Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Recommended Posts

On 1/31/2020 at 5:41 PM, Sally Stone said:

Yes.  US Army Aviator. 1977 to 1999.

woo hoo!  I was a huey crew chief from 85-87. Spent a lot of that time in Germany picking up pieces of, and flying missions for the first wave of Blackhawks that had a rocky start to service.  When it came time to reenlist they wanted me to retrain for those AND go to Ft Drum.  I said no thanks. lol

 

Link to comment
  • Replies 222
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Jani

    27

  • Marcie Jensen

    23

  • Ivy

    18

  • Rianon

    16

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 1 month later...

USAF 05/1986 - 03/1990. Honorable.

 

Ironically, I was in my dorm room watching an episode of Mauri interviewing a Male to Female transgendered individual from a small town and thought, "hey, that's me."

 

So what did i do when I got out? I got a job, got married, had kids, and 30 years later, joined this forum to finally address my issues. So I bet you're probably thinking, "Say What?"

 

Me too.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
3 hours ago, MelanieTamara said:

So what did i do when I got out? I got a job, got married, had kids, and 30 years later, joined this forum to finally address my issues. So I bet you're probably thinking, "Say What?"

 

Less unusual than you think. About half of the MtFs seem to have served in one branch or another. About half of what's left over go into "ultra manly" careers like police, fire-fighters, construction, etc... Especially with us older gals. A bunch of us dove into marriage, had kids, etc... The 70's and 80's were not a great time to be trans.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Jackie C. said:

Less unusual than you think. About half of the MtFs seem to have served in one branch or another.

My understanding (from VA site) is that there is a higher percentage of transgender vets, than in the general population.

Link to comment

21 years US Navy, retired as CDR (1980-2002) Pilot, intel officer.   Wonderful memories but always fearful of being found out as transgender.

Link to comment

Actually, Melanie Tamara joined the thread ...

On 2/18/2021 at 10:24 PM, MelanieTamara said:

So what did i do when I got out? I got a job, got married, had kids, and 30 years later, joined this forum to finally address my issues. So I bet you're probably thinking, "Say What?"

Actually, I'm thinking, "Join the Club." That's my progression, too, but for me it was 50+ yrs, two marriages, 5 kids. When Covid lockdown started, I started transitioning, although it was October before I got serious with HRT.

 

I was in ANG, then USAF active 68-69, to Korea for the Pueblo Crisis. I was highly PO'ed when we got activated, but I am so very thankful now. Without VA, I would have checked out a long time ago.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Lee H said:

I was highly PO'ed when we got activated, but I am so very thankful now. Without VA, I would have checked out a long time ago.

Me too.  I was not happy to be drafted, but the VA has been a lifesaver for me.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Hello @Margo I served one tour in the Navy (VF101 F-14) and my dad retired after 30 as a Cdr.  Welcome aboard!

Link to comment
5 hours ago, Jani said:

Hello @Margo I served one tour in the Navy (VF101 F-14) and my dad retired after 30 as a Cdr.  Welcome aboard!

Thanks Jani, very glad to be here.

Link to comment

USMC, Sergeant, 1982-1990, Field Radio Operator & ATC Radar Tech

TN Army National Guard, Sergeant, 2000-2007, Armorer/Supply & Combat Engineer

Police Officer, City, Patrol, 1990-1992

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

I served in the USAR from 2003 to 2012 as  a 92FH7, 88M, and 21W.  I was deployed to Iraq from 2005-2006 and 2009-2010.  

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...

Indeed, I served. I realize this is an old thread, but I've been thinking lots lately about my 3-1/2 years in the army. I'm an "oldie": I'm a Vietnam vet. Visiting Pulse most every day now, I was reminded of my two Grand Purges during my army years.

 

Grand Purge #1 occurred in the days just before I was due to leave for my first posting: field artillery school in Ft. Sill, Oklahoma. At the time, I was still living at home with my parents (and a few "secrets") in a tiny walk-up apartment  in the Bronx. I recall boxing up all of my "girly things" and driving them to Orchard Beach. (Do any of you know Orchard Beach?) It was winter, so I had the place to myself. Methodically, I drove from one trash barrel to the next, stuffing each barrel with "her things." I'm sure I drove away, thinking, Well, that's that. Never again!

 

Grand Purge #2 happened as I packing to leave Ft. Leonard Wood, Missouri, on my way to Vietnam. Again: lots of boxes, lots of packing tape, again a drive to rid myself of the "evidence," only this time to a deserted picnic grounds in the Missouri woods. Again (probably), I drove away, thinking, Well, that's that. Never again!

 

Today, I laugh to think: two Grand Purges! Did I really believe "Never again!" meant never again?

 

And did anyone ever peek in those trash barrels at Orchard Beach and the Missouri picnic grounds and go: "Huh?"

 

Riannon

Link to comment

I did the field artillery school in Ft. Sill, Oklahoma, but at the time I was still hiding from myself.

At that time, my biggest concerns were the weak beer, and lack of toilet paper in the latrine.

Link to comment

I didn't manag4e to get to Fort Sil--I wound up at the Fort Be4nning School for Wayward Buys and Idiots (Infantry school followed by jump school), but I suspect the same set of lumps and worries. I did the same thing with purging prior to leaving for training, and then for Germany.

 

Thank you for your sacrifice and service, Riannon. I missed your war by about 18 months but got to go to the Army's Special Olympics in Grenada, Panama and Desert Storm. The proudest moment in my 24 year of service came after Desert Storm when my unit participated in a Memoria day parade. What made it so special came at the end when all the local Vietnam veterans were lined up waiting for us as we passed in review.  THEY saluted us!!! After their service and its aftermath, ours was so small in comparison.  That these heroes would salute us was humbling and made my heart swell with pride for them, and everyone who served in Southeast Asia.

Link to comment

You were deserving of those salutes, Marcie.

 

I didn't go to Vietnam to find for any Grand Purpose. Nor did I want to go. I locked myself into military service by taking ROTC when I was an undergrad. Vietnam was already aflame at the time. I had hoped to have my four college years be uninterrupted. I also felt sure that, by the time I had my BA, Vietnam would be a thing of the past. How stupid! When By the time I graduated, Vietnam was really roaring! Because I'd taken ROTC, I had no choice but to serve. I'd truly cornered myself.

 

Thanks for your post, Marcie. If I'd been on the sidelines at that Memorial Day parade, you'd have gotten a salute from me too.

 

Riannon

Link to comment

I went in "73, got out in "75. Honorable conditions. I wasn't the best soldier but tried my best.

I was lucky I wasn't sent to Vietnam but I was trained for it. Gosh that was so many years ago.

LM.

Link to comment

Hi, Linda Marie

 

I was lucky, too, in an odd way. After graduating artillery school, the army sent me, not to Vietnam, but to South Korea. I was there for a year. That was followed by a year stateside, at Ft. Leonard Wood. It was only after Leonard Wood that the army sent me to Vietnam. Why I say I was lucky is because by the time I arrived in Vietnam I had some seniority. I credit my seniority with saving my life.

 

You're right: all this now seems so long, long ago.

 

Cheers!

Riannon

Link to comment

I didn't go to Nam either.  They pulled a handful of us out and sent us to Special Weapons school.  I ended up in Europe.

Link to comment

No, no military service at all despite wanting to  be a soldier when I was a prepubescent kid.  As I approached legal majority though, considering my circumstances, I didn't think a military career would be appropriate, so I went another direction.  

 

Lots of respect and admiration though, for those "who served", especially those who saw combat.

 

 

Link to comment

As I believe I mentioned in an earlier post, I didn't want to go in the army; to avoid having my undergrad years interrupted, I signed up for ROTC––which then trapped me into serving. I say "trapped," but, to be perfectly honest, there was a little hidden away part of me that was excited to be going into the army. Growing up, I like my fem side––my secret fem side––but all the while I wondered what would happen if I had to lead with my maleness. That's why, when I saw there was no chance of getting out of serving, I quietly thought, Hmm, I wonder … That's why I purged for leaving for Ft. Sill, my first assignment. I managed too to get through twelve months in South Korea without giving much thought my purged femininity. It wasn't until I was back from South Korea and spending a stateside tour in Missouri that I began to mail-order at least the bare minimum so that I might resurrect my true self in the privacy of my bachelor's quarters. For twelve months, in the privacy of those quarters, I was happy, Of course, when I received orders for Vietnam, I did it all over again: purged all of the fem things I'd only recently purchased by mail-order.

 

Riannon

Link to comment

I joined the NevANG in '63 to avoid being drafted. 'Nam was starting to heat up, a 2-S required full time attendance, and I couldn't afford it. This genius plan worked for 41/2 years, until Pueblo was snatched, then we got activated. Oops. 6 mo later, shipped to Kwang-Ju AFB, ROK. It sucked. Tent city for first 5 +/- mos, then tilt-ups until I got a 3 mo early out for school. Then into the Anti-war Movement in and around SF State.

I "served" really doesn't describe my military experience. I "endured" is closer, and the USAF "tolerated" me. And I owe the USAF such a huge debt of gratitude for this.

 

We were on active duty long enough to qualify for GI Bill and VA Health Care. Without it, I never would have graduated, but I probably would have died in '05 and maybe several other times.  I have gotten so much more from having served than ever I contributed. I thank Sam from the bottom of my heart -- he's been such a good Uncle for me. 
 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 187 Guests (See full list)

    • Petra Jane
    • MaryEllen
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • Willow
      Good morning    Now @Abigail Genevieve and @Mmindy what makes you so certain I didn’t mean it to say bee itch certificate?  lol. Thanks Mindy. I was asleep when you saw this and fixed it, and yes Abigail, as a moderator I could have fixed it myself, or weren’t you pointing out the irony of that?   I use Alexis as my alarm to get up.  And I set the ringer to be two guys telling me to get up.  I was so sound asleep when they started telling me to get up that it scared me and my first thought were I had over slept.  Since I have a difficult time getting to sleep as early as I have to in order to get enough sleep I at least cut back my normal awake time to get ready.  But now I have to do my hair and get going.   enjoyed my coffee and a little time catching up   see you all later, for its hi ho hi ho it’s off to work I go.   Willow
    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...