Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

THANK YOU JOE - Executive Order on Day One to strengthen anti-discrimination protections for the LGBTQ+ community


Heather Shay

Recommended Posts

  • Forum Moderator

On his first day in office, President Joe Biden issued an executive order strengthening anti-discrimination protections for the LGBTQ community, marking a quick turnaround from Trump administration policy.

 

Under the new executive guidance, federal agencies are to assume that laws forbidding discrimination apply to sexual orientation and gender identity, not just race, religion, sex and national origin. The measure was part of a slew of orders Biden signed shortly after his swearing-in, as both a substantive and a symbolic rebuke of the Trump era.

 

The order suggests that enforcement agencies under Biden will be open to pursuing discrimination complaints on behalf of LGBTQ people in a way the Trump administration was not.

 

The Human Rights Campaign called it “the most substantive, wide-ranging executive order concerning sexual orientation and gender identity” ever issued by a U.S. president.

“Today, millions of Americans can breathe a sigh of relief knowing that their President and their government believe discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity is not only intolerable but illegal,” the advocacy group’s president, Alphonso David, said in a statement.

 

The Supreme Court issued a landmark decision last June ruling that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects workers from discrimination related to sexual orientation and gender identity. But that ruling applies explicitly to discrimination in the workplace, whereas Biden’s executive order makes clear the safeguards extend to other areas like housing and education.

 
In a fact sheet released Wednesday, the Biden administration said the new order will “build on” the protections cemented by the Supreme Court.

 

“All persons should receive equal treatment under the law, no matter their gender identity or sexual orientation,” the White House said in a statement.

 

The Trump administration had urged the Supreme Court to rule that gay and transgender workers were not covered by Title VII, and after the ruling came down this past summer, the Trump administration tried to limit its reach. 

 

The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that the Justice Department’s civil rights division had recently issued a memo stating that the Bostock ruling, as it’s known, should not be applied to education and housing. The memo also argued that employers may still be allowed to discriminate against LGBTQ workers by citing religious beliefs. 

 

The executive order issued Wednesday was one that LGBTQ advocates were hoping to see immediately from the Biden administration. It should clarify that the federal government as an employer adopts the broader view of the Bostock decision as to what constitutes “sex discrimination” ― that it includes discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity ― while applying that interpretation to other laws like the Affordable Care Act, the Fair Housing Act and other parts of the Civil Rights Act.

 

“All persons should receive equal treatment under the law, no matter their gender identity or sexual orientation,” the Biden White House said on its first day.

 

The previous administration had peeled back similar LGBTQ protections in other areas. Under then-President Donald Trump, the Department of Health and Human Services tried to scuttle an Obama-era regulation that forbade discrimination against transgender people in health care settings. As with the Bostock case, that measure was based on the administration’s narrow reading of “sex discrimination.” 

 

A federal judge blocked the HHS measure from moving forward last year, ruling that it conflicted with the Bostock decision. The judge said the administration had refused to do the “sensible” thing and “pause and reflect on the decision’s impact.” 

 

Trump also reinstated the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on transgender people serving in the military. Biden has vowed to quickly end that policy, too. 

 

The Trump administration tried to undermine discrimination protections in smaller petty ways as well. In 2019, the Interior Department scrubbed the words “sexual orientation” from its guide on workplace discrimination. 

 

 
headshot
Labor Reporter, HuffPost
 
Edited by Jani
Clean out ads at end of post
Link to comment

Not surprising, but still a Welcome respite from the hostile policies of the last 4 years.  Thanks for sharing Heather Shay❣️

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I was wondering if president Joe signed in a law that protected us. In the stack of Executive orders he had.

 

Yeah, US.

 

Kymmie

Link to comment
6 hours ago, KymmieL said:

I was wondering if president Joe signed in a law that protected us. In the stack of Executive orders he had.

 

Yeah, US.

 

Kymmie

Joe just became President on Jan.20th,2021 at noon yesterday... Executive orders are practically all he can do now while we wait for The House and Senate to start hammering out laws to be signed. Both facilities are still kinda busy figuring this 2nd impeachment stuff and how to secure a government that was sieged by delusional traitors.

Link to comment
  • Admin

That's outstanding news.  The shift in tone and policy has begun, even before his inauguration, with the nomination of a trans woman to be second in command of the Dept. of HHS.

 

There will be setbacks to come.  The more conservative courts will be sure to rule in favor of religious exemptions to many of Pres. Biden's policies. But he will fight for us for sure.

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

Hooray for sanity. Three cheers for decency. Rejoice in respite. An inspiring ray of sunlight is shining through the dark and threatening clouds; hopefully, they're dissipating. By signing this Executive Order on Day 1, our President has given it at least four years to evolve in the law, and hopefully become entwined with other Title VII non-discrimination provisions. 

 

A new day is dawning -- maybe some people will be awakening. These pioneers into public life are our national role-models. They show the world American empathy and our progress toward inclusion and equal opportunity rather than the narcissistic delusional scapegoating and blind ambition infecting the Republican Party.

 

The Republicans incited an attempt to bring our American experiment in democracy to an ignoble end; the Democrats are encouraging an attempt to bring our best American values into fruition. It feels soooo good, doesn't it?   

Link to comment
1 hour ago, ValerieRun said:

Seems an appropriate topic for Politics section

?I agree but it's hard to hold back what small doses of sunshine rays poking out from behind the storm clouds...crazy times. Feels more like a small knot in my neck finally gave and the numb from it is beginning to kicking in. I'm hard to satisfy but my bar is so low now, the smallest of good things is like rain shower over death valley.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
2 hours ago, ValerieRun said:

Seems an appropriate topic for Politics section

 

Honestly felt more like Uplifting News to me. So that's where it is.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Jackie C. said:

 

Honestly felt more like Uplifting News to me. So that's where it is.

 

Hugs!

?Rad

Link to comment

EsgZ8X_WMAMzut6?format=jpg&name=small

 

ABC/Ipsos poll. It was the most popular of all the Biden early executive actions. Mask mandate was #2.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Makes you wonder what kind of person would oppose that.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
2 hours ago, RhondaS said:

EsgZ8X_WMAMzut6?format=jpg&name=small

 

ABC/Ipsos poll. It was the most popular of all the Biden early executive actions. Mask mandate was #2.

I saw this too. Heart-warming news! There is still a lot of work to do in the fight against discrimination and phobias about the LGBTQ community, but the public attitudes are slowly but surely shifting. I wonder what the geographic representation of the survey sample was.

 

2 hours ago, Jackie C. said:

Makes you wonder what kind of person would oppose that.

There are a few of them in my family, sadly.

 

Love,

~Audrey.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 143 Guests (See full list)

    • KayC
    • Evelyn J
    • awkward-yet-sweet
    • violet r
    • VickySGV
    • AllieJ
    • MaeBe
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,023
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Delaney
    Newest Member
    Delaney
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dillon
      Dillon
    2. Kaylee888
      Kaylee888
    3. lily100
      lily100
      (39 years old)
    4. Luce
      Luce
      (44 years old)
    5. Luke.S
      Luke.S
  • Posts

    • Davie
      Incredible news for transgender and abortion providers and patients in Maine. Despite violent threats, Gov. Janet Mills of Maine has signed a sanctuary bill into law. It even enshrines WPATH Standards of Care as protected by Maine.   https://twitter.com/ErinInTheMorn/status/1782894991368462520/photo/1
    • Davie
      Incredible news for transgender and abortion providers and patients in Maine. Despite violent threats, Gov. Janet Mills of Maine has signed a sanctuary bill into law. It even enshrines WPATH Standards of Care as protected by Maine.   https://twitter.com/ErinInTheMorn/status/1782894991368462520/photo/1
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Basically my only source of validation is from close friends who know I'm trans 😅   I'm not a very masculine-looking guy in general, and I've had to stop binding due to pain, so strangers and physical validation aren't things I can get. My family still uses she/her pronouns and female terms with me, so there's not much validation at home, either.   I'm grateful I have friends that are willing to use my pronouns and such, though. It makes me feel a lot better.
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • violet r
      This is a question I ask myself all the time. When I'm out I hope that I can some what pass
    • violet r
      I use my  chosen name online and when ever I can. I play some online game and only go by that name. That is how everyone there know me. Yes it does feel great to be called the name you prefer. 
    • Breezy Victor
      I was ten years old when my mom walked in on me frolicking around my room dressed up in her bra, panties, and some pantyhose. I had been doing this in the privacy of my bedroom for a little while now so I had my own little stash box I kept full of different panties, bras, etc ... of hers. My mom's underwear was so easy for me to come by and she was a very attractive woman, classy, elegant. Well when she walked in on me, she looked at me with disgust and said to me... "If I wanted to run around like mommy's little girl instead of mommy's little boy, then she was going to treat me like mommy's little girl."  She left my bedroom after telling me NOT to change or get dressed or anything and returned with a few of her work skirts and blouses and such. She made me model off her outfits for her and I have to admit ... I LOVED EVERY SECOND OF IT. I felt so sexy, and feminine. And she knew I loved it.  She told me we can do this every weekend if I'd like. It would be OUR little secret. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      The usual social ways, of course.  Taking care of my partners and stepkids, being involved in my community.  That makes me feel good about my role.   As for physical validation and gender... probably the most euphoric experience is sex.  I grew up with my mother telling me that my flat and boyish body was strange, that my intersex anatomy was shameful, that no man would want me. So experiencing what I was told I could never have is physical proof that I'm actually worth something.  
    • KathyLauren
      <Moderator hat on>  I think that, at this point we need to get the thread back onto the topic, which is the judge's ruling on the ballot proposition.  If there is more to be said on the general principles of gendered spaces etc., please discuss them, carefully and respectfully, in separate threads. <Moderator hat off>
    • Abigail Genevieve
      People who have no understanding of transgender conditions should not be making policy for people dealing with it. Since it is such a small percentage of the population, and each individual is unique, and their circumstances are also unique, each situation needs to be worked with individually to see that the best possible solution is implemented for those involved. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No.  You are getting stuck on one statement and pulling it out of context.   Trans kids have rights, but so do non-trans kids.  That conflict is best worked out in the individual situation. 
    • MaeBe
      I get the concept, I believe. You're trying to state that trans kids need to or should be excluded from binary gender spaces and that you acknowledge that answers to accommodate those kids may not be found through policy. I disagree with the capability of "penetration" as being the operative delimiter in the statement, however. I contest this statement is poorly chosen at best and smacks of prejudice at worst. That it perpetuates certain stereotypes, whether that was the intent or not.   Frankly, all kids should have the right to privacy in locker rooms, regardless of gender, sexuality, or anatomy. They should also have access to exercise and activities that other kids do and allow them to socialize in those activities. The more kids are othered, extracted, or barred from the typical school day the more isolated and stigmatized they become. That's not healthy for anyone, the excluded for obvious reasons and the included for others--namely they get to be the "haves" and all that entails.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Context.  Read the context.  Good grief.
    • MaeBe
      Please don't expect people to read manifold pages of fiction to understand a post.   There was a pointed statement made, and I responded to it. The statement used the term penetration, not "dissimilar anatomy causing social discomfiture", or some other reason. It was extended as a "rule" across very different social situations as well, locker and girl's bedrooms. How that term is used in most situations is to infer sexual contact, so most readers would read that and think the statement is that we "need to keep trans girl's penises out of cis girls", which reads very closely to the idea that trans people are often portrayed as sexual predators.   I understand we can't always get all of our thoughts onto the page, but this doesn't read like an under-cooked idea or a lingual short cut.
    • Ashley0616
      I shopped online in the beginning of transition. I had great success with SHEIN and Torrid!
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...