Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Extended Healthcare = "nazi Healthcare"


Guest Zabrak

Recommended Posts

  • Root Admin
No you didn't, but then again I didn't really expect an answer.

Keep it clean. There's no need to be rude or confrontational.

Link to comment
Guest CharlieRose
Just like all of the conspiracy theories about Bush? People claimed that Bush was going retain the Presidency after his second term, still claim that he was behind 9/11, claim just about everything about him, including that he is the Anti-Christ.

Yes Obama is different than every other President. His administration has taken over private corporations, forced banks to take "loans," then not allowed them to repay the "loans." He even has a Tsar to regulate the pay of employees of private companies.

Why is it that a white person disagreeing with a black man is automatically assumed to be racist?

Rational, reasonable discussion would be good. Barney Frank asking someone "On what planet do you spend most of your time?," and comparing them to a table. That certainly is rational and reasonable. No the woman, a member of LaRouche Youth Movement, certainly wasn't being rational, but is that any reason for Frank to go down to her level? Other Democratic politicians have also been less than rational, Pelosi is saying the whole movement is fake, amazing not one person came to that conclusion on their own. Boxer saying that they are all organized, certain members of the media calling them teabaggers, and racists. Are any of those people acting rational?

I have no problem with conservatives like yourself and do not consider the entire group loony. And yes, there are some loony liberals, too.

I don't consider the entire party to be racist just because there are white people disagreeing with a black man. There are black republicans who disagree with Obama. That doesn't make them racist against white people. But I think that for a lot of people, these irrational fears and ideas are sprouting from xenophobia. Some people have let it slip that their fears are rooted in racism, ie. Glenn Beck saying the health care bill (as well as the entire Obama administration) is a form of reparations. (ie. slave reparations) So... because he's a black man, he must want to punish white people? (And let's not forget he's only half black) *shakes head*

I thought that the Barney Frank comment was something these people needed to hear for a long time. To entertain these ideas by responding to them as if they're actually probable hasn't been working and makes about as much sense as the ideas do. All they do is scream over someone responding rationally. Barney Frank was saying, "Are you aware that your ideas are nuts?" Which they totally are. Perhaps not the most dignified or polite thing to do, but also quite needed and very funny. :D And Nancy Pelosi's never quite rational. :P

Link to comment

wow :blink: this is why i dont like political debates, someone's bound to get personal.

i do hate how white people are always assumed to be racist when they dont like a person of a different race. that very idea is racist agenst white people. i dont like racism as a whole. white, black, brown, green, purple, it doesnt matter.

i dont know about all the rest of the country, but i live in tennessee, and everyone in my city who didnt like obama quoted race and religion as their basis for hating him. it may not be true in other places, i dont know, but here, yea, its racism.

frankly, i think all of politics is loopy. its all flame wars, and hitting below the belt. its pretty disgusting how both parties have acted over the years, and yet the people still put up with it. oh well, guess thats life. i hate neither liberals nor conservatives. i draw inspiration from both. all i hate is sexism/herero-supremacy/racism (i count transphobia as sexism. if they didnt judge based on sex, then they would have no problem with us), and i get that kind of stuff 90% of the time from conservatives. but the ones that arent stupid i can be friends with, i could name 3 off the top of my head. the stupid rule applies to liberals too, they can be just as annoying.

i want to start the republicrats, and end this pointless division. its ok to divide on issues, thats how this whole thing works, but this is like a civil war. and from i can see, its not that civil.

Link to comment
Guest CharlieRose
wow :blink: this is why i dont like political debates, someone's bound to get personal.

Whoops. I apologize for my part in that. I can be blunt when I speak my mind sometimes. :P I have nothing against anyone here, have not been offended and am not trying to offend anyone. I have actually been quite enjoying this debate thusfar. (I love debates!) :D

i want to start the republicrats, and end this pointless division. its ok to divide on issues, thats how this whole thing works, but this is like a civil war. and from i can see, its not that civil.

Skyy, you're funny. Republicrats, that's awesome. :D And, yeah, when it comes to war, all those silly terms are never what they imply. "Friendly" fire, "civil" war...

Link to comment
Guest Zabrak

Its not your fault in any way, Charlie. No one here needed to try to make things into personal attacks. It was only opinions and no one ment to offend anyone. Peace, love and chicken grease. :)

Link to comment
Whoops. I apologize for my part in that. I can be blunt when I speak my mind sometimes. :P I have nothing against anyone here, have not been offended and am not trying to offend anyone. I have actually been quite enjoying this debate thusfar. (I love debates!) :D

oh no no no, i wasnt talking about you. i didnt notice anything super offensive about your posts. they all seemed to be humble political beliefs, no flaming in them. :lol: dont worry, i have a habit of being honest too. and debates are great, nothing wrong with them, i was refering to the assault on zabrak. it takes a lot of self control to have a mature debate, and some cant do it, cause it involves biting the bullet a lot, and dealing with humor and sarcasm. :) i really dont trust myself to debate; if i feel strongly about the subject and know it well, i get really offended easily (like gay marriage, for me, its like debating whether black people should be equals), or if i dont know the subject well, i dont even bother making stuff up (like health care, i'm not 18, never researched it, and dont really know much about it). so dont worry, i wasnt talking about you.

Skyy, you're funny. Republicrats, that's awesome. :D And, yeah, when it comes to war, all those silly terms are never what they imply. "Friendly" fire, "civil" war...

i forgot about friendly fire. :lol: it funny how terms can change their meaning. the the sarcastic "oh, great" is virtually never used in a positive light. "wise man" and "wise guy" are opposites.

oh, and i've always wanted to say the word republicrats, and now i finally can use the term.

sorry for the weird response posting, i'm not that computer savvy, so this is the best i can do :lol:

hmm...now i'm craving chicken soup, thanks zabrak <_<:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Guest NatalieRene

What I don't understand is how did he stoop to her level by blowing her off? Should he have really bothered to waste everyone's time by answering her instead of moving on to the actual semi rational guy asking about what happens tot he people losing their houses?

Link to comment
Guest Joanna Phipps

Ok we all know that the trans community has many issues, chroning un/underemployment being one of the big ones. Thankfully i am employed but its part time and for 8/hr with no benefits, having grown up in Canada I know what a good state system can do for a person's peac of mind. You know you can get into the hospital should you need to, you can see a Dr or dentist with little or no co-pay. The standard of care, whie not equating a Mayo Clinic, is quite good and if its an emergency the will see you no matter what.

The majority of the people who are against it seem to fall into two camps

1) those who have money and wouldnt need/use it anyway

2) those who think that anything remotely socialist is way too close to communist (all though the two systems have little in common)

The majority of those for it seem to be people like us who have no insurance otherwise, and dont stand a hope in unowhere of getting any because we dont make enough at work or on public assistance or social security to pay for daily living and medical insurance.

just my 0.01$

Link to comment

oh, i forgot something i meant to say before. i only withdrew my amusement about how silly the woman was, the burn stands as funny. just wanted the clear that confusion up.

i want sushi now...sushi is the best food on this planet. :D

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 170 Guests (See full list)

    • MaeBe
    • Ashley0616
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • missyjo
    • KathyLauren
    • KymmieL
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • missyjo
      I've no desire to present androgynous..nothing wrong with it but I am a girl n wish to present as a girl. shrugs, if androgynous works fir others good. always happy someone finds a solution or happiness    today black jeans  black wedges..purple camisole under white n black polka dot blouse half open   soft smile to all 
    • MaeBe
      I have read some of it, mostly in areas specifically targeted at the LGBTQ+ peoples.   You also have to take into account what and who is behind the words, not just the words themselves. Together that creates context, right? Let's take some examples, under the Department of Health & Human Services section:   "Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike."   or   "Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families."   From a wording perspective, who doesn't want to protect the health and well-being of Americans or think that families aren't good for America? But let's take a look at the author, Roger Severino. He's well-quoted to be against LGBTQ+ anything, has standard christian nationalist views, supports conversion therapy, etc.   So when he uses words like "threatens the health and well-being of children and adults alike" it's not about actual health, it's about enforcing cis-gendered ideology because he (and the rest of the Heritage Foundation) believe LGBTQ+ people and communities are harmful. Or when he invokes the family through the lens of, let's just say dog whistles including the "penalization of marriage" (how and where?!), he idealizes families involving marriage of a "biological male to a biological female" and associates LGBTQ+ family equity as something unhealthy.   Who are the radical actors? Who is telling people to be trans, gay, or queer in general? No one. The idea that there can be any sort of equity between LGBTQ+ people and "normal" cis people is abhorrent to the author, so the loaded language of radical/destructive/guise/threaten are used. Families that he believes are "good" are stable/well-ordered/healthy, specifically married/nuclear ones.   Start looking into intersectionality of oppression of non-privileged groups and how that affects the concept of the family and you will understand that these platitudes are thinly veiled wrappers for christian nationalist ideology.   What's wrong with equity for queer families, to allow them full rights as parents, who are bringing up smart and able children? Or single mothers who are working three jobs to get food on plates?
    • Ashley0616
      Well yesterday didn't work like I wanted to. I met a guy and started talking and he was wanting to be in a relationship. I asked my kids on how they thought of me dating a man and they said gross and said no. I guess it's time to look for women. I think that is going to be harder. Oh well I guess.  
    • Ashley0616
      I don't have anything in my dress pocket
    • Carolyn Marie
      This topic reminds me of the lyrics to the Beatles song, "A Little Help From My Friends."   "What do you see when you turn out the lights?"   "I can't tell you but I know it's mine."   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @Ivy have you read the actual document?   Has anyone else out there read it?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am reading the Project 2025 document https://www.project2025.org/policy/   This will take some time.  I read the forward and I want to read it again later.   I read some criticism of it outside here and I will be looking for it in the light of what has been posted here and there.  Some of the criticism is bosh.   @MaeBe have you read the actual document?
    • RaineOnYourParade
      *older, not holder, oops :P
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No problem!
    • RaineOnYourParade
      Old topic, but I gotta say my favorites are: "Stop hitting on minors" (doesn't work if you're holder tho) and "Sure as [squid] not you"
    • Carolyn Marie
      Abigail, I think we will just leave the other posts where they are, and the discussion can start anew here.  It is possible to do what you ask, but would disrupt the flow of the discussion in the other thread, and would require more work than it's worth.   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am in too good a mood to earn my certificate today. I am sure something will happen that will put me on the path to earning it.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      It's likely most cis-women consider a fitting unnecessary "because they know what  they wear" and get used to the wrong size.  The instructions for what your size is are simple and why go to any further effort?  You measure your bandsize and you measure your max and subtract the two to get the needed info for the cup size.  Then you buy the same size for years until it hurts or something.
    • KatieSC
      Congratulations Lorelei! Yes, it is a powerful feeling to have the documents that say "you are you".
    • Mmindy
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...