Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Older transwoman. Should I get voice surgery?


Penny Patton

Recommended Posts

I just starting on the road to transitioning and have been watching a lot of videos about voice feminization. I've begun doing the exercises they recommend. I've been doing this since December. At the moment I'm considering voice surgery as a "last resort" if I don't get satisfactory results from coaching and practice. However, I'm not getting any younger, I'm already 43, and I've heard it can take years for the coaching route and I'm concerned I won't have my true voice until I'm in my 50's.

 

I'm not opposed to voice surgery, but I've heard the results aren't always good and I'm concerned if I go that route and don't like the results, I'll have lost the option to get there through voice coaching. Am I worried about nothing? Should I take the plunge once it's available to me (And how long into HRT would I have to wait before they'd let me?) so I can enjoy life as a woman to the fullest while I still relatively young? I'd love to hear your advice and experiences about this.

 

Thank you!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I don't really have any advice for you.  My experience was with a voice therapist. 

 

After a few sessions, we established that I could not get my voice into the "approved" female range without damaging my vocal cords.  I needed to raise it a full octave, and it was obviously not happening.

 

I was able to comfortably raise the pitch by half an octave, which was better than nothing.  The more useful aspect of the voice therapy was learning to add more feminine inflection to my voice.  For example, the male tendency is for the pitch to drop at the end of a sentence.  The female tendency is for the pitch to stay steady or even rise at the end of a sentence.  So learning not to let my voice drop was valuable.

 

I did about half a dozen sessions with the speech therapist.

 

I decided early on not to have vocal surgery, for several reasons.  There was the cost, of course.  Also, while the surgery can raise the pitch, it cannot alter the resonances of the larynx and sinuses.  If those resonances happen to sound very male, raising the pitch will not change that.  And, of all the surgeries that trans folks consider, vocal surgery has the lowest success rate.  I have heard the results when it does not go well: it can sound pretty bad.

 

I am not trying to scare you off.  Most often, the results are good.  I am just explaining my reasons for rejecting it.

 

In the end, I decided to accept the limited results of the vocal therapy.  My voice is the feature most likely to "out" me, and I get "sir-ed" on the phone a lot.  C'est la vie.  I am a trans woman and I make no apology for that.  I am not trying to be stealth.

 

I started my transition at age 62.  I am 67 now, and pretty much done transitioning.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, KathyLauren said:

I am a trans woman and I make no apology for that.  I am not trying to be stealth.

I feel the same way, @KathyLauren. If I focus and take time to form my thought before speaking, I can do reasonably well. But, if someone notices - it is what it is.

 

I've noticed a few cis-women, whom as they've aged, have experienced a deepening of their voices, and it doesn't seem to bother them - and it DEFINITELY doesn't bother me...LOL!

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Kathy is right, this surgery has a low success rate.  Add to that you still need to have voice therapy to train your new voice.  Everything I've read and heard says its not a slam-dunk.   Save your money.  Work on your pitch, inflection and cadence.  You will be fine.

 

PS: At 43 you are not old! 

 

Jani

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

What Jani said. I didn't start voice training until I was 48. My voice is fine and higher pitch than some of my cis-female friends. It's all good.

 

Resonance and cadence matters more than pitch anyway. Anybody can do cadence and resonance.

 

Hugs!

Link to comment

Yeah, this is a tough one to swallow for me too. I agree with the above. I have a deep voice. It sucks, but I'm stuck with it. I'm 69 yrs old, and retired. I don't have the money for the surgery anyway. The next time around hopefully the universe will get it right. 

Link to comment
  • Admin

74 now, 63 when I came out full time.  My throat went through torture from Mononucleosis at 25, and that was enough for me as to my goals for more than dental work.  I just got done editing a video I made of my Chorus yesterday.  Our Executive Director is a Trans  woman who is 18 months older than I am, but she is attractive and acceptable AND she is PROUD of her very strong and pleasant Baritone, and we have one early 40's chemistry professor, almost glamorous who gets an octave below her.  Neither one has been given trouble for their voices. They are just very pleasant women to be around.  What they do have going for them is that both have feminine speech patterns and body language.  Feminine speech is much more varied in tone and word choice that we were used to in male situations.  Feminine faces are more animated than male voices.  Males tend to be combative even in ordinary and friendly speech.  Women approach each other as equals and friends who are not competing.  My suggestion to help your voices is going to be taking up singing with a group that will take you where you are and work with you.  My speaking voice is low Tenor to higher Tenor depending on the actual conversation.  You might also look up Toastmasters Intl. and join the female gettogethers  with them.  They will help you get confidence on speaking as you, even with the voice you do not think fits you right now.  So many fun ways  to handle the voice situation without surgery.

Link to comment
  • Admin

Penny, when I transitioned I was 55, and practices with the help of a CD.  My voice wasn't especially deep, but I almost always got "sir'd" on the phone.  Over time, and with practice, especially on cadence and resonance, my feminine voice developed.  Unless I'm having a long conversation I can use my female voice effectively, and rarely get "sir'd" on the phone.  But after, say 10-15 minutes, it gets tiring to keep up the voice, and it will drop a bit.  But as others have said, it is the things you can successfully work on, and when face to face, the expressions, body language, and smile that convince people they're talking to a woman.  I wish you luck!

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

That's what I noticed about how the male way of speaking is conclusion-based, dictatorial and one-sided, women is more dialogue and exchange. I think it really is the archetypal mars/venus, attraction and repulsion energies. 

Link to comment

Hey Penny

Yeah i did the surgery and it did not make a bit of difference.

I had to VT with a coach for over 2yrs. She actually was impressed enough with my voice to end our training 

However, I still get sir on phone and my voice always gives me away at social gatherings even with R/C and my fem traits.

Then again, I stop work on it. Cuz it really was screwing with my Dysphoria,

sorry I am not much help. 

I can tell this..I known plenty of TG whom had successful surgeries .

Good Luck 

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

I echo what has been said, the success rate it extremely low. I was born with a more feminine voice, but still had to work on how I speak as to have more feminine speech. 
 

 

Link to comment
  • 5 months later...

Hi. I recently had voice feminization surgery with Dr. Haben in Rochester, NY. There's another thread with a woman who wasn't so happy with the results, so check out that discussion, too. I agree with what most of the people above said. This surgery is probably one of the riskier ones, but I really wanted to have it done. I'm only about a month and a half post-op, so I still have a couple of months (or more) before I can really judge the results. I'm quite satisfied with the results, however. My pitch is noticeably higher and that's what I was aiming for. My voice is still a bit weak, but I only just started talking, so I feel confident that that will improve. I thought Dr. Haben did a good job. If you decide to get this surgery make sure you have plenty of time to recover. Good luck with whatever you decided. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 145 Guests (See full list)

    • Betty K
    • MaybeRob
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...