Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Relationship negotiation


Kestrel McLoughlin

Recommended Posts

I ought to preface that I begin talking non-explicitly about sex, in case that's not people's cup of tea. And this is an extremely self-indulgent rant of unfair feelings.

 

I just need a moment to release this anger before I can become a productive contributor to this office spreadsheet again. Feel no need to read my wall-of-text style, I'm sorry.

I should be excited that my gifted Ipsy subscription make-up kit, the first make-up I will have ever worn, is on its way. But I can't. Because when it comes I have to worry that putting it on, even experimentally to wear for a little while in my living room, will be an existential threat to my marriage.

 

She had said that though she's bisexual, it's never come up that she's "only romantically attracted to women, not sexually", and "historically only a very particular gender expression". That she "deliberately married an anti-patriarchy man". And isn't sure yet whether... well, I'm compatible with her libido, I guess. So think about it: at a time when I'm trying to discover what my gender expression is, the minefield I'm expected to disregard is whether a specific gender expression is a turn-off TO MY SPOUSE.

 

I am in limbo. My wife, while originally "freaked out" that I "won't even consider an open-marriage as a possibility", has accepted that I don't want that conteingency. I doubt she's internalized why it's not a perfectly fine thing to hear: that if she completes this emotional reactive journey and resolves that she can no longer be attracted to me, she'll need to release her libido in people she DOES find attractive rather than me, her spouse.

 

I get it, she needs to take time to process, now that she realizes that my coming out as a woman to her means that she's in a marriage with a lady. I'm too scared to put on my new skirt in front of her. She doesn't glance at me as I change anymore, she doesn't touch me casually anymore, but blames exhaustion, and so I'm passively waiting for her to be well-rested so I can resume passively waiting for any sign, some day, some week, that my love life is alive.

 

I very-much could only show up in love pending eager consent, I don't want it any other way, all I'm saying is that waiting to find out whether you're permanently a turn-off to the person you married, on her own emotional timeline, destroys my self-esteem, when self-confidence is part of attraction, and I'm a pathetic mess and I hate that I've been reduced to this. My spirit is supposed to be waxing right now, that's what my transition was doing to me, making me far more me, a core of white hot energy in me, promising new beginning, an adventure and an indomitable lustre for life. That's the promise of Kestrel. And it's all hinging on the lackadaisical ponderings of Lisa, who spends most of her free time scrolling through her phone or sleeping and has had low libido for a long time before my coming out to her but apparently suddenly may need to release her sex drive in some man or three.

 

That's the message of my transition. That what I no longer can be identified as, she may need to find elsewhere. When she said I will always be her family, it sounded as though she were describing a sibling or some kind of wet nurse. It sounded like The Brady Bunch describing that maid.

 

That's without even considering what that means for my children. I tried to steer away from the contingency she mentioned at the latest, "Then I think either it will just be fine or we'll need to split up". I couldn't ask whether that would mean custody negotiations or a loveless roommate.

 

What. Do I do. With this make-up.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Wear it? I'm kind of jealous that you've got the kit and presumably the skill to apply it. I've seen the results when someone who knows what they're doing applies it and as far as I can tell, it's basically witchcraft. I want to learn.

 

On the rest of it though, I can offer you sympathy and camaraderie. That sounds a lot like the hour I just spent with my therapist. My spouse and I are still having relations, but things have been rather one-sided for a while now. While I am generous and enthusiastic in my attentions I've been responsible for my own orgasms for, gosh, going on ten years maybe? She absolutely will not touch the new equipment.

 

I've taken the same hit to my confidence. My refrain of late when I fail at anything has been, "That's OK. I need to accept that nobody wants me." My self-confidence is basically a raging dumpster fire being taken out to sea by the tsunami. I had a similar response to coming out. She said that she was OK with it and that she liked breasts. She says she loves me and wants to stay with me. She has rejected me in the bedroom since 2018.

I know she's fighting her own demons though, so I take care of her as best I can, reassure her that I still love her and carry on. My therapist thinks I'm an idiot. My friends think I'm an idiot. I love her though, so I don't have much of a choice. So long as she loves and accepts me, I'm not wired in such a way as to give up on us. My therapist also suggested couples counseling. I'm afraid to suggest it though, lest my spouse view it as an attack.

 

Don't get me wrong. The rest of my life is, well, if not magnificent I'm doing the best that I can. I'm happy with myself and working on being the best me that I can be. I feel good. Great even. I just wish that my spouse was as excited about me as I am to be with her.

 

Right now, I'm trying to focus on the good things in my life. It's not perfect, but it's not all steaming garbage either. My therapist gave me a positivity journal today. I think I already hate it, but we'll see how things go.

 

As for your wife wanting to see other people... that's a bad sign. I know people can be in poly relationships, but they're not for everybody. Heck, I know people in poly relationships, but I don't think I could be in one myself. I guess you have to look at what you're getting from your relationship. If she wants it to change in a way you're not comfortable with, then maybe it's time to pack it in. It takes two (or more) people to make a relationship work. They all have to put in the effort to nurture it and make it grow. If only one of you is willing to put in the effort, the relationship dies. It might limp along for a while, but eventually it has to end.

 

That was kind of dark. I'm not saying things can't get better. I hope that your spouse realizes that you're the girl for her, forever and always. Luck. Love. Peace.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment

 

@Kestrel McLoughlin

@Jackie C.

I'm sorry, you both sound to have it rough. ?I hope it works out and your partners realize they'll be losing more than just a mate.

I was the complete opposite with my partner, I was ok with being in an open relationship looking at other things. He knew I was pansexual, and he was 4 yrs older and had way more interactions then I did when we met in college. The rule was, he'd let me know beforehand for an ok, while he didn't want to know mine cuz he proclaimed he wasn't a jealous person...To my grief, I later found out he had major possessive issues and gets extremely jealous to a mentally abusive level. I literally have to call him out on it everytime now, cuz I don't think he fully realizes how messed up and counterproductive he can be. He said he had been having disassociative issues. That plus, his inflated ego and pride, he tended to bottle his problems till it came to a tea kettle bursting point. Oy...

When I told him, I'm bigender, he told me flat, he's straight, to my ?. But he didn't break it off there and then, and said he'd support me and see where things went. We both admitted we didn't want to go back to being alone, but the bottle was set. Bit later we had a big fight, but in the end of it he didn't want me to go. Feels sorta like we are both lost at sea holding onto eachother. I'm my own form of hopeless and he's his own. He wanted to change the rules, to keep me for himself, but I'm still very open to other things coming in. Yeah there maybe no boys allowed anymore but I'll live. I don't trust he'll have eyes only on me forever. After all he did dump a lady he was seeing for 4 yrs to be with me. I already during my short open relationship freedom period, had my one time chance to enjoy a couple together, and had nobody else since except only him. Still with him and we are still both idiots at times, but I'm extremely enduring. I think it's cuz I'm just purely stubborn and refuse to give up easily. ?

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 148 Guests (See full list)

    • Breanne_O
    • AllieJ
    • VickySGV
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...