Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Androgenous Compliments and Affirmation


thoughtfullyyours

Recommended Posts

Hi there! 

 

My partner is struggling with their gender identity. They've talked to me a lot about wishing they didn't need pronouns at all or that it was possible to take gender out of their identity. 

 

I'm looking for advice on how to compliment their physical appearance without gendered language.

 

I Ian tell it stings when people say they're "beautiful" or "pretty." But they also struggle with body dismorphia and it seems especially important for them to be reminded that they're attractive. 

 

There are of course gender neutral synonyms like "gorgeous," and obviously saying someone's "sexy" applies regardless of gender. But, to those of you who identify as gender non-conforming, are there compliments that have made you feel particularly seen? Any ideas for affirmation? 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Welcome thoughtfully,

I remember thinking the word handsome seems to worker all genders.  But if they were considered male at birth they may feel it to male.

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment

Oh this is a tough one because most compliments are mostly gender focused.  I have heard many used for both but some just never sounded right to me so I get what you are saying.  Like calling a women handsome just did not sound right to me.  

 

Sometimes the non verbal is the way to go.  The eyes can say a thousand things and a slight approving hum in a sexy or positive way can definitely get a point across.

Obviously physical reactions and human contact is another but that's situational and not always appropriate.  But a hug is a hug and OMG I wish I had these more often.

As for complimenting they or them verbally with words it is a hard thing but keeping it to the basic forms of the word is best and most likely consider neutral.

Like don't compliment a blouses or cute top as such, compliment a shirt that looks nice.

Bad example but you get what I am saying.  

Good Luck!

 

 

Link to comment

More neutral compliments can be things like:

That's a nice color on you.

You look happy/bubbly/cheerful/whatever today.

It's hard to do, but there are ways to find neutral positive things.

TA

Link to comment

I've called people of various genders "cute". I, and I'm sure others, consider it gender neutral. But I've asked transmasc and nb folks if they were ok with my saying so, and assured them I didn't mean it in a girly way. Some might consider it a feminine compliment... 

 

~Toni

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I might suggest saying they are "looking good" or "have a confident look about them."   Look for words that are generalist in nature.  

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...
  • 9 months later...
On 4/5/2020 at 8:06 AM, ToniTone said:

I've called people of various genders "cute". I, and I'm sure others, consider it gender neutral. But I've asked transmasc and nb folks if they were ok with my saying so, and assured them I didn't mean it in a girly way. Some might consider it a feminine compliment.

Yeah, I think I've actually heard adult men getting called cute more often than adult women. But my entire life I've absolutely hated being called cute (I'm afab) before I even considered that I might not be 100% cishet, and I know of some other people that hate it as well. So they might just hate it un-gender related. I do very much agree though, I think of "cute" as gender neutral.

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

My favorite compliments are "You look more like yourself" or "You look confident and sexy" MMMM yes please thank you! I *hate* to be called "cute" but find "looking good" or "you look amazing" annoyingly vague. Get specific? "Your hair looks great today." or "Nice butt" or something like that could help avoid gendered vagaries.

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...

We get so hung up because language when it comes to gender is imprecise IMO. 

 

I've broken it down like this. 

 

Most people are either XY or XX be they gay, straight or bi and then there are folks who are intergendered physically and some of us have intergendered brains. 

 

I like to refer to M2F as XY females and F2M as XX males. That to me seems more precise than other words used to label of describe folks. The thought behind those words means more than the word themselves. Me? I switch from regular guy to sissy with no warning and no known trigger. When I go to "dude" I'm comfortable in my skin and when I switch to sissy i'm less comfortable in my skin.

 

What happens with a M2F in a marriage? A rhetorical question. If the wife is cool with it is she a lesbian? Is the M2F partner a lesbian? 

 

If a gay male transitions M2F is that person a straight female? 

 

Why not leave sexual orientation out of the equations? 

 

Practically speaking, I would like there to be more heterosexual females be they XY or XX than males. A 40/60 ratio would be nice. I think society would be more civilized with a slightly higher ratio of females vs males. 

 

Growing up I didn't know about trans females and I never entertained the idea of dating one but knowing what I know now, and if I were single, would not think twice about it. Op or non op would be fine with me. What matters if the person inside. 

Link to comment
  • 5 months later...

"You look great!" is always a good one for me. Or "You look awesome, that really suits you!" Stuff like that works for me. General statements like "You're super smart!" or "That color looks great on you!" are good, too. It works for me to take out the gendered statements like "You're a very smart young lady." Take out the "young lady" and it's a statement I like. "Dear" is a good endearment, "darling" is a good word, and "love" just sounds sweet to me. All of these are gender neutral (I've seen them used for men, women, and others) and they sound great! Hope this helps!

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 133 Guests (See full list)

    • Betty K
    • MaybeRob
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...