Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

The LDS temple. Ordinance that stops trans


Guest (Lightsider)

Recommended Posts

Guest (Lightsider)

One of the things about the temple is a particular ordinance. This is part of the endowment process.

The reason this is important to the Mormon Trans experience is because it requires a level of nudity. You only wear a thin apron over your shoulders around your neck and comes down below the knees. The sides are wide open.

A temple worker will touch each part of body and give it a blessing. This includes your pelvic area. The reason this is important is so that Mormon Trans realize where another barrier is that keeps them from full membership and truly seen as equals. If the person is pre-op this would be a problem as there is a clear MALE and FEMALE side to the temple. If there is anything that would prevent the Mormon Trans from blending as their target gender regardless of Operative status this would cause big problems.

If you are male, a male temple worker blesses you. If you Female you have a female worker bless you. Interestingly enought this is the only place in the Mormon church where women weild the priesthood.

The Temple is strongly geared towards male or female. Nothing in between is recognized. Even androgenous members would encounter a problem here and might feel uncomfortable because they would have to be blessed as either a male or female and recieve a new name that is either MALE or FEMALE.

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...
Guest Xeriis

The Temple is strongly geared towards male or female.

It is geared towards male and female, but there is no nudity or anything else that is posted. Just wanted to clarify a little.

Link to comment
  • Admin

Actually Nicole had been admitted to the Utah Temple and taken part in rites there years before acting on her GD and had personal knowledge of things that do happen. She says "element" which would fit into the rites that Joseph Smith brought into the Mormon faith system. Not full nudity, but symbolic approximations.

Link to comment
Guest Xeriis

Ah, I see. I have also been to the temple a number of times in the past (though not in the past few years). I can see what she was saying and I'm simply saying the picture she paints is much different from that of my experiences.

Link to comment
Guest Jenn348

One of the things about the temple is a particular ordinance. This is part of the endowment process.

The reason this is important to the Mormon Trans experience is because it requires a level of nudity. You only wear a thin apron over your shoulders around your neck and comes down below the knees. The sides are wide open.

A temple worker will touch each part of body and give it a blessing. This includes your pelvic area. The reason this is important is so that Mormon Trans realize where another barrier is that keeps them from full membership and truly seen as equals. If the person is pre-op this would be a problem as there is a clear MALE and FEMALE side to the temple. If there is anything that would prevent the Mormon Trans from blending as their target gender regardless of Operative status this would cause big problems.

If you are male, a male temple worker blesses you. If you Female you have a female worker bless you. Interestingly enought this is the only place in the Mormon church where women weild the priesthood.

The Temple is strongly geared towards male or female. Nothing in between is recognized. Even androgenous members would encounter a problem here and might feel uncomfortable because they would have to be blessed as either a male or female and recieve a new name that is either MALE or FEMALE.

I don't know where you are getting your information, but it isn't from a reliable source.

Yep, no nudity. The temple worker doesn't touch the pelvic area, only part of the leg or part of the stomach. The apron stays on the entire time and nobody ever sees anything they shouldn't. Many genetic women are told to fear this process, but my wife came back out wondering what all of the hype was about.

As for the new name, it's not really a name in the normal sense of the word. People don't use it like a name. I don't feel it right to go any further into detail, but I can tell you it's not really a name.

An important LDS belief is that we existed in a pre-earth life and our spirits were male or female. There is nothing in the teachings to preclude the idea that a male body could house a female spirit accidentally through a birth defect. In fact, the idea of the fall supports that mistakes can and do happen. If you read my other posts, you'll see that the church leadership is coming around on this issue. There are trans people who are considered worthy and go to the temple in their proper gender role (the one they actually want to be!).

People who believe they are sexless or that their spirit doesn't have a gender/sex, nobody is forcing them to be a Mormon. If their beliefs don't match ours, they are free to worship elsewhere as they please. See D&C 134.

Personally, I know my spirit is female and I am correct to strive to live my proper gender role. I know this from my own personal prayer. Just as Joseph Smith did, I asked God about it. For anybody reading this, don't take my word or anybody else's word (good or bad) about Mormonism. Ask God for yourself!

Link to comment
Guest Xeriis

One of the biggest disagreements I had was that 'pelvic area' was specifically mentioned, but not accurate at all. Anyone that has been to the temple knows that by saying 'pelvic area' it is purposely misleading and leads one to paint a picture that is highly sexualized when it is not. This is only one thing I want to correct, there are many, many others.

To those who wish to know about the basic principles and beliefs about what happens in the temple, there is a 40 or so page pamphlet put out by the church about the temples ("Preparing for the Temple" I think it's called, but I am not sure). Mostly members read this, but it is generally available to all. If studied ahead of time the temple is not an overwhelming or weird experience at all.

There are many things in life where we know the general principles, but never go into detail or ask others to share their personal experiences. Examples of a few are sexuality, your 'first time' and cis-female related items. Thinking of these, people are likely to talk about it a little among themselves, but often change topics or say much less with 'an outsider' around. Generally we think of these things as extremely personal or 'sacred'. This is no different for the temple. You would be more comfortable hearing about any of those issues in my life (and would gladly recount such if someone 'Must know' if I am serious), than I would be about sharing my temple experience. I do not feel we are 'keeping this a secret' from younger people or kids. They can read about it in the pamphlet, and similar resources, and learn most everything they will want to know. After family or friend has been to the temple, I am more than willing to share my experiences with them there, but generally not before or elsewhere.

An important LDS belief is that we existed in a pre-earth life and our spirits were male or female. There is nothing in the teachings to preclude the idea that a male body could house a female spirit accidentally through a birth defect. In fact, the idea of the fall supports that mistakes can and do happen. If you read my other posts, you'll see that the church leadership is coming around on this issue. There are trans people who are considered worthy and go to the temple in their proper gender role (the one they actually want to be!).

Sometimes one reason couples are unable to have children is that the woman actually has a xy chromosome, but for whatever reason her body still developed to where it is. It is reassuring to know that a genetically cis-male can have fully functional female organs, although not have children. I have also wondered about these couples in the church as it means there are two genetically cis-males together, but many never even know it. I was happy to find another opinion on the matter.

I also feel like Jenn348 and look forward to living in my proper gender role.

Link to comment
Guest Jenn348

One of the biggest disagreements I had was that 'pelvic area' was specifically mentioned, but not accurate at all. Anyone that has been to the temple knows that by saying 'pelvic area' it is purposely misleading and leads one to paint a picture that is highly sexualized when it is not. This is only one thing I want to correct, there are many, many others.

To those who wish to know about the basic principles and beliefs about what happens in the temple, there is a 40 or so page pamphlet put out by the church about the temples ("Preparing for the Temple" I think it's called, but I am not sure). Mostly members read this, but it is generally available to all. If studied ahead of time the temple is not an overwhelming or weird experience at all.

There are many things in life where we know the general principles, but never go into detail or ask others to share their personal experiences. Examples of a few are sexuality, your 'first time' and cis-female related items. Thinking of these, people are likely to talk about it a little among themselves, but often change topics or say much less with 'an outsider' around. Generally we think of these things as extremely personal or 'sacred'. This is no different for the temple. You would be more comfortable hearing about any of those issues in my life (and would gladly recount such if someone 'Must know' if I am serious), than I would be about sharing my temple experience. I do not feel we are 'keeping this a secret' from younger people or kids. They can read about it in the pamphlet, and similar resources, and learn most everything they will want to know. After family or friend has been to the temple, I am more than willing to share my experiences with them there, but generally not before or elsewhere.

An important LDS belief is that we existed in a pre-earth life and our spirits were male or female. There is nothing in the teachings to preclude the idea that a male body could house a female spirit accidentally through a birth defect. In fact, the idea of the fall supports that mistakes can and do happen. If you read my other posts, you'll see that the church leadership is coming around on this issue. There are trans people who are considered worthy and go to the temple in their proper gender role (the one they actually want to be!).

Sometimes one reason couples are unable to have children is that the woman actually has a xy chromosome, but for whatever reason her body still developed to where it is. It is reassuring to know that a genetically cis-male can have fully functional female organs, although not have children. I have also wondered about these couples in the church as it means there are two genetically cis-males together, but many never even know it. I was happy to find another opinion on the matter.

I also feel like Jenn348 and look forward to living in my proper gender role.

I think it really goes to show that there is no physical measurement somebody can make to determine the gender of a person, let alone what gender the spirit of that person is.

It certainly isn't genetics, because there are XY females and XX males out there. Plus, there are XXY and other variants where people have grown up to appear male or female. For the intersexed, they used to do a chromosome test and then assign based on that, but the brain's gender cannot be read based on that and the doctor ruined people's lives by assigning the wrong gender.

Measurements of genitals likewise have proven wrong, as have testing for presence of testicular or ovarian tissue.

The only 100% reliable method for determining what a person is would be to ask them! That's why they allow intersex children to grow up a few years without surgical alteration so they can let the kid tell them what they really are. There's no valid reason to not take that same approach for transgendered people, whose genitals appear within normal limits but whose brains have proven to not match up.

People who claim that God wouldn't make mistakes, or that a spirit's gender can be divined through eyeball measurements, lab tests or chromosomal studies are narrow-minded fools. Sure, in middle-school biology they teach it that way, but if we treated everything in our lives the way we treated them in middle school, our lives would certainly be a huge mess. Life is complicated, and the sooner people get that through their heads, the better.

Link to comment
Guest Xeriis

The only 100% reliable method for determining what a person is would be to ask them! That's why they allow intersex children to grow up a few years without surgical alteration so they can let the kid tell them what they really are. There's no valid reason to not take that same approach for transgendered people, whose genitals appear within normal limits but whose brains have proven to not match up.

I have come to believe that God has simply allowed some things to happen in life. If everything was very straight forward or set in stone, there would be very little diversity and much more black and white. Simply what would life really be like if we knew exactly where we were supposed to go, how to go there and when. I often think that though I may have a choice, the correct path would be obvious.

Although there are many understandings and intolerances now, it'll all work out in the end. God knows each of our circumstances, how we feel and the faces we've had to make in life.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 116 Guests (See full list)

    • Abigail Genevieve
    • SamC
    • Ashley0616
    • Betty K
    • Maddee
    • MaeBe
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,023
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Delaney
    Newest Member
    Delaney
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bebhar
      Bebhar
      (41 years old)
    2. caelensmom
      caelensmom
      (40 years old)
    3. Jani
      Jani
      (70 years old)
    4. Jessicapitts
      Jessicapitts
      (37 years old)
    5. klb046
      klb046
      (30 years old)
  • Posts

    • awkward-yet-sweet
      The usual social ways, of course.  Taking care of my partners and stepkids, being involved in my community.  That makes me feel good about my role.   As for physical validation and gender... probably the most euphoric experience is sex.  I grew up with my mother telling me that my flat and boyish body was strange, that my intersex anatomy was shameful, that no man would want me. So experiencing what I was told I could never have is physical proof that I'm actually worth something.  
    • KathyLauren
      <Moderator hat on>  I think that, at this point we need to get the thread back onto the topic, which is the judge's ruling on the ballot proposition.  If there is more to be said on the general principles of gendered spaces etc., please discuss them, carefully and respectfully, in separate threads. <Moderator hat off>
    • Abigail Genevieve
      People who have no understanding of transgender conditions should not be making policy for people dealing with it. Since it is such a small percentage of the population, and each individual is unique, and their circumstances are also unique, each situation needs to be worked with individually to see that the best possible solution is implemented for those involved. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No.  You are getting stuck on one statement and pulling it out of context.   Trans kids have rights, but so do non-trans kids.  That conflict is best worked out in the individual situation. 
    • MaeBe
      I get the concept, I believe. You're trying to state that trans kids need to or should be excluded from binary gender spaces and that you acknowledge that answers to accommodate those kids may not be found through policy. I disagree with the capability of "penetration" as being the operative delimiter in the statement, however. I contest this statement is poorly chosen at best and smacks of prejudice at worst. That it perpetuates certain stereotypes, whether that was the intent or not.   Frankly, all kids should have the right to privacy in locker rooms, regardless of gender, sexuality, or anatomy. They should also have access to exercise and activities that other kids do and allow them to socialize in those activities. The more kids are othered, extracted, or barred from the typical school day the more isolated and stigmatized they become. That's not healthy for anyone, the excluded for obvious reasons and the included for others--namely they get to be the "haves" and all that entails.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Context.  Read the context.  Good grief.
    • MaeBe
      Please don't expect people to read manifold pages of fiction to understand a post.   There was a pointed statement made, and I responded to it. The statement used the term penetration, not "dissimilar anatomy causing social discomfiture", or some other reason. It was extended as a "rule" across very different social situations as well, locker and girl's bedrooms. How that term is used in most situations is to infer sexual contact, so most readers would read that and think the statement is that we "need to keep trans girl's penises out of cis girls", which reads very closely to the idea that trans people are often portrayed as sexual predators.   I understand we can't always get all of our thoughts onto the page, but this doesn't read like an under-cooked idea or a lingual short cut.
    • Ashley0616
      I shopped online in the beginning of transition. I had great success with SHEIN and Torrid!
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Have you read the rest of what I wrote?   Please read between the lines of what I said about high school.  Go over and read my Taylor story.  Put two and two together.   That is all I will say about that.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      "I feel like I lost my husband," Lois told the therapist,"I want the man I married." Dr. Smith looked at Odie, sitting there in his men's clothing, looking awkward and embarrassed. "You have him.  This is just a part of him you did not know about. Or did not face." She turned to Odie,"Did you tear my wedding dress on our wedding night?" He admitted it.  She had a whole catalog of did-you and how-could you.  Dr. Smith encouraged her to let it all out. Thirty years of marriage.  Strange makeup in the bathroom.  The kids finding women's laundry in the laundry room. There was reconciliation. "What do we do now?" Dr. Smith said they had to work that out.  Odie began wearing women's clothing when not at work.  They visited a cross-dressers' social club but it did not appeal to them.  The bed was off limits to cross dressing.  She had limits and he could respect her limits.  Visits to relatives would be with him in men's clothing.    "You have nail polish residue," a co-worker pointed out.  Sure enough, the bottom of his left pinky nail was bright pink  His boss asked him to go home and fix it.  He did.   People were talking, he was sure, because he doubted he was anywhere as thorough as he wanted to be.  It was like something in him wanted to tell everyone what he was doing, and he was sloppy.   His boss dropped off some needed paperwork on a Saturday unexpectedly and found Odie dressed in a house dress and wig.  "What?" the boss said, shook his head, and left.  None of his business.   "People are talking," Lois said. "They are asking about this," she pointed to his denim skirt. "This seems to go past or deeper than cross dressing."   "Yes.  I guess we need some counseling."  And they went.
    • April Marie
      You look wonderful!!! A rose among the roses.
    • Ashley0616
      Mine would be SHEIN as much as I have bought from them lol.
    • MaeBe
      This is the persistence in thinking of trans girls as predators and, as if, they are the only kind of predation that happens in locker rooms. This is strikingly close to the dangerous myth that anatomy corresponds with sexuality and equates to gender.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      At the same time there might be mtf boys who transitioned post-puberty who really belong on the girls' teams because they have more similarities there than with the boys, would perform at the same level, and might get injured playing with the bigger, stronger boys.   I well remember being an androgynous shrimp in gym class that I shared with seniors who played on the football team.  When PE was no longer mandatory, I was no longer in PE. They started some mixed PE classes the second semester, where we played volleyball and learned bowling and no longer mixed with those seniors, boys and girls together.
    • Timi
      Leggings and gym shorts, sweatshirt, Handker wild rag. Listening to new Taylor Swift album while strolling through the rose garden in the park. 
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...