Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

I Finally Have A Reason To Buy A Blu-ray Player!


Guest Robin Winter

Recommended Posts

Guest Robin Winter

My wife and I've just finished watching Avatar, and oh my god, it was amazing!!!! It had the most amazing CG I've ever seen, it was almost flawless! The movement of everything looked so fluid and natural, I was absolutely blown away. And it was sappy enough to draw a few tears, which I always appreciate.

I think what I appreciated the most was the tribal feel to everything, it was very much in line with my own beliefs and connection with nature.

This movie alone has convinced me to finally buy blu-ray, so I can watch it properly when it hits the shelves.

Avatar%20Zoe%20Saldana.jpg

Link to comment
  • Admin

Yup, your review is pretty much in line with all the other ones I've heard.

I can't wait to see it. My family went to the theater today, 40 minutes before a mid-afternoon show, and it was SOLD OUT. Doggone it!

Its been out for 3 weeks and the crowds are still crazy. Oh, well, try again next weekend I guess.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest ChloëC

ugh! It is so hard to keep up with current technology!!! I have a netbook and I've had an LCD monitor for my computer for about two or so years, but I just can't justify buying a new TV yet (we're connected to DirecTV) or blu-ray player. Just don't watch enough tv to care if I can see either wrinkles or facelift scars. I found the graphic opening to Saving Pvt. Ryan, now some years old, quite graphic enough. I surely don't need to see individual blood droplets or minute body parts spewing out of bodies, thank you.

Tho the last 3-D movie I actually saw was some piece of schlock from 1967 called 'The Bubble' which isn't even listed in IMDB!!! So, I guess I'll have to take a peek when the hoopla dies down. (I will not stand in any line to see a movie!)

But, Shilo, I'll probably get a blu-ray player eventually. Gotta keep the economy moving, don't we?

Chloë

(btw, I bought one of my daughters, an early mp3 player back in about 1998 or so, and not one other kid in her middle-school had the slightest idea what she had (a Diamond Rio300!) The Sony Walkman reigned supreme then! And the IPOD was still a gleam in Steve Jobs eye.

Link to comment
Guest sarah f

I want to see the movie too Shilo. I am waiting until the lines start to die down. I don't like to go to a packed theater. I like to have some chairs between me and my wife. Although it will be hard to drag my wife to watch Avatar. She doesn't like science fiction but I will try. If I don't get to see it at the movies then maybe I might have to buy a blue ray player before I watch it at home. Sigh

Love,

Sarah F

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter
ugh! It is so hard to keep up with current technology!!! I have a netbook and I've had an LCD monitor for my computer for about two or so years, but I just can't justify buying a new TV yet (we're connected to DirecTV) or blu-ray player. Just don't watch enough tv to care if I can see either wrinkles or facelift scars. I found the graphic opening to Saving Pvt. Ryan, now some years old, quite graphic enough. I surely don't need to see individual blood droplets or minute body parts spewing out of bodies, thank you.

Tho the last 3-D movie I actually saw was some piece of schlock from 1967 called 'The Bubble' which isn't even listed in IMDB!!! So, I guess I'll have to take a peek when the hoopla dies down. (I will not stand in any line to see a movie!)

But, Shilo, I'll probably get a blu-ray player eventually. Gotta keep the economy moving, don't we?

Chloë

(btw, I bought one of my daughters, an early mp3 player back in about 1998 or so, and not one other kid in her middle-school had the slightest idea what she had (a Diamond Rio300!) The Sony Walkman reigned supreme then! And the IPOD was still a gleam in Steve Jobs eye.

I remember the Diamond Rio! Vaguely.

Even if you don't get it blu-ray, believe me, it's worth watching on DVD. But it's movies like this that Blu-Ray really shines for! The colors are so vibrant, and so much work was put into detailing the CG.

I want to see the movie too Shilo. I am waiting until the lines start to die down. I don't like to go to a packed theater. I like to have some chairs between me and my wife. Although it will be hard to drag my wife to watch Avatar. She doesn't like science fiction but I will try. If I don't get to see it at the movies then maybe I might have to buy a blue ray player before I watch it at home. Sigh

Love,

Sarah F

Um..we didn't go to the theater to see it *blushes*. But, I think we will be tomorrow. It was too amazing not to see it in 3D. I think your wife might be surprised at this one. It is science fiction, yes, but that's really a very small part of the bigger picture. The adverts glorify the combat and alien nature of it, but that's really not where the emphasis is placed for the majority of the film. I think the two strongest aspects are the romance and the harmonious way of life of the Na'vi people, how they connect with all other life on the planet. Ya sure there's a big battle at the end, but they had to make money too, right? And unfortunately, the two things that sell best are sex and explosions.

Link to comment
Guest Donna Jean

OMG! I SOoooo want to seethis movie!

But, I also hate full theaters. Therefore, I'll wait a bit for the hoopla to die down!

Huggs....

Donna Jean

Link to comment

Blu-Ray?

Is that some sort of weapon, a death ray perhaps?

I am waiting on each new technology as I had a Quasar Time Machine and a Betamax before they settled on VHS, LPs attempted two systems of quadraphonic sound, discrete and encoded (encoded won for the nearly six months that it lasted) - the LP itself was the winner over the 45 for high fidelity because of its longer playing time - I also own 8-track recorders (2 and 4 channel versions), reel to reel recorders 7 and 10 inch reels (2 & 4 track), super 8 mm film movies, then with sound then the big VHS pack with a camera attached, to 8mm video tapes, dvt recorders to the new generation of hard disc or memory card camcorders and let's not forget the RCA video player, Pioneer Laser Disc and DVD along the way...............what will be next?

I also have been selling off my paper weights (film cameras).

I'll wait for the lines to go away a bit and just watch the movie.

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter

They already had that war with Blu-Ray and HD, Sally, and Blu-Ray won. They'll never stop advancing to new technologies, but for the next several years at least, I think Blu-Ray will be the standard. Especially since it has the capability of coding and reading 4 layers, at a whopping 100 gigs of data ^_^

Link to comment

I'm waiting for the cerebral implants that will allow Netflix to beam them directly into your brain bypassing all optical interpretation. :lol:

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter
I'm waiting for the cerebral implants that will allow Netflix to beam them directly into your brain bypassing all optical interpretation. :lol:

Love ya,

Sally

LOL, I'm sure that's not too far off ^_^

Link to comment
Guest NatashaJade

I jumped the gun and bought an HD-DVD player...it now plays my old DVDs nicely. I then acquired a PS3, which is an awesome Blu-Ray player as well as a game machine (not that I have time to play games...except WoW now that my friends have forced me to play). But Blu Ray is a great delivery system. Not just for the picture, but for the sound. Of course, if you don't have an HD TV or a good sound system, your old DVD player will still be just fine.

luv

Gin

Link to comment
Guest julia_d

Ripoff of Dances with Wolves.. all cgi and no substance.. 1.5/10 .. same old dreary junk.. I turned it off and watched something else after 104 minutes.

Buy a blu-ray player for this?? .. outta your mind.. much better things to spend that amount of money on. In 6 months it will be something else is the big hyped up rave reviews blockbuster.. and 6 months more.. and 6 months more... and on and on.. Honest/. Takes James Cameron 10 years to rip off Dances with Wolves and then the whole media circus crawls right up inside his backside and sets up camp there.. with turkey and sprouts and all the trimmings.. Lucky it came out at the hoildays.. I don't think a summer release (when they were sober) would have got anything like the rave reviews.. because they are SO obviously bought and paid for it's unbelievable.. Am I the only reviewer on the planet who sees this overhyped heap of cgi junk for what it is? The kings new clothes anybody?? Yeah it very pretty.. ohh.. ahhh.. cgi.. oooo.. I want some dark meat please.. shuddup and eat your ersatz soya stuff.. it's wonderful.. look at the colour.

I stopped falling for this hollywood cgi junk years ago.. Watch I'm a cyborg but that's ok.. for instance.. or Amilie .. or something with an actual STORY instead of this "inside of a matchbox and a lot of cheap flashy cgi" rubbish that seems to pass as a "movie" these days.

Every hyped up film comes out and "breaks all box office records" .. forget these lie sold and reviewed films.. go watch the flops.. and see REAL films made to tweak a particular nerve or say something about people, society or a situation.. I look at the hollywood things now as very second rate parodies of films.. enough explosions and fast motion and people forget there isn't ANY story worth mentioning.. Good filmmaking is when you can put 2 people in one room for 30 minutes and have nothing but entertainment.. or perhaps 6 people total in a 2 hour film that is set in 4 rooms and a set of stairs.. and be gripping and engaging.. (name that film.. go on.. I dare you)

A couple of nights ago I watched "Requiem for a Dream" .. not easy going, but I lasted to the end and thought.. wow.. tells it like it is..

Please.. you may like what you want. but see through all the hype and spin and turn the sound off and watch.. it's garbage.. the soundtrack is no better.. You should be able to follow a film with only one or the other. In the case of Avatar even with both it's hard to see what the point of any of the characters is.. oh.. and theres a lot of cgi.. did I mention all the cgi?? .. just so nobody is in any doubt.. there is a lot of cgi here. Why would you want to buy a blu-ray player to "watch it properly" anyway.. You have been to the cinema.. that IS seeing it properly.. it may have escaped peoples attention but films come out FIRST in the cinema (unless they actually have a story and some substance in which case they go straight to disk.. can't have the cinema going audience THINKING can we?) and to disk later.. THE film experience is the cinema.. it's where they are made for and designed to be seen.. Take it from me.. In 6 months when this comes out on disk chances are you will have forgotten it and be on about something else.. and then something else.. and 6 months later something else..Last film that dragged me to the flicks (it was a paid outing because the studio didn't send a disk for review) was Taxi.. more junk.. and probably the last time I will bother with the cinema. and it was even worse on TV a few weeks back... drivel.. but that was a "box office record breaker" as well..

If you want to buy a blu-ray player do so by all means.. you need a 2-4k HD tv and a good 300+ sound system to go with it to make it worth while.. sorry.. I would buy a car or get my nose done...... but do it for the right reasons.. not for some film that 6 months down the line will be another "forgotten over hyped lump of junk" .. remember.. those of us who watch films (I used to write the reviews for the local paper) have seen it all before .. Transformers 2.. ewwwwwwwwww. The day after tomorrow (at least that had some acting in it and a bit of a story) and a raft of things whose name defeats me because they are so 5 minute wonder nothings. 4 weeks from now the movie press will be raving over the next "breaks all records" smash.. and this lump of garbage will be forgotten where it should be till it hits free tv in 24 months or so..

Link to comment
Guest NatalieRene

I bought a blueray player from Samsung when I found out that I could stream netflix videos with it. Ironically I no longer buy blueray videos but stream mostly everything. I'm more apt to call my device a netflix streamer that can also play bueray except that no one else would know what the heck I'm talking about. lol

I haven't seen avatar yet. I've heard it is good but I can't afford to spend ten dollars to go watch a movie. I'll have to wait until I can add it to my netflix list.

Link to comment
Guest Melanieshaman
Ripoff of Dances with Wolves.. all cgi and no substance.. 1.5/10 .. same old dreary junk.. I turned it off and watched something else after 104 minutes.

Buy a blu-ray player for this?? .. outta your mind.. much better things to spend that amount of money on. In 6 months it will be something else is the big hyped up rave reviews blockbuster.. and 6 months more.. and 6 months more... and on and on.. Honest/. Takes James Cameron 10 years to rip off Dances with Wolves and then the whole media circus crawls right up inside his backside and sets up camp there.. with turkey and sprouts and all the trimmings.. Lucky it came out at the hoildays.. I don't think a summer release (when they were sober) would have got anything like the rave reviews.. because they are SO obviously bought and paid for it's unbelievable.. Am I the only reviewer on the planet who sees this overhyped heap of cgi junk for what it is? The kings new clothes anybody?? Yeah it very pretty.. ohh.. ahhh.. cgi.. oooo.. I want some dark meat please.. shuddup and eat your ersatz soya stuff.. it's wonderful.. look at the colour.

I stopped falling for this hollywood cgi junk years ago.. Watch I'm a cyborg but that's ok.. for instance.. or Amilie .. or something with an actual STORY instead of this "inside of a matchbox and a lot of cheap flashy cgi" rubbish that seems to pass as a "movie" these days.

Every hyped up film comes out and "breaks all box office records" .. forget these lie sold and reviewed films.. go watch the flops.. and see REAL films made to tweak a particular nerve or say something about people, society or a situation.. I look at the hollywood things now as very second rate parodies of films.. enough explosions and fast motion and people forget there isn't ANY story worth mentioning.. Good filmmaking is when you can put 2 people in one room for 30 minutes and have nothing but entertainment.. or perhaps 6 people total in a 2 hour film that is set in 4 rooms and a set of stairs.. and be gripping and engaging.. (name that film.. go on.. I dare you)

A couple of nights ago I watched "Requiem for a Dream" .. not easy going, but I lasted to the end and thought.. wow.. tells it like it is..

Please.. you may like what you want. but see through all the hype and spin and turn the sound off and watch.. it's garbage.. the soundtrack is no better.. You should be able to follow a film with only one or the other. In the case of Avatar even with both it's hard to see what the point of any of the characters is.. oh.. and theres a lot of cgi.. did I mention all the cgi?? .. just so nobody is in any doubt.. there is a lot of cgi here. Why would you want to buy a blu-ray player to "watch it properly" anyway.. You have been to the cinema.. that IS seeing it properly.. it may have escaped peoples attention but films come out FIRST in the cinema (unless they actually have a story and some substance in which case they go straight to disk.. can't have the cinema going audience THINKING can we?) and to disk later.. THE film experience is the cinema.. it's where they are made for and designed to be seen.. Take it from me.. In 6 months when this comes out on disk chances are you will have forgotten it and be on about something else.. and then something else.. and 6 months later something else..Last film that dragged me to the flicks (it was a paid outing because the studio didn't send a disk for review) was Taxi.. more junk.. and probably the last time I will bother with the cinema. and it was even worse on TV a few weeks back... drivel.. but that was a "box office record breaker" as well..

If you want to buy a blu-ray player do so by all means.. you need a 2-4k HD tv and a good 300+ sound system to go with it to make it worth while.. sorry.. I would buy a car or get my nose done...... but do it for the right reasons.. not for some film that 6 months down the line will be another "forgotten over hyped lump of junk" .. remember.. those of us who watch films (I used to write the reviews for the local paper) have seen it all before .. Transformers 2.. ewwwwwwwwww. The day after tomorrow (at least that had some acting in it and a bit of a story) and a raft of things whose name defeats me because they are so 5 minute wonder nothings. 4 weeks from now the movie press will be raving over the next "breaks all records" smash.. and this lump of garbage will be forgotten where it should be till it hits free tv in 24 months or so..

This....LOL

In all seriousness, I have heard through sources i trust, that's exactly as Julia says... Dances with wolves only flashier. Dances was a incredible movie, and didn,t need the flash to tell a story. Sad that people are blowing up the theatres to see this drivel. Don't get me started about Transformers 2 lol Yes, Avatar has broken all those box office records..yadda yadda, the only reason was because of the flash, look at what the Dark Knight did... yes it's a comic book movie but look at how dark it was. Didn't need flash (minus a few explosions) it was a pretty cerebral movie for a comic book movie.

Maybe it's a on demand rental, but that would be it for me.

Link to comment
Guest ChloëC

julia,

I decide to watch a movie for only 2 or 3 reasons - see what all the hoopla is about so I can join in discussions, or be entertained, or be forced to do some thinking. It has to be a really important movie to meet the first, a really appealing one for the second, and a practically impossible one for the third (though movies like Ma Vie En Rose are pretty good)

Several things I do get tired of - disaster movies showing a broken or semi submerged Statue of Liberty. It was interesting in the original Planet of the Apes (btw, the real book story was much more shocking), but by Day After Tomorrow and AI, it was so yesterday. I happen to like fantasy movies either animated or live-action, but without much moral behind it (I don't like being preached to), and with an admission (or wink to the audience) that it is pure fantasy. You know, brain candy. Like comedies.

I hate movies that are fantasies masquarading as serious introspections into the human condition. Like most non comedies - people doing things that nobody would ever do, scifi movies that bring in a deus ex machina every five minutes (because the director thinks it's cool). Titanic for example was a pure fantasy movie, every character, every action was totally unbelieveable, but let's face it, Leonardo and Kate gave it an appeal...to some. Or Daniel Day Lewis in Last of the Mohicans bursting through the underbrush with muzzle loading flintlock muskets blazing away. Pure hokum, but a nice spectacle.

I just fear Avatar is a fantasy masquarading as drama masquarading as fantasy. Like it's supposed to be taken seriously. Please. It's a fantasy. Don't ruin it.

Chloë

Link to comment
Guest julia_d

I get that.. homest.. I loved the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Very well made with a good cast and probably one of the greatest stories of the last century. I'm waiting for The Hobbit.. if it ever gets made.

I don't have any objection to "fantasy" or whatever genre, what I do object to is the over selling of one or two movies during a release run while much better (to my eyes) films get completely ignored.

I watch most everything that comes out (I'm a lucky person who still gets loans of the screeners a week before they hit the cinema) and I get to see some wonderful films. The last few weeks I have been impressed by St Trinians 2 (more Ealing style madness.. nice sequal), Sherlock Holmes and Law Abiding Citizen. Pure fantasy with action, some laughs and plenty of drama. They have enough of a story to hold my interest and want to know the outcome. I'm saying no more.. but those are my picks for the cinema that are running right now. Waiting for later this week are Daybreakers, Book of Eli and Nine..

It's Complicated just made me think of You have mail.. but without the quality cast.

Link to comment
Guest Robin Winter
Ripoff of Dances with Wolves.. all cgi and no substance.. 1.5/10 .. same old dreary junk.. I turned it off and watched something else after 104 minutes.

Buy a blu-ray player for this?? .. outta your mind.. much better things to spend that amount of money on. In 6 months it will be something else is the big hyped up rave reviews blockbuster.. and 6 months more.. and 6 months more... and on and on.. Honest/. Takes James Cameron 10 years to rip off Dances with Wolves and then the whole media circus crawls right up inside his backside and sets up camp there.. with turkey and sprouts and all the trimmings.. Lucky it came out at the hoildays.. I don't think a summer release (when they were sober) would have got anything like the rave reviews.. because they are SO obviously bought and paid for it's unbelievable.. Am I the only reviewer on the planet who sees this overhyped heap of cgi junk for what it is? The kings new clothes anybody?? Yeah it very pretty.. ohh.. ahhh.. cgi.. oooo.. I want some dark meat please.. shuddup and eat your ersatz soya stuff.. it's wonderful.. look at the colour.

I stopped falling for this hollywood cgi junk years ago.. Watch I'm a cyborg but that's ok.. for instance.. or Amilie .. or something with an actual STORY instead of this "inside of a matchbox and a lot of cheap flashy cgi" rubbish that seems to pass as a "movie" these days.

Every hyped up film comes out and "breaks all box office records" .. forget these lie sold and reviewed films.. go watch the flops.. and see REAL films made to tweak a particular nerve or say something about people, society or a situation.. I look at the hollywood things now as very second rate parodies of films.. enough explosions and fast motion and people forget there isn't ANY story worth mentioning.. Good filmmaking is when you can put 2 people in one room for 30 minutes and have nothing but entertainment.. or perhaps 6 people total in a 2 hour film that is set in 4 rooms and a set of stairs.. and be gripping and engaging.. (name that film.. go on.. I dare you)

A couple of nights ago I watched "Requiem for a Dream" .. not easy going, but I lasted to the end and thought.. wow.. tells it like it is..

Please.. you may like what you want. but see through all the hype and spin and turn the sound off and watch.. it's garbage.. the soundtrack is no better.. You should be able to follow a film with only one or the other. In the case of Avatar even with both it's hard to see what the point of any of the characters is.. oh.. and theres a lot of cgi.. did I mention all the cgi?? .. just so nobody is in any doubt.. there is a lot of cgi here. Why would you want to buy a blu-ray player to "watch it properly" anyway.. You have been to the cinema.. that IS seeing it properly.. it may have escaped peoples attention but films come out FIRST in the cinema (unless they actually have a story and some substance in which case they go straight to disk.. can't have the cinema going audience THINKING can we?) and to disk later.. THE film experience is the cinema.. it's where they are made for and designed to be seen.. Take it from me.. In 6 months when this comes out on disk chances are you will have forgotten it and be on about something else.. and then something else.. and 6 months later something else..Last film that dragged me to the flicks (it was a paid outing because the studio didn't send a disk for review) was Taxi.. more junk.. and probably the last time I will bother with the cinema. and it was even worse on TV a few weeks back... drivel.. but that was a "box office record breaker" as well..

If you want to buy a blu-ray player do so by all means.. you need a 2-4k HD tv and a good 300+ sound system to go with it to make it worth while.. sorry.. I would buy a car or get my nose done...... but do it for the right reasons.. not for some film that 6 months down the line will be another "forgotten over hyped lump of junk" .. remember.. those of us who watch films (I used to write the reviews for the local paper) have seen it all before .. Transformers 2.. ewwwwwwwwww. The day after tomorrow (at least that had some acting in it and a bit of a story) and a raft of things whose name defeats me because they are so 5 minute wonder nothings. 4 weeks from now the movie press will be raving over the next "breaks all records" smash.. and this lump of garbage will be forgotten where it should be till it hits free tv in 24 months or so..

I can assure you my opinion of this movie has naught to do with hype. I saw an ad for it twice. That's the extent of the hype I was exposed to. I'm never given to forming an opinion until I've seen something for myself. And as a matter of fact, I'm rarely impressed with CGI, this is pretty much the first film that has impressed me for CGI.

And as I mentioned earlier, I have not in fact been to the cinema to see it. Though I'm seriously considering it tomorrow, in 3D. I can understand why you wouldn't like this one, after reading your post, but I have this uncanny ability to find something I can appreciate in almost any film. I'm confident that in my movie collection, everyone registered at Lauras forums could find at least 6 that they would enjoy. Yes, even you.

I have seen for myself how Blu-ray looks on a television with specifications to match mine, and I can positively say that it would indeed be worth while, as a blu-ray player now costs significantly less than $200 for a basic model.

Just because you personally don't see worth in a film doesn't make it garbage, it just means you don't like it :)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 124 Guests (See full list)

    • Breezy Victor
    • Ashley0616
    • violet r
    • MaeBe
    • AllieJ
    • April Marie
    • VickySGV
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,023
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Delaney
    Newest Member
    Delaney
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bebhar
      Bebhar
      (41 years old)
    2. caelensmom
      caelensmom
      (40 years old)
    3. Jani
      Jani
      (70 years old)
    4. Jessicapitts
      Jessicapitts
      (37 years old)
    5. klb046
      klb046
      (30 years old)
  • Posts

    • awkward-yet-sweet
      The usual social ways, of course.  Taking care of my partners and stepkids, being involved in my community.  That makes me feel good about my role.   As for physical validation and gender... probably the most euphoric experience is sex.  I grew up with my mother telling me that my flat and boyish body was strange, that my intersex anatomy was shameful, that no man would want me. So experiencing what I was told I could never have is physical proof that I'm actually worth something.  
    • KathyLauren
      <Moderator hat on>  I think that, at this point we need to get the thread back onto the topic, which is the judge's ruling on the ballot proposition.  If there is more to be said on the general principles of gendered spaces etc., please discuss them, carefully and respectfully, in separate threads. <Moderator hat off>
    • Abigail Genevieve
      People who have no understanding of transgender conditions should not be making policy for people dealing with it. Since it is such a small percentage of the population, and each individual is unique, and their circumstances are also unique, each situation needs to be worked with individually to see that the best possible solution is implemented for those involved. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No.  You are getting stuck on one statement and pulling it out of context.   Trans kids have rights, but so do non-trans kids.  That conflict is best worked out in the individual situation. 
    • MaeBe
      I get the concept, I believe. You're trying to state that trans kids need to or should be excluded from binary gender spaces and that you acknowledge that answers to accommodate those kids may not be found through policy. I disagree with the capability of "penetration" as being the operative delimiter in the statement, however. I contest this statement is poorly chosen at best and smacks of prejudice at worst. That it perpetuates certain stereotypes, whether that was the intent or not.   Frankly, all kids should have the right to privacy in locker rooms, regardless of gender, sexuality, or anatomy. They should also have access to exercise and activities that other kids do and allow them to socialize in those activities. The more kids are othered, extracted, or barred from the typical school day the more isolated and stigmatized they become. That's not healthy for anyone, the excluded for obvious reasons and the included for others--namely they get to be the "haves" and all that entails.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Context.  Read the context.  Good grief.
    • MaeBe
      Please don't expect people to read manifold pages of fiction to understand a post.   There was a pointed statement made, and I responded to it. The statement used the term penetration, not "dissimilar anatomy causing social discomfiture", or some other reason. It was extended as a "rule" across very different social situations as well, locker and girl's bedrooms. How that term is used in most situations is to infer sexual contact, so most readers would read that and think the statement is that we "need to keep trans girl's penises out of cis girls", which reads very closely to the idea that trans people are often portrayed as sexual predators.   I understand we can't always get all of our thoughts onto the page, but this doesn't read like an under-cooked idea or a lingual short cut.
    • Ashley0616
      I shopped online in the beginning of transition. I had great success with SHEIN and Torrid!
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Have you read the rest of what I wrote?   Please read between the lines of what I said about high school.  Go over and read my Taylor story.  Put two and two together.   That is all I will say about that.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      "I feel like I lost my husband," Lois told the therapist,"I want the man I married." Dr. Smith looked at Odie, sitting there in his men's clothing, looking awkward and embarrassed. "You have him.  This is just a part of him you did not know about. Or did not face." She turned to Odie,"Did you tear my wedding dress on our wedding night?" He admitted it.  She had a whole catalog of did-you and how-could you.  Dr. Smith encouraged her to let it all out. Thirty years of marriage.  Strange makeup in the bathroom.  The kids finding women's laundry in the laundry room. There was reconciliation. "What do we do now?" Dr. Smith said they had to work that out.  Odie began wearing women's clothing when not at work.  They visited a cross-dressers' social club but it did not appeal to them.  The bed was off limits to cross dressing.  She had limits and he could respect her limits.  Visits to relatives would be with him in men's clothing.    "You have nail polish residue," a co-worker pointed out.  Sure enough, the bottom of his left pinky nail was bright pink  His boss asked him to go home and fix it.  He did.   People were talking, he was sure, because he doubted he was anywhere as thorough as he wanted to be.  It was like something in him wanted to tell everyone what he was doing, and he was sloppy.   His boss dropped off some needed paperwork on a Saturday unexpectedly and found Odie dressed in a house dress and wig.  "What?" the boss said, shook his head, and left.  None of his business.   "People are talking," Lois said. "They are asking about this," she pointed to his denim skirt. "This seems to go past or deeper than cross dressing."   "Yes.  I guess we need some counseling."  And they went.
    • April Marie
      You look wonderful!!! A rose among the roses.
    • Ashley0616
      Mine would be SHEIN as much as I have bought from them lol.
    • MaeBe
      This is the persistence in thinking of trans girls as predators and, as if, they are the only kind of predation that happens in locker rooms. This is strikingly close to the dangerous myth that anatomy corresponds with sexuality and equates to gender.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      At the same time there might be mtf boys who transitioned post-puberty who really belong on the girls' teams because they have more similarities there than with the boys, would perform at the same level, and might get injured playing with the bigger, stronger boys.   I well remember being an androgynous shrimp in gym class that I shared with seniors who played on the football team.  When PE was no longer mandatory, I was no longer in PE. They started some mixed PE classes the second semester, where we played volleyball and learned bowling and no longer mixed with those seniors, boys and girls together.
    • Timi
      Leggings and gym shorts, sweatshirt, Handker wild rag. Listening to new Taylor Swift album while strolling through the rose garden in the park. 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...