Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Old Dog - New Tricks


Sally Stone

Recommended Posts

I am always looking for opportunities to improve my use of makeup, so I am continuously on the lookout for new techniques or a technique I haven’t tried yet.  Over the years, I have learned that many of the makeup hacks that work well for cis women, aren’t quite so effective for me.  I have also been disappointed by many of the techniques offered for trans women.  Ultimately, finding techniques that work for me individually, is hard work and involves lots of trial and error.  In fact, most of the time, a technique that works well for me is one cobbled together from a combination of hacks from both cis and trans women.

 

Lately, I have decided I am not happy with my long-standing method for camouflaging beard shadow.  The common solution to this problem is to use a correction type concealer that neutralizes the blue undertones created by whiskers under the skin.  For a long time, I have used an orange concealer to neutralize my beard shadow and the standing technique is to use the correcting concealer underneath foundation.

 

While the orange concealer does neutralize the blue under my skin there is a tradeoff, that is, now I have to apply an excessive amount of foundation to cover up the unnatural orange undertone created by the correction concealer.  This results in foundation that is way too heavy and isn’t very natural looking.  If I go light on the foundation, then the orange undertone isn’t covered properly – what is a girl to do?

 

Well, you go back to experimenting, which is exactly what I did.  Instead of continuing to use the trans hack, I thought about the cis method of using concealer.  Instead of using concealer underneath foundation, the cis method, which is also the prevailing method, recommends applying concealer over top of foundation.

 

Obviously, you can’t apply a correction concealer over top or you’ll end up with areas of the face exactly the same color as the concealer.  Since I would use orange to correct the blue, I’d end up looking like an Oompa Loompa.  To use concealer on top of foundation on an area of the face you don't want to alter the color of, it is important to select a concealer that matches the shade of your foundation.  And, if you aren’t going to neutralize the blue undertones of beard shadow, it is imperative you find a highly pigmented concealer that adequately covers beard shadow but also blends well.

 

So, I went on a search for a high-powered concealer that matched the shade of my foundation.  That was hard, really hard, but I did find one.  I use L’Oreal Infallible Total Cover, shade 308 as a foundation.  It’s called “Sun Beige” which when trying to compare shades isn’t very helpful.  Even L’Oreal’s concealers don’t use shade descriptions that make it easy to match their own foundation, so I resorted to a personal search to find a concealer, any brand, that matched the L’Oreal foundation.

 

Honestly, it was stroke of good luck that I found a concealer from the makeup brand “Benefit.”  It is called “Industrial Strength” concealer and their shade #3, medium, turned out to be a near perfect match for my preferred brand of foundation.

 

Now, I could do the rest of my face with foundation and then cover my beard shadow with concealer and and since the two products were nearly an identical shade, all I needed to do was to blend them extremely well.  This was the breakthrough I needed.  No longer did need to put a lot foundation over the orange corrector and since this new concealer was super-pigmented, I could use it sparingly, which resulted in intense, extremely effective coverage without piling on a lot of makeup. 

 

Using a high-quality foundation brush, I feathered the concealer into the foundation creating a uniform all-over shade that completely covered my beard shadow but at the same time didn’t result a heavy, cakey face.  After blending foundation and concealer, I did my normal contouring and then set my makeup.

 

Clearly, this new beard cover technique turned out to be a very effective combination of techniques that I would never have stumbled upon without resorting to a lot of research and a lot more personal experimentation.  It only goes to show that makeup techniques are supremely personal.  While you can learn a lot from what you read or what you watch on the internet, experimenting with individual or combination techniques really is the only way to find what works best for each of us.  It goes without saying, that you must always be willing to try something new. 

 

Who says an old dog can’t learn new tricks!

Link to comment

I agree that concealer is hard to conceal. I don’t have to use it much now. I was using a Nyx concealer pallet that had multiple shades but I rarely go fancy on my makeup.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 183 Guests (See full list)

    • MaryEllen
    • Ashley0616
    • Vidanjali
    • Petra Jane
    • April Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • MaeBe
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,025
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • April Marie
      Congratulations to you!!!This is so wonderful!!
    • missyjo
      I've no desire to present androgynous..nothing wrong with it but I am a girl n wish to present as a girl. shrugs, if androgynous works fir others good. always happy someone finds a solution or happiness    today black jeans  black wedges..purple camisole under white n black polka dot blouse half open   soft smile to all 
    • MaeBe
      I have read some of it, mostly in areas specifically targeted at the LGBTQ+ peoples.   You also have to take into account what and who is behind the words, not just the words themselves. Together that creates context, right? Let's take some examples, under the Department of Health & Human Services section:   "Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike."   or   "Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families."   From a wording perspective, who doesn't want to protect the health and well-being of Americans or think that families aren't good for America? But let's take a look at the author, Roger Severino. He's well-quoted to be against LGBTQ+ anything, has standard christian nationalist views, supports conversion therapy, etc.   So when he uses words like "threatens the health and well-being of children and adults alike" it's not about actual health, it's about enforcing cis-gendered ideology because he (and the rest of the Heritage Foundation) believe LGBTQ+ people and communities are harmful. Or when he invokes the family through the lens of, let's just say dog whistles including the "penalization of marriage" (how and where?!), he idealizes families involving marriage of a "biological male to a biological female" and associates LGBTQ+ family equity as something unhealthy.   Who are the radical actors? Who is telling people to be trans, gay, or queer in general? No one. The idea that there can be any sort of equity between LGBTQ+ people and "normal" cis people is abhorrent to the author, so the loaded language of radical/destructive/guise/threaten are used. Families that he believes are "good" are stable/well-ordered/healthy, specifically married/nuclear ones.   Start looking into intersectionality of oppression of non-privileged groups and how that affects the concept of the family and you will understand that these platitudes are thinly veiled wrappers for christian nationalist ideology.   What's wrong with equity for queer families, to allow them full rights as parents, who are bringing up smart and able children? Or single mothers who are working three jobs to get food on plates?
    • Ashley0616
      Well yesterday didn't work like I wanted to. I met a guy and started talking and he was wanting to be in a relationship. I asked my kids on how they thought of me dating a man and they said gross and said no. I guess it's time to look for women. I think that is going to be harder. Oh well I guess.  
    • Ashley0616
      I don't have anything in my dress pocket
    • Carolyn Marie
      This topic reminds me of the lyrics to the Beatles song, "A Little Help From My Friends."   "What do you see when you turn out the lights?"   "I can't tell you but I know it's mine."   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @Ivy have you read the actual document?   Has anyone else out there read it?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am reading the Project 2025 document https://www.project2025.org/policy/   This will take some time.  I read the forward and I want to read it again later.   I read some criticism of it outside here and I will be looking for it in the light of what has been posted here and there.  Some of the criticism is bosh.   @MaeBe have you read the actual document?
    • RaineOnYourParade
      *older, not holder, oops :P
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No problem!
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Old topic, but I gotta say my favorites are: "Stop hitting on minors" (doesn't work if you're holder tho) and "Sure as [squid] not you"
    • Carolyn Marie
      Abigail, I think we will just leave the other posts where they are, and the discussion can start anew here.  It is possible to do what you ask, but would disrupt the flow of the discussion in the other thread, and would require more work than it's worth.   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am in too good a mood to earn my certificate today. I am sure something will happen that will put me on the path to earning it.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      It's likely most cis-women consider a fitting unnecessary "because they know what  they wear" and get used to the wrong size.  The instructions for what your size is are simple and why go to any further effort?  You measure your bandsize and you measure your max and subtract the two to get the needed info for the cup size.  Then you buy the same size for years until it hurts or something.
    • KatieSC
      Congratulations Lorelei! Yes, it is a powerful feeling to have the documents that say "you are you".
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...