Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Article on Native American Trans* folks


Charlize

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

As a trained anthropologist, and a trans person, I found the article very interesting. I do wonder whether "two-spirit" individuals were treated the same across most, or all Native American cultures. There were differences in religious and cultural practices, especially between widely physically separated tribes. I am skeptical about any claims that all Native American peoples were uniform in their approach to most anything. In fact, I have spoken with Mayan people, who tell me that they do not recognize "two-spirit" people in their culture. It is easy to make generalizations.

Thanks for posting this, Charlize.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

I think it is an over-generalization to assume it was universal--what was universal was the Christianization process very nearly wiping out such identities as acceptable to one degree or another, whether they existed or not.

Many Navajos have no idea there is any such thing, though a judge mentioned to me that Nadleehi (can't spell properly on the board) were valued as the best teachers for children, and mentioned her family having a hired tutor who was nadleehi when she was a child, who taught them horseback riding as well as weaving (traditionally a women's art among the Navajos).

It's also ridiculous to assert that there were no gender roles in First Nations societies before Europeans came along. Those roles looked different than European roles, and different from one tribe to another, but if they didn't exist, neither would the understanding of people who transgressed them.

I know the complementary duality of male and female genders and sexes is deeply embedded in Navajo thinking and philosophy; the word nadleehi means "one who is transformed" and recognizes the transformation of someone's social roles. Their terms also translate well to "female-bodied man" and "male-bodied woman."

It's also simplistic to directly correlate modern conceptual understanding of transgender identity with two-spirit identity. The medical transition many of us undergo is distinctly modern and many traditional cultures with intact third gender or two spirit identities are in the process of figuring out how the concepts relate to each other.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Thank you for sharing that Ravin. I'm learning.

Hugs,

Charlize

Link to comment

Have read a great deal concerning two spirit people.

Thanks for your words, Ravin. Over generalizations contribute to all kinds of social stigma. No group of people is without vice.

This is a good discussion. Thank you Charlize for posting it!

Do-hi-yi !

Link to comment

Interesting articles. Although there is some generalization, what jumps out at me is how religion had such a hand in destroying a culture and belief system that was different. So sad, and it continues on even today.

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...
On July 8, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Briana said:

Interesting articles. Although there is some generalization, what jumps out at me is how religion had such a hand in destroying a culture and belief system that was different. So sad, and it continues on even today.

You know, I do not believe it is ever 'religion' that destroys anything. Religion, like any other thing in life, can be used for good or for ill. It is the within the hands of the weilder that the determination is made.  Like guns. 

If you want to talk about culture and belief systems being destroyed, we include the likes of Josef Stalin, Pol Pot, Augusto Pinochet, Idi Amin and Mao Zedong (and many others) who committed some of humanity's greatest atrocities. Religion? Nope. 

People destroy people.

:(

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
On 7/7/2016 at 5:18 PM, Charlize said:

Hhmmm....I disagree

On 7/7/2016 at 6:08 PM, Carolyn Marie said:

As a trained anthropologist, and a trans person, I found the article very interesting. I do wonder whether "two-spirit" individuals were treated the same across most, or all Native American cultures. There were differences in religious and cultural practices, especially between widely physically separated tribes. I am skeptical about any claims that all Native American peoples were uniform in their approach to most anything. In fact, I have spoken with Mayan people, who tell me that they do not recognize "two-spirit" people in their culture. It is easy to make generalizations.

Thanks for posting this, Charlize.

Carolyn Marie

I'm more inclined to agree w/ this reply.  I don't know about training, but I had undergraduate and graduate studies in both anthropology and sociology before I decided to do other things so I think I can give a relatively educated opinion that the article linked in the initial post progressively stretches the imagination.  While I'm not one to usually engage in ad hominem like arguments, I quickly noted the title and subtitle of the journal/magazine in which the linked article was "printed."

Personally, I've never heard of any such two-spirit/transgender traditions in my mother's peoples.

[No special bone to pick w/ re: to the notion of "two-spirts" here.  Just happened to be looking at old posts/threads and this one caught my eye.]

 

;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Thank you for your post Tejana.  It echoes those of other members and perhaps may provide some additional incites.   I am certainly no expert on the Native American acceptance of gender issues which is why i felt this article with it's mention of different tribal attitudes was interesting.  I haven doubt that, as in our own society, there are large variations .

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...
Guest Squallsong

I have to agree with Carolyn Marie on this one...skepticism.

In reference to Lakota "Winkte", they fail to acknowledge that the Lakota woman was under no defined set of gender rules (Siouxan peoples are like most plains peoples, their women held high station and authority) and for that reason it was widely acceptable that they took whatever role suited them, while less masculine men were restricted from typical male roles (and for this reason were defined separate from male).  Algonquian peoples had a "coming of age" ceremony for males (which involved a prolonged overdose of datura) to rid males of their memory (and literally killed any femininity a male had).  Southeastern tribes held a belief in three genders (and three spirits which collectively defined which gender the individual was)...the list is infinite...and a generalization such as the five stated (a Southwestern belief) is not universally accurate.  Most tribes embraced their "two spirit" members, and it was not until colonization that this changed.

European society was based on patriarchal and aristocratic hierarchy, and the collective beliefs of Native Peoples was a direct assault upon the entire European culture.  With colonization came religious doctrines which vilified all non-binary people.  Native men embraced the notion as it brought power and station to them, in contradiction to the equality that had traditionally maintained their culture and society.  Europeans used religion to fuel a revolution within Native cultures, so that feminism could be eradicated for another three centuries...and any non-binary notions could be quashed for another four.

Even today, there is a great deal of denial of the "two spirit" within many Native cultures despite growing evidence to the contrary.  Mayan is particularly noteworthy, as they had a ruling class when the Spanish arrived, and their oppressors took extreme steps to eliminate trans and gay people, while rewarding those in power for assisting in that goal.

The article does spread the ideals of acceptance though and it introduces at least one accurate description of the notion of "two spirit" to Europe through a page regarding religion, so in that respect, it is decidedly a good thing.

Be well and take care!

Squallsong

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Thank you Squallsong and others.  This is interesting and helps me understand a culture we in America are unfortunately not fully exposed to.

Jani

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 188 Guests (See full list)

    • MaeBe
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • SamC
    • VickySGV
    • Timi
    • Ivy
    • Lenneth
    • Susie
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,025
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • VickySGV
      I do still carry a Swiss Army knife along with my car keys.  
    • Timi
      Jeans and a white sweater. And cute white sneakers. Delivering balloons to a bunch of restaurants supporting our LGBT Community Center fundraiser today!
    • April Marie
      Congratulations to you!!!This is so wonderful!!
    • missyjo
      I've no desire to present androgynous..nothing wrong with it but I am a girl n wish to present as a girl. shrugs, if androgynous works fir others good. always happy someone finds a solution or happiness    today black jeans  black wedges..purple camisole under white n black polka dot blouse half open   soft smile to all 
    • MaeBe
      I have read some of it, mostly in areas specifically targeted at the LGBTQ+ peoples.   You also have to take into account what and who is behind the words, not just the words themselves. Together that creates context, right? Let's take some examples, under the Department of Health & Human Services section:   "Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike."   or   "Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families."   From a wording perspective, who doesn't want to protect the health and well-being of Americans or think that families aren't good for America? But let's take a look at the author, Roger Severino. He's well-quoted to be against LGBTQ+ anything, has standard christian nationalist views, supports conversion therapy, etc.   So when he uses words like "threatens the health and well-being of children and adults alike" it's not about actual health, it's about enforcing cis-gendered ideology because he (and the rest of the Heritage Foundation) believe LGBTQ+ people and communities are harmful. Or when he invokes the family through the lens of, let's just say dog whistles including the "penalization of marriage" (how and where?!), he idealizes families involving marriage of a "biological male to a biological female" and associates LGBTQ+ family equity as something unhealthy.   Who are the radical actors? Who is telling people to be trans, gay, or queer in general? No one. The idea that there can be any sort of equity between LGBTQ+ people and "normal" cis people is abhorrent to the author, so the loaded language of radical/destructive/guise/threaten are used. Families that he believes are "good" are stable/well-ordered/healthy, specifically married/nuclear ones.   Start looking into intersectionality of oppression of non-privileged groups and how that affects the concept of the family and you will understand that these platitudes are thinly veiled wrappers for christian nationalist ideology.   What's wrong with equity for queer families, to allow them full rights as parents, who are bringing up smart and able children? Or single mothers who are working three jobs to get food on plates?
    • Ashley0616
      Well yesterday didn't work like I wanted to. I met a guy and started talking and he was wanting to be in a relationship. I asked my kids on how they thought of me dating a man and they said gross and said no. I guess it's time to look for women. I think that is going to be harder. Oh well I guess.  
    • Ashley0616
      I don't have anything in my dress pocket
    • Carolyn Marie
      This topic reminds me of the lyrics to the Beatles song, "A Little Help From My Friends."   "What do you see when you turn out the lights?"   "I can't tell you but I know it's mine."   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @Ivy have you read the actual document?   Has anyone else out there read it?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am reading the Project 2025 document https://www.project2025.org/policy/   This will take some time.  I read the forward and I want to read it again later.   I read some criticism of it outside here and I will be looking for it in the light of what has been posted here and there.  Some of the criticism is bosh.   @MaeBe have you read the actual document?
    • RaineOnYourParade
      *older, not holder, oops :P
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No problem!
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Old topic, but I gotta say my favorites are: "Stop hitting on minors" (doesn't work if you're holder tho) and "Sure as [squid] not you"
    • Carolyn Marie
      Abigail, I think we will just leave the other posts where they are, and the discussion can start anew here.  It is possible to do what you ask, but would disrupt the flow of the discussion in the other thread, and would require more work than it's worth.   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am in too good a mood to earn my certificate today. I am sure something will happen that will put me on the path to earning it.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...