Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

The politics of 2024 and who do you think will be best for us


Willow

Recommended Posts

Not sure I like any of the recent presidential candidates, but the race for California Senator is taking off, as Sen. Dianne Feinstein is expected to retire at the end of her term in 2024. So far, there are 3 Democratic candidates entering the race to take Feinstein's place in 2024. Rep. Adam Shiff, Rep. Katie Porter, and Rep. Barbar Lee, all 3 Democrats. I'm sure there will be others not as pleasing. Let's put another Democrat in the Senate.

Link to comment
  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Marcie Jensen

    22

  • Willow

    21

  • Ivy

    16

  • awkward-yet-sweet

    11

2 hours ago, Ivy said:

At the risk of sounding "Woke", this seems like a bad reason for not wanting women to run for office.

 

Not a reason for not wanting women to run...it just means that the majority who do are the kind I find very unacceptable.  

 

A few women who have raised large families could be quite helpful at returning this nation to sound fiscal principles.  But those are exactly the type of women who have other things to do and wouldn't consider running.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, awkward-yet-sweet said:

A few women who have raised large families could be quite helpful at returning this nation to sound fiscal principles.  But those are exactly the type of women who have other things to do and wouldn't consider running.

Perhaps.  I've raised 8 kids and there's no way I'd run for anything.

Link to comment

It seems like the bitterest irony is that the people who probably should be running the show would never think of running or would want to.  Sometimes I favor the concept of choosing politicians by lottery instead of election.  Then normal people might have a chance. 

 

On a side note, my husband was asked to run for sheriff a couple of years ago.  He declined, but ended up managing the campaign of our current sheriff.  I'd love to see my husband in political office someday...like a state senator or something.  But I know he'd say it would be safer being handed a live cobra in a sack.  🙄

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Good morning 

 

many of my comments are out there to spark continuing conversation and are never meant to insult or hurt anyone, including an all female ticket.  I seriously doubt that would have a chance but what if it did?

 

@Marcie Jensen I was trying to avoid naming names. But here goes at the risk of getting blasted.  First, vp Kamala Harris.  She has not shone any presidential moments in my opinion and has done nothing with her alleged assignments.  The other would be e speaker Nancy Pelosi.  If there was ever a more divisive speaker of the house I can’t imagine who it would have been.  Insulted Trump at the State of the Union address,  Changed her position on legislation that she had backed when proposed by a Democrat but decided it was a terrible idea when proposed by a Republican.  Argued against allowing Presidential decrees while backing Obama’s.  Yes there are others on both sides of the aisle with similar behavior and they all need to go.  The whole point of term limits and maximum age is to get fresh ideas and give others a chance,  she is one who is past her prime.

 

There I said it and I expect I will be blasted for it.  But it is my opinion which I am permitted and I will defend your right to have a different opinion.  In fact I already did defend your rights as I am a veteran.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Marcie I guess I didn’t connect the dots.  You listed not people but key positions in government I was referring to that.

Link to comment
23 minutes ago, Willow said:

Good morning 

 

many of my comments are out there to spark continuing conversation and are never meant to insult or hurt anyone, including an all female ticket.  I seriously doubt that would have a chance but what if it did?

 

@Marcie Jensen I was trying to avoid naming names. But here goes at the risk of getting blasted.  First, vp Kamala Harris.  She has not shone any presidential moments in my opinion and has done nothing with her alleged assignments.  The other would be e speaker Nancy Pelosi.  If there was ever a more divisive speaker of the house I can’t imagine who it would have been.  Insulted Trump at the State of the Union address,  Changed her position on legislation that she had backed when proposed by a Democrat but decided it was a terrible idea when proposed by a Republican.  Argued against allowing Presidential decrees while backing Obama’s.  Yes there are others on both sides of the aisle with similar behavior and they all need to go.  The whole point of term limits and maximum age is to get fresh ideas and give others a chance,  she is one who is past her prime.

 

There I said it and I expect I will be blasted for it.  But it is my opinion which I am permitted and I will defend your right to have a different opinion.  In fact I already did defend your right, others on both sides of thre aisles as I am a veteran.

Good heavens, Willow! I agree with you about Ms. Harris and Ms. Pelosi, and for exactly the same reasons. There are, as you point out others on both sides of the aisle that are similar in behavior. No question of it.

 

I guess that I too failed to connect the dots. I was trying to say that this country has numerous examples of women who have risen to positions of power in government at all levels, so accepting an all woman ticket shouldn't be an issue. Frankly, everything you have said in this thread makes sense and I fully agree with.

 

Also, neither you, nor anyone else should be blasted for expressing their opinion. For any reason. From one veteran to another, thank you for serving and the sacrifices you made when you served.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Thank you Marcie.  I must admit I didn’t make many sacrifices.  4 years USAF. First one was all training. Then 18 months in info China and finally just over a year in Alexandria Va.  I was a special electronics technician.  Authorized civilian clothing while in Indo China.  Treated as permanent party as soon as I left basic.  But I did give of myself and received a letter of commendation from our commanding general for a job well done.  None of this is in my jacket because it was all TS at the time.  I am still restricted on certain places I can’t go or have to report.

 

and thank you for your service.

Link to comment

My pleasure, Willow. Most of my time was spent in civvies, too. I was what is now called a "Clandestine Case Officer" (used to be a different title, but someone senior needed a bullet on their fitness report) and held that same security clearance. My specialty was the Middle East. And like you, there are places I can't go.  And by joining, serving and still being restricted in where you can travel, you ARE sacrificing to this day, IMHO.

 

Also, thank you for starting this thread. The discussion is meaningful and important. Let's hope it continues for a long time!

Link to comment

 

Nikki Haley was mentioned.

 

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/2024-republicans-race-bottom-already-underway-rcna71466

 

"Former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (R) on Thursday criticized the so-called Don’t Say Gay measure signed into law by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) last year, saying it doesn’t go “far enough.” ... “Basically, what it said was you shouldn’t be able to talk about gender before third grade,” Haley said at a town hall in Exeter, N.H., according to Fox News. “I’m sorry, I don’t think that goes far enough.”

 

"The South Carolinian is basically telling GOP primary voters not to be too impressed by the Floridian’s notorious anti-LGBTQ measure — because she’d go in an even more reactionary direction."

 

Nope.

 

Link to comment

I am NOT endorsing any candidate at this point; it's far too early. But we need to remember that news organizations have an agenda too. We also need to remember to look at the entirety of a person's remarks and the context in which they are spoken. The MSNBC article reminded me of what one of my professors in seminary used to say. It was "Exegete the entire passage and never take a verse in isolation.'" With that, and that alone, here is the rest of the quote that MSNBC did not include along with the context. (Being cynical about the media, I took the trouble to find and read a transcript of Ms. Haley's remarks.)

 

Context: she was discussing parental rights in educating their children and contrasting it with her own experience in school.

 

Quote's final part: “When I was in school you didn’t have sex ed until seventh grade. And even then, your parents had to sign whether you could take the class,” she added. “That’s a decision for parents to make,”

 

This puts a bit of a different spin on things as she was talking about sex ed in general as opposed to singling out any particular group. It's also interesting that just before these remarks she was addressing the need for the GOP to get younger in its leadership and become more inclusive. 

 

Again, I'm NOT endorsing any candidate or party. I don't belong to either, nor will I after the last election cycle. I don't trust the media, frankly, to be objective and can only stress the need to find out the totality of what's being said as opposed to what's being reported.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

As I was saying earlier in this thread.  Since at least the 60s the media has controlled what people hear from a candidate and about a candidate.  If you read her history as a politician you will see that she managed to stop a lot of the anti transgender rhetoric in South Carolina.  It certainly was too soon to change it all but she stopped things like the bathroom bill, forced the DMV to take your picture regardless of how you were dressed as long as you could still be recognized.  And started allowing doctors and hospitals to treat us.

 

Not saying she’ll get nominated or that politicians don’t change their platform as it suits them but for a republican she pretty moderate.  Perhaps she can at least influence the Republican Platform.

 

regarding sex Ed. I don’t think that belongs in elementary school.  However, I know that girls had private classes about things unique to them including periods and related changes even when I was that young centuries ago. LOL.  Boys generally nothing until we were high school seniors.  And then it was about STDs.  Am I old fashioned in that regard?  Maybe I am.  But the media needs to stay out of controlling our election.

Link to comment

I don't think you're being old fashioned at all, Willow. I don't believe children as young as 5 or 6 (kindergarten) need, or understand, sex ed. At my age there are things I don't want to know. LOL And, I agree with you in everything you've said about the media and politics. 

 

My point was (I hoped) to point out why folks need to look at the entire content rather than the sound bite and sensationalism the media so loves. Guess I wasn't clear. Apologies.

Link to comment
19 minutes ago, Marcie Jensen said:

I don't believe children as young as 5 or 6 (kindergarten) need, or understand, sex ed.

Probably not.

But pretending transgender people don't exist doesn't make it so.

I think younger kids can understand gender on some level without it being a "sex ed" thing.  When I was that age I saw gender roles and such, but there was no interest in physical sex.  A "man in a dress" was just that - a curiosity perhaps.

Link to comment
17 minutes ago, Ivy said:

 

But pretending transgender people don't exist doesn't make it so.

Granted. But, the CONTEXT of Ms. Haley's remarks were made in regard to sex ed only. Nothing more and nothing else. She said nothing about transgender people one way or the other, and frankly, her record as governor was pretty trans-friendly. Especially for a republican in a deep red state.

 

That said, I doubt she will the GOP nomination due to how the primary system is rigged, and it's sad for a whole bunch of reasons. 

Link to comment

This is true, I went back and checked. .Taken out of context and to some extent misrepresented.

And when she was governor, her policies were nothing like what's happening now.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I can’t really add anything to @Ivy or @Marcie Jensen s’ recent comments as I agree with both.  Neither major party is really a party of the majority anymore.  They are both parties of the elite and the rest of us choose based on who we like least and vote for the other.  And I’ve said it before the media doesn’t write up everything that might change peoples mind they too pick one side or the other and choose what they say accordingly.  
 

look at the tv news.  Do any of then report unbiased political news.  I think it’s pretty evident they don’t.  One in particular has gone ult right and the others generally go left until after the election.  Then it doesn’t matter who you are, you gets lots of negative press by all.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I see that the concerns regarding Transgender rights being trampled in the next election are being discussed on other platforms.  Nikki Haley is being talked about on at least one.  Pro, the things she did for us in SC, con that’s was a number of years ago and she may change her stripes to have any chance of winning.  I haven’t heard much about Desantos other than he could be a lot like Trump.

 

at least both Republicans and Democrats are agreeing on one thing anybody but Trump and anybody but Biden. The Biden numbers are worse than the Trump numbers.  That was according to a media report so who knows the truth.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I’m a little behind on the news.

 

Who is Vivek Ramaswamy, 37?  Is he our next threat if elected president?  From what little I know, he seems to be against everything, I didn’t see anything we was FOR.  But I admit I didn’t go searching yet.  What he is against in broad brush strokes was easy.  

 

 

Link to comment

All I've heard is that he's an entrepreneur who has written two books: "Woke, inc." and "Nation of Victims." He co-founded Strive Asset management. He's pretty vague about his positions on issues, but seems to favor a meritocracy in all aspects of life, both public and private. Two days ago he wrote an op-ed piece for the Wall Street Journal about why he's running for president, but again it's pretty vague. Here's a link to the WSJ article:

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-im-running-for-president-c4a8ea7

Link to comment

I've never heard of Vivek Ramaswamy.  He can run if he wants, but I doubt he'd end up with more than 1 or 2% of the vote since he isn't a household name. 

 

We know Trump will run, but I don't think he's going to get the Republican nomination.  The problem with that is he'll likely decide to run with some new party, and he'll split the vote like Teddy Roosevelt or Ross Perot.  That was how we got Woodrow Wilson and Bill Clinton (ick on both counts), and it'll mean another 4 years of Biden.  Stick a fork in it at that point.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

If the January 6th committee would get Justice moving or Georgia would get charges filed, or New York even, we might not have to worry about Trump.  However, I think he still has just enough ptfe slathered all over everything that he won’t get convicted of anything.  In case someone doesn’t know ptfe is generic for DuPonts Teflon. (Which they stopped producing when their patent ran out.)

 

@Marcie Jensen thanks for the WSJ reference.

 

Willow

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Well it’s like I thought, nothing new, just another way to promote MAGAISMs, and take yet another swipe at us.  

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Willow said:

Well it’s like I thought, nothing new, just another way to promote MAGAISMs, and take yet another swipe at us.  

I agree. I think that sums it up nicely.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I will simply say that i seriously doubt i will support any republican.  Conservative has changed to be applied in social matters. The party of Lincoln, trying to hold a nation together is now finding support in dividing groups rather than unification.

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment
  • Carolyn Marie locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 103 Guests (See full list)

    • Sally Stone
    • KathyLauren
    • MaeBe
    • Susie
    • Birdie
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • Penrose-Pauling
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.6k
    • Total Posts
      767.9k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,012
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Quillian
    Newest Member
    Quillian
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 777fleetleader777
      777fleetleader777
      (21 years old)
    2. ArinHallm3
      ArinHallm3
      (18 years old)
    3. ITakMyTime
      ITakMyTime
      (70 years old)
    4. Jess31
      Jess31
      (40 years old)
    5. Natalie71645
      Natalie71645
      (39 years old)
  • Posts

    • Sally Stone
      Think positively, Ashley.  I have no doubt you'll find your king or queen at some point.   Hugs,   Sally
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Bob had the night off from teaching kara-tay and they planned to spend a lot of it at Cabaret.   Once in, Taylor waited for her man to park and looked around.  There was a sign "Mary, Paul and Peter LIVE tonight" and, sure enough, three microphones were standing in the open area.  A new hostess came up to her. "Are you alone?" "Oh, no.  He's coming." Taylor was led to a table. Bob was there in a minute and managed to get in there and seat her.  She smiled. "The act will be along in a few minutes. And Congratulations! I am SO EXCITED!!" Taylor responded to his look. "I got promoted." "To what?" "Head of Marketing." "You're kidding." "Nope.  It seems the Board finally woke up to the fact that the China cash cow may come to an end and they need to do something. Did you know that the VPs on up all get over a million dollars in compensation without really doing anything?" "No." "I am supposed to figure out how to re-energize over thirty acres of factory that have laid idle for forty years or more." "Why don't they do it?" She whispered,"the head of production is the son of the previous head of production. He has never produced anything."  She explained that everything was made in China and exported back to the US and sold under different brand names. "How am I going to find someone?" He smiled. "Congratulations. Sounds like a problem.  Hey, today we were talking about problems at our Philly plant.  One, it was built before World War 2. Second the city and state are tightening regulations and the tax structure is adverse.  Third, we get protestors every day, some of whom break into the factory.  People are talking about relocating." "We are forty miles from an interstate." "That is a plus.  Makes it harder for protestors to find us if we moved here." "You are really thinking that?" "I am, right now. I can't speak for the company.  I know there is a rail line." "Spur, actually, with several sidings.  The buildings are in good shape." "Do you have about five acres we could look at? How about if I take some pictures and send them off?" "Great.  And protestors would not be tolerated in Millville.  The factory area once upon a time was the main employer and people are very protective." Two weeks later she was in Philadelphia with Gibson and a few others.  The deal was signed and by end of summer ten acres, with an option on another ten, were being upgraded and equipment was coming in by rail. Not five, but ten.  She got a $20,000 bonus out of the blue.  The company was flush with Chinese cash that they didn't know what to do with. She was developing plans. But back to dinner.  "Did I tell you what they are paying me?" "No." She told him. "That is more than I am making." "You don't sound happy." "It takes some getting used to.  You are Management and Croesus combined." "Yeah. Is this a problem?" "No.  As I said, it takes some getting used to."  The musicians arrived and were introduced: three local teenagers in Peter Paul and Mary clothing and wigs like it was the 60s.  They began singing. "They are good," she said. "They are lip-synching." "They are good at lip-synching." They listened for a while. "Work is going to be intense for a while." "I'll bet." "I won't be able to talk to you about some of it." "I bet." They had a good evening.   The high point for Bob was that she let him put his hand on hers.  The high point for her was Bob did not seem threatened by her now being Management and making more than he did with a Masters. She didn't tell him she was likely to be in on the distribution of money the Chinese sent every year to keep them fat and happy.  But she had to finish up that report, so the evening ended early.  He drove her home, checked her apartment for people and again walked away hearing her lock the door three times.  She didn't say it, but he knew she was going to have a long talk with her therapist as well.   Her therapist was a night owl.  
    • Ashley0616
      envy: painful or resentful awareness of an advantage enjoyed by another joined with a desire to possess the same advantage obsolete : MALICE : an object of envious notice or feeling
    • MaeBe
      I sit back and think, am I this person? I definitely argue, but with the willingness to alter my opinion if I find that my information is lacking. So, no? I also don't go pointing fingers in faces like a crazed person, usually I am the one to argue with that kind of person; typically because they can't see past emotion and have little concern for actual facts. Sometimes it's sport that I do this (ENTP, baby!), but usually it comes from a place of trying to inform and shift opinion--or at least get them to actually obtain facts or get their facts from objective sources.
    • Ashley0616
    • Ashley0616
    • Ashley0616
    • MaeBe
      How exciting! Have a glorious evening!
    • Adrianna Danielle
      I will be meeting her wife tonight
    • Betty K
      Thank you Vidanjali that is so great to hear. I'm glad the joy comes across even though the subjects are dark, and especially that my voice is pretty! This was really a breakthrough for me, and I revelled in the entire process. Never had creating music been so effortless from start to finish.
    • Charlize
      The thoughts and suggestions above are certainly excellent!  I might also suggest that you continue to reach out to the trans community where your feelings are understood through experience.  I have found that helpful.  The is especially true when i try to help another in distress, not to look for a fellow sufferer but to help another find a path to self acceptance and peace.  Funny how helping another can pull me out of my own funk. We are here to help as we can.  Remember you are not alone in your feelings.   Hugs,   Charlize
    • Vidanjali
      This is great, Betty. Your voice is so pretty and soothing. I listened to both tracks on your channel. The messages are clear and there is a very effective tone for the content you are portraying as it neither sounds antagonistic nor overtly facetious, but rather empowered and joyful. 
    • Vidanjali
      @FinnyFinsterHH I am sorry to hear you're struggling so much. I'll start by saying I understand how this feels because I too have had episodes where I've gotten very upset about my chest to the point of panic or depression. So, I will offer what advice I can, but understand I know it's not easily done, though there are ways through it. Gradually think about whether someone you know can help get you a binder. Until then, because you feel this way when you realize your chest is there, you can work on developing mental techniques to get your mind off dwelling on your chest. You'll realize your chest is there throughout the day, of course, because the chest is a prominent part of the body.   First, think about addressing the physical reaction. Drink a glass of water and take several deep breaths. This can help to calm your body.   I strongly recommend mindfulness and meditation practices. You can practice techniques throughout the day, wherever you are. For example, say you catch a glimpse of yourself in a reflective surface and begin to feel sick, seeing the chest. Take a moment and instead cast your glance on anything around you, preferably something in nature like looking up at the sky or at a tree. Describe the object you're viewing in neutral terms meaning describe the color, texture, shape, borders, patterns, etc.; but avoid personal or emotional description such as, "It makes me feel..." or "It reminds me of...". This will redirect your mind away from dwelling on your body shape and calm the nervous system. There are many more mindfulness practices you can find online.   You can also try using a CBT (cognitive behavioral therapy) journal app. In such an app will guide you to describe what upset you, the feelings, thoughts, and beliefs involved, analyzing and reframing them.    Finally, consider developing a regular meditation practice. This will strengthen your mind and gradually you will find yourself less prone to feeling consumed by upsetting events.    I should also mention, if you are artistic, consider channeling your experience into artistic expression. This has worked for me before - I've created a few art pieces addressing my experience of gender dysphoria. in such a way that felt empowering - like I owned it instead of it owning me.   None of these things is a quick fix. Nor should they be because what you're dealing with is a deep issue. But will sustained effort you can find your way to living with more peace and comfort.
    • VickySGV
      I am a little different in my angle of approach on this one, but my skepticism on the "Phishing Trips" the AG's are taking is that they have gone into these investigations with the idea that illegal actions are occurring regularly.  They are going in on the information of unharmed third parties who have imagined fantastic "theories and plots of harm".  What is going to happen when the institutions turn over information that has NONE of this fantasy outcome in it.  Proof of a negative is impossible under standard logic and even most Laws of Evidence.  Just because the records do not show it happened will not in their minds equate to harm not having happened, just that someone is lying to them or covering up something that they know from their personal fantasies.  The problem is that they have made a public face of wisdom and social courage against the fantastic, they have their "glorious Quest"" and like Don Quixote will be tearing up windmills looking to justify their private images.
    • Ivy
      This sounds really good.  Good luck with it.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...