Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Study: Trans People More Likely to Develop Alzheimer's Symptoms


Carolyn Marie

Recommended Posts

  • Forum Moderator

With some of the reports coming out these days they almost seem to be linking anything to anything. I do wonder about the sample size though as I wouldn't imagine it could be too large as open trans issues and particularly non-binary adults (as they are somewhat indeterminate / quantifiable as so varied) can be difficult to pin down.

 

Tracy

Link to comment
  • Admin

The few details it actually gave make me want to say "so what" to it.  There are so many possible factors toward even the appearance of validity to this that it reduces it to speculation of even its relevance.  "Two years???"  may be significant to me in another 10.  Oh well. 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

If , as the article speculates, the risk factors of alcoholism, depression, obesity and heart disease increase the risk of Alzheimers that isn't because people are trans but instead of how society treats gender issues.  

I guess as an alcoholic, trans person with heart disease i might qualify.  

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

 

 

Link to comment

I personally think that entire article is B.S.

 

"transgender adults experience a greater number of health disparities considered risk factors for dementia — including higher cardiovascular disease, depression, diabetes, tobacco/alcohol use and obesity — and the social inequities experienced by transgender adults are also linked to an increased risk of cognitive impairment"

 

Cardiovascular disease, depression, deabetes, tobacco/alcohol and obesity? Thats the american culture.

 

How do "social inequities" contribute to brain function? Is it because I tell the bill collector that I "forgot" to pay my credit card bill last month?

 

And of course they had to go to the pronoun issue...

 

One example of the discrimination faced by transgender individuals in the healthcare system is staff failing to use their preferred pronouns or names.

 

What that has to do with Alzheimers, I don't know.

 

I just hope we as a whole don't codify the supposition that being transgendered means losing your mind.

 

 

Link to comment

@MelanieTamara

I have to agree that this "study" is BS. It's sophisticated click-bait.

It's both bad science and bad reporting. I used to edit well-known medical journals and if this document arrived at our office, it would be passed around and laughed at (or ignored altogether). They've taken a few headline terms (Trans is trending these days) and made such broad generalizations that any real science involved has to blush. And personally it feels offensive to be grouped like this—trans people are much more diverse than fake science web sites are. There is a lot a bad medical science on the web these days. Beware of most of it.

Sheesh,

Davie

Link to comment
23 hours ago, Charlize said:

If , as the article speculates, the risk factors of alcoholism, depression, obesity and heart disease increase the risk of Alzheimers that isn't because people are trans but instead of how society treats gender issues.  

I guess as an alcoholic, trans person with heart disease i might qualify.  

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

 

 

Same here.  And add the fact that my father had dementia and my mother had Alzheimer's, I think I qualify as well.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

I approve of more studies and treatment and prevention of Alzheimer's. But I have known it runs in the genes and one may have more factors than others .  Known people who never drank getting it .   I think stress is a big factor  which could be a reason why  more a risk , being part of a group that has been that has less acceptance in society could be a reason for some slight risk computation .  But more study and think having  more exposure to brain injury from war , accidents and sports is likely a much bigger risk factor and being part of the LBGT umbrella .    

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 232 Guests (See full list)

    • Abigail Genevieve
    • MaeBe
    • Ashley0616
    • missyjo
    • KathyLauren
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • missyjo
      I've no desire to present androgynous..nothing wrong with it but I am a girl n wish to present as a girl. shrugs, if androgynous works fir others good. always happy someone finds a solution or happiness    today black jeans  black wedges..purple camisole under white n black polka dot blouse half open   soft smile to all 
    • MaeBe
      I have read some of it, mostly in areas specifically targeted at the LGBTQ+ peoples.   You also have to take into account what and who is behind the words, not just the words themselves. Together that creates context, right? Let's take some examples, under the Department of Health & Human Services section:   "Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike."   or   "Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families."   From a wording perspective, who doesn't want to protect the health and well-being of Americans or think that families aren't good for America? But let's take a look at the author, Roger Severino. He's well-quoted to be against LGBTQ+ anything, has standard christian nationalist views, supports conversion therapy, etc.   So when he uses words like "threatens the health and well-being of children and adults alike" it's not about actual health, it's about enforcing cis-gendered ideology because he (and the rest of the Heritage Foundation) believe LGBTQ+ people and communities are harmful. Or when he invokes the family through the lens of, let's just say dog whistles including the "penalization of marriage" (how and where?!), he idealizes families involving marriage of a "biological male to a biological female" and associates LGBTQ+ family equity as something unhealthy.   Who are the radical actors? Who is telling people to be trans, gay, or queer in general? No one. The idea that there can be any sort of equity between LGBTQ+ people and "normal" cis people is abhorrent to the author, so the loaded language of radical/destructive/guise/threaten are used. Families that he believes are "good" are stable/well-ordered/healthy, specifically married/nuclear ones.   Start looking into intersectionality of oppression of non-privileged groups and how that affects the concept of the family and you will understand that these platitudes are thinly veiled wrappers for christian nationalist ideology.   What's wrong with equity for queer families, to allow them full rights as parents, who are bringing up smart and able children? Or single mothers who are working three jobs to get food on plates?
    • Ashley0616
      Well yesterday didn't work like I wanted to. I met a guy and started talking and he was wanting to be in a relationship. I asked my kids on how they thought of me dating a man and they said gross and said no. I guess it's time to look for women. I think that is going to be harder. Oh well I guess.  
    • Ashley0616
      I don't have anything in my dress pocket
    • Carolyn Marie
      This topic reminds me of the lyrics to the Beatles song, "A Little Help From My Friends."   "What do you see when you turn out the lights?"   "I can't tell you but I know it's mine."   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @Ivy have you read the actual document?   Has anyone else out there read it?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am reading the Project 2025 document https://www.project2025.org/policy/   This will take some time.  I read the forward and I want to read it again later.   I read some criticism of it outside here and I will be looking for it in the light of what has been posted here and there.  Some of the criticism is bosh.   @MaeBe have you read the actual document?
    • RaineOnYourParade
      *older, not holder, oops :P
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No problem!
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Old topic, but I gotta say my favorites are: "Stop hitting on minors" (doesn't work if you're holder tho) and "Sure as [squid] not you"
    • Carolyn Marie
      Abigail, I think we will just leave the other posts where they are, and the discussion can start anew here.  It is possible to do what you ask, but would disrupt the flow of the discussion in the other thread, and would require more work than it's worth.   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am in too good a mood to earn my certificate today. I am sure something will happen that will put me on the path to earning it.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      It's likely most cis-women consider a fitting unnecessary "because they know what  they wear" and get used to the wrong size.  The instructions for what your size is are simple and why go to any further effort?  You measure your bandsize and you measure your max and subtract the two to get the needed info for the cup size.  Then you buy the same size for years until it hurts or something.
    • KatieSC
      Congratulations Lorelei! Yes, it is a powerful feeling to have the documents that say "you are you".
    • Mmindy
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...