Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Being Considerate to our Non-Binary Friends with Language


Recommended Posts

  • Forum Moderator

So I wanted to take a moment to talk about including our non-binary members. I'd like to remind all my friends here at TransGenderPulse that not everyone identifies in the neat little boxes we call "male" and "female, "boys" and "girls," or even "men" and "women." For some of us, nature had other plans.

 

One of my favorite people in the world is intersex and genderfluid. They like to be identified as "he" or "she" depending on how they're presenting on that particular day. That's OK. I try my best to accommodate them. Sometimes I screw up and need to be corrected. That's OK because we're friends.

 

One of my oldest friends is bigender. They like to be referred to as "he" or "she" depending on how they're presenting that particular day. Fortunately for my slow brain, they tend to go all-out when they're presenting feminine so that's an easy switch for me to make.

 

I've got more friends, some I've made here and some out into the world who don't identify with either gender. They prefer to be addressed as they/them or just friend. I like friend the best. We're all friends here, right? I'd like us to stay friends and keep our circle growing. It's always good to have more friends.

 

Language is a powerful tool. It shapes our perception of the world. It lets us communicate our ideas. It helps us preserve knowledge for future generations. Like most tools, it can be used to help or harm. I'd like all my transgender friends to stop and think about how it feels to be mis-gendered. I want you to remember how deep the words cut when somebody calls you "sir" or "ma'am" when that's not who you are. Your cheeks heat and you get that lump in your throat. Your inner self screams at the world that it isn't who you are, but you choke on it. It has to roll off your back. You mustn't make a scene.

 

Now stop and think about what words like, "ladies" and "bros" do to all of us who don't fit into those neat little boxes. Sure, I like being referred to as a woman. I am a woman. We have members that like being referred to as men. That's OK, they're men. There are more choices than those two little boxes though. I think it's our duty when posting publicly to be as inclusive as we can. We're all friends here. Calling our fellow travelers friend instead of "ladies" or "my dudes" isn't really a hardship, is it?

 

Sometimes, we can say things in the moment that we don't mean. We can say things without thinking. I think we can be better. Isn't that what being your true self is about in the end? Being the absolute best version of yourself that you can be?

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Thank you for this Jackie.  We can say things in the moment but its important to self correct.  Its important to be the best version of ourselves and recognize that others are doing so as well.

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Jackie C. said:

Fortunately for my slow brain, they tend to go all-out when they're presenting feminine so that's an easy switch for me to make.

 

My only issue is this part. It's unfortunate to have a slow brain. But you aren't slow brained. It's still a learning experience that still need work to reinforce the habit.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Fair enough, but being too hard on myself is something my therapist and I are working on. I had a much more difficult time with the lovely non-binary person who helped me get legal support with TLDEF. Admittedly, I've never met them in person, but I'm still kicking myself for slipping up with their pronouns during our correspondence.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment

Thank you Jackie. We are the first ones who should make the effort to gender correctly our friends. If we who understand what that means and how it hurts don't make the effort, how can we ask cis people to make the same effort?

 

I know I need to pay more attention myself.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Jackie C. said:

Fair enough, but being too hard on myself is something my therapist and I are working on. I had a much more difficult time with the lovely non-binary person who helped me get legal support with TLDEF. Admittedly, I've never met them in person, but I'm still kicking myself for slipping up with their pronouns during our correspondence.

 

Hugs!

But at least you recognize and try to correct the mistake. One small step for everybody, can be one giant leap for human kind. You have all my ? s

Link to comment

Thank you for posting this, @Jackie C.. I strive to use everyone's preferred name and pronouns whenever I can and I ask if I'm unsure. I also make a concerted effort to use gender-neutral language whenever possible. I do hope that people let me know if I make a mistake and that I never intend to use the wrong pronouns or language. But language is indeed a funny thing. Words in many languages have a gender assigned to them, so a binary way of linguistic thinking is ingrained into our brains just as much as the social and cultural aspects of gender are. I agree that simply having awareness of and being sensitive to these issues are the first steps towards creating a more inclusive world for everyone across all gender identities and expressions.

 

Love,

~Audrey.

Link to comment
  • 4 months later...

I’m in danger of making a rod for my own back. I’ve thought about where I sit on the non binary ‘scale’ and, it’s shifting at the moment. 
 

Now, I might want to place myself at a point where I would like neutral pronouns. At the same time, there are some people who know that I’m transitioning to non binary. (Is that terminology correct? Can you transition from amab to neutrois, or is transitioning purely like..... mtf?). Anyway, if somebody turned round to me and said ‘I think you’re now more female than male, then I’d be tempted to tell them to use she/her if they wished. 
equally, I’d be somewhat concerned that I’d like overstepped my target. I don’t want to present as female, at the moment, I think, but that could be denial or something. 
 

I’ll wrap this up with..... I just do not know what pronouns or gender to use with myself at the moment and I’m having difficulty deciding what others should call me. 
 

 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
2 hours ago, PixieOfTheHills said:

I’ll wrap this up with..... I just do not know what pronouns or gender to use with myself at the moment and I’m having difficulty deciding what others should call me. 

 

Let us know and we will do our best. We will screw up from time to time. I try my best, but gender neutral pronouns are rough for my calcified brain to process for some reason. Nobody's perfect. What matters is that they try.

 

For now though, let's just call you friend. OK?

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
  • Admin

Thanks for this topic, Jackie.  It's very important.  As long as I've been here, and as many times as I interact with community members IRL, I am still often confused and I find using pronouns like "they/them" awkward.  It's just that folks from my generation aren't used to it, and it takes us time to make the adjustment.  But like you said, we need to try our best, and I think that goes a long way.  What more people from the cis-world, right?  I've always tried to cut cis-folk a lot of slack, as long as they aren't misgendering and using the wrong pronouns in a hurtful way.  For me, as long as they make an effort, its all good.

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

It goes further with me.....

 

 because I’m now so aware that I shouldn’t use the wrong pronouns etc, it spills over into even talking about people in general. Eg. Yesterday I was posting about somebody I know and I was worried about referring to ‘her’, because as far as I know...... that’s what....... they...... are. It’s like I’m now scared to use her/she/him/his at all about....... anybody!!!

 

 If I ever get told off about using the wrong pronouns, I’m going to feel so bad...... hence my extreme caution. 
 

on a slightly parallel vein, my name & ‘sometimes dead’ name. I am known to nearly everybody by my given name. But I’ve chosen an androgynous name I use with the few select people who know I’m non binary. Now, Is this a bad thing to do? I ask myself. It’s being deceitful, perhaps? I don’t know. I’ll speak to my therapist about it, who knows my dead name and chosen name, the latter of which she uses. 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

It's a good topic to raise Jackie, and some of the points here have raised just how complicated it is, even for us who are better placed to understand.

 

My current view is really to worry little if the person adressing us is being natural and not deliberately negative. For one thing, unless someone is obviously who they feel or know they are then the uninitiated cannot really be chastised for getting it wrong. When I read here on the forum I myself often find it difficult to ascertain correct gender and pronouns so I am certain the general population will, and probably always will, get it wrong.

 

I raise this point, bearing in mind that I read in the news this week about the fallout from a railway employee anouncing with ' ladies and gentlemen' : https://uk.news.yahoo.com/railway-firm-apologises-non-binary-093229536.html

 

My own view, even though speaking as someone who is ~ non binary -> mtf is that this is just political correctness gone mad. I know others will have a different view but I am not looking for discussion of this, just giving an example of how extreme things may get if everyone would want their different ways with recourse to litigation etc if they didn't get their way. There are many views on any situation and I think the danger for everyone is for people to take or give offence on a whim, no matter how slighted they feel.

 

If, or more probably when, I get it wrong please accept my apologies as I am only human.

 

Tracy

Link to comment

I totally agree Tracey. The thing is, I find, that the media gets involved and in order to turn news into entertainment, they blow everything up sensationally to the point where people are led to a negative view of something, which results in bad publicity. There’sa certain morning TV presenter  here in the uk who relishes doing this. 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
1 hour ago, PixieOfTheHills said:

There’sa certain morning TV presenter  here in the uk who relishes doing this. 

 

Yeah, we have those in the US too. They're looking for clicks/views and outrage drives up their ratings. It's like reality TV: You find a batch of the CRAZIEST SOBs you can dredge up and use them to represent your show because that'll get the audience tuning back in.

 

If the crazy happens to reinforce the world-view of your audience, that gets them coming back and there's a whole layer of "turn the serfs against each other" baked in. It's just a mess. Things were ever so much saner in the days before the 24-hour news cycle. Now it's all "fill time" and "rile-up the base!"

 

Hugs!

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 102 Guests (See full list)

    • Betty K
    • Adrianna Danielle
    • VickySGV
    • Timi
    • KayC
    • MomTGDaughter
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...