Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest sophia.gentry58

APA Dumps WPATH

Recommended Posts

Guest sophia.gentry58

This is over a year old, but I was unable to locate this story anywhere here at LP. Has anyone read the July, 2012 story that APA has essentially renounced WPATH because they feel they are not empirically based!? Is this why the APA changed the DSM diagnosis of GID to GD? If the APA, up to this point been was following the lead of WPATH, but now has renounced them, what does that mean for us? I have nothing but questions and no answers. Help please!!! :banghead:

Sophia

Share this post


Link to post
Guest Leah1026

APA makes recommendations. The psych community can do what they please. Some will follow WPATH. Some never did.

This is a report from last year from the APA:

http://www.psych.org/File%20Library/Learn/Archives/rd2012_GID.pdf

Having scanned that link I get the impression the difference is more political than scientific. They are using the lack of studies as a tool to try to undermine WPATH. My feeling is the APA doesn't like the fact that their precious DSM is becoming increasingly less relevant as far as our care is concerned. So this is an indirect attack on WPATH. WPATH may lack official studies, but we have tons of actual real world experience of working with real trans people (not test subjects). WPATH also has many members that are actually trans themselves and that fact probably sticks in the craw of some psychiatrists as the "imates running the asylum". So yeah it sounds a bit like sour grapes to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest KimberlyF

On this issue, they're both (gender part of DSM at least) becoming irrelevant. When therapy becomes strongly suggested and not a requirement and HRT on demand is already the norm with calls for SRS on demand, what purpose will WPATH have in that future?

On the other hand, gender issues only make up a small percentage of all the disorders covered in DSM. I think with the shift, the APA will survive.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest LizMarie

I'm actually very uncomfortable with SRS on demand as there is statistical validation that the WPATH SOC and the one year RLE have significantly reduced the regret factor among trans people. I don't object to informed consent for HRT but even there my recommendation is to work with a therapist. If you're going to transition, you are going to turn some aspects of your life upside down and having a confidant and a guide through that process seems wise to me.

And yes, APA will survive but will it be relevant to the treatment of trans folk? That remains to be seen.

Share this post


Link to post
VickySGV

Well, there is a small distinction between the two groups, APA is American Psychological Association, and WPATH is World Professional Association for Transgender Health. WPATH is getting a lot of input from more than just U.S. professionals, and some of my friends who attend its functions do find that it is significant in Europe, and Pacific Rim areas, so do not write WPATH off the charts too soon, in addition WPATH is sponsoring better research in those countries, so some of our stuck up U.S. types may not have the last or best word yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Drea

WPATH is highly political which has become more and more stacked with trans folks involved in setting standards and pushing their agendas.

So it isn't surprising if APA, as a professional organization, would distance itself from an organization that is more and more political based rather than science based such as WPATH,

So I agree with Leah that it is a political difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest LizMarie

And the APA is littered with people who still want to practice reparative therapy, Drea. Let's not forget that little detail, shall we? So while you deliberately demean WPATH simply because trans people are members (why shouldn't they be?) you also say nothing about people who want to continue to practice a form of "counseling" that has been shown to be unethical and actually harmful. I would choose WPATH over the APA with regards to my health care, given the APA's track record thus far.

Share this post


Link to post
Drea

I saw nothing in the APA promoting reparative therapy. Can you provide a reference?

As I recall there are some in WPATH who are very unpopular because of their views. No question the organization has been picking and choosing research based upon what supports the view it wishes to have. That is one of the APA objections I recall, the selective choosing of information (including accepting questionable information) by WPAATH that supports the conclusions it wishes to present and rejecting information that regardless of merits that doesn't.

I am one that tends to live in the world of facts. I can live with the good and the bad. I think there is reason to see this as a medical condition which I don't think is inconsistent with APA but is in many ways inconsistent with WPATH which is more and more focused on choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest LizMarie

I said members, Drea,

Members, like:

Joseph Nicolosi
Charles Socarides
Benjamin Kaufman
Robert Spitzer (who recanted his position in 2012 and apologized for making unproven claims about the efficacy of reparative therapy)
And of course, the infamous Kenneth Zucker.
If you wish, I'll go dig up more but the point is made. There are APA members who still adhere to practices that have been shown to be harmful, so let's not forget that little fact, shall we? The APA could censure these people or even remove them but it doesn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Guest KimberlyF

It's hard to make a case for medical necessity without a diagnosis-including a diagnostic code-which is all some insurance companies start with. I don't have a single diagnosis or code from WPATH that has helped my insurance with the treatment services they recommend. I can thank the APA for my HRT and both for the legitimacy to get insurance approved for surgery.

This to me ironically fits in well with Sarah's topic. Many of the people in the APA are also in WPATH. One group wanting the other to do what is best or being critical sure seems to be getting them tossed under the bus, while they were all the talk when the decided to change GID to GD. What have you done for us lately?

Share this post


Link to post
Guest LizMarie

The APA is the American organization, Kimberly. Usually American organizations are given precedence in America, especially by insurers who do not wish to support transgender medical treatment any more than is necessary. This is why the US insurance industry still classifies transgender surgeries as "experimental" even after 80 years of success stories.

My observation was simply that Drea was deliberately demeaning WPATH while ignoring that members of the APA still practice harmful methods and even have vocally argued in favor of those methods. APA could censure or remove those members but does not.

I think it's wise to realize that both organizations have their pluses and minuses and casting one as the "hero" and the other as the "villain" is not a fair evaluation of either organization.

Share this post


Link to post
Drea

...And of course, the infamous Kenneth Zucker.

If you wish, I'll go dig up more but the point is made. There are APA members who still adhere to practices that have been shown to be harmful, so let's not forget that little fact, shall we? The APA could censure these people or even remove them but it doesn't.

You mean the same infamous Ken Zucker on WPATH's Standards of Care Workgroup? The same one who WPATH hasn't kicked out? That is even trusted on the SOC working group, one of the key purposes of the group?

Now I remembered this from memory and cross checked. He is listed last on the list so maybe they don't like him? Maybe it is intent to push him off? Or wait...it is an alphabetical list, I guess the "Zu" gets him that distinct position. I bet he found that annoying growing up too.

Now I can't say what others you list that may also be WPATH members. As I said I knew this one off the top of my head.

So I don't see either group doing the sort of housekeeping you expect and I am not sure the mechanisms even exist.

What I haven't seen is how these individuals, who coincidentally are members of APA, have caused the APA to advocate reparative therapy as primary means of treatment nor other treatments which have been proven harmful.

And just to clarify, where you said

So while you deliberately demean WPATH simply because trans people are members (why shouldn't they be?)

I said:

As I recall there are some in WPATH who are very unpopular because of their views.[example given above] No question the organization has been picking and choosing research based upon what supports the view it wishes to have. That is one of the APA objections I recall, the selective choosing of information (including accepting questionable information) by WPAATH that supports the conclusions it wishes to present and rejecting information that regardless of merits that doesn't.

I do not "demean". I pointed out what I see as a structural problem. The picking and choosing of research based upon it supporting the view. An issue that exists in the broader trans community. And yes I think WPATH is becoming more of an advocacy group. In fairness even in the HBIGDA that was one of it's function. It does seem to becoming less science based and more advocacy based. The picking and choosing of research being one symptom and I do think more trans folk becoming members are part of the change. Is this not fact that more trans folks have become members? By the way I have no doubt that there are plenty of trans folk who are APA members too.

If I were to "demean" I would not be discussing the issues involved but using demeaning characterizations such as "idiot", "stupid".

Now it is curious to note that I could qualify for full voting membership in WPATH but couldn't even be an associate in APA.

Now I really don't have any big issues with the WPATH standards. They are pretty tame actually. I think putting blinders on, using bad research to support the cause and not acknowledging good research that doesn't fit so well is an issue that can threaten WPATH's legitimacy. I am sure there are individual members that do speak to unpopular things, but as an organization they aren't taken seriously.

It is very much like this topic about how anyone speaking something that the majority in the community doesn't like gets dumped on. http://www.lauras-playground.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=57683

Share this post


Link to post
Tejana

...And of course, the infamous Kenneth Zucker.

If you wish, I'll go dig up more but the point is made. There are APA members who still adhere to practices that have been shown to be harmful, so let's not forget that little fact, shall we? The APA could censure these people or even remove them but it doesn't.

You mean the same infamous Ken Zucker on WPATH's Standards of Care Workgroup? The same one who WPATH hasn't kicked out? That is even trusted on the SOC working group, one of the key purposes of the group?

Now I remembered this from memory and cross checked. He is listed last on the list so maybe they don't like him? Maybe it is intent to push him off? Or wait...it is an alphabetical list, I guess the "Zu" gets him that distinct position. I bet he found that annoying growing up too.

Now I can't say what others you list that may also be WPATH members. As I said I knew this one off the top of my head.

So I don't see either group doing the sort of housekeeping you expect and I am not sure the mechanisms even exist.

What I haven't seen is how these individuals, who coincidentally are members of APA, have caused the APA to advocate reparative therapy as primary means of treatment nor other treatments which have been proven harmful.

And just to clarify, where you said

So while you deliberately demean WPATH simply because trans people are members (why shouldn't they be?)

I said:

As I recall there are some in WPATH who are very unpopular because of their views.[example given above] No question the organization has been picking and choosing research based upon what supports the view it wishes to have. That is one of the APA objections I recall, the selective choosing of information (including accepting questionable information) by WPAATH that supports the conclusions it wishes to present and rejecting information that regardless of merits that doesn't.

I do not "demean". I pointed out what I see as a structural problem. The picking and choosing of research based upon it supporting the view. An issue that exists in the broader trans community. And yes I think WPATH is becoming more of an advocacy group. In fairness even in the HBIGDA that was one of it's function. It does seem to becoming less science based and more advocacy based. The picking and choosing of research being one symptom and I do think more trans folk becoming members are part of the change. Is this not fact that more trans folks have become members? By the way I have no doubt that there are plenty of trans folk who are APA members too.

If I were to "demean" I would not be discussing the issues involved but using demeaning characterizations such as "idiot", "stupid".

Now it is curious to note that I could qualify for full voting membership in WPATH but couldn't even be an associate in APA.

Now I really don't have any big issues with the WPATH standards. They are pretty tame actually. I think putting blinders on, using bad research to support the cause and not acknowledging good research that doesn't fit so well is an issue that can threaten WPATH's legitimacy. I am sure there are individual members that do speak to unpopular things, but as an organization they aren't taken seriously.

It is very much like this topic about how anyone speaking something that the majority in the community doesn't like gets dumped on. http://www.lauras-playground.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=57683

I stumbled onto this thread just out of curiosity, and followed the link provided in the the above quoted-post (i.e., "Pedestals, a commentary", a thread initiated by Faith Gibson). I read the each of the posts contained in these two threads.

I am incredibly impressed with the commentaries of Drea and Ms. Gibson, at least those posted in this thread and the Pedestals... thread. Thank you for sharing your intellect and for your searching analysis of these issues contained in these threads..

Again, I am very impressed...so much so that I chose to resurrect this almost three year-old thread as a means of expressing my appreciation.

Best wishes, and thanks again to you both for sharing your perspectives in these two threads. Via con dios.

Share this post


Link to post

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Who's Online   13 Members, 0 Anonymous, 140 Guests (See full list)

    • Astrid
    • JoniSteph
    • Susan R
    • MaryMary
    • AdriannaB
    • Belle
    • magical realism
    • A. Dillon
    • Willa
    • Cyndee
    • MaryEllen
    • Jocelyn
    • luke_b
  • Topics With Zero Replies

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      69,719
    • Total Posts
      630,120
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      6,084
    • Most Online
      8,356

    magical realism
    Newest Member
    magical realism
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Posts

    • Jani
      Well yes and no.  My dad still uses the nickname I used for decades.  It sounds silly when he does it.  My wife even commented on it when we last saw them.  I'm at the point of not caring anymore since I'm comfortable with who I am and if its said loud enough in public, he's the one who seems odd.  Plus we don't see my parents face to face regularly.   So the daughter just may see it as not worth the effort.    This would be a nice outcome.     Jani
    • Aidan5
      Hey Spence! Welcome to the forum, we welcome you with open arms    
    • Charlize
      I would have done the same thing you did Susan.  I say that from my own experience.  It has taken my son many years to properly name me and not refer to me as Dad in public.  When we are together in private it doesn't bother me but in public it can cause confusion and embarrassment.  If the woman does use her daughters chosen name and it disturbers her daughter i'm sure she will say something.  My guess is that she would see it as a final acceptance.   Hugs,   Charlize
    • Susan R
      Thanks ladies, I trust both of you for your sage advice.   Susan R🌷
    • magical realism
      Thanks susan, and you dont have to think i was putting up with anything, its just nice to hear im not completely alone even in some small way,heh
    • Aidan5
      Haha that's true.     He is so hyper and excited all the time it is adorable and hard to keep up with him, and I thought I was hyper!! But I really think he was throwing some hints at me and I am definitely taking them and keeping them. He seems like the kind who likes to tease playfully so I better watch out haha.  
    • VickySGV
      Asking the Trans person is always in good taste and correct manners.  My only caution is to do it at a private time between the two of them.  
    • Susan R
      Welcome Magical Realism, a pleasure to meet you...You are not alone in this at all.  I too have been having dreams like this.  I’ve had them for decades but since going full time they now have changed slightly. Mine were a little different [pre-transition] in that the fact that I was presenting male except I had breasts accompanied by a bra under my male clothes. The funny thing is that in almost every dream, the people in the dream were unknowing of my little secret until later in the dream, I eventually always get outed by some ridiculous circumstance..lol.  But oddly enough, since actively starting my transition, I am always presenting as Susan.  It’s almost as if my subconscious is aware of my conscious activities...(kidding)   Well Magical Realism, thanks for putting up with my ramblings. These things happen from time to time. I’m glad you came aboard...hope you stay for the ride.   Warmest Regards, Susan R🌷
    • Jackie C.
      I would have been a little more direct and said, "Maybe you should ask her." That's just me though. I can't think of a reason I would be uncomfortable if my mother started calling me by my actual legal name and using the correct pronouns. Well, I might be a little skeeved out. We're not close and she's been hostile about it up until now. She'd be up to something. Your new friend though, she seems sincere.   I don't see anything wrong with your answer. It never hurts to try and make a loved one more comfortable when you're talking to them.   Hugs!
    • Susan R
      My wife & I are attending an inclusive church regularly now and afterwards we attend an adult class at the church.  Right now, we’re in the middle of a 7 week study called ”Dialogues on Sexuality”.  The class focuses on LGBTQ+ inclusiveness, birth gender, gender roles, church patriarchy, and gender identity.  It’s been very good.  I think this class is the church’s way to get the members of congregation to learn, understand and adopt their “inclusiveness doctrine”.  It’s early in the game but they’re trying so hard and for the most part, we feel very welcome there.   My wife brought one of the class members over to me after the class was over.  My wife had been talking to her and confided with her in the small group time.  The nice woman had an interesting question for me. Her daughter is a 36 year old MtF.  The daughter is now called by her new female name by everyone except her.  So this lady asked me, “If my daughter hasn’t specifically asked me to call her by her female name but has asked others in front of her to use her female name, should I continue to use her male birth name?” Then added, “Do you think she minds?”   I had to pause and think.  I said, ”You're using all the correct pronouns, why not match that when you address her and do what she asks the others around her to do.”  I added, “I think out of respect and love, she is simply not correcting you.  Make her day and starting right now, only use her new female name...see how she reacts. Or you could just ask her but doing it out of your own volition will probably make her happiest”    I honestly don’t know if I gave her the best advice because on the small chance her daughter wanted only her to call her by her birth name I could of messed up a good thing.  I just saw it through my own eyes.  Well, this lady and then my wife started tearing up and she now wants us to get together.  I’m just hoping I helped instead of hampered the situation.  I really don’t know the daughter so it’s a hard call and wondering if I there was any advice, different or not, you all would’ve given this nice lady.   Susan R🌷
    • AdriannaB
      I was comfortable presenting as female
    • magical realism
      Thank you so much. 😃
    • Jackie C.
      Don't be silly. I'm always right. 😋   We're always anxious at first. This is a big step and the repercussions can be huge either way. Coming out represents a risk. Friends and family might not be so understanding and staying in the closet results in a life of quiet desperation. Whatever you choose, we're here to offer our support.   Hugs!
    • A. Dillon
      As a teenager who actually has a lot of male friends, I would generally recommend a hoodie or crewneck sweater of some kind (ones with graphic designs is a bit intriguing, something you could wear to a casual first date). I would also say that dark wash jeans is the way to go because guys typically wear darker colors. For the shoes, any sort of sporty or hightop sneakers are good, bonus points for hightop Vans or Converse. They give your feet a more masculine shape, and as long as you have feet size 7M or up the world is open to you. Now for the most important part in the winter; your outerwear! A men's coat that is just a bit too big goes perfectly with everything, and neutral colors are your friend with all of this. Honestly, just try to translate your own style into the men's aisle, keeping in mind what will best square you out and make you look like the man of your dreams. As long as it makes you happy, don't be scared to try.
    • magical realism
      Really it was just a coin toss =p more chance than anything. Thank you for the welcome,really im kind of anxious, i always get that way when waiting for a reply on a post somewhere,im always dreading the worst. But so far it seems like a nice safe place to be,i hope youre right.Ill definitely keep poking around,it was one of the posts on here that made me want to give joining a try,oh well,into the pool i go!
  • Upcoming Events

×
×
  • Create New...