Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Electrolysis & Dark Skin, A Regimen?


Guest Nab-Nab

Recommended Posts

Guest Nab-Nab

Hi,

My name is Nabela and I have dark skin, curly to wavy hair, and I'm interested in electrolysis. To my understanding the process is more expedient and effective than laser, and due to it working on all skintones a better choice overall. Over the past few days, I've been giving serious thought to placing this particular treatment within phase 1 of my transitioning plan, but I'm still having some misgivings. A few questions that I have are:

What sort of regimen for aftercare should I adopt? What products should it encompass?

I should begin aftercare immediately after the procedure? In the car or when I get home?

Is it possible to numb the area before treatment? If so, what should I use or request? Do treatment centers offer a numbing agent for an extra fee?

Whom are some of the notable and cost-efficient professionals or centers?

Thank you for your time and advice,

Nabela

Link to comment
Guest Eh-lyssa

Typically for electrolysis you need to shave the area about 3 or 4 days before your appointment and then stop shaving until your appointment so the technician can see which hairs are active (they are the ones that are growing) since they can only kill the active hairs.

For numbing I use emla cream which is a mix of lidocaine and prilocaine. I got mine online from amazon but you can find it in many places like pharmacies. You put the cream on about 1 hour before your appointment and then put saran wrap on over top to stop it from drying out. The numbing effect lasts for about 20 minutes or so after you remove it so its best to keep it on until the last minute.

After a while I found my neighborhood electrologist was too slow so I seeked out the expertise of E3000 in Carrollton TX because I wanted something faster. E3000 specialized in TG clients and they use a flash thermolysis technique that is much faster than the blend method my local electrologist was using. Where my local electrologist was $60/hr she would clear about 200-300 hairs per hour, E3000 is $110/hr and they go at about 2-3 times that speed and they also use lidocane injections so you don't feel anything except the lidocane shots. Since it only matters how many hairs per dollar E3000 worked out to be cheaper. At my first clearing at E3000 they had 2 techs working on me at once and it took 5 hours with 2 techs to clear all my facial hair. That was the first pass though. It takes multiple clearings to get all the hairs and with each clearing less hair comes back. After the 1st clearing about 60% remains and about 20% is removed with each clearing after. I am about to do clearing #5 soon on my face and #2 on my "south pole".

Good luck

Alyssa

Link to comment
  • 5 months later...
Guest Rita_Rodriguez

Unfortunately I don't get any numbing agent when I do thermolysis but I only go for an hour a week. After going for about a year, I definitely have far less hairs.

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

Hello Nabela:

My doctor prescribes one oxycodone and one tablet of Lorazepam one hour before my treatment. The oxycodone helps with the pain and the lorazepam lowers the anxietry level. My technician rubs triple antibiotic ointment on the treated area after electrolysis. I often bring a cold pack in a plastic sandwich bag which keeps swelling down and I apply cold pak on the trip home. Then I reaply antibiotic ointment after I get home to prevent any skin infection or flareup.

I did an hour a week for the first year. Now that I'm approaching FFS surgery, I'm doing two hours a week which when I started was almost unthinkable going two hours. I'm a woos when it comes to pain. Now that I'm having electrolysis on the most tender area of the face, the upper lip, I don't need no stinkin pain relief, just kidding. Eoowww. Can I get general anesthesia for doing this area :doh1: .

My technician uses the blend method of electrolysis. I would love to make a trip to Electrolysis 3000 or to the electrolysis technicians with Dr Zulowski in Chicago who uses light sedation. When you are comfortable in the hands of two experienced technicians and can get a complete clearing, that is the way to go. Also don't wait. Start treatment immediately as it does take some significant time to clear your entire face. Kathryn

Link to comment

Hi Nabela,

About the only thing I can add is that both of my electrologists recommended using a sunburn lotion afterwards, particularly with aloe. It did seem to help the redness, along with ice, as Julia mentioned.

Electrolysis bleached a couple of my moles out to invisibility. But, it also bleached my skin to some extent. I use makeup to cover. Youmight ask whether this could happen with you too. Of course, that's a problem with laser, one of the reasons I went with electrolysis alone.

Best of luck to you!

Love, Megan

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...

I also recommend bringing a cold pack in a clean baggy and apply it for on the way home. It keeps swelling down After I get home, I lightly blot the treated area with witch hazel soaked cotton pad followed by reapplying an antibiotics ointment to kill skin bacteria.

No shaving for a minimum of 24 hours and be very gentle around the treated area. Or leave the treated area alone for a day or two to heal. Kathryn

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 114 Guests (See full list)

    • Stefi
    • Pip
    • Carolyn Marie
    • VickySGV
    • Evelyn J
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...