Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Well - Not So Good - Women's Rights Advocates Trash Transwomen


Guest Elizabeth K

Recommended Posts

Guest EvenClose

Bigots will be bigots untill people who are better either shun them out like they do everyone else or they realize the err of their ways.

I for one think boycotting anything and everything around radicals like that is well deserved. They are entitled to their opinions, doesn't mean I have to stand by and do nothing about it though. If they think organizing and conquering is a great tactic...So be it. I don't see them getting far. Reminds me of...well...Ill just say something along the lines of the world 65-70 years ago...Just sayin.

Miranda

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

At least the comments were good.

I in no way agree with or condone what those women said. When I only half jokingly refer to myself as a male feminist that is NOT the kind of feminism I meant.

I have long thought that transsexuals and other transdender must drive radical feminists absolutely mad. For FTMs -often I hear repeated here an embracing of stereotypes that they fight to eradicate. Even in some small things such as liking to be called girls as adults when even here in this very conservative area some women get upset when that term is used because it is seen as originating in deprecation and was so often used by men in a patronizing way. As if women didn't mature. Not a criticism-just an observation I was thinking about just yesterday as a matter of fact. I don't want to fall into the use of that term because even mild feminists often find it offensive after coming of age.

And MTFs are seen by some feminists as having benefited economically and socially from a male power position and then want to also be included in the Women's Club when they have not, to their way of thinking, paid their dues, while seeking to fulfill outdated gender roles. I disagree with that but have read that criticism several times before.

As for FtMs -what could be worse in a militant feminists eyes than selling out to the enemy? They don't understand transgender any better than any other segment of the population-possibly given the prejudices against us in those around them even less than most if that is possible.

I'm not surprised the militant feminists attack us. I am surprised they don't do it more often. I suppose as our profile in society rises so will these attacks. We really weren't on the radar much till now with most of them.

Again I don't agree with the militant feminists in any way but this is how I understand the situation.

Johnny

Link to comment

they seem like clans men in bras . or cup cakes . screaming about being the master gender. * shakes head* . but they are also cowards . they hide and do not give any one a chance to fight back. im not even mad . i feel sorry for them being so ignorant .

Sakura

Link to comment

Maybe I was looking at the wrong comment section? Wading through the follow up posts, of which there may be more than 50, I thought of how many years ago, I would read leftist progressives arguing over how many angels could dance on the head of a pin while the Reaganites were winning the hearts and minds of the American Public. They lost the war while squabbling amongst themselves...

There are a lot of comments at the end of this article, but I guess I missed the vicious ones. I really thought most of the posters were left wing intellectuals, many of whom were debating the tired old argument about "men" in women's bathrooms...and paternalistic vs. maternalistic leadership qualities.

The good news is the intelligentsia does not shape public perception. I think the McDonalds video of the trangender beatdown did more to gain sympathy for trans people from America than anything in the last 10-20 years... Seeing that horror in video brought out a lot of compassion in people who may not have previously had it. Also, the followup interviews by Chrissie(sp?) were totally responsible and a credit to the Trans movement. A big plus...

Michelle

Link to comment
Guest Donna Jean

I would read leftist progressives arguing over how many angels could dance on the head of a pin while the Reaganites were winning the hearts and minds of the American Public. They lost the war while squabbling amongst themselves...

Michelle

Who lost the war while squabbling amongst themselves?

Dee Jay

Link to comment

I'm refering to the war to capture public opinion, not a war like the Mid East or Vietnam...

The conservatives were able to "capture" the American flag and Patriotism as a Republican virtue while the Democrats were weak after the end of the 1970's. Its pretty much stayed that way don't you think?

Btw, I don't want to get political other than in support of trans rights. I just think its a shame that traditionally oppressed groups squabble among themselves when they should be uniting to educate the public about our cause. It looks in the article like the Fems are willing to throw us under the bus... and its a shame. America's attitude toward gays has changed dramatically in the last 30 years because of organized activism and we could use that kind of effort...and help from others.

Michelle

Link to comment
Guest chngnwnd

A thinly veiled attempt at rationalizing bigotry...

Unfortunately, I fear many will buy it because it provides cover to not change under the guise of advancing womens' rights; it's very calculated on thier part and empowers those who would oppress us around the globe...

Bobbi

Link to comment

It seems to me that these are just angry and bitter "Feminists" attacking the most vulnerable group out there.

They know they can't attack men, and certainly could never bring their rights down or bring them down in social status, and they can't attack gays or gay rights because part of their movements members is made up of lesbians and gays are men, so who is left? Oh, duh! of course. Men who became women who are still largely scorned by society. makes perfect sense...

And of course, lets not allow transsexuals the right to respond in any form or contest all of this nonsense because what we say makes sense and isn't sexist, bigoted, extremist blather. The fact is, as of now we're lower on the totem pole than these women are and they want to keep us down since we are the only group left for them to feel superior about themselves over.

Inferiority complex much?

*Sighs*

~Risu.

Link to comment
Guest Vixen Amber

Since when as anyone ever given a crap about extremist femicup cakes? I'd be more worried about a group that actually has leeway in the world like the religious and less worried about what is essentially another forgotten joke on a old SNL skit.

Link to comment
Guest Omagdi

Radicalization always leads to fear and ignorance.

I can say something about extremists in the feminist movement; they feel vulnerable and non-powerful. That is why they react with such anger to transwomen. If they truly did not feel threatened, they would not jump to the conclusion that women are so vulnerable that a transwomen who simply needs to use the restroom must be a "male" conspiring to rape them. :thumbdown:

Link to comment
Guest Jenny K.

LESS THAN HUMAN??? So that means they don't think we should have any humans rights then. Which...also includes a right to live. That's evil. So I guess what they're saying is a woman is defined by her reproductive parts and nothing else. Which in essence reduces women to sex objects...supposedly the very things feminists fight against. How sad.

Link to comment
Guest ChloëC

I perceive the problem to be that we already have the ultra right which has taken over a mainstream political party as being against us. And this article shows that a group that is supposedly 'liberal' in its ideaology as being against us. (we certainly do encourage strange bedfellows, don't we?). To a moderate person, which (hopefully, anyway) makes up most this country, who reads the diatribes on both sides, the problem becomes, well if the left and the right are both against this group, there is really no reason for me to be for it, so I'll just stay out of the way and let them at it.

See, we don't gain more enemies, but we have a high probablility of losing friends. That's the problem.

This kind of rhetoric shows that the political/social spectrum is often just a circle with the extremists of both sides meeting on the opposite side from those who try to maintain a moderate position.

Hugz

Chloë

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...
Guest natascha

Personally, i think it is funny "in a dark sarcastic joking way, No offense intended".

But these are women, who think that if anyone who has/had a penis is absolutely dangerous. What about hermaphrodites???? i reckon that they think that hermaphrodite are dangerous also, because of that extra bit of equipment, (i you know what i mean). People have there opinions, and i have mine, my opinion is that thess so-called "women" should have their rights taken away for a week, and see how they like it.

Trans-folk, are the type that has to go through crap everyday of their lives, because they are "different", they are the vunerable ones, because of the torment from biggoted S$%T-HEADS, that have absolutely no understanding of what the pain is like.

Why can't a MTF shower in a female public shower? they are rightly female, and have more right to be female than anyone else. why can't a MTF use female public toilets? oh, right, because of the thing between the legs... trans-folk are not going to do anybody any harm, they just want to live their lives as they truly are, and to be excepted as their true selves.

But their always is pig-headed snobs, that think that they are better than everyone else.

trans-folk, get more crap, killed, tortured, made out to be a freak, picked on because they are "outside", the stupid "binary" gender system.

women, are NOT the only vunerable ones.

we need the protection, and quite a bit more.

natascha

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...
Guest Janice Lynn

I believe we've always known there are radical feminists out there who, as some have

pointed out, are so insecure in their own skins that they are in need of an easy target.

What troubles me most is that they have access to the deliberations of a committee

running under the banner of the United Nations. If there is any comfort it is in knowing

that virtually no one knows or cares what the United Nations is on anything. For example,

I can't see that the UN's policies on human rights ... isn't this what it is all about ... have

had virtually no effect on the policies or laws of any country?

As for the two writers of the article, I only feel something of a sense of pity in that they

are so out of touch with the gradual but unstoppable movement in America toward

making one's gender a matter of self-identification rather than the X on their birth

certificate. The fight won't be easy, but it is curious that at least 2 self-proclaimed

feminists find themselves in alignment with the extremes on both the right and left.

Perhaps they are uptight about the idea of a MTF using the stall next to them in the

ladies room, but the fact of the matter is that the MTFs I know and have known simply

want to take of business and get the heck out of there without some fool calling a

security guard or cop. What is the benefit in causing a ruckus in that venue? And

for that matter, when is the last time anyone heard of an MTF molesting, let alone

raping, a GG in a public restroom? I challenge the insecure GGs to provide evidence

that MTFs are a hazard in a public restroom. More likely GGs threaten the safety

and wellbeing of the MTF.

Finally, kudos to the poster who pointed out that FTMs don't seem to draw the raise

the same fears and angst as MTFs. To be downright silly, perhaps we should ask the

UN to defer on any decision regarding transsexuals until GMs have indicated their

objections to a trans man using a men's room.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 130 Guests (See full list)

    • Breanne_O
    • AllieJ
    • VickySGV
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...