Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

The Trans Panic Defense


Charlize

Recommended Posts

I suspect if I read the paper, it would basically say "it is not a reasonable excuse for provocation" in a very long-winded legal thinking sort of way, and the parts about explanations to jurors come down to "here is how to tell people it is not a reasonable excuse for provocation."

It mentions the ABA move towards limiting this type of defense. I will say, as a defense attorney, I would never use it. It is unethical. Full stop.

There shouldn't be any need to educate jurors of anything, because it simply should not be used. It is not a reasonable excuse for provocation.

Link to comment

Thank you for posting this info. I hope this horrible excuse is made illegal to use. It's sickening that someone even came up with it in the first place.

Link to comment
  • Admin

While I agree with Ravin that the defense should not be used, I am not naive enough to believe that it will not ever be. For many defense attorneys, if there is no ethical or legal reason why it shouldn't be used, and it might prove successful as a tactic, then sooner or later it will be used.

There was a time not so long ago when it was perfectly acceptable in rape trials to bring up the victim's sexual history, or to discuss what she was wearing at the time, as "provocations" that led the defendant to commit the rape. Over time, laws changed as did judicial rulings, making such tactics either unethical, illegal or both. There will come a day when the same will be true of the gay panic or trans panic defense. There may already be some states that have outlawed it, but I'm not sure.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
  • Admin

It is illegal to use the defense here in California. This came about partly from a case in Ventura County where a boy who was tried as an adult killed a suspected gay/Trans* fellow student with a revolver to the base of the skull. The decedent had been flirting with his killer in an effeminate way for a couple of days. The defense hung up the jury, but the decision was 10 to 2 in favor of conviction, and a plea bargain was made on that basis. Most of the jury did not buy the defense.

Link to comment
Guest clearleeraines

My two cents, Our judicial system is 200+ yrs old, It was/is a good one. 200 yrs no changes no reforms or very little. The politicians/lawers make the laws. They have learned how to use this to get elected to public office. Then they learned the wealthy would pay to get a law passed, lobbying. Now greed has a foothold. The moral majority is neither!. From big corp's and the goverment to your local city counssl!

corruption reigns, The defense, This defense was, I have very little doubt started, to defend someone of wealth! It worked, money/greed.

Our court system is swamped with crime, the system works 40+ hrs a week, cops, prosecutors, ect. They plea bargan over 90 %!

ONCE AGAIN 90%. So if you know the system, and have money, NO PROBLEM, or if you know the system and can manipulate the system i.e. file a million motions, get postponements, fire you P.D. Drag it out. They have no choice but to come at you with a DEAL! to make you go away! Just like the BAD cops and lazy prosecuters, and even worse the P.D.'S.

OUR SYSTEM IS BROKE PEOPLE!. There is no accountabilty, who questions the police? Who questions a Judge? whos got the money? I lived 3/4 of my life sheltered, a militery brat overseas, and growing up in alaska, A good life heathy life. A MANS LIFE :unsure: .

I was raised with morals "christian parents" middle class, I am not a felon or a criminal UNLESS you count my remaining silent when I saw people being screwed because they are black, poor, gay, trans, I have not seen one person with wealth get screwed, EVER!

My crime? keeping silent about it, cuz i don't want you to know about me! my drugs and boose, my sexual identity, my gender identity!

THEN IT HAPPENED TO ME !!!. The police in other nations, nations much much older than this one, with greater populations than this one, with a quarter of the crime as this one, I KNOW I'VE LIVED THERE! don't even carry guns! . . . . . . .I AM BI-SEXUAL, I AM TRAN'S, I AM WHITE, I AM POOR, I AM A ADDICT, I AM NO LONGER SILENT!!!!! :superman: eh hem! superperson.

Mx Clear Lee Raines, God Bless the usa it needs it!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Just a note on this defense and what it means to me. I posted it not only because of the nasty reality of how we may be perceived but because of the danger of being attractive to a cis gendered person who is also homophobic or transphobic. I have seen several posts at Laura's asking about coming out to potential boyfriends. The fact that this defense even has been tried should emphasize how important early honesty can be. We shouldn't have this potential excuse for hate in existence but until (if) things change caution is very important. Hate, alcohol, and drugs often add up to violence. Please be careful. Wacko's do exist.

Hugs,

Charlize

Link to comment

My two cents, Our judicial system is 200+ yrs old, It was/is a good one. 200 yrs no changes no reforms or very little. The politicians/lawers make the laws. They have learned how to use this to get elected to public office. Then they learned the wealthy would pay to get a law passed, lobbying. Now greed has a foothold. The moral majority is neither!. From big corp's and the goverment to your local city counssl!

corruption reigns, The defense, This defense was, I have very little doubt started, to defend someone of wealth! It worked, money/greed.

Our court system is swamped with crime, the system works 40+ hrs a week, cops, prosecutors, ect. They plea bargan over 90 %!

ONCE AGAIN 90%. So if you know the system, and have money, NO PROBLEM, or if you know the system and can manipulate the system i.e. file a million motions, get postponements, fire you P.D. Drag it out. They have no choice but to come at you with a DEAL! to make you go away! Just like the BAD cops and lazy prosecuters, and even worse the P.D.'S.

OUR SYSTEM IS BROKE PEOPLE!. There is no accountabilty, who questions the police? Who questions a Judge? whos got the money? I lived 3/4 of my life sheltered, a militery brat overseas, and growing up in alaska, A good life heathy life. A MANS LIFE :unsure: .

I was raised with morals "christian parents" middle class, I am not a felon or a criminal UNLESS you count my remaining silent when I saw people being screwed because they are black, poor, gay, trans, I have not seen one person with wealth get screwed, EVER!

My crime? keeping silent about it, cuz i don't want you to know about me! my drugs and boose, my sexual identity, my gender identity!

THEN IT HAPPENED TO ME !!!. The police in other nations, nations much much older than this one, with greater populations than this one, with a quarter of the crime as this one, I KNOW I'VE LIVED THERE! don't even carry guns! . . . . . . .I AM BI-SEXUAL, I AM TRAN'S, I AM WHITE, I AM POOR, I AM A ADDICT, I AM NO LONGER SILENT!!!!! :superman: eh hem! superperson.

Mx Clear Lee Raines, God Bless the usa it needs it!

This is not accurate in several respects. Yes, the criminal justice system needs improvement, and there are biases and imbalances, which are worse some places than others.

However, it is NOT true that the system has never been reformed. It has been many times, and continues to be.

And, while yes, there are problem people to be found in any position, from beat cops to judges, it is not true that the majority of people in these positions are not professional and don't do the best they can at it.

Even those doing the best they can often have unconscious biases which lend to something less than justice being done, and the laws themselves often structure the system in ways that do nothing about the underlying problems which contribute to crime. We criminalize things that would better be handled other ways, like homelessness and drug addiction.

When you get caught up in the criminal justice system, as either a defendant or the victim of a crime, it can seem especially unfair when you do not feel heard.

Also, plea offers many places get less favorable the longer you drag out a case and the more motions are filed, etc., the closer it gets to trial.

Link to comment

While I agree with Ravin that the defense should not be used, I am not naive enough to believe that it will not ever be. For many defense attorneys, if there is no ethical or legal reason why it shouldn't be used, and it might prove successful as a tactic, then sooner or later it will be used.

There was a time not so long ago when it was perfectly acceptable in rape trials to bring up the victim's sexual history, or to discuss what she was wearing at the time, as "provocations" that led the defendant to commit the rape. Over time, laws changed as did judicial rulings, making such tactics either unethical, illegal or both. There will come a day when the same will be true of the gay panic or trans panic defense. There may already be some states that have outlawed it, but I'm not sure.

Carolyn Marie

The American Bar Association has come down on the side of "it's unethical" and argued why. Each jurisdiction makes its own decisions about that, though, and each bar. So it can take time for some places to catch up. I for one would withdraw from a case rather than assert such a defense, if a client felt that it's use was the only avenue for zealous defense.

Link to comment
Guest clearleeraines

My two cents, Our judicial system is 200+ yrs old, It was/is a good one. 200 yrs no changes no reforms or very little. The politicians/lawers make the laws. They have learned how to use this to get elected to public office. Then they learned the wealthy would pay to get a law passed, lobbying. Now greed has a foothold. The moral majority is neither!. From big corp's and the goverment to your local city counssl!

corruption reigns, The defense, This defense was, I have very little doubt started, to defend someone of wealth! It worked, money/greed.

Our court system is swamped with crime, the system works 40+ hrs a week, cops, prosecutors, ect. They plea bargan over 90 %!

ONCE AGAIN 90%. So if you know the system, and have money, NO PROBLEM, or if you know the system and can manipulate the system i.e. file a million motions, get postponements, fire you P.D. Drag it out. They have no choice but to come at you with a DEAL! to make you go away! Just like the BAD cops and lazy prosecuters, and even worse the P.D.'S.

OUR SYSTEM IS BROKE PEOPLE!. There is no accountabilty, who questions the police? Who questions a Judge? whos got the money? I lived 3/4 of my life sheltered, a militery brat overseas, and growing up in alaska, A good life heathy life. A MANS LIFE :unsure: .

I was raised with morals "christian parents" middle class, I am not a felon or a criminal UNLESS you count my remaining silent when I saw people being screwed because they are black, poor, gay, trans, I have not seen one person with wealth get screwed, EVER!

My crime? keeping silent about it, cuz i don't want you to know about me! my drugs and boose, my sexual identity, my gender identity!

THEN IT HAPPENED TO ME !!!. The police in other nations, nations much much older than this one, with greater populations than this one, with a quarter of the crime as this one, I KNOW I'VE LIVED THERE! don't even carry guns! . . . . . . .I AM BI-SEXUAL, I AM TRAN'S, I AM WHITE, I AM POOR, I AM A ADDICT, I AM NO LONGER SILENT!!!!! :superman: eh hem! superperson.

Mx Clear Lee Raines, God Bless the usa it needs it!

This is not accurate in several respects. Yes, the criminal justice system needs improvement, and there are biases and imbalances, which are worse some places than others.

However, it is NOT true that the system has never been reformed. It has been many times, and continues to be.

And, while yes, there are problem people to be found in any position, from beat cops to judges, it is not true that the majority of people in these positions are not professional and don't do the best they can at it.

Even those doing the best they can often have unconscious biases which lend to something less than justice being done, and the laws themselves often structure the system in ways that do nothing about the underlying problems which contribute to crime. We criminalize things that would better be handled other ways, like homelessness and drug addiction.

When you get caught up in the criminal justice system, as either a defendant or the victim of a crime, it can seem especially unfair when you do not feel heard.

Also, plea offers many places get less favorable the longer you drag out a case and the more motions are filed, etc., the closer it gets to trial.

You Obviously have had no experience on defendant end ?. And what reform would you be referring too ?. Nothings really been done since "peel" and the police 1920 ?. They rotated the cops around because there was corruption then!. Have YOU ever been in a CA. State prison ?. Have YOU ever been homeless ?. I think the now viral video of the female student's violent attack speaks for it self. I was in the state system for just a short time and saw officer perpetrated crimes that make that video look innocent many times. ASK ANYONE WHO'S EVER HAD A NUMBER!!!. How creative are you with pepper spray and a baton ?. Tazer anyone ?. No one really has ANY idea, until it happens to you! I didn't. Put a second on the house, sell the car's, and find a "good" lawyer if you can ?. And by all means live with your video device, phone whatever, night and day and use it. Protect and serve. Honesty and integrity. Justice if you can afford it! Guilty till proven paid innocent. It ain't like tv people. Those who defend the system are Ignorant and pretentious and BRAINWASHED!. I now know what I took for granted, dos not exist!. ok thats my latest rant I feel better :)

The Clear one

Link to comment

Yes, there has been reform. Important reforms have come both through judicial enforcement of constitutional law (cases like Gideon v. Wainwright and Miranda v. Arizona), and through legislation. Some reforms have been good, some not so good. 200 years ago there were basically just a handful of common law felonies most places, and the sentence for all of them was death, usually by hanging.

I don't have experience in California, but I actually went to law school and became a public defender after my husband got a raw deal with the criminal justice system. He took a plea for something he didn't do because he didn't want to risk 12 years in prison if he fought and lost, because his attorney couldn't be bothered to do her job and he didn't trust her with it. I decided to go to law school because I knew I could do better than what we saw (his PD didn't even show up to court a couple of times, never mind actually do a proper client interview or give him a good explanation of what he was up against as far as evidence and trial ability of his case).

There's a reason I said it can feel especially unfair if you feel unheard in the process. That has pretty obviously been your experience.

I very clearly stated that the system has problems. That does not mean it has not changed in 200 years. It has, and there are people continuing to fight for change to improve it, as well as more people working in it who mean well than who don't.

You are very right that it isn't like on TV.

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
Guest Clair Dufour

It should be noted that this defence is used on jury trials where the jury has much more leeway. Judges have to work with rule of law and precedence. Also, its often an excuse for the drug and sex trade gangs that many TG people find themselves involved in to survive.

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...

I'm curious, what are the usually accepted causes for reasonable "heat of passion"? I personally think this wouldn't apply, because violent rage over finding out someone isn't who you thought they were? Come on now, that's not reasonable "heat of passion" in the slightest, not in my opinion at least.

Link to comment
  • Admin

I'm curious, what are the usually accepted causes for reasonable "heat of passion"?

A couple of examples that come to mind include: Discovering one's spouse in bed with their lover; an angry argument over whose sports team was better (only half kidding there); or a violent argument over a traffic collision.

That doesn't mean any of these reasons excuses would fly in a court of law, but they've all been tried.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
  • Admin

Most "First Degree"crimes with the longest jail or even death penalty consequences require "malice aforethought" to be involved, which means a long standing hatred for their specific victim, or group of victims and they require preparation and planning to commit the crime at a specific opportunity. It is a goodly list. A legitimate defense to all of this is a Self Defense situation where you feared for your life and property and/or the life and property of another person

Trans* (Gay, LesbianPanic ) Defense is a "self defense" attempt that tries to make the victim the initial aggressor who was intent on harming the defendant in a criminal case and subjecting the defendant to great harm. The idea is that for some people, the knowledge that they had sex with a Trans* person has irreparably injured them and will forever handicap them in their community and make them targets or hatred and ridicule or even rejection from their communities. There are some areas where a man soliciting a non-trans prostitute is looked on as just a normal great guy male having fun. (To heck with his marriage.) Change the sex partner and he becomes a community outcast for being Homosexual. Pretty squirrely as you see.

By now if you are not about to make a desperate run to the toilet, you can get a picture of some really crazy ideas and misconceptions people have of Trans* people. The American Bar Association did declare that it was un-ethical for its members to use it in behalf of a client, several years ago and California added a law that makes it an illegal defense in state courts and can subject the attorney advancing it subject to discipline.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 94 Guests (See full list)

    • Betty K
    • Adrianna Danielle
    • VickySGV
    • Timi
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...