Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest sophia.gentry58

APA Dumps WPATH

Recommended Posts

Guest sophia.gentry58

This is over a year old, but I was unable to locate this story anywhere here at LP. Has anyone read the July, 2012 story that APA has essentially renounced WPATH because they feel they are not empirically based!? Is this why the APA changed the DSM diagnosis of GID to GD? If the APA, up to this point been was following the lead of WPATH, but now has renounced them, what does that mean for us? I have nothing but questions and no answers. Help please!!! :banghead:

Sophia

Share this post


Link to post
Guest Leah1026

APA makes recommendations. The psych community can do what they please. Some will follow WPATH. Some never did.

This is a report from last year from the APA:

http://www.psych.org/File%20Library/Learn/Archives/rd2012_GID.pdf

Having scanned that link I get the impression the difference is more political than scientific. They are using the lack of studies as a tool to try to undermine WPATH. My feeling is the APA doesn't like the fact that their precious DSM is becoming increasingly less relevant as far as our care is concerned. So this is an indirect attack on WPATH. WPATH may lack official studies, but we have tons of actual real world experience of working with real trans people (not test subjects). WPATH also has many members that are actually trans themselves and that fact probably sticks in the craw of some psychiatrists as the "imates running the asylum". So yeah it sounds a bit like sour grapes to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest KimberlyF

On this issue, they're both (gender part of DSM at least) becoming irrelevant. When therapy becomes strongly suggested and not a requirement and HRT on demand is already the norm with calls for SRS on demand, what purpose will WPATH have in that future?

On the other hand, gender issues only make up a small percentage of all the disorders covered in DSM. I think with the shift, the APA will survive.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest LizMarie

I'm actually very uncomfortable with SRS on demand as there is statistical validation that the WPATH SOC and the one year RLE have significantly reduced the regret factor among trans people. I don't object to informed consent for HRT but even there my recommendation is to work with a therapist. If you're going to transition, you are going to turn some aspects of your life upside down and having a confidant and a guide through that process seems wise to me.

And yes, APA will survive but will it be relevant to the treatment of trans folk? That remains to be seen.

Share this post


Link to post
VickySGV

Well, there is a small distinction between the two groups, APA is American Psychological Association, and WPATH is World Professional Association for Transgender Health. WPATH is getting a lot of input from more than just U.S. professionals, and some of my friends who attend its functions do find that it is significant in Europe, and Pacific Rim areas, so do not write WPATH off the charts too soon, in addition WPATH is sponsoring better research in those countries, so some of our stuck up U.S. types may not have the last or best word yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Drea

WPATH is highly political which has become more and more stacked with trans folks involved in setting standards and pushing their agendas.

So it isn't surprising if APA, as a professional organization, would distance itself from an organization that is more and more political based rather than science based such as WPATH,

So I agree with Leah that it is a political difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest LizMarie

And the APA is littered with people who still want to practice reparative therapy, Drea. Let's not forget that little detail, shall we? So while you deliberately demean WPATH simply because trans people are members (why shouldn't they be?) you also say nothing about people who want to continue to practice a form of "counseling" that has been shown to be unethical and actually harmful. I would choose WPATH over the APA with regards to my health care, given the APA's track record thus far.

Share this post


Link to post
Drea

I saw nothing in the APA promoting reparative therapy. Can you provide a reference?

As I recall there are some in WPATH who are very unpopular because of their views. No question the organization has been picking and choosing research based upon what supports the view it wishes to have. That is one of the APA objections I recall, the selective choosing of information (including accepting questionable information) by WPAATH that supports the conclusions it wishes to present and rejecting information that regardless of merits that doesn't.

I am one that tends to live in the world of facts. I can live with the good and the bad. I think there is reason to see this as a medical condition which I don't think is inconsistent with APA but is in many ways inconsistent with WPATH which is more and more focused on choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest LizMarie

I said members, Drea,

Members, like:

Joseph Nicolosi
Charles Socarides
Benjamin Kaufman
Robert Spitzer (who recanted his position in 2012 and apologized for making unproven claims about the efficacy of reparative therapy)
And of course, the infamous Kenneth Zucker.
If you wish, I'll go dig up more but the point is made. There are APA members who still adhere to practices that have been shown to be harmful, so let's not forget that little fact, shall we? The APA could censure these people or even remove them but it doesn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest KimberlyF

It's hard to make a case for medical necessity without a diagnosis-including a diagnostic code-which is all some insurance companies start with. I don't have a single diagnosis or code from WPATH that has helped my insurance with the treatment services they recommend. I can thank the APA for my HRT and both for the legitimacy to get insurance approved for surgery.

This to me ironically fits in well with Sarah's topic. Many of the people in the APA are also in WPATH. One group wanting the other to do what is best or being critical sure seems to be getting them tossed under the bus, while they were all the talk when the decided to change GID to GD. What have you done for us lately?

Share this post


Link to post
Guest LizMarie

The APA is the American organization, Kimberly. Usually American organizations are given precedence in America, especially by insurers who do not wish to support transgender medical treatment any more than is necessary. This is why the US insurance industry still classifies transgender surgeries as "experimental" even after 80 years of success stories.

My observation was simply that Drea was deliberately demeaning WPATH while ignoring that members of the APA still practice harmful methods and even have vocally argued in favor of those methods. APA could censure or remove those members but does not.

I think it's wise to realize that both organizations have their pluses and minuses and casting one as the "hero" and the other as the "villain" is not a fair evaluation of either organization.

Share this post


Link to post
Drea

...And of course, the infamous Kenneth Zucker.

If you wish, I'll go dig up more but the point is made. There are APA members who still adhere to practices that have been shown to be harmful, so let's not forget that little fact, shall we? The APA could censure these people or even remove them but it doesn't.

You mean the same infamous Ken Zucker on WPATH's Standards of Care Workgroup? The same one who WPATH hasn't kicked out? That is even trusted on the SOC working group, one of the key purposes of the group?

Now I remembered this from memory and cross checked. He is listed last on the list so maybe they don't like him? Maybe it is intent to push him off? Or wait...it is an alphabetical list, I guess the "Zu" gets him that distinct position. I bet he found that annoying growing up too.

Now I can't say what others you list that may also be WPATH members. As I said I knew this one off the top of my head.

So I don't see either group doing the sort of housekeeping you expect and I am not sure the mechanisms even exist.

What I haven't seen is how these individuals, who coincidentally are members of APA, have caused the APA to advocate reparative therapy as primary means of treatment nor other treatments which have been proven harmful.

And just to clarify, where you said

So while you deliberately demean WPATH simply because trans people are members (why shouldn't they be?)

I said:

As I recall there are some in WPATH who are very unpopular because of their views.[example given above] No question the organization has been picking and choosing research based upon what supports the view it wishes to have. That is one of the APA objections I recall, the selective choosing of information (including accepting questionable information) by WPAATH that supports the conclusions it wishes to present and rejecting information that regardless of merits that doesn't.

I do not "demean". I pointed out what I see as a structural problem. The picking and choosing of research based upon it supporting the view. An issue that exists in the broader trans community. And yes I think WPATH is becoming more of an advocacy group. In fairness even in the HBIGDA that was one of it's function. It does seem to becoming less science based and more advocacy based. The picking and choosing of research being one symptom and I do think more trans folk becoming members are part of the change. Is this not fact that more trans folks have become members? By the way I have no doubt that there are plenty of trans folk who are APA members too.

If I were to "demean" I would not be discussing the issues involved but using demeaning characterizations such as "idiot", "stupid".

Now it is curious to note that I could qualify for full voting membership in WPATH but couldn't even be an associate in APA.

Now I really don't have any big issues with the WPATH standards. They are pretty tame actually. I think putting blinders on, using bad research to support the cause and not acknowledging good research that doesn't fit so well is an issue that can threaten WPATH's legitimacy. I am sure there are individual members that do speak to unpopular things, but as an organization they aren't taken seriously.

It is very much like this topic about how anyone speaking something that the majority in the community doesn't like gets dumped on. http://www.lauras-playground.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=57683

Share this post


Link to post
Tejana

...And of course, the infamous Kenneth Zucker.

If you wish, I'll go dig up more but the point is made. There are APA members who still adhere to practices that have been shown to be harmful, so let's not forget that little fact, shall we? The APA could censure these people or even remove them but it doesn't.

You mean the same infamous Ken Zucker on WPATH's Standards of Care Workgroup? The same one who WPATH hasn't kicked out? That is even trusted on the SOC working group, one of the key purposes of the group?

Now I remembered this from memory and cross checked. He is listed last on the list so maybe they don't like him? Maybe it is intent to push him off? Or wait...it is an alphabetical list, I guess the "Zu" gets him that distinct position. I bet he found that annoying growing up too.

Now I can't say what others you list that may also be WPATH members. As I said I knew this one off the top of my head.

So I don't see either group doing the sort of housekeeping you expect and I am not sure the mechanisms even exist.

What I haven't seen is how these individuals, who coincidentally are members of APA, have caused the APA to advocate reparative therapy as primary means of treatment nor other treatments which have been proven harmful.

And just to clarify, where you said

So while you deliberately demean WPATH simply because trans people are members (why shouldn't they be?)

I said:

As I recall there are some in WPATH who are very unpopular because of their views.[example given above] No question the organization has been picking and choosing research based upon what supports the view it wishes to have. That is one of the APA objections I recall, the selective choosing of information (including accepting questionable information) by WPAATH that supports the conclusions it wishes to present and rejecting information that regardless of merits that doesn't.

I do not "demean". I pointed out what I see as a structural problem. The picking and choosing of research based upon it supporting the view. An issue that exists in the broader trans community. And yes I think WPATH is becoming more of an advocacy group. In fairness even in the HBIGDA that was one of it's function. It does seem to becoming less science based and more advocacy based. The picking and choosing of research being one symptom and I do think more trans folk becoming members are part of the change. Is this not fact that more trans folks have become members? By the way I have no doubt that there are plenty of trans folk who are APA members too.

If I were to "demean" I would not be discussing the issues involved but using demeaning characterizations such as "idiot", "stupid".

Now it is curious to note that I could qualify for full voting membership in WPATH but couldn't even be an associate in APA.

Now I really don't have any big issues with the WPATH standards. They are pretty tame actually. I think putting blinders on, using bad research to support the cause and not acknowledging good research that doesn't fit so well is an issue that can threaten WPATH's legitimacy. I am sure there are individual members that do speak to unpopular things, but as an organization they aren't taken seriously.

It is very much like this topic about how anyone speaking something that the majority in the community doesn't like gets dumped on. http://www.lauras-playground.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=57683

I stumbled onto this thread just out of curiosity, and followed the link provided in the the above quoted-post (i.e., "Pedestals, a commentary", a thread initiated by Faith Gibson). I read the each of the posts contained in these two threads.

I am incredibly impressed with the commentaries of Drea and Ms. Gibson, at least those posted in this thread and the Pedestals... thread. Thank you for sharing your intellect and for your searching analysis of these issues contained in these threads..

Again, I am very impressed...so much so that I chose to resurrect this almost three year-old thread as a means of expressing my appreciation.

Best wishes, and thanks again to you both for sharing your perspectives in these two threads. Via con dios.

Share this post


Link to post

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 88 Guests (See full list)

    • VickySGV
    • Dannie
    • QuestioningAmber
  • Topics With Zero Replies

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      69,031
    • Total Posts
      623,390
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      5,719
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Dannie
    Newest Member
    Dannie
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Brienne
      Brienne
      (47 years old)
    2. ShyAshley
      ShyAshley
      (33 years old)
  • Posts

    • Jani
      This is nice Michelle. We can all be an inspiration to someone, whether we know it or not.   Jani
    • michelle_kitten
      A friend at work today sent me a message he wanted to talk to me.  I was leery, because he can talk on and on, and lecture if he thinks someone's done something incorrectly.  Sigh.  I asked him what he wanted to talk to me about and he replied, "Nothing. Just something personal."  Okay.  Well, that's sounds better than, "You should have done..."  So, after my shift was over I went by to see him.   He said, "I have to thank you." "What for?" I asked. "Because, of  you I went and got help for something that's been a problem for a while and I was too embarrassed to get help." Of course, at this point my mind is going.  Is he gay?  Is he trans too?  He is a bit effeminate.  "What's happened?" I asked. He tells me he's been feeling really run down, and sleeps away his weekends for some time.  He went to the doctor, and they diagnosed him with low-T.  He's on hormones now, and may end up on estrogen blockers as well.   That's exactly why I have been open about my transition with folks.  I believed if I was living a lie, by coming out others might find the courage to stop living lies as well.  I am very happy about this.  I am glad he is getting help.
    • AJ Baumann
      Thanks gennee. It is nice to find supportive community 💚 AJ
    • Nivegnal
      I ponder what I would really do if it all was just handed to me tomorrow.  Would I jump in both feet or not.  It’s easy to say you want this or that and different when you can actually get it.  I know this well enough.   I’m not in a hurry to have more surgery.  SRS is not on my scope but seems like a possible step.   Like you I’m more interested in an orchy and shed my T.   But I’m still healing from my last tangle with a scalpel.    Before I go on with that I want to understand my feelings and place in all this.  I’m hoping the therapist can show/teach/explain what’s what and why.  
    • NB Adult
      Back in the early 1990's I was fortunate being in a VA related counseling program for PTSD issues. My counselor was in a long term lesbian relationship, so when I broached the subject of what I intended to accomplish as a trans person, she had no qualms about writing me all the necessary letters. Prior to that I had been seeing Dr. Anne Lawrence, I know some people detest her, but she saw fit to put me on feminizing HRT and she also wrote me a letter of recommendation for SRS. Later it turned out that the endocrine specialist at the local VA hospital knew Anne, and he bought into my plan to transition and set me up for free meds. He also wrote me a letter recommending an orchiectomy and or SRS as I had complained about having to take Spironolactone as a testosterone blocker. So when I hooked up with Dr. Bowers I had both feet in the door but in the finale analysis decided that it wasn't the ultimate panacea for me. The reason I blathered all this past history out is that I felt at the time that if anything that you desire to accomplish is really valid and that important to you, then you will be manipulative and as devious as necessary to achieve what you need to. I am a bit embarrassed by putting all this out there, because in the end I dropped the ball entirely and in retrospect I have to concede that we should take our time going through the process step by step and not try to circumvent the system. It is what it is for our own good.
    • Nivegnal
      I am hoping to feel “the weight” lifted.   It is nice to know there are those here that understand.  
    • Nivegnal
      I wish you all the best with your conversations and your marriage.  The first time I came out to my first wife it was easy and she was totally supportive.  We shopped together and she taught me make up. It was wonderful. Then we got divorced a year later and my world crumbed.   She eventually couldn’t do it any longer even though I was not truly out still being in the military.  Still a guy in public and at work or every where outside our home.   ot was crushing.  Having to go deep in hiding again. I almost took my life.  My fear of this happening again is crippling.   I hope to work through my fear and one day tell my wife now.   Good luck this weekend ❤️
    • Amanda Thomas
      Thank you for your kind support Jani. More and more, I'm reaching the point that I realize I can't go back to my old life no matter what I do. Strangely, this is a source of courage. I have to move forward now and I feel a strange sort of calm knowing that my transition is beginning no matter what I try to do to stop it. It seems I am not letting my fear stop me from living anymore.
    • Jani
      I don't know much about Italian protocols in therapy but hopefully you can search online for therapists.  Might there be a society that they belong too (such as the APA) to search for members and qualifications?   I googled "therapists in Italy" and found this.  https://internationaltherapistdirectory.com/listings/italy-1/   Jani
    • Jani
      I love cars and all things automotive. I used to race a dedicated car; high strung race engine, full safety cage, trailered, etc.  While I no longer race since I don't have the stamina I do still have a small fleet of vehicles that I love.  I have a well equipped shop to play in.  I also love to cook and sew, always have.  While I once fretted over my "male-centric" hobbies I've found it to be a non issue.     Enjoy what you do.   Jani
    • Jani
      I was terribly nervous going in and walking on air on the way out as I had finally unburdened my soul to someone. This will hopefully be a good thing for your too.    Jani
    • Jani
      This was me too so you're not alone.  I found it difficult to explain to my wife something I couldn't explain to myself.  Counseling helped me a lot.     All my best.  Jani
    • NB Adult
      Being willing to sit down and talk through all of the issues she has is critical.
    • Jackie C.
      Best of luck Sara! My conversation was a little different from what you're going to have, but Susan and I are closer now than we've ever been before. Over the weekend she was telling an old friend how much more pleasant I've been to have around the house since I've started transitioning. Note here is that I'm OUT out. I present as female all the time, I'll happily answer questions to the best of my ability and I'm not ashamed of being transgender. I'd rather I wasn't mind you, but I think part of being trans is making the most out of a difficult situation.   Your wife sounds like a wonderful and caring individual. You're still the person she fell in love with, you're just sharing a little more of yourself. I think it's telling that you came out to her and she stuck around. I think you'll be OK.   Hugs!
    • SaraAW
      @Nivegnal  My wife is still upset I hid it from her. What she can’t grasp is that I wasn’t ready to tell her as I had almost no answers at the time and was really feeling shame. We have had only very brief conversations since as we have had people staying with us almost non stop since the initial conversation.    I honestly don’t know that I would I have really done a whole lot different if I could have a do over. It was one of the most stressful things I have ever done in my life. It took everything I had to bring it into the light. I am still stressed about it both the situation with my wife and the fact I am not out to anyone else other than my therapist, my GP and my endo.    I am going to have a much more in-depth series of conversations with my wife this weekend, as we are finally going to have some alone time. We will see how it goes.    I wish you the best of luck in coming out to your spouse. Everyone is different and will handle the news in their own way. You may end up with a super supportive partner.    *hugs*   Sara
  • Upcoming Events

×
×
  • Create New...