Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Glen or Glenda


Guest princessofdarkness

Recommended Posts

Guest princessofdarkness

So I am a B-movie and cult film fanatic. Thusly, I am a fan of filmmaker auteur Edward D. Wood Jr., mostly known for 'Plan 9 From Outer Space', sometimes erroneously called the worst movie ever made. I simply don't see it that way. I don't think I can ever call a film with such effort and love poured into it, that entertains me so, anything other than a great film. And I'm not being anything less than honest here.

Okay, brief history of me and movies and Ed Wood; I've always been a film nut, but around the age of 12 and 13 I became a standard cinephile; drank down all the Oscar movies, big blockbusters, established "classics", all the Hollywood establishment stuff. After a year or two of that, I admitted that most of it was pretty shallow and pedestrian in my eyes, or at least not tailored for me.

So I kind of was adrift with films, until I found what movies were truly meant for me, Ed Wood's (shall we say individualistic?) type of movies being among them, and I truly learned that people like Wood were simply too good for the Hollywood establishment. Wood was indeed not a good filmmaker, but each and every one of his films had his heart and soul in it, especially 'Glen or Glenda'. He might not be able to tell a coherent story, or write a coherent story for that matter, but by God, he tries. Usually he wanted to just entertain people, just like how he was entertained by science fictions and horror classics (real classics) of his youth, he just wanted to spread that love.

Very few in Hollywood today have that love for film, I can tell. Or if they did, they lost it a long time ago, when winning little gold trophies (they even named him Oscar), making money, and appearing on talk shows and magazines became the main appeal of staying in the film business. Not telling stories. Not entertaining with the kind of movies they were raised on. Not like Wood did. That's what makes Ed Wood a hero of mine. I highly recommend 'Ed Wood' by Tim Burton from 1994. One of my absolute favorite movies of all time...of course, so is 'Glen or Glenda', so take what I say at your own risk.

Now while Wood usually made science fiction/horror films (until his sad decline into the porn industry), his first film was what he called his most personal work of art (as opposed to 'Plan 9', which he called 'his masterpiece'). That is 'Glen or Glenda', a movie about a cross dresser named Glen, and has a brief subplot about a transwoman named Anne.

In real life, Ed Wood was a crossdresser, and when Christine Jorgensen became the first recipient of a sex change operation, it made some headlines, so naturally the exploitation film circuit saw a quick buck to make off of it. Wood happened to be in the right place at the right time, and managed to get his first directing job, allegedly using his experience with crossdressing as an asset to make the film. It was shot in 4 days, as these kind of films generally were, for only $20,000 dollars (though I'm not sure it even made that back), and by the time it was released (these films usually only were released in the scuzziest theaters in the deep South) it became clear Wood obviously hijacked the original concept of a sex change operation to make it about it himself and crossdressing.

Wood stars as Glen, and Dolores Fuller (Wood's real life girlfriend at the time) plays his girlfriend Barbara. Wood's going to get married soon, but he just can't tell her his secret about his crossdressing. And...I guess that's the basic plot. But if you watch the movie, it becomes clear there's nothing "basic" about it...hardly a plot to speak of.

The transgendered subplot is about Alan, raised by his mother in a more feminine manner, who identified as a woman by the time she was a teenager. When Alan, now Ann, was drafted to go fight in World War II (they mention she fought with woman's clothing under the uniform, which is another connection to Wood, who said during WWII he was afraid of being injured, and having his women's undergarments discovered at the hospital) who got a sex change operation after the war, and lived happily afterwards. A short, almost unrelated, segment, but very enlightened for a 1950's film (especially a 1950's exploitation film).

Unfortunately, the resolution to Glen's story is more frustrating. He decides to admit it to his girlfriend (good), she decides to stick by him (good), and then they see a councilor who 'cures' Glen of his CDing (bad). My mind wonders if this ending came about because Wood, who did indeed use the film to plead for acceptance of crossdressers and the transgendered, also wanted to overcome his crossdressing, so the ending is wishful thinking. As far as I know Wood was never "cured", there's nothing to cure. Maybe his then-girlfriend Fuller asked for that ending. I couldn't imagine the producers did, they didn't care about any social responsibility, they were probably more upset the film wasn't a sleazier, trashier, soft core porno. Either way, it's regrettable.

All the same, the film is more kind to the trans community than most I can think of. It's not perfectly enlightened, not at all, but it's extremely progressive for 1953, and Wood probably saved it from becoming a sensationalist porno about a transwoman (which are all over the place now, sadly).

More noticeably, for most, isn't just how poorly it's made, but how utterly incomprehensible it is in that poorness. Bela Lugosi is in the film as an all seeing God-like scientist who shouts things such as "PULL THE STRING" over footage of running buffalo (and he does so out of nowhere). And my favorite line from him (there's no context to understand it any better, he says it for seemingly no reason)

"Beware...beware! Beware of the big green dragon that sits on your doorstep; he eats little boys...puppy dog tails, and big, fat snails. Beware, take care...beware!" (Ponder this for the rest of your life)

Some lines do make sense, but are simply oddly written. The narrator is a therapist talking to a cop. When the cop asks him to tell him the story of the crossdresser he knows, the doctor replies with

"Only the infinity of the depths of a man's mind can really tell the story" I really wish they showed the cops reaction to that Serling-esque sentence...

Most importantly, a dream sequence, that lasts nearly 15 minutes (and the movie is only 65 minutes) features the Devil, a BDSM style sex scene (non-graphic...I'm going to assume the producers put this in to please the sexploitation crowd) and a ton of other seemingly unrelated, bizarre things. I can't even describe it properly. No matter how many times I watch it, the scene floors me it's bizarreness. It's among the strangest things in any film ever.

The film is very short, and because it's public domain, can be seen anywhere online, including YouTube. I highly recommend it, but if you see it because of me, you may grow to hate me for it :P

Yes it's "bad", in the traditional meaning of "bad movie" (Leonard Maltin said of it, "possibly the worst movie ever made"). But it's among the most interesting movies you'll ever see, that much is certain, it's got a lot of heart, and I can say it is one of my favorites of the 50's, so as Joe Bob Briggs would say "4 stars, check it out".

Link to comment
Guest Gregg Jameson

Wow, Princessofdarkness, you can write quite a review! :D

You have peaked my interest about this movie, despite bad reviews. I often don't agree with many reviews of movies. I often enjoy films the majority tend to dislike. I don't watch many movies unless it's winter and/or I am wanting to just chill for awhile and have already done my meditations. I will try to watch it in the next week or so.

It's clear you love movies and enjoy sharing your insights about movies.

Such fun to feel your enthusiasm as I read your review.

Nicely done, indeed! :D

Thanks for sharing!

Warmly,

Brad

Link to comment
Guest Kaylee

Hi Princess,

I want to thank you for your post. I was aware of "Glen or Glenda", but have totally forgotten about it. I'm not actually sure if I've seen it all the way through at some point or not. I find it hard to believe it was more than just a comment in film school about Ed Wood.... I've seen too much of it.

I think the Bella Lagosi scenes were mostly footage that had been filmed for something else. Wood had worked with him, and some projects never got finished leaving footage laying around. After he passed away.... Wood used it where ever he could.

I do have "plan 9" in my collection. I can think of more than a few movies that I find far worse. Sometimes those movies just "get" you. Mine would be "Santa Clause Conqures the Martians".... Also on the top 5 worst movies of all time list. It's rediculous... poorly acted.... and just soo funny!

Thanks again for the post. I.think I'm gonna see if I can order it up someplace :)

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

The big green dragon got to me long ago, ahhhhh.....

Thanks for the review, I watched this mornin', good for a few laughs and some serious subjects brought up,

Cyndi -

Link to comment
  • Admin

I first watched "Glen or Glenda" perhaps 25 or 30 years ago. I don't recall how I came to view it, but it fascinated me. At the time I was deep in the closet, too. Yes, its schlocky in its way, as most of Wood's films are, but for those of us living this life, it still resonates. The final scene (no giveaways from me) is still vivid in my mind, and always will be. Thanks for your thoughtful review, Princess.

HUGS

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

I read a book about Ed Wood and read his bio. I believe there's a book about Glen/Glenda somewhere. I agree with you that few in Hollywood have a love for films. Look at all the lousy films out there. I'm drawn to quirky individuals but Ed Wood was trying to come to terms with who he really was. He had courage for what he put out in such a time as the 1950s.

Link to comment
Guest princessofdarkness

Thank you for reading everyone!

Brad: Thank you so much for the kind words. :wub: I hope (or pray) you enjoy it.

@Kaylee: I actually watch 'Santa Claus Conquers the Martians' every Christmas. Along with 'Santa Claus' (1959) which might be even stranger (a mind blowing thought)! :blowup:

@Cyndi: Glad you took on the Ed Wood experience.

@Carolyn: Thank you for your thoughtful comment Carolyn. Hugs!

@gennee: He certainly did. He was interesting above all else. Thanks for reading.

Link to comment

The Bela Lugosi filmed the scenes for Glen or Glend , it was Woods' first movie, Lugosi was near the end of his career but Woods madesseveral films with him, he died before the completion of Plan 9.

Always a fan of B movies and some that should have been much further along in the alphabet.

Besides where else could you watch Tor Johnson 'act'?

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment

I'm so glad you mentioned this on the Forum!

Cyndi watched it, then we got together and she pulled it up again for four of us to watch. It's an amazing piece of work! I will watch it again on my own soon...

Thank you again!

Love, Megan

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I'm so glad you mentioned this on the Forum!

Cyndi watched it, then we got together and she pulled it up again for four of us to watch. It's an amazing piece of work! I will watch it again on my own soon...

Thank you again!

Love, Megan

I laughed even harder the 2nd time. I saw things I'd missed the first time.

C -

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
Guest Razilee

I finally got to watch "Glen or Glenda", having read the commentaries on it and Ed Wood, Jr. I think that he is just about the most courageous filmmaker/actor of all time. You can see his sensitivity and understanding of the subject showing through even if the budget and the talent available was almost non-existant. Most portrayals of crossdressing are done as "comedy". As we all know from experience it is rather quite serious, sometimes a matter of life and death, as the film also pointed out. I will never see a sweater the same again.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 113 Guests (See full list)

    • VickySGV
    • KymmieL
    • mattie22
    • MaybeRob
    • Adrianna Danielle
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...