Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Electrolysis


Suzanne44

Recommended Posts

Hi it's Suzanne

 

   I am at the very beginning of my transition. I've been using razors and or epilator/shave on my body hair. I've been looking into laser hair removal and electrolysis I've a few questions.

1. Are home laser hair removal devices any good. (Body)

2. Are home electrolysis hair removal devices any good. (Face)

3. I live in the u.k does anyone know if I can get electrolysis done on the N.H.S 

I would appreciate any help and advice on this subject. Thank you.

 

As always<3 Suzanne

Edited by Jani
Fixed formatting
Link to comment

It's Suzanne

 

Sorry about the mistakes in how my post is set out and the auto correct on (shave)which tuned out shaved.

 

❤️ Suzanne

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Fixed.

 

I don't believe any of the home laser's are strong enough to do any good.  At least where I live, there is a reason why operators are licensed by the state.  It could be a dangerous thing to do without training. 

 

Electrolysis is something you need extensive training on to do well.  Plus unsterile needles can cause problems.  

 

Have you tried looking on the NHS website for the answer to your question?  

Jani

Link to comment
On 10/30/2022 at 10:53 AM, Suzanne44 said:

1. Are home laser hair removal devices any good. (Body)

 

I have the one from Tria Beauty (It claims to be significantly better than any of the others. I couldn't say whether that's true or not as I've never used any other). I used it for upper chest, and the backs of hands and feet. Progress with it was slow, but after several months there was a definite and significant reduction in hair. It didn't eliminate all of it, but I do feel like it made a big improvement and gave me a big head start on any further professional hair removal.

 

That was a little over a year ago at this point, and so far the results have stayed. I haven't noticed any regrowth (Although I did start HRT several months ago).

 

Of course, being laser, results will vary considerably depending how dark the hair is. Most of mine was very dark, with very light skin, so I was somewhat of an ideal case. Most of the hair that remains ranges from very light to medium or so.

Link to comment

Hi it's Suzanne

 

   Thank you both for your input and advice it is greatly appreciated. I will definitely try to find more info on the NHS website, I'll also do more research into the different types of laser hair removal device's. Thank you again.

 

❤️ Suzanne 

 

Link to comment

Hi Suzanne.

My belief is that you can get both electrolysis and laser on the NHS….but not much and only after a confirmed diagnosis from the Gender Identity Clinic for your area.

My local GIC (York/Leeds) will fund a maximum 8 hours of laser or 16 hours of electrolysis. With the best will in the world this is not going to totally eliminate facial hair (but will obviously help)

I would also add that with the current waiting lists on the NHS it may be some time before your treatment will begin - checking the updated waiting list at my GIC today, they are currently looking at arranging initial appointments for people referred in November 2018 😕 (So if you haven’t referred yet, just do it - you will have years to ponder whether it is the right thing for you or not)

 

My personal recommendation would be to find a local licensed electrolysis/laser practitioner and ask their advice (hair colour makes a difference), and just get on with it yourself.

 

Good luck in your journey - it’s a rollercoaster, but it can be a hugely positive change in your life (certainly is being for me🙂)

Dee. X

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Suzanne - I personally bought a package on my laser treatments consisting of 8 - 1 hour sessions. This has eliminated all but a few dark hair of my thick, heavy facial hair. I had 1 free session after 6 months beyond the end of the treatments for any catchup / stubborn growth - upper lip and chin areas mainly.

I have been doing electrolysis once a week since February of this year. I would skip aa week before and after a laser session. My grey hair has been reduced to odd fine hair now from sideburns to less than an inch of my lip and chin. My electrologist has 20 years experience and thanks to her, I am glad that I switched Spas back in January.

So this year - dark hair is gone and grey hair is well on its way though it will definitely be more than a year to complete facial hair removal.

So glad also, that i scrapped the epilator early on in this process. It was a lot more painful than electrolysis ( both with no pain or skin anaesthetic.

Just what has worked for me Suzanne.  Good Luck.

 

Big Canadian Hug

JoniSteph

 

Link to comment

Hi Jonisteph

 

Thank you for you information and sharing your experience with me. I too have scrapped the epilator because it was too painful. I'm now looking into laser hair removal. I've also decided against home electrolysis due to the risks.

Link to comment

I will provide my advice here - home options need a massive amount of time commitment.  I started removing my body and facial hair (shaving) in 1986 and copped a fair bit of slack for doing so.  I suggest starting with professional laser hair removal as soon and young as possible, and realize that it isn't effective for white (and blonde?) hairs and it's not very effective for "red" hairs.  Ultimately though, if you are seeking to be permanently hair free on an area of your body, you will need to move onto electrolysis.  I have been undergoing electrolysis for a little over thirteen months - weekly 1hr sessions for the first 9-10 months then slowly winding back, currently fortnightly.  I have very little hair on my neck and face now and what remains can only be seen when viewed close up.  I've started having my electrologist shape my eyebrows to fill up my 1hr sessions. 

Electrolysis specific advice.
Be patient and prepared for the long haul, even a good electrologist will only remove around 500 hairs in a one hour session.  I had far less facial and neck hairs than most biological males, but it's still taken a very long time.  I could almost fall asleep during laser treatments, no chance of that with electrolysis.  The area below the nose is the most painful area I've had treated although the eyebrows and immediately adjacent to the lip hair aren't much better.   I've found the treatment of the rest of the face to be merely uncomfortable/unpleasant.  Actually, the worst part of electrolysis for me is dealing with dysphoria between appointments for the first 8-9 months.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi @Suzanne44, I just wanted to agree with @Trans22 that hair removal by laser and/or electrolysis will be a long haul. The heavier the beard and the thicker the hair will determine as to the time spent with the hair colors setting the method to be used. Within a couple more sessions I will be starting in the area around the mouth,  bring on the EMLA numbing cream - LOL.

I also share Trans22 dislike for the dysphoria of having to wear hair on my face for 3/4 days between sessions to allow sufficient growth.

 

Big Canadian Hug

JoniSteph

 

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...

I have used home laser on my legs, underarm and pubic area. All those places have a very small amount of hair. Need to shave l20230228_195554.thumb.jpg.b2759120c96ce6018d46d38a69b75acf.jpgegs once a month same as underarm

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
On 12/1/2022 at 10:33 PM, Trans22 said:

I will provide my advice here - home options need a massive amount of time commitment.  I started removing my body and facial hair (shaving) in 1986 and copped a fair bit of slack for doing so.  I suggest starting with professional laser hair removal as soon and young as possible, and realize that it isn't effective for white (and blonde?) hairs and it's not very effective for "red" hairs.  Ultimately though, if you are seeking to be permanently hair free on an area of your body, you will need to move onto electrolysis.  I have been undergoing electrolysis for a little over thirteen months - weekly 1hr sessions for the first 9-10 months then slowly winding back, currently fortnightly.  I have very little hair on my neck and face now and what remains can only be seen when viewed close up.  I've started having my electrologist shape my eyebrows to fill up my 1hr sessions. 

Electrolysis specific advice.
Be patient and prepared for the long haul, even a good electrologist will only remove around 500 hairs in a one hour session.  I had far less facial and neck hairs than most biological males, but it's still taken a very long time.  I could almost fall asleep during laser treatments, no chance of that with electrolysis.  The area below the nose is the most painful area I've had treated although the eyebrows and immediately adjacent to the lip hair aren't much better.   I've found the treatment of the rest of the face to be merely uncomfortable/unpleasant.  Actually, the worst part of electrolysis for me is dealing with dysphoria between appointments for the first 8-9 months.

 

Can confirm.  I'm late 40's so have a mix of dark and white aged hairs on my face (very few white hairs on body though) and I've skipped IPL and gone straight to electrolysis.  That was a mistake I think.  Other trans people I know of similar age went with laser on the dark hairs and used electro to 'finish up' or remove those few spots the IPL didn't sort.  As it happens I've had 5x 35m sessions so far and I do have areas on my top lip that are now hair free but its red there, with some pitting, and you can see it through light foundation.  I usually have my session on a Thursday afternoon and my last proper shave is a Monday/Tuesday morning so I have the 1/2mm (at least) hair showing for the tweezers to grab.

It is painful but bearable for the most part, and the left side of my face is WAY more sensitive to it than the other for some reason and I am using numbing cream 30-40m before my session.

 

My electro therapist recommended I try IPL on my neck and cheecks etc whilst she does my top lip and chin, and advised laser doesn't work for everyone and on some its not permanent either.  I may well try it, and I've also just got a Panasonic handheld IPL machine for my body. That does work on my test patch but the hair has started to grow back after a month or so.  I suspect if I keep doing it I may see improved results (it wasn't cheap, about £300 or so).

 

Apart from the pain, the worst part is having the hair there.  I don't feel like I can dress femme with any stubble at all so I'm skinny jeans and hoodie for the time I have to wait for it to settle, and with my sessions being weekly I don't get hardly any time inbetween.   I've been invited to a girls night out end of the month so I've asked for a 2 week break so my skin can heal a bit better so doing makeup and such won't be as much an issue.

 

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 199 Guests (See full list)

    • Adrianna Danielle
    • MaeBe
    • MomTGDaughter
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My parents were life long Democrats. 
    • Ivy
      'Nuff said. Yeah I'm not thrilled with Biden either. There are some conservative ideas I'm good with.  And I do feel that the current Democratic party is too cozy with the bankers and wealthy.  But despite all their talk, when it comes down to it, so are the Republicans.  And it's not the Dems calling for our eradication. Unfortunately, I see this election as existential for trans folks.  
    • Mmindy
      Good evening everyone,   @Birdie your CNA Is ill informed about breast and proper bra fitting.   My wife and I are checking out a campground up in Michigan just a little North of Saginaw, MI. We had a great meal at a local tavern serving delicious perch fillet dinner.   We’re going to check out the Saginaw,MI Bay area for summer time activities for when we come back on occasion. We belong to a camping club call Adventure Outdoors and have free camping at their resorts around Michigan and Ohio.   Hugs,   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋    
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...