Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Vulvoplasty?


Nora

Recommended Posts

Has anyone here gone with a partial vaginoplasty/partial depth vaginoplasty/minimal depth vaginoplasty/limited depth vaginoplasty/zero depth vaginoplasty/whatever-other-names-they-have-for-it??? How satisfied were you with the results? Anything you'd wished you had known in advance? I'm super curious and seriously considering it. ...Also kinda terrified lmao. XD 

Link to comment

Oh, and are there different kinds of partials? 

Ideally, I'd rather have a vaginal canal, but from what all I've read online about current methods, I'd be too terrified of the increased risks and complications and daily dilation. I'm currently asexual; I'm not interested in sex of any kind with anybody. But I also know that I haven't always been asexual, and I might not be in the future either, so I'd really LIKE a vaginal canal, so if there's like some new technique being done that mitigates the risks and doesn't require dilation, I'd definitely wanna go with that. Part of me wants to wait for whatever magical technology needs to be discovered before that can happen...but at the same time, I really don't want to wait until I'm middle-aged, so I'm really leaning towards partial vaginoplasty sooner rather than later and crossing my fingers in hopes that perhaps in the future they can construct a vaginal canal that doesn't have any risk of sealing itself shut. That really terrifies me lmao. And I SUCK at self-management enough as it is; I'd TOTALLY find a way to screw it up somehow LOL. ?

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I went with a "no cavity" vaginoplasty, a.k.a. "zero depth", a.k.a. vulvoplasty, etc.  It is not actually zero depth: I have a dimple about 3/4 of an inch deep where a vagina would be, so it doesn't look too weird on a quick glance.

 

I knew that there was no chance that I would ever want a penis anywhere near me (I find them, and often their owners, repulsive), so I had no need for a vagina.  Yes, girls sometimes play with toys, but my wife and I don't have much libido left, and she was never into toys.

 

With no compelling reason to have a vagina, I could not see any reason to put up with months of full-time dilation, years of daily dilation, and a lifetime of ongoing dilation.

 

I have no regrets about that decision.  What the surgeon gave me looks quite realistic.  It would require a very close inspection to see that it was not a cisgender vulva. 

 

I have other issues with ongoing pain and discomfort that make me question the wisdom of having GCS at all.  But that is not related to the full-depth versus shallow-depth decision.  On the whole, I am glad I had it, and I am very happy with my decision on the type of surgery.  Mine is just a b***h to live with.  So be sure you really want it before going ahead.

Link to comment

I'm pretty scared too and surgery is not high on my "want to do" list ;) 

 

Honestly I am hoping to just let everything atrophy and that'll get it close to nothing, not sure if that's even a possibility though.

Link to comment
16 hours ago, Kelly2509 said:

I'm pretty scared too and surgery is not high on my "want to do" list ;) 

 

Honestly I am hoping to just let everything atrophy and that'll get it close to nothing, not sure if that's even a possibility though.


Same; I actually have a lifelong medical phobia lmao. Didn't realize I was trans until a couple years ago lol; (I'm 26 and three quarters. =P)

In regards to letting it atrophy close to nothing, I do believe it's possible, but if you decided you wanted GCS later on, it could make it more difficult. =/

If you're sure that's what you want though, I'd suggest letting HRT do most of the work for you, then training with a chastity cage, gradually decreasing the size of the cage over time...not sure of the possible health ramifications of micro-penis though. O.O

Oh! I just learned about a new experimental procedure or something where they use your cheek cells from inside your mouth to line the vaginal wall during vaginoplasty...or something like that; not sure what kind of technology could possibly do that, but I ain't a doctor. Allegedly, this method would eliminate the need for dilation, because the body registers the cheek cells as SKIN cells, and as a result, NOT register it as an open wound that needs to be healed shut, thus eliminating the need for dilating. 

Not sure how far away they are from commercial viability or if it's already something that's being offered to trans patients, but if it's not, I think I'd rather wait until it becomes safer and more mainstream....but at the same time, I really don't wanna risk waiting too long and regretting not having done something sooner. Ugh. ...I hate my brain lmao. =P

Link to comment
16 hours ago, KathyLauren said:

I have other issues with ongoing pain and discomfort that make me question the wisdom of having GCS at all.  But that is not related to the full-depth versus shallow-depth decision.  On the whole, I am glad I had it, and I am very happy with my decision on the type of surgery.  Mine is just a b***h to live with.  So be sure you really want it before going ahead.


How long ago was it? Are you still recovering...or is it due to complications? O.O
(Sorry if that's too personal. >.<)

Link to comment
16 hours ago, KathyLauren said:

I went with a "no cavity" vaginoplasty, a.k.a. "zero depth", a.k.a. vulvoplasty, etc.  It is not actually zero depth: I have a dimple about 3/4 of an inch deep where a vagina would be, so it doesn't look too weird on a quick glance.

 

I knew that there was no chance that I would ever want a penis anywhere near me (I find them, and often their owners, repulsive), so I had no need for a vagina.  Yes, girls sometimes play with toys, but my wife and I don't have much libido left, and she was never into toys.

 


I'm totally into boys lol. I've never actually been in a serious relationship with a girl before; came out to my parents (as gay) when I was a teenager. ....It still trips me out to think of myself as technically straight now; never thought I'd see the day LOL. ?

But yup; depending on my current personality, I'm totally into boys and all their various bits and pieces hehehe. XD

...Two of my other personalities are asexual; the other two are straight (now) lol. My head is weird. =P XD

Link to comment
8 hours ago, Nora said:


Same; I actually have a lifelong medical phobia lmao. Didn't realize I was trans until a couple years ago lol; (I'm 26 and three quarters. =P)

In regards to letting it atrophy close to nothing, I do believe it's possible, but if you decided you wanted GCS later on, it could make it more difficult. =/

If you're sure that's what you want though, I'd suggest letting HRT do most of the work for you, then training with a chastity cage, gradually decreasing the size of the cage over time...not sure of the possible health ramifications of micro-penis though. O.O

Yeah potential GCS is a concern that comes up every so often.  I don't know how I'll feel in 5 years or 10 years but right now (at 9 months HT) my main complaint is purely cosmetic and I can usually get by with a gaff in most circumstances.  My situation is also that I'm married, not sexually active and my self esteem is such that I can't imagine anyone wanting anything to do with this so the thought of having a need for a functional vagina is pretty alien to me.  Maybe if I'd done this 20 years ago...

 

For now I'm trying to be patient, hoping my HT will help and avoiding exercise for that area (not that I really have to avoid it per se, I really don't have much desire for any of that these days) so we'll see where it goes from here.  So far the needle hasn't moved much.  The cage idea is interesting, I knew of them but no actual hands-on experience so perhaps some reading is in order. ;)

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
8 hours ago, Nora said:


How long ago was it? Are you still recovering...or is it due to complications? O.O
(Sorry if that's too personal. >.<)

 

A year and a half ago.  I was "recovered", in the sense that all the surgical wounds were fully healed, in the normal three months.  So I guess you'd call this a complication.

 

Not as far as the surgeon is concerned, though.  He can't see anything to fix: it all looks good to him.  So this is the rest of my life, apparently. :(

Link to comment
19 hours ago, KathyLauren said:

 

A year and a half ago.  I was "recovered", in the sense that all the surgical wounds were fully healed, in the normal three months.  So I guess you'd call this a complication.

 

Not as far as the surgeon is concerned, though.  He can't see anything to fix: it all looks good to him.  So this is the rest of my life, apparently. :(


Daaaaym! You should sue that guy! Who'd you go to? 

DO NOT just accept constant physical pain and discomfort as part of your life from now on; you can't be the first one this has happened to, and I'm positive there are surgeons willing to hear your case and have probably heard of it before and would be able to fix it. Please please don't accept this as your new normal. You deserve better. *big hugz* 

Link to comment
20 hours ago, Kelly2509 said:

For now I'm trying to be patient, hoping my HT will help and avoiding exercise for that area (not that I really have to avoid it per se, I really don't have much desire for any of that these days) so we'll see where it goes from here.  So far the needle hasn't moved much.  The cage idea is interesting, I knew of them but no actual hands-on experience so perhaps some reading is in order. ;)


Same lol. I can't even remember the last time I climaxed lmao. I'm usually asexual though and have always kinda hated my little boy parts, specifically because they'd wanna wake up and play at the worst possible times lol. Needless to say, that NEVER happens anymore lmao. (I started HRT on February 1st of this year.) There's been a couple times where I actually TRIED getting aroused and had to GIVE UP because I got too tired LOL. ? 

Link to comment
5 hours ago, Nora said:


Same lol. I can't even remember the last time I climaxed lmao. I'm usually asexual though and have always kinda hated my little boy parts, specifically because they'd wanna wake up and play at the worst possible times lol. Needless to say, that NEVER happens anymore lmao. (I started HRT on February 1st of this year.) There's been a couple times where I actually TRIED getting aroused and had to GIVE UP because I got too tired LOL. ? 

JEALOUS!  I always hated mine as well mostly for the same reasons.  Let me just sleep through the night dammit! ;)  I feel like this is an unhealthy attitude, but I dream of a day when all that stuff stops working (I feel like a weirdo in that I haven't really lost any functionality, I just don't find anything satisfying anymore).  I started HT in December last year and while needs are definitely reduced I want them gone altogether.  I think I was hoping HT would help me become more asexual (in addition to all my other hopes for it) and it hasn't really worked out that way for me.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
6 hours ago, Nora said:

DO NOT just accept constant physical pain and discomfort as part of your life from now on; you can't be the first one this has happened to, and I'm positive there are surgeons willing to hear your case and have probably heard of it before and would be able to fix it. Please please don't accept this as your new normal. You deserve better. *big hugz* 

 

There are no other surgeons covered by my insurance, and I can't afford to go elsewhere at my own expense.

 

I don't intend to do nothing, but whatever happens, it will not be surgery, and it will not be quick.  I am seeing my GP next month, and I intend to raise the issue with her.  Of course, that means getting her up to speed on post-op anatomy.  She sounds willing.  I also have an appointment with the only pelvic floor physiotherapist in the province with experience dealing with post-op trans women clients, but that is in January.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, KathyLauren said:

 

There are no other surgeons covered by my insurance, and I can't afford to go elsewhere at my own expense.

 

I don't intend to do nothing, but whatever happens, it will not be surgery, and it will not be quick.  I am seeing my GP next month, and I intend to raise the issue with her.  Of course, that means getting her up to speed on post-op anatomy.  She sounds willing.  I also have an appointment with the only pelvic floor physiotherapist in the province with experience dealing with post-op trans women clients, but that is in January.

I hope you find some options when you see your GP and physio!

Link to comment
16 hours ago, Kelly2509 said:

JEALOUS!  I always hated mine as well mostly for the same reasons.  Let me just sleep through the night dammit! ;)  I feel like this is an unhealthy attitude, but I dream of a day when all that stuff stops working (I feel like a weirdo in that I haven't really lost any functionality, I just don't find anything satisfying anymore).  I started HT in December last year and while needs are definitely reduced I want them gone altogether.  I think I was hoping HT would help me become more asexual (in addition to all my other hopes for it) and it hasn't really worked out that way for me.


You'll get there! *big hugz* ☺️

Personally, I was already asexual long before I learned I was trans...I've been asexual ever since I was a little kid locked up in a psychoward where sex was used as currency; I can't even count in my head how many times I was raped....and so yeahhh...for some BAFFLING reason I just kinda sorta lost ALL interest in anything sexual! ?

...TMI? ?

Link to comment
12 hours ago, Kelly2509 said:

@Nora well THAT deserves the Big Hugz!  ?


Thanks lol. Totally over it. Vengeance will come! ???
(...I use a lot of dark, defensive humor as social armor lol. ?)

Link to comment
9 hours ago, gina-nicole-t said:

@Nora I though about only having the zero-depth vaginaplasty surgery and being done with it. Then a trans woman I know in Vancouver B.C showed me a toy she uses and it totally changed my mind about the dilation, the second surgery to form the canal, and all the healing. I will probably never let a man near it, but to let some of these new toys have at it is totally worth it. Maybe I will find a woman; who knows.


Damn...that must've been quite the toy lol. ?

Link to comment
  • 4 months later...

I have a question for us girls who had HAD a Vulvoplasty, Here it is.

I am considering vulvoplasty over vaginoplasty for my Gender Affirming surgery.

Is the scrotal sac required to be kept for vulvoplasty? If not, could/should I consider adding the scrotectomy in the same procedure to my upcoming simple bilateral orchiectomy?

 

It'd be Very helpful for an early reply, as My Orchi will be on Friday and I'll need to talk to my doctor maybe tomorrow or Tues.  TY, sisterz!   <Kj>

 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
6 hours ago, Kjiersten said:

I have a question for us girls who had HAD a Vulvoplasty, Here it is.

I am considering vulvoplasty over vaginoplasty for my Gender Affirming surgery.

 

Is the scrotal sac required to be kept for vulvoplasty? If not, could/should I consider adding the scrotectomy in the same procedure to my upcoming simple bilateral orchiectomy?

 

It'd be Very helpful for an early reply, as My Orchi will be on Friday and I'll need to talk to my doctor maybe tomorrow or Tues.  TY, sisterz!   <Kj>

 

 

Keep everything except the testes themselves.  The scrotum skin is used to make the labia majora.  The scrotum in males and the labia majora in females are the same tissue, so using scrotum skin makes for realistic labia. 

 

Without scrotum skin, they would probably use a skin graft from your thigh or something, but the surgery will be more complex, and the results will be inferior.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Hi,

 

Like Kathy said, it all depends on where you want to end up.  I got an orchidectomy last November and included the scrotectomy because I have no need nor any intention of going any further.  But if you plan on any further cosmetic surgery involving that area, then you need to leave it intact.  Plus your urologist/surgeon needs to know so that they can choose the best approach for minimal scaring.  It’s all up to you and your goals.


By the way, getting the orchidectomy has been good for me.  No more blockers, no more progesterone.  But I have midrange adult female estrogen levels in just one month post surgery.

 

Willow 

Link to comment
15 hours ago, KathyLauren said:

 

Keep everything except the testes themselves.  The scrotum skin is used to make the labia majora.  The scrotum in males and the labia majora in females are the same tissue, so using scrotum skin makes for realistic labia. 

 

Without scrotum skin, they would probably use a skin graft from your thigh or something, but the surgery will be more complex, and the results will be inferior.

TY Kathy. I'll DEFinitely bear that in mind. Saves me chasing the Doctor tomorrow. Simple Orchi it is, then   ;*  ❤️  ❤️Kjiersten   <Kj>

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...
  • Forum Moderator

Yes. It's my understanding that the areas that need to be cleared still need clearing. It's not as much as you'd think though. They're still using that scrotal skin for your labia after all.

 

I had full depth and it took me out of circulation for four months, but I was climbing the walls by the end of three and resumed normal activity a little early. It really depends on your health pre-surgery.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
2 minutes ago, Hannah Renee said:

Thank-you. I assumed the clearing needed to be done because the skin would be used internally. Hoped it wouldn't be necessary "for external use only."

 

Tragically, the "internal use only" parts are bits that don't generally have much hair to being with.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
1 hour ago, Hannah Renee said:

Thread bump for a couple of questions. Does one need to have electrolysis for a zero-depth vaginoplasty? And you mentioned 3 months post-op recovery. Would that be a normal expectation, and how would it compare to a full v-plasty? My curiosity is piqued in that my insurance (Medicare+ BCBS) doesn't seem to cover MTF top surgery, but would cover the bottom. I don't think I really need the full deal at my age.

 

Hair removal is at the discretion of the surgeon.  Dr. Brassard does not require hair removal, even for full-depth procedures.  Many of his patients do remove hair anyway for full-depth, in case the surgical removal doesn't catch every one.  It is less critical for zero-depth.

 

Three months is considered a normal recovery time for both procedures.  It takes roughly a year for 100% healing, but most people can do most activities (including sex) at three months.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 134 Guests (See full list)

    • Betty K
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...