Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Insurance coverage?


Rowan

Recommended Posts

Hi all! I think this is kind of far fetched, but I'm keeping my fingers crossed. Has anyone here ever had insurance help out or cover their laser hair removal? The only reasoning I can think of would be that it's more than just cosmetic to help with gender disphoria. All of my Google searches haven't turned anything up, but I figure that if anybody knows for sure, it's someone here. Thank you!

Link to comment

They usually don't. That may be changing, but part of the problem is that most of the technicians are not medical professionals per se and therefore would be considered cosmetic.   

Link to comment
  • Admin

If you can find a doctor who will certify that it is a medical necessity, then maybe you'll have a chance with your insurance company.   I have not heard of one that considers it anything more than cosmetic.  Even the U.S. Tax Court hasn't gone that far for TG-related health care deductions.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

Basically what others have said above.  There are some medications that cause unwanted hair growth as a side effect but even that's not generally covered.  Before Minoxidil (a.k.a. Rogaine) was used to pattern baldness etc., it was used to control B/P.  You have no idea how many people I took care of back then that came in as hairy as a monkey from being on it.  Seriously!  And it didn't always go away totally when the Minoxidil was stopped.  And for some, it didn't go away at all.  Imagine the poor woman that went on it and one day found hair growing out of her nose and her ears and her face and back and...and...  You get the picture.  Even then they wouldn't cover it and still don't for other meds that can cause unwanted hair growth..

Unfortunately, it's still viewed as cosmetic like many things we think are necessary, like teeth & hearing.

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...
Guest Markietoo

Hello folks,

My first post in quite some time but thought I'd share some information that may prove useful.  I live in California and have medical coverage with Kaiser.  They covered the required hair removal necessary prior to my GCS last October.  Still having facial work done and they pay for that too.   The coverage includes genital hair removal via laser or electrolysis as well as facial hair removal by either laser or electrolysis, my choice.  Small co-pay of $10 a visit.  Not all Kaiser coverage is the same but based on the company/governmental agency paying for it.  After paying out of pocket for two years of facial work, they started to pay for it last year.  Saved us thousands of dollars.  No costs at all for the GCS either except for a few dollars for some meds when I was discharged from my 8 day hospital stay.  That was all, they covered everything else.  Yeah for Kaiser!  

I have two practitioners who I'd recommend to those in my general area who need quality, friendly, effective hair removal.  Send me a PM and i'll pass you their contact information.  Both accept Kaiser insurance and private payment for reasonable costs.

Markie Anna

Link to comment

Hi Markie,

I have Kaiser too, but in Virginia. So you are right it is different, but from what my GT is telling me Kaiser is working towards just standardizing their policies and are using as CA as a template. Some of these changes are taking place in 2017.

 

Link to comment

My insurance specifically states that it covers Electrolysis for those diagnosed with GID. I just can't find anyone willing to submit a claim in my area. I am starting to look into how I might be reimbursed by my insurance company, but it does not look like any easy process.

Link to comment

Ask the insurance company who they have in your area. Since many electrolysis places are not clinics/medical care providers, getting them to submit claims is pretty hard, most won't.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 232 Guests (See full list)

    • Abigail Genevieve
    • MaeBe
    • Ashley0616
    • missyjo
    • KathyLauren
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • missyjo
      I've no desire to present androgynous..nothing wrong with it but I am a girl n wish to present as a girl. shrugs, if androgynous works fir others good. always happy someone finds a solution or happiness    today black jeans  black wedges..purple camisole under white n black polka dot blouse half open   soft smile to all 
    • MaeBe
      I have read some of it, mostly in areas specifically targeted at the LGBTQ+ peoples.   You also have to take into account what and who is behind the words, not just the words themselves. Together that creates context, right? Let's take some examples, under the Department of Health & Human Services section:   "Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike."   or   "Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families."   From a wording perspective, who doesn't want to protect the health and well-being of Americans or think that families aren't good for America? But let's take a look at the author, Roger Severino. He's well-quoted to be against LGBTQ+ anything, has standard christian nationalist views, supports conversion therapy, etc.   So when he uses words like "threatens the health and well-being of children and adults alike" it's not about actual health, it's about enforcing cis-gendered ideology because he (and the rest of the Heritage Foundation) believe LGBTQ+ people and communities are harmful. Or when he invokes the family through the lens of, let's just say dog whistles including the "penalization of marriage" (how and where?!), he idealizes families involving marriage of a "biological male to a biological female" and associates LGBTQ+ family equity as something unhealthy.   Who are the radical actors? Who is telling people to be trans, gay, or queer in general? No one. The idea that there can be any sort of equity between LGBTQ+ people and "normal" cis people is abhorrent to the author, so the loaded language of radical/destructive/guise/threaten are used. Families that he believes are "good" are stable/well-ordered/healthy, specifically married/nuclear ones.   Start looking into intersectionality of oppression of non-privileged groups and how that affects the concept of the family and you will understand that these platitudes are thinly veiled wrappers for christian nationalist ideology.   What's wrong with equity for queer families, to allow them full rights as parents, who are bringing up smart and able children? Or single mothers who are working three jobs to get food on plates?
    • Ashley0616
      Well yesterday didn't work like I wanted to. I met a guy and started talking and he was wanting to be in a relationship. I asked my kids on how they thought of me dating a man and they said gross and said no. I guess it's time to look for women. I think that is going to be harder. Oh well I guess.  
    • Ashley0616
      I don't have anything in my dress pocket
    • Carolyn Marie
      This topic reminds me of the lyrics to the Beatles song, "A Little Help From My Friends."   "What do you see when you turn out the lights?"   "I can't tell you but I know it's mine."   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @Ivy have you read the actual document?   Has anyone else out there read it?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am reading the Project 2025 document https://www.project2025.org/policy/   This will take some time.  I read the forward and I want to read it again later.   I read some criticism of it outside here and I will be looking for it in the light of what has been posted here and there.  Some of the criticism is bosh.   @MaeBe have you read the actual document?
    • RaineOnYourParade
      *older, not holder, oops :P
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No problem!
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Old topic, but I gotta say my favorites are: "Stop hitting on minors" (doesn't work if you're holder tho) and "Sure as [squid] not you"
    • Carolyn Marie
      Abigail, I think we will just leave the other posts where they are, and the discussion can start anew here.  It is possible to do what you ask, but would disrupt the flow of the discussion in the other thread, and would require more work than it's worth.   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am in too good a mood to earn my certificate today. I am sure something will happen that will put me on the path to earning it.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      It's likely most cis-women consider a fitting unnecessary "because they know what  they wear" and get used to the wrong size.  The instructions for what your size is are simple and why go to any further effort?  You measure your bandsize and you measure your max and subtract the two to get the needed info for the cup size.  Then you buy the same size for years until it hurts or something.
    • KatieSC
      Congratulations Lorelei! Yes, it is a powerful feeling to have the documents that say "you are you".
    • Mmindy
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...