Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Target moves Pride displays after “violent” customer backlash


Ivy

Recommended Posts

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/05/target-moves-pride-displays-after-violent-customer-backlash/

 

https://www.advocate.com/business/target-pride-threats-removal-employees

 

 

“Since introducing this year’s collection, we’ve experienced threats impacting our team members’ sense of safety and well-being while at work,” Target said in a statement Tuesday. “Given these volatile circumstances, we are making adjustments to our plans, including removing items that have been at the center of the most significant confrontational behavior.”

 

Since the retailer unveiled its collection in early May, anti-LGBTQ+ conservatives have begun recording their visits to the store, either to criticize certain items or to harass employees about the displays.

 

"Several conservatives have said that they want to give Target 'the Bud Light treatment'.” 

 

Looks like they're working on that "Eradication" thing.  It's not only for trans people.

Link to comment

In just the recent past, more and more businesses began to celebrate pride, incorporating rainbow logos and selling pride merchandise. There was some controversy over that emergence, but it was of the academic and quiet type. Thinkers posed such questions as "is corporate participation in pride so much virtue signaling, or a real sign of awakening acceptance?" and following that, "corporations celebrating pride - does it do more harm than good if it's merely performative to reflect what they believe their consumer base will be attracted to?" I think we're seeing the answers to those questions. It's not true allyship if it's so easily pushed back into the closet. Will the h8ers shout and shake their fists at the sky as well when an arch of refracted prismatic light appears following precipitation?


 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Vidanjali said:

. Will the h8ers shout and shake their fists at the sky as well when an arch of refracted prismatic light appears following precipitation?

💜

Link to comment
  • Admin

Ok, I have the time to go look at the Target stores near me out of pure curiosity on this one.  They are NOT my first go-to for my Pride merchandise fix of the year.  (I have already bought a shirt from my church's Pride ministry last Sunday afternoon). 

 

Two churches in the Pasadena CA area that are LGBTQ supportive have received E-mail threats of bomb and gun violence in recent weeks and a city beside mine has had two highly vocal anti-LGBTQ religious organizations rent store front "church" space, which the City Council is not happy about.  The actions are tying up serious law enforcement investigation time.  The advent of the "Selfie video" of a violent sounding and manufactured brief encounter phenomena is getting out of hand.  The fantasies about LGBTQ people harming, instead of nurturing children are running like cockroaches a lot of places I had not seen before, and they are becoming rallying cries. 

Yes, Target is selling the merchandise to make money with the least overhead for store security they can come up with, I am of the opinion that they do acknowledge us for our money with is capitalistic sense and not out of altruism.  It is nice to be a significant segment of the national buying power that gets recognized, and I am also aware that they lose even more if their employees are injured, physically or mentally. 

Link to comment
  • Admin

I've underestimated the amount of violence inherent in the anti-LGBT, hysteria--fed right wing movements in this country.  They aren't content with just protests; they are in-your-face and threatening violence at every opportunity, both online and in-person.

 

We will soon lose all support from the business community.  Danger to their employees will trump sympathy for us.  Our community is in dire straits, and I'm talking about all the letters; L, G, B, T, & Q.

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
44 minutes ago, Carolyn Marie said:

I've underestimated the amount of violence inherent in the anti-LGBT, hysteria--fed right wing movements in this country.  They aren't content with just protests; they are in-your-face and threatening violence at every opportunity, both online and in-person.

 

We will soon lose all support from the business community.  Danger to their employees will trump sympathy for us.  Our community is in dire straits, and I'm talking about all the letters; L, G, B, T, & Q.

 

Carolyn Marie

I'm afraid you're right, @Carolyn MarieA true democracy protects its most vulnerable minorities, but this is America, the profitable, we're talking about.

Link to comment
8 hours ago, Carolyn Marie said:

they are in-your-face and threatening violence at every opportunity, both online and in-person.

 

It is tragically ironic. 

Link to comment

I did visit the local Target the other day and saw the tucking friendly merchandise amongst the more typical corporate Pride offerings, did wonder how long until it became the cultural battlefield of the moment. 

Link to comment
  • Admin

I did not go to my local store, but what exactly is "Tucking Friendly" swim apparel??  I hope our MtF sites have enough good info on "Tucking" that a singular garment is not needed for Pride Month, and why or how in the name of a Sainted Skunk would "tucking" become such a hot issue to Cis &*^% when all I hear is Trans who have no idea what it means.

Link to comment
  • Admin
3 hours ago, VickySGV said:

 and why or how in the name of a Sainted Skunk would "tucking" become such a hot issue to Cis &*^% when all I hear is Trans who have no idea what it means.

 

It's not the garments per se, but the deliberate misinformation being put out by right wing pundits and bloggers who claim they are meant for toddlers and youth.  Someone from the MSM did a fact check on the air and said that the Target catalog had absolutely no "tucking friendly" bathing suits for anyone besides adults.  But facts are not the point, or the goal, of the right; just stoking more hysteria.

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

"Tuck friendly construction" and "extra crotch coverage" are the words on the label on that hard to read image.

Link to comment
  • Admin

I am not naive to our needs, but incontinent adults, and pre-pottytraining children wearing diapers could benefit from that type of garment construction.  Yes I am picking apart the protestors arguments to show their bias and lack of critical thinking. OTOH, the garment creator could have used something other than a 'code word' for Trans users.  Do not poke sticks into wild animal's cages is an admonition I received often as a child.

Link to comment

I guess underwear is getting political now…   I mean, why not?

Underwear cops instead of undercover cops.  Maybe undercover underwear cops?  They could work the public restroom beat.

What happens if I go "commando"?

Link to comment

This is getting ridiculous. I mean, so what? It just exists, it's not like you're FORCED to buy it. Just ignore it! Shop somewhere else if it's that big a deal to you! oh wait, they don't have the brain capacity for that.

Link to comment
  • Admin
48 minutes ago, Ivy said:

Underwear cops instead of undercover cops.  Maybe undercover underwear cops?  They could work the public restroom beat.

What happens if I go "commando"?

 

"Captain Underpants" comes to mind.  My son used to love those books.  Oh, wait...I think those books are banned!

 

Curses, foiled again!

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

I didn't check the kids section, but haven't heard that Target offered the 'tuck friendly' clothing in their sizes from any source than the people filming themselves vandalizing the stores. 

Link to comment

I'm thinking they just carry them there to be misleading.  The actual truth doesn't matter when your object is to stir up some muck.

Link to comment

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/05/conservatives-admit-that-bud-light-target-boycotts-are-about-making-pride-toxic-to-corporations/

 

"On his own Daily Wire show, host Michael Knowles reiterated Walsh’s point. “This has been the point that has been building for months now, which is we need to make that symbol toxic, the Pride flag symbol, we need to make that toxic,” Knowles said. “We need to have companies think twice about it.”

 

And this…

"On The Daily Blast Live, host Erica Cobb accused Target specifically of “performative allyship.

“This is the reason why everyone is so up in arms about people monetizing saying that they are allies,” she said. “Allyship is not meant to be comfortable. Why is it not meant to be comfortable? Because the people that you are aligning with aren’t comfortable. The whole point of allyship is to join forces, is to amplify minority voices. That means that you are in it with that group regardless. So, if you are going to back down from what you are doing—essentially just monetizing off of LGBTQIA+—that means that you were never about it to begin with.”

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Ivy said:

"On his own Daily Wire show, host Michael Knowles reiterated Walsh’s point. “This has been the point that has been building for months now, which is we need to make that symbol toxic, the Pride flag symbol, we need to make that toxic,” 

 

Do they even realize the irony of what they say. Something is either toxic or it isn't. Making something toxic implies applying toxicity to it, whereas there was none prior to application. And whence comes said toxicity? THEY (the h8ers) are the very source of that toxicity.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
2 hours ago, Vidanjali said:

Making something toxic implies applying toxicity to it, whereas there was none prior to application.

 

It is very much like making "woke" a dirty word.   Nonsense from specialists in nonsense.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Charlize said:

It is very much like making "woke" a dirty word.

Well, they don't want people to wake up.

Link to comment
5 hours ago, Ivy said:

Well, they don't want people to wake up.

It's hard to tell what they want cuz there was never any logic to the thought. They're so noisy it's like telling somebody "go to sleep" with a megaphone directed on the ear. Not only does it advertise the fruit, it sells it too. The situation is entirely messed up, evil, but what was I to expect. 🤷

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
On 5/24/2023 at 9:24 AM, Carolyn Marie said:

I've underestimated the amount of violence inherent in the anti-LGBT, hysteria--fed right wing movements in this country.  They aren't content with just protests; they are in-your-face and threatening violence at every opportunity, both online and in-person.

This is the unfortunate truth. What bothers me the most about these attacks (especially the online variety) is the blatant and purposeful misinformation they spew. In general, the public take these lies and deceitful statements as fact without doing any due diligence. Reading the comments on any of these reveal the level of idiocy and ignorance about the LGBTQ+ but especially the T. Some of the anti-trans comments are so off-base and so far from the truth that I have to believe most are strategically posted by specific anti-trans groups. IMHO, It’s all one big dog & pony show.

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Susan R said:

In general, the public take these lies and deceitful statements as fact without doing any due diligence.

The people into this scan the internet for the most outlandish individuals, and post the insanity as a supposed example of a trans person.  If you look hard enough, you'll eventually find a weirdo of some sort.  And it's easy to take a statement out of context and completely misrepresent what was actually being said.

If you can keep people angry enough, they won't think about what they're actually doing.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 152 Guests (See full list)

    • Abigail Genevieve
    • MaeBe
    • violet r
    • Betty K
    • Adrianna Danielle
    • KathyLauren
    • SamC
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow bitch certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My parents were life long Democrats. 
    • Ivy
      'Nuff said. Yeah I'm not thrilled with Biden either. There are some conservative ideas I'm good with.  And I do feel that the current Democratic party is too cozy with the bankers and wealthy.  But despite all their talk, when it comes down to it, so are the Republicans.  And it's not the Dems calling for our eradication. Unfortunately, I see this election as existential for trans folks.  
    • Mmindy
      Good evening everyone,   @Birdie your CNA Is ill informed about breast and proper bra fitting.   My wife and I are checking out a campground up in Michigan just a little North of Saginaw, MI. We had a great meal at a local tavern serving delicious perch fillet dinner.   We’re going to check out the Saginaw,MI Bay area for summer time activities for when we come back on occasion. We belong to a camping club call Adventure Outdoors and have free camping at their resorts around Michigan and Ohio.   Hugs,   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋    
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I agree.   Biden has been known to switch positions without notice, whether on abortion, Gaza or gay marriage.  Most of what he has done has been via executive order and decision, so it does not carry the force of lasting law and can be easily reversed.  I really do not trust him at all.   Trump says a lot of things.  He switches his position all the time.  Most of what he wants to do will require legislation to accomplish, some of which will simply never become law.  I do not trust him at all.   I'm not sure which is worse for trans people specifically because of this, and the fact that the other issues that surround trans folk which I attempted to isolate this question from, but here I go :) also affect trans people along with everyone else.   In either case trans folk need to be prepared. 
    • Carolyn Marie
      I'm certain that there are some, if not many, but you would be hard pressed to find them willing to speak up on this forum.  There are many trans folk who are conservative, and believe that Biden's non-trans related policies are terrible.  Those include his economic, foreign policy, border security, and environmental policies.  I'm a lifelong Democrat, and even I don't like all of Biden's policies.  It comes down to who would do the most damage to the most people, and the most damage to America as a going democratic nation which has respect for the rule of law.   Carolyn Marie
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...