Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Laser Hair Removal vs. Electrolysis?


Guest Nova Maria

Recommended Posts

Guest Nova Maria

So I don't really understand the difference between laser and electrolysis. Can anybody explain it? I've heard that people get really good, permanent results from electrolysis, but it's soooooooo expensive! By opting for the cheaper laser procedure, would I compromise the quality of the hair removal?

Personal experiences are greatly appreciated. Thanks!

:wub: Nova

Link to comment
Guest EvenClose

In my opinion, laser works. It has worked well for me. Of course it don't get the red or blonde hairs. Those will have to be taken care of with electro. Thats basically the difference. If you can get laser to blast off all the dark ones and follow up with electro that will probably be the quickest route.

They say laser is for permanent hair reduction. Electro gets all of it.

Electro they use a small needle to insert it into each follicle and zap the hair. Laser is a big beam that can wipe out a lot at a time.

If a electro tech can get 250 hairs an/hr. Say the average face has between 10k and 30k hairs on it. Lets average 15k hairs.

Thats 60 hrs of electro at say 65 an hr. $3900 and you hope they get every one. Some may come back and have to be zapped again. Now lets add a 20% rate of failure on the 15,ooo hairs. So thats 3000 hairs that have to be had again. That comes to 12 more hours of electro. $780 for that. So a grand total of $4680...Thats just an average.

Some peoples face could have 30,ooo hairs. As much as 40,ooo. But since I used the averages it probably makes it a little more realistic. Point is you can see how expensive that COULD be. Not that it will, but the possibility of it being.

Now lets take a look at laser prices. They vary a lot from area to area. Lets take an average of 3,ooo to 5,ooo dollars. Lets say that gets us 85% reduction in hair. So 15,000 again...That leaves 2250 left. (Which depending on the color hair you have may go up or down, the effectiveness of their laser. etc.etc) So 2,250 thats left to electro would cost $585. So if the average cost was 4000 for laser and 585 for electro we end up at $4585 this route and all electro would be $4,680. See the price probably ain't much different.

Problem you run into is finding a good place to do either one. The better they are and equipment the faster the results. Electro is much slower. But the results are 100% permanent. Laser is not approved by the fda and all that to be permanent. They just say a reduction. I assume they say that because it doesn't get the light colored hairs.

Anyway hope I put it in perspective for ya, any questions just ask someone will be along shortly to answer them.

Miranda

Link to comment
Guest Sally G.

A combination probably works best.

I had my second session of laser yesterday. The first session got rid of a lot of the dark hairs (even I was able to see the difference!) so this second session will likely clean up even more. The plan is for at least eight sessions of laser spaced a month apart. These are interspersed with electrolysis on the grey and white hairs on which the laser doesn't work. I managed to get a good discount on the laser ($150 per session for a total of $1200). The total for electrolysis will be greater as I have a lot of white/grey hair and it will take much longer.

As too the procedures themselves I have found the laser more painful (a short, sharp burning sensation), although as I discovered yesterday the decrease in dark hairs from the first session resulted in a noticable lowering of the pain levels in the second session. The electro is less painful but the pain is more constant over a period of time.

Hope this helps

Aroha

Sally G.

Link to comment
Guest Donna Jean

.

I've had 65 hours of electrolysis so far and I need about twice that much more to go....

But, my facial hairs are gray/white and Laser won't work on those....

So, I only do Electrolysis....

Even the people that have good laser results usually have to have some Electrolysis to finish up....

Also, Electrolysis is the only permanent hair removal process.....

Huggs

Dee Jay

Link to comment

Don't mean to hijack the thread but I am in the same boat.

I have already visited an electrolysis technician for a consultation I have gotten a picture from her.

All my facial hair is dark so I think I would be a good candidate for laser, but I have only heard that laser is a waste of money as it doesn't last and electrolysis is the only "real" solution.

So far I have (electrolysis):

130 for each 2 hour session

Need a session a week so:

130 x 4 = 520/month

or more accurately:

130 x 52(weeks in a year) = 6760 / year

So basically from what I was told it would be 13.520 for my facial hair removal through electrolysis.

For me as I assume as with many of us girls, cost is quite important as that is just taking away from money I am saving from surgery.

If I have to, I will spend the money, but if there is a cheaper/quicker solution even if it is more painful, I will gladly take it.

Advice?

Link to comment
Guest Donna Jean

.

Unfortunately....Laser is cheaper overall ....

It often needs to be repeated so the cost goes up.....

And, I'm with you.....I'd do it if it hurt more but was cheaper.....But, I don't know of anything.....

I've spent about $3500 so far with about another $7000 to go....So, it's in the ball park that you were quoted...

Dee Jay

Link to comment
Guest Donna Jean

As long as they don't use some super powered laser that could cut metal to remove my hair I'll probably go the laser route.

Naw.......I'm pretty sure they don't use one that strong.....

Dee Jay

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

I have heard that electrology is the only permanent hair removale, and laser is only permanent hair reduction, but I don't know, there are some very good laser people that swear it's permanent. I think I'm more going over to the laser side of things. Hey I think it might just work as good as they claim it does.

Love

Melissa 67

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 167 Guests (See full list)

    • Adrianna Danielle
    • Lenneth
    • KathyLauren
    • SamC
    • VickySGV
    • Abigail Genevieve
    • Betty K
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,025
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • Davie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      "I love you so much,"  Lois said.  They met in the driveway. "I could not live without you." "Neither could I." "What are we going to do?" "Find another counselor?" "No. I think we need to solve this ourselves." "Do you think we can?" "I don't know.  But what I know is that I don't want to go through that again.  I think we have to hope we can find a solution." "Otherwise, despair." "Yeah.   Truce?" "Okay,  truce." And they hugged.   "When we know what we want we can figure out how to get there."   That began six years of angry battles, with Odie insisted he could dress as he pleased and Lois insisting it did not please her at all.  He told her she was not going to control him and she replied that she still had rights as a wife to a husband. Neither was willing to give in, neither was willing to quit, and their heated arguments ended in hugs and more.   They went to a Crossdressers' Club, where they hoped to meet other couples with the same problems, the same conflicts, and the same answers, if anyone had any.  It took them four tries before they settled on a group that they were both willing to participate in.  This was four couples their own age, each with a cross dressing husband and a wife who was dealing with it.  They met monthly.  It was led by a 'mediator' who wanted people to express how they felt about the situation.  Odie and Lois, as newcomers, got the floor, and the meeting was finally dismissed at 1:30 in the morning - it was supposed to be over at 10 - and everyone knew how they felt about the situation.   There was silence in the car on the way home.   "We aren't the only ones dealing with this." Odie finally said.   "Who would have thought that?  You are right."   "Somebody out there has a solution." "I hope you are right."   "I hope in hope, not in despair."   "That's my Odie."    
    • Abigail Genevieve
      The counseling session was heated, if you could call it a counseling session.  Sometimes Lois felt he was on Odie's side, and sometimes on hers.  When he was on her side, Odie got defensive. She found herself being defensive when it seemed they were ganging up on each other.   "This is not working," Lois said angrily, and walked out.  "Never again. I want my husband back. Dr. Smith you are complicit in this."   "What?" said Odie.   The counselor looked at him.  "You will have to learn some listening skills."   "That is it? Listening skills?  You just destroyed my marriage, and you told me I need to learn listening skills?"   Dr. Smith said calmly,"I think you both need to cool off."   Odie looked at him and walked out, saying "And you call yourself a counselor."   "Wait a minute."   "No."
    • Ashley0616
      Just a comfortable gray sweater dress and some sneakers. Nothing special today. 
    • VickySGV
      I do still carry a Swiss Army knife along with my car keys.  
    • Timi
      Jeans and a white sweater. And cute white sneakers. Delivering balloons to a bunch of restaurants supporting our LGBT Community Center fundraiser today!
    • April Marie
      Congratulations to you!!!This is so wonderful!!
    • missyjo
      I've no desire to present androgynous..nothing wrong with it but I am a girl n wish to present as a girl. shrugs, if androgynous works fir others good. always happy someone finds a solution or happiness    today black jeans  black wedges..purple camisole under white n black polka dot blouse half open   soft smile to all 
    • MaeBe
      I have read some of it, mostly in areas specifically targeted at the LGBTQ+ peoples.   You also have to take into account what and who is behind the words, not just the words themselves. Together that creates context, right? Let's take some examples, under the Department of Health & Human Services section:   "Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike."   or   "Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families."   From a wording perspective, who doesn't want to protect the health and well-being of Americans or think that families aren't good for America? But let's take a look at the author, Roger Severino. He's well-quoted to be against LGBTQ+ anything, has standard christian nationalist views, supports conversion therapy, etc.   So when he uses words like "threatens the health and well-being of children and adults alike" it's not about actual health, it's about enforcing cis-gendered ideology because he (and the rest of the Heritage Foundation) believe LGBTQ+ people and communities are harmful. Or when he invokes the family through the lens of, let's just say dog whistles including the "penalization of marriage" (how and where?!), he idealizes families involving marriage of a "biological male to a biological female" and associates LGBTQ+ family equity as something unhealthy.   Who are the radical actors? Who is telling people to be trans, gay, or queer in general? No one. The idea that there can be any sort of equity between LGBTQ+ people and "normal" cis people is abhorrent to the author, so the loaded language of radical/destructive/guise/threaten are used. Families that he believes are "good" are stable/well-ordered/healthy, specifically married/nuclear ones.   Start looking into intersectionality of oppression of non-privileged groups and how that affects the concept of the family and you will understand that these platitudes are thinly veiled wrappers for christian nationalist ideology.   What's wrong with equity for queer families, to allow them full rights as parents, who are bringing up smart and able children? Or single mothers who are working three jobs to get food on plates?
    • Ashley0616
      Well yesterday didn't work like I wanted to. I met a guy and started talking and he was wanting to be in a relationship. I asked my kids on how they thought of me dating a man and they said gross and said no. I guess it's time to look for women. I think that is going to be harder. Oh well I guess.  
    • Ashley0616
      I don't have anything in my dress pocket
    • Carolyn Marie
      This topic reminds me of the lyrics to the Beatles song, "A Little Help From My Friends."   "What do you see when you turn out the lights?"   "I can't tell you but I know it's mine."   Carolyn Marie
    • Abigail Genevieve
      @Ivy have you read the actual document?   Has anyone else out there read it?
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I am reading the Project 2025 document https://www.project2025.org/policy/   This will take some time.  I read the forward and I want to read it again later.   I read some criticism of it outside here and I will be looking for it in the light of what has been posted here and there.  Some of the criticism is bosh.   @MaeBe have you read the actual document?
    • RaineOnYourParade
      *older, not holder, oops :P
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...