Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

What Religion Is Right


Guest debo

Recommended Posts

Guest ignota

Believe in what makes sense to be believed in?

I believe it'll all work out in the end. And it'll be one helluva ride finding out where it ends :)

Look at me, all so optimistic... i'm agnostic. i don't always even believe in what i sense, but i feel grateful to be given the privilege of sensing it. Even if i got the wrong body, i'm thankful to have been given one. And if someone or some god/dess made it all, i'm grateful to them too.

Link to comment
Guest Julie T

Hi everyone

I usually post in Wicca because that is my belief system, and I do put faith in the ideas that something made the universe. The Goddess, to me , is the female aspect of the Creator. It is still a belief system, and it has it's own forum, so what is my point?

I am Unitarian Universalist. We accept all belief systems including Christianity, but we are not a Christian Church. The key is we believe in ethical living. We also believe in rational thought as a way to understand the universe and what we seem to be doing within it.

Our answer to 'What religion is right?" would be something like this? "All of them and none of them, it is what is in your head, and what is in your heart."

Julie

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest ColinFarber

You'll never know until you die.

And you might never know even then; if souls and afterlife don't exist, you might just NEVER know :P

So you only have one chance to decide; honestly, I believe the best thing is do what feels more natural for you.

I'm what I call a "skeptical deistic agnostic". I give almost everything the benefict of doubt; I think that maybe a God exists because I kind of perceive hir but I don't believe it's the God of any specific religion; and in the end I wonder if this even matters.

I do what I do because I think it's the right thing to do, not because of what would await me in the afterlife. For all I know, there might be a magical carnival full of clowns XD

Link to comment
Guest Brendalynn

That is a hard question to answer. I believe the answer to that question will be found within yourself. Look deep inside yourself and follow your instincts and you will find an answer. If you have to ask, "Is this the right religion for me?" then it's a good chance the answer is no. You will feel it inside when you find the answer you are looking for.

Good luck

Link to comment
  • 8 months later...
Guest Weaver

Follow your noggin.

Those three words are probably the best for any given situation.

Because there are so many religions, perhaps none of them are true?

Link to comment
Guest Kelly-087

None..

I find it no more likely that Jesus rose from the dead than Heracles slew the Hydra. This can apply to all religions. There's too many of them. And too many practitioners to claim they are right for any of them to actually be right.

Link to comment
Guest winterangel

I think atheism is frequently misinterpreted, and I fail to see how this comes about. Atheism is nothing more than either the rejection of a belief in a deity or deities, or simply the lack thereof.

I also fail to understand what this "hardline atheism" is. I've never come across it myself, as all atheists I know of, personally and popular (e.g. Richard Dawkins), are agnostic atheists. You cannot reasonably declare that there are no deities, because the existence of a deity is not falsifiable; therefore, all atheists must (logically) be agnostic atheists, and if any atheist is not agnostic, they are no more reasonable than a person who declares there is a deity or deities.

Moreover, atheism "says" nothing. Like I said, it's nothing more than the rejection of a belief in a deity or deities, or the lack thereof; atheism is not a religion or even a belief system. I, personally, do not think of humans as the center of the universe, far from it. I think Homo sapiens is an insignificant species on an insignificant mote suspended in an astronomically vast universe, which may or may not also exist alongside other universes within a multiverse. It has been around for only roughly two hundred thousand years, whereas the universe has been around for nearly fourteen billion years.

But, do not take me for a nihilist, either. Despite its overall insignificance, Earth has a relatively great significance to me, because it is my home planet, and I share it with over seven billion other humans, and millions of other species, also. The accomplishments of our species are indeed grand insofar as we can compare ourselves to other species; we currently do not know of any other intelligent life forms in the universe, although the odds of there being at least one other intelligent species out there, somewhere, are enormous.

As for the question of which religion is 'right,' this would first and foremost require an evaluation of every extant religion, and then we would need to confirm the validity of each religion. If we are able to confirm a specific religion is 100% valid, then that religion would be 'right,' but there is also the potential for other religions. A religion which is in the least bit theistic is already unable to be investigated, because as I said, the existence of a deity will never be falsifiable. Therefore, such religions as the Abrahamic trio, are not 'right,' but they are not necessarily 'wrong' either.

I have evaluated a few religions and personally feel that the respective holy books of the Abrahamic religions are too self-contradictory to be considered credible in the least. These books are fundamental to their respective religion, and thus I do not feel that the logic in any of their associated religions is sound. In any case, it's far too unsound for me to personally believe. There are also other reasons to doubt their legitimacy, but I shall not get into those.

To the contrary, my research of religion has only led me to believe that the idea of a deity is entirely produced by the human mind (i.e. the idea is fictional). I thus opt not to believe in any deity. Given all this, I am accurately described as an agnostic atheist, but because the agnostic is logically assumed, I omit it in most circumstances.

Overall, I do not bear a fondness for religion, namely organized religion. I have personal philosophies, many of which are like those of Buddhism, and these have proven for me to be excellent substitutes for religion. (I was previously a devout Christian.) I think you should believe in what you wish to believe, rather than accept a packaged religion.

In conclusion, to each their own.

Link to comment
  • Admin

I cannot comment on which religion is right, but we do have a history of the ones who were wrong. These are the religions that have ended up catastrophically killing all of their members in a single generation or even incident. ( Even Christianity itself was headed in the wrong direction in its early years by recommending its members not have children since the end of the world was close at hand. It was at least flexible enough to change that heading, but seems to have swung in the opposite direction in the last many years.)

Religions that tend to harmonize mankind with its place in the natural life of the universe, and who see all human experience as holy and unique in our ability to see the entirety of life and existance at least head in the right directions.

Link to comment
Guest Alexx21

i am at a cross roads at what religion i am , i believe that there is one God , that jesus was an holy man but not the son of God

i believe in life after death and that we reincarnated into animals or humans or plants , I believe in magic as well and in angels

I dont have one set way of believing i believe in many things there is nothing telling me that i am wrong in what i believe in at all

Whatever you believe weather its Muslim , christian , pagan etc its true to you and holds something special to you hold on to that

what ever it might be

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 99 Guests (See full list)

    • VickySGV
    • KymmieL
    • mattie22
    • MaybeRob
    • Adrianna Danielle
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...