Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Baby step? Opinion on this exchange with SO


CasualDiane

Recommended Posts

So I'm chatting with my wife from work, and I mention that I'm going to be getting new undies, tighter to show off my behind better.

She approves, and sends me a link to andrewchristian.com, a popular homosexual underwear shop.

It's exactly the opposite of anything I want to see, and she seems to know it. "I wish i could see your face right now", she says.

She goes on to say "It's like Victoria's Secret equivalent for guys, if you can get past the soft core porn".

I say "Ack".

She says "That's what I feel like at VS".

Sensing an opportunity, I say "I would rather shop at VS than that place".

She says "You want to shop at VS? I guess if you're into that".

I say, "not exactly, but if I had to pick one, it wouldn't be Andrews. They both seem like overpriced places to shop. I would rather go to amazon for one stop shopping".

she says, "ok, Caitlyn"

And after that I changed the subject.

So in my interpretation is that that is at the ver least a tacit admission that shes probably going to be ok with stuff she doesnt have to see...

but the Caitlyn comment bothers me...

I think the fog is forcing me to take these kinds of risks.

Link to comment

Hi Diane,

I watched my wife very carefully during the media storm surrounding Jenner. She was interested but not in the circus freakshow kind of way, and her comment was "everyone deserves to be happy." I took that as acceptance of TG/TS but knew also that it's easy to be accepting until it happens to you. She has always been open minded, but having gay / lesbian friends (which she does) was still not enough once it became personal. So yeah, I'd say continue to tread carefully. Her responses seem like she'd be okay with it, but it really is very hard to tell what someone's reaction will be when things get real.

Good luck, though. I know the secrecy is hard. As hard and as devastating as it was for me to come out, the secrecy was worse.

Hugs,

Courtney

Link to comment
Guest ErIca W

Maybe you should ask her " what if I am into that"?

Could always say you were asking hypothetically if she goes too negative. Could lead to a good conversation.

I'd still recommend in person rather than by email.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

In my experience there was a line. You are getting close to crossing it. If you plan to disclose your desires to your wife then perhaps that is an opening but i seriously doubt it is an open door. It is your decision how to proceed and what panties to wear but don't feel it will not affect your relationship. She may or may not accept your desires but it will also put doubt in her mind.

There came a point in my life that "the fog" as you described it became an imperative. Tread gently and with kindness and understanding of her perceptions and fears if you continue.

Hugs,

Charlize

Link to comment

Well! It was an interesting night to say the least.

After that conversation yesterday, I kind of expected something to happen that evening, i just wasn't sure what direction it would go.

We settled down for sexytime again and she immediately asked me about my legs again, and i knew this time I was not going to just concede. I had to tell her how i really feel. Honestly, the conversation was kind of a blur...

I remember her saying things like:

"But not even my gay friends shave their legs"

"so?"

"But Caitlyn's wife said she was shaving long before, and even after he didn't need to so for the sports"

"Irrelevant, I am not Jenner. I'm not even in the same situation. I don't want to be a woman, I just like how it feels"

"But I just can't compete with that. my hair grows back almost instantly, and you naturally have almost none, and here you are removing what little you have"

"I'm sorry I was made that way, but I am in no way trying to compete with you. I just like the way it feels"

"But I feel like I'm in bed with a woman, and I'm not a lesbian"

"I'm sorry I've put you in this position, and caused the feelings you're having. I just really dislike the hair on my legs, probably as much as you do. I'm sorry if I'm not what you hoped for"

She mentioned something about masculinity/being a guy, but she realized that that was a bad line of reasoning when I started to say that I was sorry I wasn't fitting into her version of masculine. She caught herself being upset over something she normally is not, but obviously things are different when it's personal as CiCi mentioned above.

When she was done, I made a point to validate all of her feelings and mentioned she absolutely has the right to feel that way. Then I started about my feelings:

"I'm afraid you will love me less because of this... that you find me repulsive."

And this is where the conversation seems to lighten, with her saying that she absolutely doesn't find me repulsive, and she still loves me even those there's this one thing she doesn't like. She mentioned that I probably don't like 100% of everything about here either, and that that's ok.

And then I proceeded to reward her with multiple Os. It might not be a turn on for her, but it doesn't seem to be a turn off either.

I believe I have won a battle of sorts, and one that even some out-of-the-closet folks have lost before.

Of course, this has all been completely outside the scope of the "Dressing" topics. I feel I'm going to have to let her get used to this new situation before doing anything else. I'm going to purchased some androgynous undies, put the few panties I have away for awhile... I just can't lie to her. I figure that sometime in the next 6-12 months the topic will come up again, and it will be more clothing related. Hell, I suspect she will even bring it up. I keep buying ridiculous length "socks", and she's not stupid.

She's been trying to get me to go to her favorite gay club for awhile, and I think there's opportunity in that. Maybe the rest of this will be downhill?

Anyhow, I feel freaking amazing and I thank all of you for your kind words and suggestions. I've been on that roller coaster for a bit and I really appreciate being able to post my thoughts somewhere. I don't feel alone anymore.

I'll keep you posted.

Link to comment

You are very brave Diane. This whole Jenner thing has caused a lot of husband/ wife discussions., no doubt. They have all been one -sided in my household, with my wife roundly condemning Caitlyn, and not hesitating to opine on the moral decline, " how can this be", "I just don't get it " , etc. needless to say, I have taken the role of seemingly disinterested listener. I was hoping in my heart to hear some half way accepting comments and some empathy and understanding. Unfortunately transgenderism seems still too non mainstream for so many people. I wish you well and will say a prayer for you!

Bobbi Elizabeth

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 192 Guests (See full list)

    • RaineOnYourParade
    • MaryEllen
    • violet r
    • MaeBe
    • Siobhan F
    • Susie
    • Betty K
    • Adrianna Danielle
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My parents were life long Democrats. 
    • Ivy
      'Nuff said. Yeah I'm not thrilled with Biden either. There are some conservative ideas I'm good with.  And I do feel that the current Democratic party is too cozy with the bankers and wealthy.  But despite all their talk, when it comes down to it, so are the Republicans.  And it's not the Dems calling for our eradication. Unfortunately, I see this election as existential for trans folks.  
    • Mmindy
      Good evening everyone,   @Birdie your CNA Is ill informed about breast and proper bra fitting.   My wife and I are checking out a campground up in Michigan just a little North of Saginaw, MI. We had a great meal at a local tavern serving delicious perch fillet dinner.   We’re going to check out the Saginaw,MI Bay area for summer time activities for when we come back on occasion. We belong to a camping club call Adventure Outdoors and have free camping at their resorts around Michigan and Ohio.   Hugs,   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋    
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...