Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Full body hair ​?​


Vanessa Michelle

Recommended Posts

Hey y'all. I am a middle-aged MtF who has not so much as started transition yet, but one thing that scares me is I am basically Chewbacca (not a Star Wars fan? Substitute Bigfoot) and so have full body, dark hair which has always been one of my worst causes of dysphoria. As for for my head, which is getting very bald I assume I will have to wear a wig? So, whenever I do start my transition, what do I do about that insane amount of body hair? I mean, electrolysis or laser may have met their match here Lol 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Well, for body hair your choices are "Shave my, everything," laser or electrolysis. If your hair is dark enough, you can laser at home. Electrolysis is the most permanent solution, but also the most time consuming.

 

Or you could be like me, get alopecia universalis at 39 and not have to worry about it. I don't recommend seeking out an autoimmune disease though. They're not great. ?

 

On the plus side, wig shopping is lots of fun, or at least it will be once we can try things on again. It's still fun, just not AS fun, y'know?

 

Hugs!

Link to comment

I used to be a remarkably furry person. After 10 months of laser hair removal, with a sprinkling of electrolysis thrown in, I am slowly getting there. Unfortunately the pandemic put everything on hold for some months, so I'm behind schedule.

But all in all, I'm very pleased with my on going results. And I understand the dysphoria caused by feeling like a furry animal. Laser hair removal is pretty effective over time, electrolysis highly effective. I am now at a point where we seem to have gotten all the armpit hair gone, chest hair almost gone, and just patchy spots left everywhere else, leaving a small triangle patch in my bikini area.

It takes time, patience and willingness to endure some ouchey stuff. But it's doable.

Hugs,

TA

Link to comment

Hi @vanessa45!  nice to meet you and Welcome!

My journey started innocently enough about 5 years ago when I decided I could no longer stand having chest/stomach hair.  So, I started laser hair removal.  It was very effective.  I still have some gray hairs left that will need electrolysis someday, so if you're going to do laser start early.
Next big step for me was shaving my legs.  THAT was literally transformational for me.  The moat feminine thing I had ever felt before.
I continue to work on my legs and bought a home IPL (laser) which has also been effective in getting rid of about 80% of my hair so far.  Arms next.

So, there are options.  I was not super hairy, but I don't think the amount matters.  It might just take a bit longer.  You might start with shaving because if you are going to do laser you will have to be shaved anyway.

Welcome again, and good luck❣️

Deep breaths ... one step at a time

Link to comment

I posted this a couple of weeks ago:

 

 

If you have a high tolerance for pain, epilation is quite a good way to go from a cost point of view and means you have to spend less time shaving. Apart from my face and genitals I've used it on all other body parts and my posting link above outlines where it has worked best for me. 

Link to comment

Thanks everyone! I guess I have some options here. They're about what I imagined, but hearing from you all helps a bunch and just knowing that so many others have gone through a similar thing and come out successful is very encouraging. ?

Link to comment
12 hours ago, Vanessa Michelle said:

Thanks everyone! I guess I have some options here. They're about what I imagined, but hearing from you all helps a bunch and just knowing that so many others have gone through a similar thing and come out successful is very encouraging. ?

Yesterday I had another near-full body laser hair removal session. Over time I've learned to take a benadryl the morning of, another just before and another just after. It tamps down the tendency for my skin to become covered in red blotchy patches.

TA

Link to comment

Oh, so sorry you have to battle this as well @gina-nicole-t ?. How do/did you shave areas like your back and whatnot? Sorry, I'm still super new to it all and trying to figure this stuff out. Insurance is something I've been quite curious about. I will start a new Topic to ask that one.

Link to comment
10 hours ago, gina-nicole-t said:

@Vanessa Michelle I can't reach my back even with my long arms. Those back-blades that Amazon sells are completely worthless (I tried). I have Regence PPO for insurance and they have a great transgender part to their insurance. They are paying for my breast augmentation and FFS in January 2021 unless my governor puts the breaks on elective surgery again. So far he hasn't. Attached to this is the gender dysphoria codes from my insurance in case you would like to have a look. 

 

Best wishes on your journey, 

Gina

Gender Dysphoria Codes for Regence.pdf 201.07 kB · 2 downloads

I have had moderate success in mowing down the fur with electric clippers. It's not optimal, and delivers a "I shaved yesterday" look, but it's better than long hair flapping in the breeze. It looks fine from a distance but obviously is stubble to the touch.

The biggest advantage is being able to guide it along while slightly contorted. The disadvantage is the possibility of getting nicked.

If you are going in for laser hair removal, the clippers work fine.

I feel your pain. Hugs,

TA

Link to comment

I was watching one of the latest video from Jackie Rabbit and she says to stay away from laser removal if you are looking for permanent hair removal. She says with laser hair can come back. I have back hair myself and am thinking about electrolysis  but am thinking, for now, just doing waxing which can last for longer than shaving and give me time to consider when I will start electrolysis on that area. The area I do plan to start on would be face and crotch since those places are considered more drastic in my opinion. 

Link to comment
  • Root Admin

I use a product called a ManGroomer which I got from Amazon and swivels in the middle, and the lower half is the handle that extends so it reaches further. It can be used either over your shoulders or from the base of the spine upwards. If like me, you are on  your own, you need to go by feel and the noise of the cutters which do change depending on if you are cutting hair or not.

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

Believe it or not, you are lucky to have dark hair.  Laser works best on darker hair, especially if you don't also have very dark skin.  While not permanent, it can last quite some time and reduce overall amounts.  Us older redheads who could easily be an extra on a vikings show on the other hand.....  Laser doesn't work at all.  I'm doing electrolysis on my beard and twice a month basically lathering my whole body with a Nair type product.  Since most of my body hair is now blondish /grey it takes a while for it to be noticeable to the casual eye.  I have to shave my chest more frequently though since I do present FT and most tops expose some décolleté area.   Eventually I am going to have the chest electrocuted since I can shave one day and it's rough stubble the next :( . Even though my insurance covers some electrolysis it still adds up in costs. I'm told that after some time on HRT, body hair tends to thin in some people. I'm hopeful of that happening. I've only been on HRT for 3 months.  good luck

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Bri2020 said:

I have to shave my chest more frequently though since I do present FT and most tops expose some décolleté area.   Eventually I am going to have the chest electrocuted since I can shave one day and it's rough stubble the next :(

About 10 years before I came out to my wife, I started shaving my chest as it used to get very sweaty and itchy when I was hot, and this irritation drastically reduced when it was shaved ( the result was genuine although the reason I claimed for shaving it was not ;) ). Anyway it was a pain shaving it every day, so I asked my wife if I could borrow her epilator to address that area and while I acknowledge there was some pain, it is one of the less painful areas I use it for. At the end of a couple of months I noticed that the only areas where my hair was noticeably growing was around my nipples and that has remained the case ever since. I've been epilating my legs since I came out and the below the knee areas are going the same way, I can probably manage a week or more before having any noticeable growth in that area. Might be worth a go if you have a reasonable pain tolerance and you can get basic epilators for quite a low price (about £20 in UK)

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Niamh said:

. Might be worth a go if you have a reasonable pain tolerance and you can get basic epilators for quite a low price (about £20 in UK)

I've been subjecting myself to so much pain right now I don't think I can add any more. going for 90 minutes of facial electrolysis twice a week plus working on laser removal of a few decent sized tattoos every other month.  

I'm pushing hard on the facial hair because I think we're going to get those kinds of service businesses shut down here by new years and then I won't have any sessions for a couple months in all likelihood. I want to make as much progress as I can while I can.

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 96 Guests (See full list)

    • Stefi
    • Carolyn Marie
    • VickySGV
    • Evelyn J
    • MaybeRob
    • EasyE
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...