Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Just some ranting about my friend's smoking problem.


Artpetal

Recommended Posts

A close friend I had in high school who probably was the person in my life outside of family that I spent the most time with, started smoking after school ended. She has kept up her bad habit ever since, although there have been times she's put it on hold. Today I'm not in contact with her as much so I dunno if she still smokes. I am not sure I want to know, either.

 

There is cancer in my family and to know my old friend has smoked so long is just a huge disconnect, like what is going on here and why is my family history nothing to her. I liked her voice very much - but it has grown noticeably different due to smoking. I guess she never knew how I felt about her voice and she never wanted to know - it hurts, I never had a voice like hers growing up and to see her toss some of it aside... I meant very little to her in some ways. Just strange, strange, strange.

Link to comment
  • Admin

I can understand your frustration and the need to vent.  We never want to see friends or family do things that are self destructive.  If you think there's a chance she might be receptive, you can mention services or products that could break her of the habit.  But most of the time people with smoking or other bad habits need to find the wherewithal from within themselves.  They've heard all the "good reasons" before, and will likely dismiss them.

 

Quitting smoking and other addictions takes great strength.  You can't give that to her; she has to find it.  But I admire your friendship and understand your pain.

 

"Reasons to Quit" is a Merle Haggard/Willie Nelson song that fits this topic very well, and might help understand the issue from the smoker's viewpoint:

 

 

HUGS

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
  • Admin

Smoking is listed as the secondary cause of death for my youngest brother who died two years ago.  The third reason was COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). He had a congenital heart problem which had been known for 10 years (primary cause of death)  at the time he died and he had somewhere gotten the idea that his smoking would not affect the condition.  About 6 years ago I had been in a truck with him coming back to Los Angeles from Las Vegas, Nevada, a distance of 270 miles that takes 3 hours and he had a lighted cigarette in his mouth the whole time.  Two packs in the three + hours. He was 12 years younger than I am, but was often mistaken for my much OLDER relative. 

I fully understand your frustration, but for some obtuse reason they do not see the terrible effects it really has.  Two years later while the probate estate continues, I have things from my brother that still STINK to high heaven from the smoke, his apartment walls at the time he died were a dirty brown color which at one time had been a peach color.  He lived in a small apartment when he owned two much better homes in Las Vegas which a sister had given him when she committed suicide, and cut me out of her will, 8 years before.  I am now a joint owner with another brother she cut out of her will also.  I have severe asthma problems at 74 and find my memories are not the pleasant ones I should have.  You have my total sympathies for your friend, but in reality, you may just have to remember the good, and move on. In addiction recovery, we do learn that we need to handle life that way.

Link to comment

I smoked for 30 years, usually 1/2 pack a day and it took me many years and many attempts to stop. It really is as addictive as they say. 

I needed a good reason, so when I read about the CV risks with being over 40 and HRT, I quit. I wanted transition more than anything in the world.

Besides, it seemed self-defeating to go through the time, money and work to doll myself up and then poison myself.

All addiction is a medical problem, not a moral one. It is not so much a matter of willpower. In my case, it is comparable to divine intervention.

Link to comment

Thanks for sharing, everyone and especially Vicky... My many condolences for your brother and yes, ceiling stains and ugly smelling clothes were a fact with my father.

 

My friend has a Youtube channel and that's where I first heard the difference in her voice from then to now. Luckily or unluckily, I saw a photo of her smoking before this so I was able to prepare myself and I wasn't shocked when she said online that smoking was her life for several years. She had a lilt to her voice which is now only heard when she's laughing. Her voice was treble and now is oddly somewhat deeper. Such a pretty part of her life that is now a lot harder to access. She is such a complicated girl but really stubborn and I do hope for her health. I think she began smoking because a mutual friend started, again in high school. BACK THEN, we could gossip about it and tell each other how little our mutual friend made sense. I don't know of her parents having smoked but maybe. Her parents never divorced and she has a little sister. For that matter I don't believe her home life was toxic.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I was  addicted to nicotine.  I still snuck cigarettes after open heart surgery.  My heart issues were in part caused by years of smoking.  When i was young the health hazards were unknown and it was easy to fall into the trap.  Fortunately that need is no longer part of my day but i know that if i smoked just one i'd be back at a pack a day.  Nicotine is highly addictive.

I hope your friend gets free!

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment
  • 8 months later...

This is my first time venturing into this topic and I must say that I'm really impressed and inspired with all of you that have battled your addictions.

 

My brother died of esophageal cancer last year.  Almost 40 years of chewing tobacco and smoking pot will do that to a person.  My best friend has hypertension and COPD.  Beer and cigarettes are his favorites.  He's been trying to quit drinking for years and I did years of research online of how to help him.

 

I helped a partner of mine get off alcohol about 10 years ago.  She moved in with me and I wasn't drinking.  And I didn't give her any pressure to not drink.  She gave it up pretty quickly.  I think I just gave her the right environment for cleaning up.

 

I do consider myself an addict, but I'm not sure how true that really is.  My dad put me through a treatment program for smoking weed when I was 16.  I took it seriously and made some of that psychology a basis in my life.  I do have my drinking and drug use under control, but I'm not sure that all the effort I put into getting this kind of control was worth it (as opposed to being 100% clean and sober).  To give you an idea of this control, I've spent about $400 on alcohol in the last 8 years.  And the only thing I've smoked in the last 7 years was one bowl of pot.  I haven't been drunk since the 90's.  I've done hard drugs about 10 times in the last 25 years.  I think I latched onto inventory as a way to not be in denial.

 

Perhaps I'm just a dry drunk though.  I am antisocial.  My takeaway though is that environment is important for changing behaviors.  And replacing the undesired behavior with something else.  And focusing on being productive.

 

I loved Stveee's line:

 

Quote

Besides, it seemed self-defeating to go through the time, money and work to doll myself up and then poison myself.

 

 

Link to comment

I quit tobacco many years ago.  It was very hard to do.

In my own experience staying off of it has been fairly easy for me.  I have occasionally tried it for some reason, but when I do it makes me feel so sick that… just nope.

I don't know of anyone else with this experience though.  But surely I'm not the only one.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 95 Guests (See full list)

    • Stefi
    • Carolyn Marie
    • VickySGV
    • Evelyn J
    • MaybeRob
    • EasyE
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...