Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Target moves Pride displays after “violent” customer backlash


Ivy

Recommended Posts

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/05/target-moves-pride-displays-after-violent-customer-backlash/

 

https://www.advocate.com/business/target-pride-threats-removal-employees

 

 

“Since introducing this year’s collection, we’ve experienced threats impacting our team members’ sense of safety and well-being while at work,” Target said in a statement Tuesday. “Given these volatile circumstances, we are making adjustments to our plans, including removing items that have been at the center of the most significant confrontational behavior.”

 

Since the retailer unveiled its collection in early May, anti-LGBTQ+ conservatives have begun recording their visits to the store, either to criticize certain items or to harass employees about the displays.

 

"Several conservatives have said that they want to give Target 'the Bud Light treatment'.” 

 

Looks like they're working on that "Eradication" thing.  It's not only for trans people.

Link to comment

In just the recent past, more and more businesses began to celebrate pride, incorporating rainbow logos and selling pride merchandise. There was some controversy over that emergence, but it was of the academic and quiet type. Thinkers posed such questions as "is corporate participation in pride so much virtue signaling, or a real sign of awakening acceptance?" and following that, "corporations celebrating pride - does it do more harm than good if it's merely performative to reflect what they believe their consumer base will be attracted to?" I think we're seeing the answers to those questions. It's not true allyship if it's so easily pushed back into the closet. Will the h8ers shout and shake their fists at the sky as well when an arch of refracted prismatic light appears following precipitation?


 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Vidanjali said:

. Will the h8ers shout and shake their fists at the sky as well when an arch of refracted prismatic light appears following precipitation?

💜

Link to comment
  • Admin

Ok, I have the time to go look at the Target stores near me out of pure curiosity on this one.  They are NOT my first go-to for my Pride merchandise fix of the year.  (I have already bought a shirt from my church's Pride ministry last Sunday afternoon). 

 

Two churches in the Pasadena CA area that are LGBTQ supportive have received E-mail threats of bomb and gun violence in recent weeks and a city beside mine has had two highly vocal anti-LGBTQ religious organizations rent store front "church" space, which the City Council is not happy about.  The actions are tying up serious law enforcement investigation time.  The advent of the "Selfie video" of a violent sounding and manufactured brief encounter phenomena is getting out of hand.  The fantasies about LGBTQ people harming, instead of nurturing children are running like cockroaches a lot of places I had not seen before, and they are becoming rallying cries. 

Yes, Target is selling the merchandise to make money with the least overhead for store security they can come up with, I am of the opinion that they do acknowledge us for our money with is capitalistic sense and not out of altruism.  It is nice to be a significant segment of the national buying power that gets recognized, and I am also aware that they lose even more if their employees are injured, physically or mentally. 

Link to comment
  • Admin

I've underestimated the amount of violence inherent in the anti-LGBT, hysteria--fed right wing movements in this country.  They aren't content with just protests; they are in-your-face and threatening violence at every opportunity, both online and in-person.

 

We will soon lose all support from the business community.  Danger to their employees will trump sympathy for us.  Our community is in dire straits, and I'm talking about all the letters; L, G, B, T, & Q.

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
44 minutes ago, Carolyn Marie said:

I've underestimated the amount of violence inherent in the anti-LGBT, hysteria--fed right wing movements in this country.  They aren't content with just protests; they are in-your-face and threatening violence at every opportunity, both online and in-person.

 

We will soon lose all support from the business community.  Danger to their employees will trump sympathy for us.  Our community is in dire straits, and I'm talking about all the letters; L, G, B, T, & Q.

 

Carolyn Marie

I'm afraid you're right, @Carolyn MarieA true democracy protects its most vulnerable minorities, but this is America, the profitable, we're talking about.

Link to comment
8 hours ago, Carolyn Marie said:

they are in-your-face and threatening violence at every opportunity, both online and in-person.

 

It is tragically ironic. 

Link to comment

I did visit the local Target the other day and saw the tucking friendly merchandise amongst the more typical corporate Pride offerings, did wonder how long until it became the cultural battlefield of the moment. 

Link to comment
  • Admin

I did not go to my local store, but what exactly is "Tucking Friendly" swim apparel??  I hope our MtF sites have enough good info on "Tucking" that a singular garment is not needed for Pride Month, and why or how in the name of a Sainted Skunk would "tucking" become such a hot issue to Cis &*^% when all I hear is Trans who have no idea what it means.

Link to comment
  • Admin
3 hours ago, VickySGV said:

 and why or how in the name of a Sainted Skunk would "tucking" become such a hot issue to Cis &*^% when all I hear is Trans who have no idea what it means.

 

It's not the garments per se, but the deliberate misinformation being put out by right wing pundits and bloggers who claim they are meant for toddlers and youth.  Someone from the MSM did a fact check on the air and said that the Target catalog had absolutely no "tucking friendly" bathing suits for anyone besides adults.  But facts are not the point, or the goal, of the right; just stoking more hysteria.

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

"Tuck friendly construction" and "extra crotch coverage" are the words on the label on that hard to read image.

Link to comment
  • Admin

I am not naive to our needs, but incontinent adults, and pre-pottytraining children wearing diapers could benefit from that type of garment construction.  Yes I am picking apart the protestors arguments to show their bias and lack of critical thinking. OTOH, the garment creator could have used something other than a 'code word' for Trans users.  Do not poke sticks into wild animal's cages is an admonition I received often as a child.

Link to comment

I guess underwear is getting political now…   I mean, why not?

Underwear cops instead of undercover cops.  Maybe undercover underwear cops?  They could work the public restroom beat.

What happens if I go "commando"?

Link to comment

This is getting ridiculous. I mean, so what? It just exists, it's not like you're FORCED to buy it. Just ignore it! Shop somewhere else if it's that big a deal to you! oh wait, they don't have the brain capacity for that.

Link to comment
  • Admin
48 minutes ago, Ivy said:

Underwear cops instead of undercover cops.  Maybe undercover underwear cops?  They could work the public restroom beat.

What happens if I go "commando"?

 

"Captain Underpants" comes to mind.  My son used to love those books.  Oh, wait...I think those books are banned!

 

Curses, foiled again!

 

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

I didn't check the kids section, but haven't heard that Target offered the 'tuck friendly' clothing in their sizes from any source than the people filming themselves vandalizing the stores. 

Link to comment

I'm thinking they just carry them there to be misleading.  The actual truth doesn't matter when your object is to stir up some muck.

Link to comment

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/05/conservatives-admit-that-bud-light-target-boycotts-are-about-making-pride-toxic-to-corporations/

 

"On his own Daily Wire show, host Michael Knowles reiterated Walsh’s point. “This has been the point that has been building for months now, which is we need to make that symbol toxic, the Pride flag symbol, we need to make that toxic,” Knowles said. “We need to have companies think twice about it.”

 

And this…

"On The Daily Blast Live, host Erica Cobb accused Target specifically of “performative allyship.

“This is the reason why everyone is so up in arms about people monetizing saying that they are allies,” she said. “Allyship is not meant to be comfortable. Why is it not meant to be comfortable? Because the people that you are aligning with aren’t comfortable. The whole point of allyship is to join forces, is to amplify minority voices. That means that you are in it with that group regardless. So, if you are going to back down from what you are doing—essentially just monetizing off of LGBTQIA+—that means that you were never about it to begin with.”

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Ivy said:

"On his own Daily Wire show, host Michael Knowles reiterated Walsh’s point. “This has been the point that has been building for months now, which is we need to make that symbol toxic, the Pride flag symbol, we need to make that toxic,” 

 

Do they even realize the irony of what they say. Something is either toxic or it isn't. Making something toxic implies applying toxicity to it, whereas there was none prior to application. And whence comes said toxicity? THEY (the h8ers) are the very source of that toxicity.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
2 hours ago, Vidanjali said:

Making something toxic implies applying toxicity to it, whereas there was none prior to application.

 

It is very much like making "woke" a dirty word.   Nonsense from specialists in nonsense.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Charlize said:

It is very much like making "woke" a dirty word.

Well, they don't want people to wake up.

Link to comment
5 hours ago, Ivy said:

Well, they don't want people to wake up.

It's hard to tell what they want cuz there was never any logic to the thought. They're so noisy it's like telling somebody "go to sleep" with a megaphone directed on the ear. Not only does it advertise the fruit, it sells it too. The situation is entirely messed up, evil, but what was I to expect. 🤷

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
On 5/24/2023 at 9:24 AM, Carolyn Marie said:

I've underestimated the amount of violence inherent in the anti-LGBT, hysteria--fed right wing movements in this country.  They aren't content with just protests; they are in-your-face and threatening violence at every opportunity, both online and in-person.

This is the unfortunate truth. What bothers me the most about these attacks (especially the online variety) is the blatant and purposeful misinformation they spew. In general, the public take these lies and deceitful statements as fact without doing any due diligence. Reading the comments on any of these reveal the level of idiocy and ignorance about the LGBTQ+ but especially the T. Some of the anti-trans comments are so off-base and so far from the truth that I have to believe most are strategically posted by specific anti-trans groups. IMHO, It’s all one big dog & pony show.

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Susan R said:

In general, the public take these lies and deceitful statements as fact without doing any due diligence.

The people into this scan the internet for the most outlandish individuals, and post the insanity as a supposed example of a trans person.  If you look hard enough, you'll eventually find a weirdo of some sort.  And it's easy to take a statement out of context and completely misrepresent what was actually being said.

If you can keep people angry enough, they won't think about what they're actually doing.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 129 Guests (See full list)

    • MaryEllen
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • Willow
      Good morning    Now @Abigail Genevieve and @Mmindy what makes you so certain I didn’t mean it to say bee itch certificate?  lol. Thanks Mindy. I was asleep when you saw this and fixed it, and yes Abigail, as a moderator I could have fixed it myself, or weren’t you pointing out the irony of that?   I use Alexis as my alarm to get up.  And I set the ringer to be two guys telling me to get up.  I was so sound asleep when they started telling me to get up that it scared me and my first thought were I had over slept.  Since I have a difficult time getting to sleep as early as I have to in order to get enough sleep I at least cut back my normal awake time to get ready.  But now I have to do my hair and get going.   enjoyed my coffee and a little time catching up   see you all later, for its hi ho hi ho it’s off to work I go.   Willow
    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...