Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Abigail vs The NHS


Aggie1

Recommended Posts

 

Abi dropped a new philosophy tube about her struggles to get service through the NHS and puts a couple of cherries on top with a philosophical analysis of dysphoria and the laws of large organizations. Fascinating stuff.

 

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

This was so worth watching. I’m always impressed with the amount of creativity, logic, and ability she has to tell her story and tel it well.

 

After watching this, I realized just how lucky I’ve been transitioning here in the US but specifically in Washington State. Washington is probably one of the top places within the US to accomplish this . Sure there’s some red-tape but nothing like what Abigail and others over the pond have experienced. The transition process there needs a serious overhaul and soon.

 

Incredible video…thanks for sharing @Aggie1,

Susan R🌷

Link to comment

Interesting.  Makes me glad to live in the USA, even though the system here has high costs and the similar pain of being subjected to large institutions. 

 

When I needed to see a LGBTQ+ friendly doctor in another city, making an appointment was fairly easy.  It took a couple of weeks...not 18.  I received my prescription once the doctor figured out some of my medical mysteries.  Got cash or credit or the illusion of such?  Come right in.  Got an uncooperative doctor?  Fire the turkey and get another one.  Trouble with "Permission?"  Like the old song says...bring lawyers, guns, and money.  Insurance is a PITA, but my husband and GF seem to get things arranged quickly enough.  Charges too high?  Don't pay the bill, and argue until it gets adjusted.  

 

This video should serve as a warning for anybody who advocates for socialist medicine, "single payer" system, or similar schemes.  The US system may be bad in places, but it could be a whole lot worse. 

 

 

Link to comment
6 hours ago, awkward-yet-sweet said:

This video should serve as a warning for anybody who advocates for socialist medicine, "single payer" system, or similar schemes.  The US system may be bad in places, but it could be a whole lot worse. 

There is no denying there are serious problems with the NHS in the UK.  Apparently gatekeeping for trans-people is a big one.  I am not convinced that some form of "socialized medicine" could not work.  The problem is, as with most things, the implementation.  For one thing, it would need to be adequately funded.  So money is involved as usual.

In the US things can work pretty well - if you are covered by adequate private Insurance.  Some here have even had their GCS covered.  

For me personally, that is not the case.  I am fortunate to be in the VA system at this time - which it could be argued is kinda socialized.  It has worked well for my hernia surgery, and cataracts; less so for my trans-care.

But I do know a lot of people in crummy jobs with no health Insurance, or huge deductibles that make it practically useless.

Sometimes I fear that the attitude here is "I've got mine - screw the rest of you."

Link to comment

NHS works fine from cradle to grave. I w

 

1 hour ago, Ivy said:

There is no denying there are serious problems with the NHS in the UK.  Apparently gatekeeping for trans-people is a big one.  I am not convinced that some form of "socialized medicine" could not work.  The problem is, as with most things, the implementation.  For one thing, it would need to be adequately funded.  So money is involved as usual.

In the US things can work pretty well - if you are covered by adequate private Insurance.  Some here have even had their GCS covered.  

For me personally, that is not the case.  I am fortunate to be in the VA system at this time - which it could be argued is kinda socialized.  It has worked well for my hernia surgery, and cataracts; less so for my trans-care.

But I do know a lot of people in crummy jobs with no health Insurance, or huge deductibles that make it practically useless.

Sometimes I fear that the attitude here is "I've got mine - screw the rest of you."

  

That's the impression I get talking to many from the USA that many oppose social medicine because they simple don't want fairness. I don't get the if you are  poor just crawl off and die attitude, that some have. We pay into our system our entire working life as part of our taxes in the UK, so if we are unfortunate enough to get cancer we get treated and  not billed or told our insurance doesn't cover it.  If your are wealthy you can get private medicine in the UK but it will be the same medics that give you the treatment.
GRS  is slow in the UK but usually works out OK.  

Link to comment
7 hours ago, Diana Stone said:

That's the impression I get talking to many from the USA that many oppose social medicine because they simple don't want fairness.

 

Perhaps we have a different definition of what fairness looks like.  I agree that the US system isn't fair, but social medicine doesn't seem fair either.  To me, it isn't fair to tax others heavily and have them pay for me.  There's an attitude that people who have money don't deserve to keep what they worked for... "just pay more taxes."  To me, that's theft, not fairness.  Its even more repugnant because it is enforced by the state.  A burglar at least runs the risk of getting shot, which makes him more honest and likeable than the tax man.   

 

This video clearly shows that a national healthcare system won't work out.  Handing something over to the state just makes for inefficiency.  That's what's happened in the US to a certain extent.  60/70 years ago, it was possible to stay in a hospital, have an operation, and pay for it out-of-pocket with no insurance.  Why?  Costs were kept low, and medicine was treated like a small-town business.  It isn't that way anymore, and it is no coincidence that government involvement in healthcare has simultaneously increased.  For several decades the big players (who are backed by the government) have made it unaffordable... and over-regulation has reduced what people can buy on their own without prescriptions and expensive appointments.  When I know what I need, I shouldn't have to pay somebody for the privilege of being able to purchase it.  Its like some weird medieval guild.  

 

In social medicine nations, they haven't reduced the cost...it just gets spread around.  They haven't reduced the power of the medical establishment, but have actually increased it.  That's not the answer.  We just need to have things cost what an average person can pay, with prices listed up front in a way average people can understand. 

 

What other business can you think of that doesn't tell you the prices up front, and sends you a huge bill later?  What other business (except lawyers, perhaps) talks its own specialized half-Latin language?  What other business can you think of where there is ZERO customer service, and the provider tells you what you can and can't have?  In what other business do the service providers have such massive egos, acting bossy like they own you?  What other business has such a small amount of competition? 

 

The big point of this video is to show that social medicine is NOT working for trans people, and that the system has serious issues.  

 

 

 

 

Link to comment

I suppose you have to pick your poison.

 

100% state controlled? Quotas. 
 

100% free market. Only the “rich” survive.

 

Hybrid system. Tweak the definition of “rich”. 
 

I guess I’m in favor of any system that offers choices. Too many choices can complicate the administration process and increase costs. Too few choices can leave people underserved. 
 

There’s a Goldilocks Zone there somewhere. Not too hot, not too cold. Not too expensive. Not too complicated.

 

 The problem is that every election cycle the extremists on both sides take up the megaphone and drown out reasonable voices.

Link to comment

What we have now is not a free market.  Not even close.  It is a state controlled market, and the number of players is limited.  Big Pharma and Big Hospital makes the same profit everywhere... its just a matter of how tribute is squeezed from the people.  Elections don't make a difference because the oligarchs in every nation enable this.  

The Goldilocks zone must include removal of those who strangle us, rather than merely changing the method by which the criminals get paid.  

Link to comment

I suppose there is a tension between the absolute freedom of the individual, and society as a collective.  As much as we - especially in the US - want to believe otherwise, most of us are dependent on society at some level for our survival.  

Link to comment

Thanks for  the video, Aggie. I was not previously familiar with Abi. She's brilliant. 

 

There is intersection between stats on wealth gap among nations and "best healthcare systems" rankings. Digging a bit deeper, nations with market economies and smaller wealth gaps are less prone to be market societies. A market society is such that market economy bleeds into many/all aspects of civil life. We see that in the US where money will get you access to better education, healthcare, access to the justice system, etc. In market economies there is some central regulation by government, and various schools of thought differ on what optimal intervention should look like. There are myriad and dynamic factors to consider - none of this happens in a vacuum. I don't think it's reasonable to expect all folks in the US to bootstrap themselves into wealthy conditions else they get what they deserve. There have been massive inequities in the US, for example, from the very beginning which were partially enabled by society, economy, and government. It would be naive to believe we can simply reset conditions and assume all things are equal. I think it is equally naive to believe government will make regulatory decisions wisely when so much market economy has bled into all three branches, effectively privatizing it. 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Vidanjali said:

Thanks for  the video, Aggie. I was not previously familiar with Abi. She's brilliant. 

 

There is intersection between stats on wealth gap among nations and "best healthcare systems" rankings. Digging a bit deeper, nations with market economies and smaller wealth gaps are less prone to be market societies. A market society is such that market economy bleeds into many/all aspects of civil life. We see that in the US where money will get you access to better education, healthcare, access to the justice system, etc. In market economies there is some central regulation by government, and various schools of thought differ on what optimal intervention should look like. There are myriad and dynamic factors to consider - none of this happens in a vacuum. I don't think it's reasonable to expect all folks in the US to bootstrap themselves into wealthy conditions else they get what they deserve. There have been massive inequities in the US, for example, from the very beginning which were partially enabled by society, economy, and government. It would be naive to believe we can simply reset conditions and assume all things are equal. I think it is equally naive to believe government will make regulatory decisions wisely when so much market economy has bled into all three branches, effectively privatizing it. 

It’s the guns and butter problem. There has to be a safety net but also incentives. There have to be rules agreed to by a majority and some way to enforce them. Not too harsh and not too lenient. Having said that, sometimes you have to rock the boat to get people’s attention. If the status quo gets too comfortable people become resistant to change and the rights of minority groups get trampled. But you can’t live in a state of upheaval for too long. 
 

The system has to allow people to fight for their rights.  it’s good to have choices. And the right to choose needs to be protected. 
 

one of the unifying principles in the military at least when I was in, don’t know about today, was “I may strongly disagree with what you believe but I will fight for your right to say it.” I remember this advice being offered to me when the military was coming under intense scrutiny. Police forces are facing the same dilemma today. The problem with force is how do you police the police? Even those opposed to the use of force will resort to the use of force to protest the use of force, and justify it.

 

Trans rights and trans healthcare is no different. It has to be fought for and defended and justified. And then we struggle to get back to the Goldilocks zone until the next battlefield emerges. And the battle we fought is forgotten. 
 

wash, rinse, repeat!

 

I’m starting to wax philosophic. LOL 😆 

 

Link to comment
20 hours ago, Vidanjali said:

Thanks for  the video, Aggie. I was not previously familiar with Abi. She's brilliant. 

 

There is intersection between stats on wealth gap among nations and "best healthcare systems" rankings. Digging a bit deeper, nations with market economies and smaller wealth gaps are less prone to be market societies. A market society is such that market economy bleeds into many/all aspects of civil life. We see that in the US where money will get you access to better education, healthcare, access to the justice system, etc. In market economies there is some central regulation by government, and various schools of thought differ on what optimal intervention should look like. There are myriad and dynamic factors to consider - none of this happens in a vacuum. I don't think it's reasonable to expect all folks in the US to bootstrap themselves into wealthy conditions else they get what they deserve. There have been massive inequities in the US, for example, from the very beginning which were partially enabled by society, economy, and government. It would be naive to believe we can simply reset conditions and assume all things are equal. I think it is equally naive to believe government will make regulatory decisions wisely when so much market economy has bled into all three branches, effectively privatizing it. 

 Many people I know in the UK have gone down the private medicine route to transition and that's fine if they can afford it. But many others simply cannot. A few have basically put themselves in a position where they will be working until they drop to pay for GRS.  I started work at 15. The first job I had that paid a decent wage, I only got when I was in my mid 40s, then due to health issues I had to quit that which is how I got into making a living in music but that's been pretty much hand to mouth.  So my only route would have been via the NHS and that's usually a long wait.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 26 Guests (See full list)

    • MaryEllen
    • kira_k
    • awkward-yet-sweet
    • Heather Shay
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      78.1k
    • Total Posts
      735.1k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,696
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Lukey19252
    Newest Member
    Lukey19252
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dannie
      Dannie
      (63 years old)
    2. evesypeasy
      evesypeasy
      (30 years old)
    3. Katherine1745
      Katherine1745
      (70 years old)
    4. LittlestMikaelson
      LittlestMikaelson
      (24 years old)
    5. melissaharper
      melissaharper
      (28 years old)
  • Posts

    • Andy88
      Nattering nabobs of negativism negligently noisy.     
    • kira_k
      Hi, I'm really new here as well as relatively new to crossdressing and working things out, so wanted to get some things off my chest and hopefully a bit of support.   - I don't really like labels, but feel pressured to find one. I feel that it's a losing battle. I don't like the term crossdresser, which I will explain later. I don't really relate to trans or any of the other words. Sometimes I am a man who expresses themselves as one would expect, other times I'm a man who dresses like a woman, sometimes I feel like a woman who is dressed like a man and hate my body, other times I'm okay just expressing some femininity. It's all very confusing. I feel like it doesn't really matter and just accepting that I am who I am and how I feel is enough. But then how do you describe that to other people without pouring out the turmoil you feel about labels?   - It feels very lonely. I don't plan on transitioning so there are various issues such as hair (or lack of it), body shape and size etc, which makes it too obvious that I'm a man when trying to be feminine.  It feels like I have something to hide and I have no one to talk to and share things with. This isn't my whole life, it's just one part of me - I have many other interests, but it would be nice just to be able to say I bought this dress or skirt that I liked and to be proud of it and just have people talk back with the same sort of pride and interest.   - As I said, I don't really like being called a crossdresser, despite doing exactly what that denotes. The reason is probably more to do with other people. It already has a negative association, but it also doesn't help when you try and reach out to people on forums and the online community only to find a website full of creeps (So far, that's not what I've got here btw, which I'm very pleased to say). For example, I joined one forum, only to be propositioned within 2 minutes of joining and then to get a feed full of explicit photos. Regardless of sexual motivation or not, this isn't the way you approach strangers. I want to be treated with respect, and unfortunately, it seems that there are groups of people who make the term crossdresser a really depressing one. Don't get me wrong, I don't mean to offend anyone. It's just that this doesn't seem like the correct way to approach people. Sexy stuff is fine, if done with respect. It so happens that it's not why I cross-dress, so maybe it's just me being sensitive. I don't know. It just doesn't feel right.   - I have started to wear a wig and it's taking some getting used to. It's on securely, it doesn't move or anything. But sometimes it feels like it's sliding off the side of my head. I go check and everything is fine. I think I just need to get used to it more. - How do people deal with hair. I'm quite a hairy person and because of swap back and forth, I don't really want to remove too much. I don't mind removing leg hair and shaving, but arms are a bit obvious. I've been told that it's not essential to pass as a woman and sometimes I fell like I don't need to, as I've said above. But I was just wondering about other people's experiences when it comes to this.   I've probably blurted out too much at once and I really do apologise if I've offended anyone, I'm honestly not trying to do that. Kira x 
    • April Marie
      Perfectly stated @Marcie Jensen.   A person doesn't just go from angry to mass murderer in a day. Someone or multiple people missed signs before he acted out. Going from considering self-harm - something many if not most of us have considered because of the tremendous external and internal pressures we experience - to murdering innocent children and adults isn't a natural progression.    As I've mentioned before, our society always defaults to looking for an easy end to problems - someone or something to blame quickly so they can "solve" the problem and move on. Complex issues get a band-aid so we can get back to Starbucks and Snapchat. If Aiden had taken a knife and killed just one person would people demand knife confiscation? Would it be less of a tragedy because only one person was murdered? Of course not. Any act of violence, whether at the hands of a transgender, cisgender, nonbinary......... any act of violence is tragic and needless. The way to stop it isn't through eliminating the means, it's through addressing the root causes - inadequate mental health care, presence of tremendous societal prejudices, inadequate family structures, lack of individual accountability for actions, lack of a societal moral compass, loss of a belief in the sanctity of life....I could go on.   And, in the end, my heart breaks for the families who are suffering today because we - our politicians and our society - shed a tear and then plaster another band-aid solution over the problem.
    • Heather Shay
      Nothing plus or minus is happening.
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Mirrabooka
      Thank you very much, lovely people! I'm definitely feeling warm and fuzzy from the replies. 🥰
    • kira_k
      Thank you everyone for the very warm welcome. I really appreciate it.    Kira
    • VickySGV
      There were SEVEN deaths in this event.  I realize only SIX of the SEVEN will be publicly mourned and honored, but still the 7th death happened and the mourning for that one too needs for all of us to join it. 
    • Marcie Jensen
      Some significant facts:   First, he was 28 years old. He was not a child, kid or anything other than an adult. We don't know his mental state as HIPAA laws prevent the public from finding out. Can we place some of the blame on his medial care provider? Maybe, but this too is a gray area and we have no details regarding his care and treatment regimen.   Second, he purchased the guns legally. They were NOT "given" to him. Additionally, the firearms were purchased in five different places, and Aiden/Audrey went through at least five and possibly seven background checks; one for each firearm purchased.   A third point, firearms are not toys and should never be referred to as such for any reason. Firearms are inanimate objects--tools--and have to be wielded by human beings. Granted, humans often use them for awful purpose. Let's make no mistake, Aiden/Audrey Hale was responsible for this regardless of mental state'   The entire situation is a tragedy for any number of reasons and media reporting has been confusing at best and downright misleading at worst. While the shooter may be considered a victim too, the real tragedy is for the children and their families. While the shooter and his family have my sympathy, I can't give him a pass because of gender dysphoria. There are tens of thousands of us in this country, we have each had our own trials and bad experiences and we have dealt with them without resorting to mass murder.   And as if all of this isn't enough, one of the TN delegation to congress is already raising a ruckus and railing against the trans community. With regard to the trans community as a whole, it's simply given the far right even more grounds to persecute us and our community such bad, and unwarranted, publicity that the cause of trans rights has had a huge setback.
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      As usual, the talking heads take a tiny bit of truth and twist it.  I recall Satan quoting Scripture in the New Testament in a similar fashion.    Yeah, SSRI's can have nasty side effects.  Yeah, Christians can be (and are) targeted.  But Tucker (getting difficult to say his name with the proper consonent 🙄) making those claims in this case as mere speculation and weaving together an unfounded narrative is irresponsible and dishonest.     Until now, it has seemed like MtF trans folks have been the primary target.  If Aiden was FtM, I wonder what new facet of persecution is going to show up?  
    • Andy88
    • Pacificlife1994
      So I’m AmAB been in hormones about four or five months and people look at me more than ever.I think it’s because I’m in the androgynous phase.But recently I noticed I don’t get the weird look until I open my mouth.Talk about awkward. I think some people read me as a young feminine faced guy,and some read me as a female.The other day a young boy called me a girl at the store.Any thoughts or your own experiences/funny memories?
    • Dillon
      I'm so happy for you!
    • Andy88
      I recently went to a local body piercer for my right ear. My left ear was pierced in Europe when I was 17. My parents were thrilled. I am wearing a cute pair of onyx studs. 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...