Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Bill Introduced To Deny Military Service To Many Trans People


Recommended Posts

  • Admin

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/some-transgender-people-disqualified-military-service-under-new-gop-bill

 

 

I was expecting this kind of bill.  Goes hand in hand with the whole "anti-woke" baloney.  It stands no chance of passage in the Senate for the next two years, but if R's regain the Senate & Presidency in 2025, it will be high on their to-do list.

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

Wow. Speaking from the perspective of a retired senior NCO who hasn't read the bill, to say I'm stunned is an understatement. Personally, I never cared about a soldier's gender, orientation, ethnicity or anything else beyond their ability to do their job. The DEERS part is actually the most disturbing portion as it affects all service members, their spouses and children and the VA which currently provides gender care for veterans. If gender markers revert to those assigned at birth, this care could go away. It would also affect the careers of personnel currently serving who are members of the LGBTQIA+ community, which would clearly impact force readiness. Idiots.

 

I also find it disturbing that the bill's sponsors have never served in the military. That alone speaks volumes.

Link to comment

"new regulations that disqualify from service anyone who identifies as transgender or has a history of gender dysphoria, unless they have been stable in their biological sex for 36 months prior to joining the military. "Stable" means they no longer have a desire to transition and are not suffering from anxiety or depression."

 

2 hours ago, Marcie Jensen said:

The DEERS part is actually the most disturbing portion as it affects all service members, their spouses and children and the VA which currently provides gender care for veterans. If gender markers revert to those assigned at birth, this care could go away.

I've been kinda expecting this one.

 

2 hours ago, Marcie Jensen said:

I also find it disturbing that the bill's sponsors have never served in the military. That alone speaks volumes.

This.    I have a real problem with this kind of "Patriots" 

Link to comment

I'm with @Marcie Jensen!  It's politically motivated insanity just to whip up their 'base' base.


Military service is exactly that ... Service.  It has nothing to do with gender/sexual identity (of any type) and it is why so many LGBTQ+ people end up in the military (whether Out on not).  They're accepted for what they contribute in the Service to this country.


When political motivations try to manipulate that core identity of Service, the damage to our military will be extremely damaging and long lasting.

Let's hope common sense prevails.

Link to comment

As usual, the GOP is up to some evil garbage. Not surprised here in the least but very sad. My heart goes out to all the LGBTQ+ service members who are fighting for their country. Why should they have their freedoms taken away on the basis of their gender identity or sexual orientation? We don't hurt anybody. I wish the GOP would just leave us alone and let us be! 

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Lelouch vi Ushiromiya said:

As usual, the GOP is up to some evil garbage. Not surprised here in the least but very sad. My heart goes out to all the LGBTQ+ service members who are fighting for their country. Why should they have their freedoms taken away on the basis of their gender identity or sexual orientation? We don't hurt anybody. I wish the GOP would just leave us alone and let us be! 

On behalf of all service personnel, thank you LeLouch for the sentiments. Something needs to be cleared up regarding their rights, though. When a person joins the military, they give up (VOLUNTARILLY) some of their civil liberties for the sake of military discipline. In terms of LGBTQ+ in the military, the various services have come a long way since I joined over four decade ago. Then, being part of the community was grounds for immediate dishonorable discharge. Then, under Clinton came the "don't ask, don't tell" policy followed by less and less restrictions on service until the military has reached the point where members of the LGBTQ+ community can serve openly. That's real progress. 

 

The restrictions that service members agree to include, but are not limited to, restrictions on participation in politics while in uniform--you can't wear a uniform to a political event, you can't sue military medical and dental personnel for malpractice, if single and under a certain pay grade you have to live in barracks (which have improved greatly from the open platoon bays that often date from WW2 to things such a if your spouse or children commit a crime in government quarters you and your family can be evicted. All for the sake of "the good order and discipline" of the service. It's just the way it is.

 

In terms of equality, there have been a number of strides made; women serving in combat arms branches and on ships for example. These have been the product of both the democrats and the republicans, and keep in mind that the majority of service members are conservatives.

 

As I said previously, the really disturbing part of the proposed bill is what it does to the DEERS portion, as that affects the families of service members' families; both active duty and retired. The impact on veterans is also disturbing, in that it affects the VA in general, and more specifically health care. Health care for veterans and retirees is convoluted to say the least. For example, as a retiree, I have TRICARE (essentially, the military's version of health insurance) BUT that doesn't provide any benefits for gender issues of any sort. I also have VA health benefits which provide some assistance for gender issues,d if one is part of the lucky 4,000 who get approved annually, provides GCS assistance. Dental and vision care are handled under a different program and if all of this isn't enough, at age 65 Medicare takes over as the primary health insurer. 

 

What this bill would do is rip away any and all gender care for military personnel, their families and those of retirees. And it's being proposed by people who have never served. The irony is that the GOP is usually regarded as being pro military and the DEMs are not. The plain truth is that neither party cares one bit for the military or veterans unless it serves their own agendas. The Democrats use the military for social expe4rimentation and budget cuts for social issues to appeal to their base and the GOP uses the military for hypocritical flag waving and false patriotism to appeal to theirs. And yes, I have a dim view of both parties. This is just the latest stunt by a bunch of non-veterans that ha the potential of destroying lives and causing harm to the military in general, service personnel and their families without any regard for the consequences.

 

In the 1890s, Rudyard Kipling wrote the poem "Tommy" about this very topic. It's apt today. One of the verses begins says, "Oh it's Tommy this and Tommy that and Tommy, get behind///but it's please to march in front, sir, when there's trouble on the wind." He was talking about the treatment of soldiers in the UK by politicians and the public. His words have the ring of truth today, and this bill just underscores it. 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Marcie Jensen said:

This is just the latest stunt by a bunch of non-veterans that ha the potential of destroying lives and causing harm to the military in general, service personnel and their families without any regard for the consequences.

I've said before that those who avoided service should just sit down and shut up.

Link to comment

@Marcie JensenWhat an exceptional description of the reality of voluntary military service, the Tricare military system....or the falsity of what it really provides...and the implications of proposed legislation for LGTBQ+ service members and their family members. You are right that neither political party really cares about service members and their families and both have provided both positive and negative policies/programs over the decades. In the old mantra of "Mission First, People Always," both parties stop any real thought at "Mission First." Just wait until you experience the contradiction of terms that is Tricare For Life.

 

When we enlist or are commissioned we give up some of the rights civilians are guaranteed - and was also true in times of the draft/selective service. Good order and discipline, the necessity for the military to maintain a politically neutral position and to maintain the trust of the American people in that neutrality. We take an oath to protect and defend the constitution and to do that we (temporarily) relinquish some of our rights. That's most often not recognized by civilians...and even some service members who run afoul of the UCMJ during their service.

 

The Services and DoD have come very far from when we both served...and even farther from the days of segregation. Not many people in the military even know that the Pentagon was built with double the number of bathrooms needed to support the workforce it holds....because there were separate facilities for blacks and whites. Unfortunately, as a culture, humans are much better at technological advancements than we are at human rights advancement. But, we truly have come a long way.

 

I truly do enjoy your insight and perspective. Reading your thoughts and ideas has been so very helpful to me as I start this wonderfully amazing journey.

Link to comment

Thanks for the kind words, April. You are absolutely right about people not understanding about voluntarily relinquishing some of their rights when serving. Thanks for the reminder.

 

And, thanks for the point about Pentagon bathrooms. I learned something new this morning. That always makes it a good day. 

 

Hugs,

Marcie 

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Marcie Jensen said:

voluntarily relinquishing some of their rights when serving.

Yeah.  I didn't really understand how they could refuse the covid shots.  I don't remember anyone asking me which shots I wanted at Ft Bragg.

Link to comment

Me, too @Ivy. Just before Desert Shield we were all given experimental anthrax vaccinations, and it wasn't a matter of choice; or rather, you might say it was; it was "take the shot or go to jail. Those are your choices."

Link to comment

I've had so many vaccinations over the years - and exposure to nucs - that I glow in the dark. The worst was the old 3 shot Plague series that if you missed the window for the booster due to a field exercise, etc, you had to start over. They have since changed it but I started it 4 times before I got all 3 and the first shot was the worst. 

 

I think the anthrax experience caused DoD to opt out in some cases because it was not FDA approved. I think the Army was the only Service that opted not to discharge people who refused, though. Is that right?

Link to comment

I remember the plague shots! OMG they were awful. So was the gamma globulin (sp?) one. And I think you are correct about the anthrax shot, April. I managed to avoid that one because I had a live mission stateside, and deployed late to Desert Storm. I was in the 513th MI Bde for that one, and was one of 17 Arabic speakers in the entire Bde./ The chain of command had no idea as to what was going on. They had the two theater level POW cages as their responsibility, as well as the theater level TECHINT and DOCEX missions. They actually thought that the two Farsi speakers (I was one of those as well) and the Urdu speaker were dialects of Arabic! Imagine recovering an unexploded SCUD missile and no one on the team can read the markings and warning labels or at the cage trying to interrogate a senior enemy leader who has no common language with the interrogator. It got interesting. We had a battalion commander relieved as well as the Bde commander.

 

We still got those shots, though!

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   9 Members, 0 Anonymous, 110 Guests (See full list)

    • LC
    • Betty K
    • MirandaB
    • KathyLauren
    • Pip
    • Heather Shay
    • MaryEllen
    • Birdie
    • April Marie
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.6k
    • Total Posts
      768.1k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,019
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Breezy Victor
    Newest Member
    Breezy Victor
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Amanda May
      Amanda May
      (75 years old)
    2. bleep
      bleep
    3. onaquest
      onaquest
      (59 years old)
  • Posts

    • Heather Shay
      Early wild men of rock  
    • Heather Shay
      I've suffered anorexia once trauma and GD comfronted me. It was a coping mechanism... and I still don't eat well. working with therapist helps and might work you if indeed schedule causes your problem and you aren't rationalizing. A visit with a nutrionist could also help
    • Heather Shay
      Simon & Garfunkel broke up early in their career and Paul Simon went to England and wrote songs. He heard the record company added drums and other instruments to Sound of Silence (he hated the idea) and it took off - S&G reunited and the rest is history.   Speaking of break ups - The Who nearly broke up and if their next LP didn't go well they would break up - the LP was called Tommy.   Speaking of the Who, Pete Townsend was working on another concept album called Lifehouse and it wasnb't fgoing anywhere - so he abandoned it and took some songs from it and added others and it became Who's Next.   Seals & Croft where in Jay & The Americans backing band originally.   Poor Monkees - they were chastised because they hadn't played on their first 2 albums - but neither did the Beach Boys and The Grassroots, etc., etc., etc. as a studio group called The Wrecking Crew did most of the musical work.   And speaking of not playing on their own records - Motown has the Funk Brothers, and Stax had thweir own group and of course let's not forget The Swampers.    
    • Heather Shay
      Spattering of all sorts of emotions.
    • Heather Shay
      Regret is an aversive emotion that can be difficult to overcome. "Accept life, and you must accept regret," said the philosopher Henri-Frédéric ...
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
    • Heather Shay
      What makes you unique?
    • April Marie
      Eye appointment. Mascara and liner gone?      
    • April Marie
      I agree with you, Raine. Having a label - a word with a definition - can be so very helpful in understanding yourself and others.   To me, the danger isn't in the label but, rather, in how much of society ascribes rigid norms of behavior, of dress, and of actions to them. The majority of us in the greater LGBTQ+ communities see a fluidity, perhaps, not a hard label but a sense of recognition that helps us understand ourselves better and to garner that feeling that we are not alone (although, there are even some communities of people within the greater LGBTQ+ that see more rigidity than most of us). And, as we all know, that can lead to a belief that anything that doesn't fit into the box that carries the label is wrong, or bad.   Wouldn't it be wonderful if, instead of labels, life had bar codes that offered a wider description instead of a word or phrase? Scan and see the possibilities and not just one internalized definition.   Well, this is way too deep for having just had one cup of coffee.   Thanks for opening the topic, Raine! So thought-provoking.
    • April Marie
      Oh, Birdie! I hope you are feeling well this morning and got a good night's rest. Sending good thoughts and prayers your way!!
    • Betty K
      I love that trans and gender-diverse folk have a bunch of labels for gender. To me, it shows that we’re making sense of it, really taking a close look at it, breaking it down. Of course as you explore something you have an urge to categorise it, that makes perfect sense to me. And, as you say, knowing what label applies to you helps you feel less alone. Coming from a time and place where there wasn’t even a word for trans, I can vouch for the importance of that.
    • RaineOnYourParade
      The problem is mostly on weekdays, when I have school. I wake up right before leaving for school, but I don't get hungry until a while after I wake up, so I usually skip breakfast. Eating too early in the day makes me feel sick, so I'm usually better off. I have the first lunch shift at my school (10:35-11:05, I believe), and I'm still not all that hungry, so I usually only end up eating about half of my lunch. I sometimes have a snack when I get home, but that's still 50/50 at best, and then I usually eat most of my dinner (though I sometimes only get through closer to 70%). I might eat a snack before bed sometimes, depending on the day. In addition to my morning sickness (not from pregnancy fyi lol, I've had it for a long time, it's just the best name I have for it), I get a lot of anxiety-induced nausea throughout the day basically the entire time I'm at school and my stomach doesn't settle all the way until I've gotten home usually, too.     I'm still at a healthy weight with this, and I eat better on weekend days since I can control the times I eat more, but I'm aware it's still not exactly a healthy eating schedule. It could still potentially lead to problems in the future, I'm assuming. Any tips on how to eat better for someone whose aversion(?) to food comes from a lot of nausea? 
    • Birdie
      CNA called an ambulance yesterday at my evening meds check. I was having chest pains and very short of breath.    They arrived shortly and I had an abnormal EKG and Tachycardia. I told them 'right bundle blockage' was normal for me from a previous event, and they saw nothing new.    They said it was my decision if I wanted to go to the hospital or not, but they really didn't see nothing new based off my history and the nitro was working well at relieving my discomfort. I decided to stay home and rest.    Night call nurse called me to inform me to rest and take it easy and the doctor will see me in the morning as well.    The CNA did remove my bra before the ambulance arrived saying, "just less to explain", and she of course gave them all my medical history referring to me as "he". The medic lifted my boob to attach the EKG lead and all three referred to me as "ma'am" the whole time.    After they left she said, "I was the only person in the room that thought of you as male?"   Birdie 💖
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...