Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Fed Judge Blocks West Virginia School Sports Ban


Carolyn Marie

Recommended Posts

  • Forum Moderator

You'd think, but doubling down on the hate keeps their base energized and voting for them. It's never about the actual ban, it's about being seen TRYING to hurt the "right people." Can't have "people with pronouns" mixing with good American folk now. Their base just laps it up because it feeds the narrative of fighting against the "evil libs" that are keeping the "good American folks" from getting everything they want. We're just the new "welfare queens." Strawman argument to keep the base ignorant and voting to keep their butts in their seats.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment

i hope i don't get flamed for this but, as always, i say what i feel. and i won't apologize either. if anyone knows how it is to grow up as the gender you weren't born as, it's me. so i think i see things differently than most of you. first i want to say that hate is hate in any form just because you disagree with someone. you may see yourself and your beliefs as right, but others may see it as wrong. you don't want hate from them. so don't hate them. just disagree with them and try to influence them or educate them. nuff said about that. I'm not criticizing any of you.....just pointing out that hate is hate. stop hate. :)

 

many schools now allow a student to declare a gender and they then are treated as that gender immediately. is that ok in every situation? such as sports? maybe...maybe not. i would have loved to go to school as a girl but it wasn't allowed in the private schools i attended. and not even in the public ones at that time. did i rebel or demand that i be treated as a girl? nope. i knew what i was and was comfortable with myself. and i didn't do sports because i wasn't interested.

 

now to the sports thing. at what point should a 'gender-declared girl' participate in sports as a girl?

 

1) immediately upon the declaration?

2) after a period of time?

3) at a certain age?

4) after transitioning medical treatment has begun?

5) when e and t levels are at normal female levels?

 

it is not as simple as it may seem. there are differences in male vs. female metabolism that affect performance.

 

what if you have a genetic girl daughter. and she runs track or whatever. are you comfortable with her having to compete with a 'gender-declared girl' on her team? or does that make you think differently. is it ok if the 'girl' is on hormones? maybe not if 'she' isn't on hormones? not so simple, huh?

 

anyhoo that's my take on a very controversial subject. i don't have the answer. but i do have many questions. thank you. :)

 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
7 hours ago, April-Showers said:

now to the sports thing. at what point should a 'gender-declared girl' participate in sports as a girl?

 

1) immediately upon the declaration?

2) after a period of time?

3) at a certain age?

4) after transitioning medical treatment has begun?

5) when e and t levels are at normal female levels?

 

it is not as simple as it may seem. there are differences in male vs. female metabolism that affect performance.

 

Studies show that after one to two years of HRT (depending on which study you favor) there's no difference between a trans woman and a cis woman that isn't also present in athletically built cis women. Kids that are young enough where that doesn't matter? Who cares? So long as everybody is comfortable and having fun it's all good. People get really hung up on what's in our pants.

 

As for the rest of it, I utterly agree. There's no room for hate in my heart. I don't hate the people who keep trying to take my rights away. What's the point? They're being misled for political points. One on one, most of those people are perfectly reasonable. The ones that aren't... well, I haven't been stoned to death yet. Yet.

I'm unhappy with the system and keep voting to keep the people who ARE trying to hurt me to rile up their base out of power, but hate is a strong word. I haven't hated anyone for a long time.

 

7 hours ago, April-Showers said:

i hope i don't get flamed for this but, as always, i say what i feel.

 

Also, see rule #6. We do not allow flame wars on this site.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
20 hours ago, Jackie C. said:

Kids that are young enough where that doesn't matter? Who cares? So long as everybody is comfortable and having fun it's all good. People get really hung up on what's in our pants.

school sports are all about competition. maybe fun goes along with it but, still, sports are competitive. who cares? the genetic girls care. parents care. spectators care. i am all for kids who are genuinely transgender and who have been professionally evaluated to be able to attend school as their chosen 'gender'. and it has nothing to do with 'what is in their pants'. but with sports it may very well have to do with that. female 'sex' is vastly different than male 'sex'. and that is what my point is regarding sports. sex and gender are mutually exclusive. we need to draw the line someplace. schools are bending to progressive thinking which wants everything equal from the start....when not everything is equal. thank you.   ?

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Oh, no my point is that physical differences don't start to show until puberty. At least not so much as you'd notice. My thought was that pre-puberty separating the boys and girls into different teams doesn't really make sense. It doesn't matter. The girls might be a little smaller, they might not. I've got girls in my classroom that are easily twice the size of some of the boys in the same age group (estimated weight class. Probably slightly exaggerated. It might not be more than 1.5x).

 

So what I was saying is that pre-puberty? It doesn't matter. So who cares? Post onset of puberty, yeah, it depends on what sort of medical treatment the kid in question is receiving. The kid that's been on hormone blockers since they were twelve probably isn't going to have an advantage over any of the other students period. However the AFAB girl on the wrestling team that's been on T for the last two years really shouldn't be competing with the girls.

 

Performance-wise, those of us who transitioned later are basically a big car with a small engine. I'm on the large side for a woman, but I am regularly outperformed by my gym partners of either gender. My mentor is a 69 year old cis-woman. She's 5'3" and STRUGGLES to break 110 pounds. She can easily move at least twenty more pounds than I can with most muscle groups. I'm JUST edging her out with my legs, but that's probably because I take sculpting my rear-end (I have SERIOUS white-girl butt. Thanks Dad) very seriously and work that muscle group hard and often.

She's got more endurance than I do as well, but that's more my fault for not keeping up with my cardio routine.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Jackie C. said:

My thought was that pre-puberty separating the boys and girls into different teams doesn't really make sense.

oh, ok i see your point but you didn't mention the 'pre-puberty' in your last post. i tend to agree with you on this. but competitive sports like in junior high or high school are much different. i am as pro transgender as anyone and am proof that at even a very young age one knows what gender they are. 

 

there may be some standards that could be set...such as e and t levels....that could be established for competitive sports. not sure but maybe. the big problem i see is where a school district attempts to allow a transgender student 'full privileges' including participation in sports. some are now allowing a gender change without there being any medical treatment. again, that may be ok for most things..but not all. it is very complicated i realize. but i have always tried to put myself in others shoes when it is a controversial subject. and when i wear a genetic girls shoes i try to see it from her perspective. and if i am a very competitive athlete i sure would want my competition on an equal footing. does that make sense? thank you for responding to my post. this is a very interesting and important subject with no easy answers . :)

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

They tend to vary by sport too. For example, I can't compete in body-building or weight-lifting in the US no matter WHAT my E and T levels are. Most sports have their own rules regarding trans athletes. Even bowling (though I can't imagine why) requires you to be on HRT for at least a year and be within a specific range for your T-levels to compete.

 

At the school level, it's sticky. You don't want to exclude anybody but in high-school... well, that could mean a scholarship. A scholarship could mean the only way you're getting to go to college.

 

Though I suppose one solution would be to nationalize our colleges so EVERYBODY gets a scholarship and the stakes aren't so high.

 

Then again, I could have a skewed perspective because I don't think any of our teams EVER won anything in the four years I attended high school.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
20 hours ago, Jackie C. said:

Then again, I could have a skewed perspective because I don't think any of our teams EVER won anything in the four years I attended high school.

lol. that's both funny and sad. ?

 

i asked my twin sister how she feels about this sports thing. she was an athlete in several sports while we attended high school. and she is as enlightened as anyone when it comes to transgenders since i am her sister and we have grown up together. so i really value and trust her opinions. she agrees that it's a very difficult situation with no necessarily right or wrong answers. just a big 'gray' area. but her perspective is interesting. she said if it were someone like me who basically experienced a female-type puberty then MAYBE she would feel ok with it. but if it were a male student who suddenly declared that he was actually a female and then wanted to be on a girl's team, absolutely not.

 

another interesting thing. my sister and i are twins and are probably as close to being 'equal' as you can get even though i was born male. we are very competitive with each other in almost everything because it's fun. so here i am as close to being female as possible for a birth male. and like i said my sister is very athletic. and she ran track and won many competitions in high school. but when we run together, i always outrun her. so maybe it would have been wrong if i had been able to join the girl's track team? or maybe i'm just a girl who excels at running? or is some of the male metabolism still a part of me? who knows? i certainly don't. but it's why she said MAYBE.  thank you. ?

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Like I said, the only advantages we get are the same ones that athletic cis-women get. You will note the same narrower hips and wider shoulders in a lot of the female athletes. The extra size actually works against us. Female metabolisms aren't meant to run hulking male bodies. You're good at running.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment

I have been thinking about this subject a lot lately. I am a mixed martial artist and a few years back I tried to get into the local cage fighting thing they have here, but they told me I was not eligible because of my size. I was 150 pounds and 5'9" tall. They said I needed to be at least 175 pounds, and it kind of ticked me off. I almost picked out the biggest guy in the room and challenged him to a fight to prove to the jerks in charge that size, weight, and strength do not mean SQUAT when it comes to hand to hand combat. I was bullied a lot as a little kid, so my dad took me to some of his old military buddies to teach me how to fight when I was ten years old. In the years following I learned krav maga, shaolin kempo, aikido, jujitsu, taekwondo, judo, keysi, and hapkido. By the time I was a scrawny short kid in high school, I could best most grown soldiers in hand to hand combat regardless of my size and weight. I think two of the school bullies tried to rush me, and after that, it was smooth sailing from there on out. No more bullies heh heh. ?

In the years since, I have gained a little bit of weight. ...Now I am whopping 160 pounds haha. Still not heavy enough to fight in my local MMA ring. Phooey. I may have a chance in the women's division in like five years. Their heavyweight category for women is like 285+ pounds or something. I personally would not care too awful much if they forced me to fight against biological cisgender men twice my size. I would still whoop their ass haha. I may be small but I have a lot more training and instinctual ferocity. Super fast compared to bigger guys too. ...Then there would probably be a huge media uproar if I lost one of my fights against a man. The people making these discriminatory laws do not like to seem to talk about the fact that they are proposing doing the exact same thing they are against. They are STILL going to see a WOMAN get beaten by a MAN.

...How would that make me feel? ....Probably objectified and insulted that they would be telling everyone the only reason I lost the fight was because of my gender and not a simple matter of my male opponent having training that was superior to my own. ?

Link to comment

...Women have been slaughtering men on battlefields for thousands of years...just saying haha.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 93 Guests (See full list)

    • KayC
    • MomTGDaughter
    • VickySGV
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...