Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

House Votes to End Trans Military Ban


Recommended Posts

This is great! Once it passes, the only reason the military can reject me for is the tattoo on my left ring finger... So dumb.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Not sure on how your system works down there.  Does this bill with the amendment still have to pass the Senate?  Could be a rough ride if so.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
1 hour ago, KathyLauren said:

Not sure on how your system works down there.  Does this bill with the amendment still have to pass the Senate?  Could be a rough ride if so.

 

That's exactly right. So, assuming it gets voted on at all, it's not going anywhere.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

but, but, they came on here and told us how great he was for trans people.....

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I lost track, which one of the 20,000 documented lies (so far) was that?

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
4 hours ago, Wichita said:

A blanket end to the ban would be a bad idea. 

 

Reasoning please? I'm not ex-military so I'm honestly curious why you think that.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
11 hours ago, Jackie C. said:

 

Reasoning please? I'm not ex-military so I'm honestly curious why you think that.

 

Hugs!


I am as well. Seven years, Air Force. And it’s from that experience in a “less combat intensive branch” that I make my statement. I posted this in the thread titled Study: More than “2/3 of the military support trans service members.” I didn’t want to just spam the same thing here, unless some actually asked me for clarification. I’ll try and summarize so as not to repeat the novel:

 

In regards to allow trans members to serve, specifically down range, I find my opinion a bit mixed. If the individual in question is already completely “finished” transitioning, and only needs maintenance via hormone pills...sure. I don’t see much issue... to a point.

 

But in my (admittedly) brief bit of research since I came out (now adding a month of HRT to this research), I don’t think “in the middle of a transition” is an ideal time for most to serve.

 

To the military, humans...no matter if they’re cis, trans, straight, gay, bi... are “tools in a toolbox.” We are little different from a hammer or screwdriver. And when we break, we’re discarded for the next one in line. As I’m sure you’ve heard, that’s where the term “G.I.” comes from. We are “general issue” equipment, expendable and maintained so long as we’re useful. The moment that ends? Bye-bye.

 

While it’s true that a struggle for one person isn’t necessarily a struggle for all, the military has to operate on a lowest-common-denominator mindset. It’s why the entire military now must go through hours of computer training on “how not to r*pe” — because a small percentage of psychos decided they were entitle to another’s body. 


With combat deployments and hundreds or thousands of troops to manage, the battlefield is hardly the place to treat one or two people with kid gloves because of their individual needs.

 

And I may be very early on in my process, but from what my research has uncovered, missing medication in a deployed environment would be potentially catastrophic, since even a few days off female hormones causes menopause-like symptoms...that’s no time to be in a firefight. And that doesn’t even consider an active (in progress) transition.

 

I was discharged from the Air Force for issues relating to my depression — dysthymic disorder — that I was initially told “wouldn’t interfere with service”...up until it did...and they gave me the boot. I was later denied re-enlistment into the Army due to, presumably,  my worsening OCD as well as worsening depression.

 

And my discharge and subsequent denial was before I even admitted my gender dysphoria.

 

If OCD is enough of a disqualifier, I can’t imagine that gender dysphoria would ever be overlooked for organizations that exist to make war. The psychological community can debate until the end of time whether gender dysphoria is or is not a “mental disorder.” But that’s really just semantics. It is “a condition.”  And it’s a condition that comes with way too many variables. 
 

I think the problem with this debate is that many transgendered people claim the military is “discriminating against the trans community.” But it’s not. It’s disqualifying people based on a pre-existing condition for which transition is one possible treatment.

 

It’s no different that being disqualified for asthma, prior bone injuries, flat feet...etc. It’s one more “condition” that commanders in a combat zone don’t need to be preoccupied with.

 

Add to that the timeline and recovery needs of the various surgeries...

1 month or longer with no talking for voice feminization;

Up to 6 months no heavy lifting for breast augmentation;

Easily 1-2 months for facial surgery and;

The big one... up to a year for bottom surgery?

 

A standard enlistment being only 4 years means that someone who undergoes transition on active duty will be non-deployable and out of action for up to 1/4 of their enlistment. When I served, I was in training for the entire first year of my 4-year contract. I graduated my technical training school on my 1-year anniversary. There are some jobs that take much longer, some that are shorter. But if you add training in with surgery recovery, suddenly a 4-year contract can be 2. And that’s a reduction in value, from a command perspective, compared with someone who doesn’t need a year of surgical recovery.

 

The military mindset is that the unit is only as strong as the weakest link. Having people join and serve with the advanced warning of them being non-deployable is not conducive to a war fighting unit. The military exists to deploy...to fight wars...and it can’t do that with people stuck at home station mopping floors because he or she isn’t deplorable. 
 

 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Ok, honestly transitioning DURING service didn't occur to me. I always assumed it would be a before or after thing. Though thinking about it, it would certainly be after because the military loses interest in you rapidly as you age past eighteen.

 

Controlled asthma wasn't a deal-breaker in 1988. They only lost interest in me when I told them HOW I controlled my asthma.

 

Timeline is a little off for when menopause symptoms kick in. For me it took about two weeks. Then it got brutal.

 

Other than that though, yeah, those are good points from the military point of view.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
26 minutes ago, Jackie C. said:

Ok, honestly transitioning DURING service didn't occur to me. I always assumed it would be a before or after thing. Though thinking about it, it would certainly be after because the military loses interest in you rapidly as you age past eighteen.

 

Controlled asthma wasn't a deal-breaker in 1988. They only lost interest in me when I told them HOW I controlled my asthma.

 

Timeline is a little off for when menopause symptoms kick in. For me it took about two weeks. Then it got brutal.

 

Other than that though, yeah, those are good points from the military point of view.

 

Hugs!


I had a coworker at my last job tell me he felt “a little pain” in his knee when squatting down and ironing his uniform on a makeshift ironing board while in Navy basic training. No other issues...he ran, marched, etc. just fine. But he made the mistake of going to “sick call” over it and was promptly booted out. He had a...minor tendon issue, if I recall correctly.

 

They told him “get surgery to fix it, and you’re fine to enlist again.” He did...then promptly got denied enlistment for “prior knee surgery”...which they *told* him to get/he needed.

 

That’s a denial for a “minor surgery” for a “minor issue.” Yet trans ban opponents want them to allow people who have had multiple major surgeries. I’m thinking a “minor knee surgery” pales in comparison to a complete restructuring of our downstairs parts, breast areas, faces, etc.

 

I know (currently) of one Marine who’s trans and serving. But she’s not only an officer, she’s also in the JAG corps. They’re the epitome of desk jockeys (much like I was in my journalism field...but even I deployed once). 
 

Personally, I’m not completely opposed to someone “all finished” serving...but it still comes back to the prior surgery thing for which my friend and many others get denied for “minor surgery.” Trans surgeries are anything but minor. So why would my cis male friend get denied his dream job over a minor leg surgery, but trans activists want trans people’s surgeries “overlooked” so they can serve?

 

I just think the activists are going the route of Jurassic Park scientists...”so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.”

Link to comment
58 minutes ago, Jackie C. said:

Controlled asthma wasn't a deal-breaker in 1988. They only lost interest in me when I told them HOW I controlled my asthma.


When I was in, it was a severity thing. Minor asthma maybe acceptable, but there was definitely a limit.

 

And now I’m curious...how’d you control yours?

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

A very large amount... I can't give specifics because dosages rule... of prednisone every day. It worked but I'm lucky it didn't kill me. How did I get it? My egg donor gave it to me (Veterinarians and Medical Doctors shop out of the same catalogs. Drug companies don't care.) because while I was on pred, she didn't have to bother with doctor's visits. I was just "healthy."

 

I mentioned my dose to the recruiters and the calls stopped cold.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Jackie C. said:

A very large amount... I can't give specifics because dosages rule... of prednisone every day. It worked but I'm lucky it didn't kill me. How did I get it? My egg donor gave it to me (Veterinarians and Medical Doctors shop out of the same catalogs. Drug companies don't care.) because while I was on pred, she didn't have to bother with doctor's visits. I was just "healthy."

 

I mentioned my dose to the recruiters and the calls stopped cold.

 

Hugs!


Ahh. See I had an inhaler as a early grade schooler, but it was “past” enough and “minor” enough that when my recruiter asked about medical history and my mom mentioned it, he asked again in a tone more akin to “so no medical issues in the past...at all?”

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 128 Guests (See full list)

    • Maddee
    • Betty K
    • Mirrabooka
    • AllieJ
    • Ivy
    • Petra Jane
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
      Do you have achievements you make to mark your progress to becoming the true you?
    • Heather Shay
      believing forward movement is just ahead.
    • Heather Shay
      Worry refers to the thoughts, images, emotions, and actions of a negative nature in a repetitive, uncontrollable manner that results from a proactive cognitive risk analysis made to avoid or solve anticipated potential threats and their potential consequences.
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Willow
      Good morning    Now @Abigail Genevieve and @Mmindy what makes you so certain I didn’t mean it to say bee itch certificate?  lol. Thanks Mindy. I was asleep when you saw this and fixed it, and yes Abigail, as a moderator I could have fixed it myself, or weren’t you pointing out the irony of that?   I use Alexis as my alarm to get up.  And I set the ringer to be two guys telling me to get up.  I was so sound asleep when they started telling me to get up that it scared me and my first thought were I had over slept.  Since I have a difficult time getting to sleep as early as I have to in order to get enough sleep I at least cut back my normal awake time to get ready.  But now I have to do my hair and get going.   enjoyed my coffee and a little time catching up   see you all later, for its hi ho hi ho it’s off to work I go.   Willow
    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...