Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Trying On Clothing At Department Stores


Guest Steph S.

Recommended Posts

Guest Steph S.

Has anyone tried on or have been tempted to try on different articles of clothing at department stores? If so are there any rules around it and what can and cannot be tried on or does it depend on the store? My guess is that taking women's clothing to the men's changing room would be a total no-no.

Link to comment
Guest ~Brenda~

Hi Steph,

If you have a carry letter then you really do not have a problem with trying on clothes in the womens department.

What I do is that I know my size already so I simply pick up the dress/slacks/blouse etc. goto the cashier and buy them. No issue, no hassel.

Sometimes a pice of clothing does not fit as I would like, but these days, that rarely happens for me.

Hope this helps

Brenda

Link to comment
  • Admin

Steph, I'm assuming you are making the purchase while in male mode. I think you would get far less hassle taking women's clothes to the men's changing room

than walking into the women's dressing room dressed as a male. That will get you noticed.

I've only used the women's changing room once so far, dressed en femme, and had no problems at all. But while en femme, I would not attempt to take clothes

to the men's rooms.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment
Guest Kaitlyn88

I haven't tried on clothes yet, but my ex says she is taking me shopping in a couple of weeks. I'm pretty nervous about it but she thinks I will have no problems if i go as a girl. So I guess we'll see what happens. I never got a carry letter or anything from my therapist and haven't got my name changed yet so I will have to rely on passing. Hopefully a year of hormones and getting rid of the facial hair won't let me down. :)

Link to comment
Guest sarah f

Letter or not, it you want to try something on just go into the changing room. All they can do is tell you that you are not allowed in there. Than just ask them if you can take them to the mens changing room or do they want to lose the possible sale. I think they wouldn't say anything if you went in to try on the clothes anyway. Good Luck in the future.

Love,

Sarah F

Link to comment
Guest Donna Jean

Lizzy and I were at Cato's this fall (presenting female) and tried on tons of stuff in the fitting rooms...of course there are no "Male" rooms in that store!

I'd say that taking female items into the mens room would cause more reaction than just presenting female and doing it!

Huggs

Donna Jean

Link to comment
Guest Emily H

If you can pass female, go as a female and go into the female changing rooms.

If you shop as a male, and you are feeling lucky, go ahead and try going to the mens room. Id only do it in stores that don't check you before going to the changing rooms.

~Emily

Link to comment
  • 11 months later...
Guest Elizabeth K

An apparent 'male' in the woman's changing room can be disrupting to other women shoppers. THAT is what the clerks worry about. Go early or on week days when you would not run into others using the changing rooms.

Also - a guy and a girl shopping together? Hardly anyone else in the rooms? Clerks won't care.

Shopping alone - ATTITUDE - use common sense - if you won't be disruptive because no one is around - just do it.

I was never refused in the year I spent as androgynous. I was too afraid when I thought of myself as a crossdresser, but now wish I had been bolder. Most of the clerks who catch on, are really thinking how brave you are and are sympathetic to your plight.

I hope this helps.

Lizzy

Link to comment

This holiday season I tried on clothes for the first time. I used to grab and buy but decided in the Season, that clerks were to busy or tired to care or judge. The reality is that the problem was my being overly sensitive to what someone MAY think, rather than it violating a rule. At stores like Kohls, Target, Sears etc, no one will make you keep the merchandise in the department(for fear of losing a commission). I took blouses and tops to the mens section and tried them on. I was glad I did since3/5 weren't a good look. I just fold them over to carry in. No hassle.

Lastly, I has come to realize almost all my limitations in such matters are self imposed. As the fear of what total strangers think of me disappears, such activity becomes much easier. simply fold the garment several times and carry to the mens dressing room. No hassle.

Now..... if I could only adopt that attitude for the makeup counter!

Michelle

Link to comment
Guest kimberly c

Has anyone tried on or have been tempted to try on different articles of clothing at department stores? If so are there any rules around it and what can and cannot be tried on or does it depend on the store? My guess is that taking women's clothing to the men's changing room would be a total no-no.

Hi Steph, If in male mode just take your items to the mens dressing room. I have taken tops jeans and even bras to the male dressing room. No one

really cares. I have done this at Kohl`s and JC PENNY. Good luck.

Love Kim

Link to comment
Guest Maria_B

I've gone presenting en femme. No Hrt, no fakies, just fat-chested (Ha, see what I did there?) Be presenting fem, acting natural and going in casually.

I've bought an entire wardrobe (well, half a wardrobe and the other half was donated by my Mum ;P)

Lotsa women have no bewbies for many reasons (mastectomy, flat chested, an accident, stunted development) and lots have small amounts of facial hair ( a santa beard will get you read!) So just present female, walk in and do your stuff!

Love, Maria :wub:

Link to comment

I have tried on all items of women's clothing in department stores and was only rejected once of and that was when I first started buy my wardrobe, and that was some 10 years ago.

Patricia :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Guest Melanie N

I've taken nearly all my items to the men's changing room and had no problems at all. I even had a helper in Old Navy actually get me a smaller size skirt...he didn't bat an eye. I would like to be able to go into some stores that are women's clothing only such as Lane Bryant or J Jill, but Ive settled for catalouge shopping/ebay for now. If I get up the courage, I might go into the store, explain what I was doing and ask for help...you never know, they may help out. I always shop in male mode as I dont really pass.

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

I've gone presenting en femme. No Hrt, no fakies, just fat-chested (Ha, see what I did there?) Be presenting fem, acting natural and going in casually.

I've bought an entire wardrobe (well, half a wardrobe and the other half was donated by my Mum ;P)

Lotsa women have no bewbies for many reasons (mastectomy, flat chested, an accident, stunted development) and lots have small amounts of facial hair ( a santa beard will get you read!) So just present female, walk in and do your stuff!

Love, Maria :wub:

EXACTLY

Attitude, that's all it takes.

Lizzy

Link to comment
  • 6 months later...

May be time to bring this up from page 3?

As I have gotten a better understanding of my sizes and what works for me I buy a fair amount from Penny's clearance on-line...just look for the bargains 70+% off. Btw. they have a tall section... I actually had to return pants purchased as ultra tall because they were too long!

I posted several months ago about taking stuff to the men's section to try on and I still find it very effective. There have been many things I have tried on and been disappointed that it didn't look the way I thought it would. But at least I didn't buy and have to return it or donate to Goodwill since I was too embarassed to return it, lol!

Michelle

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...
Guest Rowan19

I just guess, pay and scurry away. I've never even CD'd in public b4, buying clothes for my "fashion-challenged cousin" is risky enough for now. It took me about half an hour to even get game enough to go to the mens section the first time I did it. One clerk in particular was very helpful, I think he could tell lol.

Link to comment
Guest Daniel Dee

I was nervous when I first started going shoping in both modes but have become very confident and now have no hesitation about going trying clothes on when dressed. Have sometimes tried on female attire when in male mode in mens changeing rooms but depends on the store and even been in womens when in men mode but depends on the store. Never had any problems. I think it is all about confidence. I never hesitate about asking for help and all SA are most helpful even male ones. I now talk to anyone when out dressed even with my quite deep voice no one seems to bother which amazes me but again I think its about confidence. Daniel

Link to comment
Guest GabeIsWinning

I know that, in the UK, Asda, BHS, H&M and Marks & Spencer have unisex changing cubicles and do not check anyone before entry.

-G

Link to comment

I was at an uPscale outlet this summer (think it was polo) and brought some swimwear (mens) into dressing room to try on. In these places, there are unisex changing rooms. When I got in and closed the door I almost freaked because someone had left three or four dresses etc in there. I threw one on and it fit! I tried them all on and really enjoyed myself but I couldn't buy any due to who i was with and besides, they were too expensive. All I thought about later was that there was probably a camera somewhere and someone had fun watching but who cares? I wasn't doing anything illegal!

Deena

Link to comment
Guest sonia shadows

An english cross dressing comedian once did a really funny sketch about what happened when he picked his clothes , announced his intentions and dissappeared into a changing cubicle. He said it was like a nuclear bomb going off, junior shop assistants running up and down like crazy etc.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest mirandacdgirl

I see clothing all the time i would love to try on but i get all weird feeling even just being in the ladys secion. like everyone is watching me. wish I had the confedence to just pick up things and buy them..I shop moslty online or take my girlfriend who knows I dress.. she doesnt mind and I just pretend its for her.

Link to comment
Guest xjpopfanx

I simply just walked up to the female's dressing room with some girl's clothing and went on in. xD Didn't get any questions or strange looks or anything, but maybe it is because I just look feminine already? ^^;; Who knows? If you look really masculine then I suggest possibly bringing a couple of female items to the male changing rooms but have it hidden amongst some men's clothing, that way they are less likely to notice so you won't have to feel as anxious about it. ^^

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...
Guest Mellissawi

I have only tried on cloths a few times. I did go in male mode. It was to the Goodwill (thrift store) there they have unisex fitting rooms. I made no big deal of it and no one gave me a second look. Even the cashiers were very polite and did nkt question any of my purchases. I even had one compliment me on some of the things I had picked out.

Link to comment
Guest thomasina uk

Trying on clothes in the changing room is one thing, is anyone blazae enough to walk out wearing their purchase?

I wish i had the guts for that.

T

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 116 Guests (See full list)

    • Davie
    • Betty K
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...