody can make to determine the gender of a person, let alone what gender the spirit of that person is.

It certainly isn't genetics, because there are XY females and XX males out there. Plus, there are XXY and other variants where people have grown up to appear male or female. For the intersexed, they used to do a chromosome test and then assign based on that, but the brain's gender cannot be read based on that and the doctor ruined people's lives by assigning the wrong gender.

Measurements of genitals likewise have proven wrong, as have testing for presence of testicular or ovarian tissue.

The only 100% reliable method for determining what a person is would be to ask them! That's why they allow intersex children to grow up a few years without surgical alteration so they can let the kid tell them what they really are. There's no valid reason to not take that same approach for transgendered people, whose genitals appear within normal limits but whose brains have proven to not match up.

People who claim that God wouldn't make mistakes, or that a spirit's gender can be divined through eyeball measurements, lab tests or chromosomal studies are narrow-minded fools. Sure, in middle-school biology they teach it that way, but if we treated everything in our lives the way we treated them in middle school, our lives would certainly be a huge mess. Life is complicated, and the sooner people get that through their heads, the better.

Link to comment
Guest Xeriis

The only 100% reliable method for determining what a person is would be to ask them! That's why they allow intersex children to grow up a few years without surgical alteration so they can let the kid tell them what they really are. There's no valid reason to not take that same approach for transgendered people, whose genitals appear within normal limits but whose brains have proven to not match up.

I have come to believe that God has simply allowed some things to happen in life. If everything was very straight forward or set in stone, there would be very little diversity and much more black and white. Simply what would life really be like if we knew exactly where we were supposed to go, how to go there and when. I often think that though I may have a choice, the correct path would be obvious.

Although there are many understandings and intolerances now, it'll all work out in the end. God knows each of our circumstances, how we feel and the faces we've had to make in life.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 148 Guests (See full list)

    • April Marie
    • LyndseyQ
    • MaybeRob
    • Petra Jane
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • Willow
      Good morning    Now @Abigail Genevieve and @Mmindy what makes you so certain I didn’t mean it to say bee itch certificate?  lol. Thanks Mindy. I was asleep when you saw this and fixed it, and yes Abigail, as a moderator I could have fixed it myself, or weren’t you pointing out the irony of that?   I use Alexis as my alarm to get up.  And I set the ringer to be two guys telling me to get up.  I was so sound asleep when they started telling me to get up that it scared me and my first thought were I had over slept.  Since I have a difficult time getting to sleep as early as I have to in order to get enough sleep I at least cut back my normal awake time to get ready.  But now I have to do my hair and get going.   enjoyed my coffee and a little time catching up   see you all later, for its hi ho hi ho it’s off to work I go.   Willow
    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...