Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Obama And Congress Report Card


Guest

How would you grade President Obama's first 100 days?  

61 members have voted

  1. 1. How would you grade President Obama's first 100 days?

    • A
      12
    • B
      17
    • C
      5
    • D
      9
    • F
      12
    • Incomplete
      6
  2. 2. How would you grade Congressional Republicans?

    • A
      1
    • B
      0
    • C
      9
    • D
      16
    • F
      29
    • Incomplete
      6
  3. 3. How would you rate Congressional Democrats?

    • A
      4
    • B
      13
    • C
      14
    • D
      10
    • F
      15
    • Incomplete
      5


Recommended Posts

i just don't believe there is a right or left anymore. D and R are relics from a time when our vote did count . our economy laws and religions are slowly being tailored to fit a different goverment, and its agenda. they are even trying to nationalize our IDs . the presidency of any candidate is little more than a puppet position, with this shadow government pulling the strings . if obama really wanted to make improvments he would regulate wall street. he would impose restrictions on the fed and force them to explain were nearly 10 trillion dallors of american money went , that seemingly vanished with out a trace , money that they could have sank back into unemployment, {since they haven't made a dent in the unemployment rate} instead of giving billions of dallors to car companies to continue building cars we cant afford why not . issue cupons to the american people for say 90% off the price of a new car, we would then in turn take those to a car lot buy the car., and the car lot or company would redeem them to the government for a slice of the bailout pie, allowing car companies to build the cars and keep people employed .

but then the heads of these companies wouldn't beable to pocket it and would have to pay their employees . instead of cutting their jobs and netting a tidy little profit . but the reason he does not do these things is because it doesn't serve the Fed a privately owned bank that has total dominion over our currency and economy . we are heading toward a global government headed from the shadows by buisness men and bankers .

i think one should find it odd that obama sends 30000 troops into afganistan, only months before american geologist find one of the biggest deposits of gold,calbalt , zinc , iron , and several other highly vaulued resources , i think the guesstimated value of with is in the several trillions . i doubt some GI was on patrol and tripped over this varitable gold mine . or a geologist, traipsing about in a war torn country stumbled across this find ?

there is a new world order coming . its being talked about openly . in the the news alls one has to do is look for it. but in case you don't want to waste time researching it your selves .

please for give the title of this video its just the best complied news clips and info. i could find. the only thing i want is for people to look ask real questions don't just take my word for it or these people in these videos or articals research it your self look at what they are doing and get mad about it.

we need to wake up. not just american people but all peoples of the world . before we all wake up one day wearing striped pajamas and a micro chip under our skin. this is the last. i will post to this thread i have said what i wanted to say.

Sakura

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...
Guest ma-head-a-spinnin

It is my experience, that politicians only make laws or policy, which suits the people, who fund their election campaigns.

I fear the power does not belong to the people, but to corporations.

On topic.

I believe Obama has defintely increased America's standing in the EU. And personally, I think the alternative, McCain (sounds like a brand of fries, I know), would have been a disaster. He would probably perpetuate America's 'world cop' policy for ever, and ever. News flash! You are not the only civilised country on the planet, stop forcing your rules onto us. Sheesh!

Link to comment
Guest Melisiris

Though we dutchies can learn a lot about the way the US treats immigrants(except for the "mexican problem" which are mostly guatamalese anyway), the new dutch government will make it near to impossible for me and my american girlfriend to live together in the netherlands(raising the minimum income and minimum age to 24 and other draconian measures to keep out the muslims, but it will hit other immigrants and their dutch partners just as hard), I will have to move to Germany because of it.

I have suspicions that Geert Wilders(right-wing islamophobe that endorses the new goverment and has a very big influence on it now) is somehow linked to the tea party, probably has the same people(or corporations) funding his movement.

Voting for tea-party alligned "politicians" will not do your county any good, like geert wilders will be a disaster for my country. And it will certainly decrease the possibilities for Obama to pass more improvements, he still has two years, FDR had four terms to get you out of the great depression, do not be too impatient. So use your common sense next week.

Link to comment

I have become very jaded in my years of watching politics as usual - the whole concept of a government for the people, of the people and by the people is totally destroyed by the introduction of campaign funding - the advice given to a very wealthy man by his father - you don't ever need to be a politician - you can afford to buy one.

Money runs the world, greed is the only real motivator for most people - so they go into politics and this need for money does not go away - the very liberal salaries of the members of congress with unbelievable pensions should any of them ever decide to leave and give up all of the graft should be enough for anyone - it is definitely enough for them to lose touch with the problems of 90% of the people that they claim to represent.

Their campaigns are funded by corporations, lobbyist and special interest groups who do not 'donate' these funds, they are purchasing votes in Congress plain and simple - that is why nothing changes - the rich are in control and want to get richer so they do, no one wants to get poorer but we are.

If Congress was really there to help us back in the days of a huge period of inflation they would have joined in on the wage and price freeze that President Nixon had imposed on the rest of the country but Congress voted in their annual pay raise proving once again how much they care about anyone but themselves.

Now during this recession while so many are losing their jobs and their homes have they passed on those pay raises - no but you do not hear about it because LBJ while still in the Senate entered a bill into Congress stating that if no vote was taken on Congressional pay raises (in particular Senatorial pay raises - what a shock) that they would go into effect automatically at the end of the session.

You don't hear about any one of them willing to give that up do you.

We have elected royalty and there is really not much difference between birthright and elected royalty in their connection with all of the people living in poverty.

At one point Ronald Reagan stated that no one ever went to bed hungry in the United States - I guess all of the homeless people were well feed while he was in office - so highly revered in the media and by the Republican Party and yet someday when a less biased history is written and his charisma is not being considered he will be one of the worst presidents of the late 20th century - Richard Nixon will be noted for all of the good that he did for the country and in foreign relations - he was responsible for the actions that eventually lead to the destruction of the Berlin Wall but Reagan got the credit because he was the man in office at the time of the event - nothing in politics happens over night and something this major took years.

Harry Truman ended World War II, FDR and Winston Churchill prolonged it by demanding an unconditional surrender from a culture that valued honor above life - don't look for those revelations just yet because revisionist history seems to last a long time - there has never been a war fought for any reasons other than greed and a need for power yet history records the American Revolution as a fight for ideals - no just we wanted to keep the tax money here - the Civil War was fought to abolish slavery - wrong again, a side benefit to so many but the main issues were Federal control over individual states and the price of cotton - yup, power and money just like always.

So how have Obama and Congress done, well they haven't ordered euthanasia for the homeless - so I give him high marks.

With total disgust,

Cynical Sally

Link to comment
Guest Melisiris

I totally understand your disgust. Getting more and more cynical myself, especially these days, but i try not to sink back in apathy, like so many people do(maybe in some decades i will be thinking just like you though). In a way I'd rather be naive than apathetic for now. If everyone turns away from politics it's a garantee that everything only will get worse.

In the case of the liberation of europe i am still grateful to FDR, all alterior motives he had aside. I would have been speaking German now not dutch(though my german is not bad, and now i have to go there) At least i had the chance of growing up in a free and prosperous western european country, such a pity the dutch are busy screwing that up now.

Link to comment
Guest KimberlyF

Melisiris,

Another guarantee that things continue to get worse is to continue to vote in a two party system and pick the lesser of two evils year after year which by definition just means the one who will just guarantee to make things slightly less worse than the other guy but still worse than before. How progressive! I'd rather 'waste' my vote on a third party candidate like the Green party or something and be able to look myself in the mirror than buy into their game. Maybe they can buy me off with a few bones tossed to the LGBT community though. They obviously don'taskdonttell care but as long as a few trinkets fall my way it's better than the other guys!

Kim

Link to comment
Guest Melisiris

At least vote for the lesser evil, but green party or socialist party is fine too in my humble opinion.;)

In the Netherlands we have a multi-party system, though this could not prevent the right wing fascist party cynically called "Party for Freedom" to gain unacceptable influence in the government, they are keeping the condoning coalition parties in a stranglehold. History is repeating itself but this time in a neighbouring country of germany.

Link to comment

At least vote for the lesser evil, but green party or socialist party is fine too in my humble opinion.;)

In the Netherlands we have a multi-party system, though this could not prevent the right wing fascist party cynically called "Party for Freedom" to gain unacceptable influence in the government, they are keeping the condoning coalition parties in a stranglehold. History is repeating itself but this time in a neighbouring country of germany.

Yes, Geert Wilders is an absolute hypocrite. The name of his party is just one example. He promotes freedom (given in our constitution), yet denies it for reasons such as cultural heritage, or having multiple nationalities.

Most recently, the double passports of one of our new ministers, was accepted without any scrutiny.

Couples of years back, both Wilders and Rutte (our new Prime Minister), made quite the ruckus about the double passports of two state secretaries. They were either Dutch-Turkish, or Dutch-Moroccan. Thus, Wilders and Rutte concluded their 'loyalty' was not guaranteed, and they moved for a vote of no confidence.

Luckily, this motion was not carried.

The new minister, who was sworn in a couple of days ago, is Dutch-Swedish. And yet, there's not so much as a beep from Wilders. The opposition has already called both Rutte and Wilders 'hypocrites', over this. Seems being part Swedish would be sufficient proof of 'loyalty', while I fail to see the distinction.

As for the TEA Party Movement, they are just as much populist weasels, as the PVV (Party for Freedom) is, here.

They want tax cuts, yet fail to come up with plans on how to prevent the US government from going bankrupt.

They promote liberty, like there is no tomorrow, yet wish to deny those liberties to non-whites.

They are complaining about the new Health care bill, yet didn't so much as grumble, when Bush jr. did something similar, just lacking fanfare.

Need I go on?

(All right, they oppose Wall Street's grabbing culture. That would be the only thing I agree with.)

I have never been big on the USA, when Bush was in the White House. I never liked the 'America above all' attitude some conservative Americans are throwing our way. And this 'Tea Party', from my perspective, makes a big red flag, next to one yellow flag, since Bush is gone.

(Feel free to tell me I'm wrong...)

You know, I know, that plenty of Americans would call me an utter communist for my views, while I prefer to call myself a socialist.

Anything below your 'Liberals' is a communist, from many Americans' perspectives.

Tiaria

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 113 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,023
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Delaney
    Newest Member
    Delaney
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dillon
      Dillon
    2. Kaylee888
      Kaylee888
    3. lily100
      lily100
      (39 years old)
    4. Luce
      Luce
      (44 years old)
    5. Luke.S
      Luke.S
  • Posts

    • VickySGV
      I am glad your schools are flush with excess spending money, but that is not the situation here in CA.  Back in 1978 an Initiative and Referendum law was passed that limited property taxes severely and basically cut funding from Property Taxes to pennies of the amounts needed to even minimally fund school districts.  Even the U.S. Supreme Court which upheld the law on Federal and Constitutional grounds nevertheless wryly commented in its decision that the state electorate had lost its collective mind in enacting the law.  Our schools are funded through the State's General Fund which receives other tax sources for creating the entire state budget. The General Fund and the legislature try to give  adequate funding  to the primary and secondary school districts as well as college districts and other obligations all from the same limited funds. There are also strict limits on assessing property taxes that actually prevent them from paying for other services directly affecting property ownership which is their proper place, and so even property related services come from our General Fund. Your property tax money seems to be ear-marked for schools which is wonderful and I hope they use it according to your thoughts, but as said we have a different problem out here in CA.  I love my state but do recognize its short comings.  Point of information, the tax law that is creating problems came from the same small area of the state as the proposed referendum on Trans Youth. 
    • VickySGV
      The numbers of those negatively affected are significant and discouraging, but the good news is that "over half" of Trans youth live in safe states, and such states do exist.
    • Maddee
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Seems like a reasonable agreement.  Seattle stays out of Texas, Texas stays out of Seattle.  Weird that the Seattle hospital had a business license in Texas... 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Seems to me the time and cost is already being spent....on lawsuits.  And schools are absolutely flush with cash, at least around here.  They get enough property taxes, they need to learn appropriate use of funds.  Buy a few less computers and a few more bathrooms, and spend less time on athletics and I'd bet you a hamburger that the issue would be solved in a year.   To me, it seems like the whole bathroom thing is like lancing a boil or a cyst.  A sharp initial pain, and done. People are just resistant to doing it.      I think I could solve most of it...but politicians get too much press off of this to want it solved.   1.  Universal use of individual, gender-neutral, private bathrooms 2.  Universal use of individual, gender-neutral, private spaces for changing athletic clothes 3.  Emphasize co-ed rather than gendered sports.  Focus on physical activity, good sportsmanship, and having FUN.  Lifelong enjoyment, not just competition. 4.  Ban for-profit athletic programs at highschool and college levels, and ban betting/gambling related to athletic programs at educational institutions. 5.  Affirm parental rights consistently, rather than treating it like a salad bar.  That means permitting gender-affirming healthcare with parental consent, AND prohibiting schools keeping secrets from parents.  Adopt the "paperwork principle."  If it is on paper, parents 100% have a right to know about it and be informed on paper, including names/pronouns if such are documented.  If it is verbal only, it is informal enough to be overlooked or discussed verbally if needed.
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.texastribune.org/2024/04/22/texas-trans-health-care-investigation-seattle/     Carolyn Marie
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/transgender-louisianans-say-ve-lost-ally-governors-seat-rcna149082     Carolyn Marie
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/2024-anti-trans-legislation/     Carolyn Marie
    • Carolyn Marie
      It would work better, but the issue will always be time and cost, unless a school district is building a new school.  Districts everywhere are short on infrastructure funds, so it's not a realistic solution in most cases.   Carolyn Marie
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I have always thought that the solution to the bathroom question (as well as improved bathroom quality/privacy for everybody) would be individual, gender-neutral, locking bathrooms.  Not this wacky thing we insist on doing with stalls.  It wouldn't take much more space, really.  And it might actually work better.  Ever notice how there's often a line at the door of the women's room, but plenty of free space in the men's?  Yet the men's and women's bathrooms are usually of equal size/capacity? 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I'm going to have to stop staying up so late at night...  Its after midnight, so technically morning.  So, Good Morning, y'all.   I got to go to work with my husband for the last two days.  I'm working on the graphics stuff for his company, so he said that nobody would really mind if I hang out.  I usually stay home, but its kind of nice to be somewhere different for a little while.  I spent part of the day at one of the company's installation sites... beautiful weather, so I worked on my laptop sitting under a tree.  And I learned something new - it is amazing how electrical wires are installed underground.  They're put in PVC tubes, and actually pulled through.  By hand!  Apparently a machine would risk breaking the wires somehow, so I watched a line of men literally playing tug-of-war with hundreds of feet of wire.  It was like something out of an old movie - my husband leading a call/response work chant and everybody pulling in a rhythm.    It does give me a bit of self-doubt, though.  Like, if that's what "real men" are doing... maybe I'm a poor-quality imitation
    • Betty K
      Can I just say quickly re the bathroom question, how come no-one ever seems to suggest building more gender-neutral toilets? 
    • Betty K
      With the onslaught of bills targeting trans kids in the US and the current attempt to radically curtail gender-affirming treatment for kids in the UK I think you could just as easily ask why are things so hard for trans kids. Given the volatile political situation around them, I am pleased to hear there are still services attempting to help them.
    • KayC
      @Mia Marie I agree that it seems most of the focus is on Trans Youth.  And maybe that is in part because of protecting Trans Youth from the political environment, and to give them a chance to transition at an earlier age.  Many of our generation have been cloistered for most of our lives by societal exceptions and I think that has made it more difficult to be Visible ... until Now. So I guess my answer is ... Be Visible and seek out, or even start, support groups in your local area.  Planned Parenthood does provide Gender Affirming Care and therapy in most U.S. regions (and they take Medicare!). 
    • KayC
      As a registered CA voter I would be HAPPY to vote against this bill ... BUT as @Carolyn Marie mentioned it has little chance to make the ballot.  Hopefully this will put the Death Knell on the bill.   wrt Parents Rights of notification.  I would agree if there was potential harm to a child, or if the child was involved in potentially harming somebody else.  BUT, that would not be the case in the preponderance of situations.  The decision to Come Out to one's own parents should be up to the individual child only.  If the child does not feel Secure or Safe in their household then it should not be up to the State or School to make that determination. If the child did feel safe and secure they would have probably already come out.  If they haven't ... then the situation seems obvious.  Protect the Child, not the System.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...