Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Cancelling Laser Hair Treatment, Scheduling Electrolysis


Guest EvaO

Recommended Posts

Permanently removing my facial hair has been something I've been trying to get done and out of the way for a while now. The reason why I've postponed it for so long is because HRT has worked wonders for me! I don't have any significant body hair, except on my legs and genitals, and I only shave my face about once every two days or every other day (I shave my legs and under my arms every two weeks). However, since going on HRT, I've found that my skin is extremely sensitive to razors, even the "pink, lady razors" with attached get sticks and, after shaving, I'll usually get little bumps, irritation and redness all along my jawline and neck. It's not TOO visible, but no less itchy and annoying.

Anyway, I scheduled my first laser hair removal session last week and was pretty excited to start the process. Then, I went to TS Road Map and read a few trans-related forums and blogs that greatly favored electrolysis over laser -- TS Road Map went as far as to say that laser was simply a waste of time and money. Even though I supposedly had the perfect skin/hair color combination (my skin is porcelain and my hair is jet black) for laser treatment, I continued to get paranoid about whether I was putting my money in the right place regarding my transition. So, yesterday, I ended up cancelling my laser treatment and scheduling a session with an electrologist for the first week of October. I am really just looking to get my face done as I can live perfectly happy with shaving my legs for the rest of my life -- and, of course, once I schedule my SRS surgery, after my consultation in September, I know I'll have to do my genitals.

The place I've scheduled my appointment with is called Sophia's Skin Care and it's in the Castro District, here in San Francisco. She is charging me $95 per hour and I'm not sure how many hours I'm going to need -- although, I'm guessing it'll range somewhere in the double digits.

I'm not sure if I made the right decision. I know some people recommend laser hair removal and then electrolysis for finishing touches, but is this just a waste of money? Wouldn't it be best to go straight to electrolysis and get it over and done with? TS Road Map and Andrea James seem to think so...

Love,

Eva

Link to comment
Guest Sarah Faith

Well to each their own, but Electrolysis takes much much longer. The thing about Laser is if your hair color is too light basically like blonde laser isn't gonna do anything really and then yes it would be a waste of money. I've basically finished laser on my face I had the ideal hair color/skin as well and I have only a few hairs left on my face and those were blonde to begin with and yes I will probably do electrolysis at some point. I know far more people personally that eliminated the majority of their hair with laser and cleaned up with electro then I do who only did electro and they are ALL happy with their results, it's just a matter of if the hair is dark enough for the eat to be absorbed and kill the follicle. :)

Anyways long story short I've had very positive experiences with Laser and I was able to basically clear a very thick coarse beard area to basically soft and smooth in just 6 months. Where as it could have possibly taken me years with electrolysis.

Link to comment
Guest Kontessa

HI Eva,

I have been doing electrolysis for about six months, so far about 3 hours per week, and have been very pleased so far. Unfortunately with all my white hair, lasar was not an option for me. It is best to find someone who is experienced, especially with transwomen because they are familar with how our beards grow. Being experienced they get more hairs per hour, but also charge more (about $90 to $120 per hr). By doing longer sessions - like 3 - 4 hrs - I get a discounted rate. So far she has cleared my face and is working on my neck area now.

I too have been on HRT, for about four plus months, and have noticed a signifcant decrease in my body hair, especially my limbs. True, electrolysis is a long process - will be about 120 to 150 hrs for me - but it is pernament and does the job.

Congratulations on your progress so far. Sounds as thou you are really moving ahead with things. Everyone one of us is different and I know that you will make the right decision for yourself.

Good Luck! Many hugs and best wishes to you, and your loved ones!

Kontessa

Link to comment
  • Admin

The only thing that matters is that YOU are satisfied. What others have experienced or prefer is nice to know, but everyone has different needs and different expectations. I hope it works out great for you. Please give us an update after you get started.

HUGS

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

Thanks, everyone, for the feedback! I think I'm going to stick to the electrologist appointment, since I've already made it and see what happens. If I find it's just getting way too pricey and painful, then I'll go back to laser. Phew, this is a lot more complicated than I had originally anticipated. :P

Link to comment

I don't know what you saw on TSRoadmap.

The general debate as I seen it revolves around permanence of laser. Spending money and then having to do electrolysis anyway.

If one is to pick one or the other, I would say on average Electro far exceeds the typical laser prices unless one has a sparse beard to get removed. Typically it is considered Electro to be at least 100 hours hitting double digits (as a minimum) isn't just a possibility but probability. But maybe there are some who managed single digit number of hours. More typically 200 hours and 400 hours are numbers I hear.

Electro has two good things 1) it has a high permanence rate and 2) you only pay a little at a time.

Electro has three bad things 1) it takes a long time; 2) a long time adds up to lots of money (more than SRS in some cases) and 3) long hours of pain

Laser, generally speaking those who are reasonably good candidates are VERY satisfied with the results. Results come relatively fast compared to electro. And the pain, while it may be intense, is short duration which in my opinion makes it easier to tolerate.

Now the issue with laser has always been permanence. Five years after having laser satisfaction rates are lower because of significant regrowth. I know people who felt it was a total waste of money because virtually all came back over several years.

At one time I was of the opinion that Laser wasn't worth it other than to get some fast results which one then dealt with the regrowth using electrolysis. That opinion was supported in that everyone I knew who were some years past when they had laser had all experienced very significant regrowth. I have since known a few who said none of the hair ever came back.

So as I see it, with laser, you pays your money, take your chances and then electrolysis out anything that doesn't remain permanent. I think if it permanently removes 30% of the hairs, it has paid for itself since electro of that 30% would have cost as much as all the laser treatments. Thus the shorter term benefit is a freebee.

Link to comment
Guest CassieX

I do Electrolysis Twice a week as I have mostly white hair left on my chin with Laser once a month for the upper lip (which is the major owie! area). With laser I know some will come back but its a great way to prep a very sensitive area for electrolysis as there will be significantly less hair there by the time I get to it, upper lip being the last place I will hit with electrolysis. My Tria laser arrived yesterday so I am itching to try it out on my body areas. I will post somewhere down the line once I test how effective it is.

Cassie

Link to comment
Guest LizMarie

There are other options for electrolysis. There are clinics, such as E3000 in Dallas, that do massive sessions (including usage of injected pain killers) and which can remove all of your facial hair in about one year, give or take a few months depending on the density of your beard. I'm told there is a similar clinic in New York city but I am not aware of the name. It would not surprise me to find other such clinics as well.

E3000 will devote two techs to you full time for your first visit there. With the average beard, that's usually at least one full day. In my case, my initial appointment in December is scheduled to be two days, with 2 techs the first day and one tech the second. That will be a full 24 hours of electrolysis in one step. The second appointment will probably be two techs for 1 full day (16 hours). After that we'll have to see how fast the beard is being removed.

But there are definitely ways to get quicker results with electrolysis.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 113 Guests (See full list)

    • VickySGV
    • KymmieL
    • mattie22
    • MaybeRob
    • Adrianna Danielle
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...