Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Abilene: No Electrolysis Here


Faelem

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone ?

Really just beginning this journey, but I'm doing all my research and finding that it might be a no go at least for a while.

I live in the Abilene Tx area and there seems to be nothing here for getting electrolysis done. The closest places are at least 2 hours away in the Dallas/Ft Worth area.

All the information I've seen says that you need to be going at least once a week (probably more) when you first start. I'm thinking with travel costs, I may be able to go every other week.

 

Is it even possible to keep up with the hair on that schedule or does it just mean that the process will be slower?

Also, if anyone is in the area, I would really appreciate any guidance you can offer. Thank you in advance! ?

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

Welcome @Faelem ! I wish I could help you with the electrolysis questions, I'm starting to look at it myself. Maybe someone will be able to answer them for you. Glad you're here! 

 

Hugs!

Delcina

Link to comment

You can schedule long sessions and go less frequently. Bring an ice pack to place on your face on the drive back to prevent swelling.  Also, you’ll have to stop mid drive to apply numbing cream. Good luck. I’m originally from West Texass and know area well

Link to comment

@Faelem I have a 3 hr drive to get to my sessions. When I started I went in male mode. I had some laser sessions first, to "clear the weeds" and that was painful - laser works best on dark hairs but not so good for grey and ginger. I would travel once a month for 3-4 hr sessions. It was expensive but still affordable. Even with a gap of almost 2 years it has made a difference, I went from needing to shave twice a day to shaving every two days before stubble is overly noticable.

I could not justify going down every week.

I have just this week restarted my electrolysis, this time going as myself. Now the NHS is paying for some hours I can really go for it. We are going to split 8 hrs over 2 days to go over the whole of my face, because of the way hair grows in cycles I will need more sessions, but the electrologist believes that getting as much as possible done at once helps to keep things neater. There is pain involved but with electrolysis they can numb the skin with cream first so it is simply uncomfortable, laser was like being repeatedly flicked in the face with an elastic band and you came away sunburnt.

Either way have cooling and moisturising gel or creams for after the sessions, your face will ache - but it is so worth it!.

Link to comment

I go once a week and can ask my woman what she thinks, if I can remember all the way til next time. 

Link to comment

Ok, so I asked her, she thought going every 2 weeks isn't ideal but OK. She's had other T clients who did longer sessions, so maybe that's the way to go. She also did the usual 'do laser first' deal. 

Link to comment

That's good Rhonda, you want to make sure that it works for you, having an honest conversation can help with your expectations and make sure you aren't throwing good money after bad.

:)

Link to comment

I missed this thread originally but I'll chime in a quick thought now... Hair removal - laser or electrolysis - is a process of reduction rather than "one and done." Follicles don't die with one treatment using either method; rather, they reduce in size until they become vellus-like or stop growing altogether. Results also depend on when the follicle is zapped. Hair has a cycle of about six weeks and is most susceptible to being damaged when actively growing; hair in a dormant stage is far less effected. That means going consistently ups your chances of catching the follicles in a growth stage. How often you go will obviously speed up results, but staying on a consistent schedule is the key.

 

The other thing that will dramatically affect hair removal results is if you are on feminizing HRT. Drugs like spironolactone drop testosterone levels which is a key player in hair growth, so that will slow down the active hair growth cycle too. That causes a 50/50 swap; less hair growth equals less shaving but also fewer windows of time to zap follicles when they are active. In my own experience, I saw much faster results from electrolysis before HRT and up through the first few months after starting. When HRT took full effect, my remaining facial hair became more vellus and slower growing, requiring an hour "clean up" every other month with my electrologist rather than every other week. :)

Link to comment
17 hours ago, Kathy2020 said:

I missed this thread originally but I'll chime in a quick thought now... Hair removal - laser or electrolysis - is a process of reduction rather than "one and done." Follicles don't die with one treatment using either method; rather, they reduce in size until they become vellus-like or stop growing altogether. Results also depend on when the follicle is zapped. Hair has a cycle of about six weeks and is most susceptible to being damaged when actively growing; hair in a dormant stage is far less effected. That means going consistently ups your chances of catching the follicles in a growth stage. How often you go will obviously speed up results, but staying on a consistent schedule is the key.

 

The other thing that will dramatically affect hair removal results is if you are on feminizing HRT. Drugs like spironolactone drop testosterone levels which is a key player in hair growth, so that will slow down the active hair growth cycle too. That causes a 50/50 swap; less hair growth equals less shaving but also fewer windows of time to zap follicles when they are active. In my own experience, I saw much faster results from electrolysis before HRT and up through the first few months after starting. When HRT took full effect, my remaining facial hair became more vellus and slower growing, requiring an hour "clean up" every other month with my electrologist rather than every other week. :)

I’d like to add that, at least for me, post HRT hair removal is more painful than pre HRT. Estrogen has made more sensitive to pain.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 147 Guests (See full list)

    • MirandaB
    • Adrianna Danielle
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • MaeBe
    • violet r
    • Ivy
    • MaryEllen
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,025
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • Davie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      "I love you so much,"  Lois said.  They met in the driveway. "I could not live without you." "Neither could I." "What are we going to do?" "Find another counselor?" "No. I think we need to solve this ourselves." "Do you think we can?" "I don't know.  But what I know is that I don't want to go through that again.  I think we have to hope we can find a solution." "Otherwise, despair." "Yeah.   Truce?" "Okay,  truce." And they hugged.   "When we know what we want we can figure out how to get there."   That began six years of angry battles, with Odie insisted he could dress as he pleased and Lois insisting it did not please her at all.  He told her she was not going to control him and she replied that she still had rights as a wife to a husband. Neither was willing to give in, neither was willing to quit, and their heated arguments ended in hugs and more.   They went to a Crossdressers' Club, where they hoped to meet other couples with the same problems, the same conflicts, and the same answers, if anyone had any.  It took them four tries before they settled on a group that they were both willing to participate in.  This was four couples their own age, each with a cross dressing husband and a wife who was dealing with it.  They met monthly.  It was led by a 'mediator' who wanted people to express how they felt about the situation.  Odie and Lois, as newcomers, got the floor, and the meeting was finally dismissed at 1:30 in the morning - it was supposed to be over at 10 - and everyone knew how they felt about the situation.   There was silence in the car on the way home.   "We aren't the only ones dealing with this." Odie finally said.   "Who would have thought that?  You are right."   "Somebody out there has a solution." "I hope you are right."   "I hope in hope, not in despair."   "That's my Odie."    
    • Abigail Genevieve
      The counseling session was heated, if you could call it a counseling session.  Sometimes Lois felt he was on Odie's side, and sometimes on hers.  When he was on her side, Odie got defensive. She found herself being defensive when it seemed they were ganging up on each other.   "This is not working," Lois said angrily, and walked out.  "Never again. I want my husband back. Dr. Smith you are complicit in this."   "What?" said Odie.   The counselor looked at him.  "You will have to learn some listening skills."   "That is it? Listening skills?  You just destroyed my marriage, and you told me I need to learn listening skills?"   Dr. Smith said calmly,"I think you both need to cool off."   Odie looked at him and walked out, saying "And you call yourself a counselor."   "Wait a minute."   "No."
    • Ashley0616
      Just a comfortable gray sweater dress and some sneakers. Nothing special today. 
    • VickySGV
      I do still carry a Swiss Army knife along with my car keys.  
    • Timi
      Jeans and a white sweater. And cute white sneakers. Delivering balloons to a bunch of restaurants supporting our LGBT Community Center fundraiser today!
    • April Marie
      Congratulations to you!!!This is so wonderful!!
    • missyjo
      I've no desire to present androgynous..nothing wrong with it but I am a girl n wish to present as a girl. shrugs, if androgynous works fir others good. always happy someone finds a solution or happiness    today black jeans  black wedges..purple camisole under white n black polka dot blouse half open   soft smile to all 
    • MaeBe
      I have read some of it, mostly in areas specifically targeted at the LGBTQ+ peoples.   You also have to take into account what and who is behind the words, not just the words themselves. Together that creates context, right? Let's take some examples, under the Department of Health & Human Services section:   "Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike."   or   "Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families."   From a wording perspective, who doesn't want to protect the health and well-being of Americans or think that families aren't good for America? But let's take a look at the author, Roger Severino. He's well-quoted to be against LGBTQ+ anything, has standard christian nationalist views, supports conversion therapy, etc.   So when he uses words like "threatens the health and well-being of children and adults alike" it's not about actual health, it's about enforcing cis-gendered ideology because he (and the rest of the Heritage Foundation) believe LGBTQ+ people and communities are harmful. Or when he invokes the family through the lens of, let's just say dog whistles including the "penalization of marriage" (how and where?!), he idealizes families involving marriage of a "biological male to a biological female" and associates LGBTQ+ family equity as something unhealthy.   Who are the radical actors? Who is telling people to be trans, gay, or queer in general? No one. The idea that there can be any sort of equity between LGBTQ+ people and "normal" cis people is abhorrent to the author, so the loaded language of radical/destructive/guise/threaten are used. Families that he believes are "good" are stable/well-ordered/healthy, specifically married/nuclear ones.   Start looking into intersectionality of oppression of non-privileged groups and how that affects the concept of the family and you will understand that these platitudes are thinly veiled wrappers for christian nationalist ideology.   What's wrong with equity for queer families, to allow them full rights as parents, who are bringing up smart and able children? Or single mothers who are working three jobs to get food on plates?
    • Ashley0616
      Well yesterday didn't work like I wanted to. I met a guy and started talking and he was wanting to be in a relationship. I asked my kids on how they thought of me dating a man and they said gross and said no. I guess it's time to look for women. I think that is going to be harder. Oh well I guess.  
    • Ashley0616
      I don't have anything in my dress pocket
    • Carolyn Marie
      This topic reminds me of the lyrics to the Beatles song, "A Little Help From My Friends."   "What do you see when you turn out the lights?"   "I can't tell you but I know it's mine."   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @Ivy have you read the actual document?   Has anyone else out there read it?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am reading the Project 2025 document https://www.project2025.org/policy/   This will take some time.  I read the forward and I want to read it again later.   I read some criticism of it outside here and I will be looking for it in the light of what has been posted here and there.  Some of the criticism is bosh.   @MaeBe have you read the actual document?
    • RaineOnYourParade
      *older, not holder, oops :P
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...