Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Trump Pledges Federal Ban On Trans Women In Sports If Re-Elected


Carolyn Marie

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, Ticket For Epic said:

That's the biggest problem with politicians, those that deserve office don't want it and those that are undeserving do.

Incredibly, alarmingly, and depressingly true.

 

Quote

Damnit!  You know, I had REALLY gotten used to that cishet white male privilege. 

I always laugh and shake my head about the whole privilege thing. Since I’m transitioning… way beyond when I wanted to, I’ve lived 42 years of my life as a “white male.”

 

And now here I am transitioning at 42/43. If I had so much privilege as a white male… why would I willingly give it up?

 

The only “privilege” I saw as a white male was the “privilege” to be called every vile name in the book just because of the color of my skin.

 

And I kid you not, the very day I finally came out and began my transition journey, some of those sand voices immediately began calling me “brave” and wishing me luck. Yo which I could only respond with a rather unladylike response…(think the 13 Ukrainians’ response to the Russian warship).

 

Quote

I think the biggest problem we have is that people don't understand or far too often, don't care to understand, that this is not a choice.  They seem to get that if we could snap our fingers and become the opposite sex we would but what they don't seem to get is that if we could snap our fingers and become comfortable with our gender assigned at birth,  WE'D DO THAT TOO!  But we can't, so we transition as an act of self preservation.

I wouldn’t. I’d take that first option every day and twice on Sundays. Perhaps it’s a result of my life as it’s been, but given a wish from a genie, I’d go cisgender female… not so much the other way.

Link to comment
29 minutes ago, Lenneth said:

It’s not even this.  I hate to say this, but legitimate voting is dead.  People just don’t realize it.  

Long dead.

 

Quote

I will still vote until I die,

After the debacle that was 2020, so will I.

 

But it’ll never be for anyone with a “D” by their name.

 

Quote

but gerrymandering, voter suppression, and court packing have rendered the system almost moot.  

 

The court packing is being considered/done by the dems because they don’t like who Trump nominated.

 

Quote

“The things they had in there were crazy. They had things, levels of voting that if you’d ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”

Oh I don’t know… I think enough shady stuff went on during that election that both sides have dirty hands. 
 

But the dirtiest hands got the presidency. I’m not a “steal” conspiracy theorist… but it was shady enough that Brandon should have led the charge to verify each and every vote was legitimate.

 

He had one chance to quell all the conspiracy nonsense for good. But he chose to ignore it while he and the cackling moron were busy celebrating their “victory.”

Link to comment
17 minutes ago, Jandi said:

It was pretty botched up.  However it was following through on a deal the previous administration had made.

A previous administration once removed. They guaranteed a departure during Obama’s term.

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Phoenix said:

Then why did he, on camera, and without skipping a beat, say on National TV that Caitlin Jenner could use whatever restroom she wanted in Trump Tower?

 

If he’s such a bigot, why does he have support from every race, orientation and gender identity?

 

What is it that they know that you don’t? Or vice versa?


What he says doesn’t interest me as much as what he does.  He plays the PR game.  Of course he will back Caitlin Jenner.  She supports him and it’s a great thing to bring up in the face of the backlash for decisions like this.  It nets him a shield of sorts against criticism because he made that one statement in a high profile environment about a high profile, public figure.

 

He has support from so many people because there are billions of people on the planet and an estimated 350-something million people in the U.S.  Statistically he would always find support from someone from every imaginable group.  The question we should ask is, what percentage of those sub-groups support him.  A gay man can support him and the assertion he has support from the gay community is accurate.  But if 50 million gay men don’t, he’s not representing them because he sure didn’t win election with that demographic’s political weight.

 

Look at the legislation he championed.  Steven Miller was hard core trying to eject minorities.  His first travel ban was rejected because it was so transparent.  He called African countries “s*** holes” with no evidence to support that statement and when many African countries are actually quite developed and wonderful societies with educated, civically aware people.

 

Miller also drafted the policy for essentially legal kidnapping of children from immigrants trying to cross the border.  And before anyone brings it up, Biden’s not getting a pass here because he could have stamped that out and didn’t.  Different discussion.  Go ahead and argue it was a deterrent for illegal immigration.  It’s also inhumane, ineffective, cruel, and fiscally irresponsible.  Even if the “camps” these separated children were being kept in were actually being run with a modicum of sanitary and educational standards, that alone is a new outlet for federal funds in a time the Republicans, with the walking tanning bed’s backing, were arguing vehemently about the budget and wasteful spending.  Them talking about budget deficits was a joke to begin with after there tax plan was pushed though.  The walking orange peel literally ran away from New York to Florida to escape the tax situation his own plan created!

 

Back on topic though, the camps these minority children were kept in were mostly atrocious.  No education, little more than sheets to use on cement floors to sleep on, no toothpaste, disgusting bathroom facilities, and lack of access to hygiene products both for bathing and feminine biological needs.

 

This man couldn’t tell the difference between a Mexican and a Honduran.  He mocks disabled people.  He insulted John McCain’s service record because he deigned to disagree with someone who dodged service altogether.  I disagree with McCain on virtually everything he stood for, but there is no disputing the man was a hero.

 

What don’t I know that they do?  More than I could begin to comprehend.  There is no way I will ever be privy to the information they had, have, and will gain in the coming days.  I do know what he said and did.  This is also my personal opinion based on my observations, experiences, discussions, reading material, and social exposure.  This is how I see this spoiled narcissist.  At every juncture he consistently takes the route that benefits himself or harms anyone not a cis, white, heterosexual, wealthy, white man.

Link to comment
22 minutes ago, Phoenix said:

But the dirtiest hands got the presidency. I’m not a “steal” conspiracy theorist… but it was shady enough that Brandon should have led the charge to verify each and every vote was legitimate.


No argument there.  Nobody is clean.  But trying to invalidate the results highlights this “alpha male’s” fragile ego.  He couldn’t accept loss.  And the whole deal with the Arizona recount?  That was going on almost 3 quarters of a year after the actual election.  And nothing changed.  Then other stated started adopting that model just to argue when Republicans lose.  If they lose, Democrats rigged the election.  It’s the cry of their people now.  I accept, without question, Democrats are shady.  I could dump on Pelosi for hours.  I think she needs a James Bond style ejection chair.  But I don’t believe they are tearing down the walls of free and fair elections while building an autocracy or oligarchy in their place.

Link to comment
  • Admin

OK, folks, this thread has started to go off the rails.  It began as a report on what the former President said about trans women in sports.  Lets not get into a lengthy discussion about every aspect of his time in office.  That would require dozens of pages and won't get us anywhere.  Please stick to the topic, or it will be locked.

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, Carolyn Marie said:

OK, folks, this thread has started to go off the rails.  It began as a report on what the former President said about trans women in sports.  Lets not get into a lengthy discussion about every aspect of his time in office.  That would require dozens of pages and won't get us anywhere.  Please stick to the topic, or it will be locked.

 

Carolyn Marie

 

Apologies.

Link to comment
7 hours ago, Lenneth said:


What he says doesn’t interest me as much as what he does.  He plays the PR game.  Of course he will back Caitlin Jenner.  She supports him and it’s a great thing to bring up in the face of the backlash for decisions like this.  It nets him a shield of sorts against criticism because he made that one statement in a high profile environment about a high profile, public figure.

 

He has support from so many people because there are billions of people on the planet and an estimated 350-something million people in the U.S.  Statistically he would always find support from someone from every imaginable group.  The question we should ask is, what percentage of those sub-groups support him.  A gay man can support him and the assertion he has support from the gay community is accurate.  But if 50 million gay men don’t, he’s not representing them because he sure didn’t win election with that demographic’s political weight.

 

Look at the legislation he championed.  Steven Miller was hard core trying to eject minorities.  His first travel ban was rejected because it was so transparent.  He called African countries “s*** holes” with no evidence to support that statement and when many African countries are actually quite developed and wonderful societies with educated, civically aware people.

 

Miller also drafted the policy for essentially legal kidnapping of children from immigrants trying to cross the border.  And before anyone brings it up, Biden’s not getting a pass here because he could have stamped that out and didn’t.  Different discussion.  Go ahead and argue it was a deterrent for illegal immigration.  It’s also inhumane, ineffective, cruel, and fiscally irresponsible.  Even if the “camps” these separated children were being kept in were actually being run with a modicum of sanitary and educational standards, that alone is a new outlet for federal funds in a time the Republicans, with the walking tanning bed’s backing, were arguing vehemently about the budget and wasteful spending.  Them talking about budget deficits was a joke to begin with after there tax plan was pushed though.  The walking orange peel literally ran away from New York to Florida to escape the tax situation his own plan created!

 

Back on topic though, the camps these minority children were kept in were mostly atrocious.  No education, little more than sheets to use on cement floors to sleep on, no toothpaste, disgusting bathroom facilities, and lack of access to hygiene products both for bathing and feminine biological needs.

 

This man couldn’t tell the difference between a Mexican and a Honduran.  He mocks disabled people.  He insulted John McCain’s service record because he deigned to disagree with someone who dodged service altogether.  I disagree with McCain on virtually everything he stood for, but there is no disputing the man was a hero.

 

What don’t I know that they do?  More than I could begin to comprehend.  There is no way I will ever be privy to the information they had, have, and will gain in the coming days.  I do know what he said and did.  This is also my personal opinion based on my observations, experiences, discussions, reading material, and social exposure.  This is how I see this spoiled narcissist.  At every juncture he consistently takes the route that benefits himself or harms anyone not a cis, white, heterosexual, wealthy, white man.

🙄

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 205 Guests (See full list)

    • MaeBe
    • MomTGDaughter
    • Adrianna Danielle
    • Mmindy
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My parents were life long Democrats. 
    • Ivy
      'Nuff said. Yeah I'm not thrilled with Biden either. There are some conservative ideas I'm good with.  And I do feel that the current Democratic party is too cozy with the bankers and wealthy.  But despite all their talk, when it comes down to it, so are the Republicans.  And it's not the Dems calling for our eradication. Unfortunately, I see this election as existential for trans folks.  
    • Mmindy
      Good evening everyone,   @Birdie your CNA Is ill informed about breast and proper bra fitting.   My wife and I are checking out a campground up in Michigan just a little North of Saginaw, MI. We had a great meal at a local tavern serving delicious perch fillet dinner.   We’re going to check out the Saginaw,MI Bay area for summer time activities for when we come back on occasion. We belong to a camping club call Adventure Outdoors and have free camping at their resorts around Michigan and Ohio.   Hugs,   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋    
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...