Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Glen or Glenda


Guest princessofdarkness

Recommended Posts

Guest princessofdarkness

So I am a B-movie and cult film fanatic. Thusly, I am a fan of filmmaker auteur Edward D. Wood Jr., mostly known for 'Plan 9 From Outer Space', sometimes erroneously called the worst movie ever made. I simply don't see it that way. I don't think I can ever call a film with such effort and love poured into it, that entertains me so, anything other than a great film. And I'm not being anything less than honest here.

Okay, brief history of me and movies and Ed Wood; I've always been a film nut, but around the age of 12 and 13 I became a standard cinephile; drank down all the Oscar movies, big blockbusters, established "classics", all the Hollywood establishment stuff. After a year or two of that, I admitted that most of it was pretty shallow and pedestrian in my eyes, or at least not tailored for me.

So I kind of was adrift with films, until I found what movies were truly meant for me, Ed Wood's (shall we say individualistic?) type of movies being among them, and I truly learned that people like Wood were simply too good for the Hollywood establishment. Wood was indeed not a good filmmaker, but each and every one of his films had his heart and soul in it, especially 'Glen or Glenda'. He might not be able to tell a coherent story, or write a coherent story for that matter, but by God, he tries. Usually he wanted to just entertain people, just like how he was entertained by science fictions and horror classics (real classics) of his youth, he just wanted to spread that love.

Very few in Hollywood today have that love for film, I can tell. Or if they did, they lost it a long time ago, when winning little gold trophies (they even named him Oscar), making money, and appearing on talk shows and magazines became the main appeal of staying in the film business. Not telling stories. Not entertaining with the kind of movies they were raised on. Not like Wood did. That's what makes Ed Wood a hero of mine. I highly recommend 'Ed Wood' by Tim Burton from 1994. One of my absolute favorite movies of all time...of course, so is 'Glen or Glenda', so take what I say at your own risk.

Now while Wood usually made science fiction/horror films (until his sad decline into the porn industry), his first film was what he called his most personal work of art (as opposed to 'Plan 9', which he called 'his masterpiece'). That is 'Glen or Glenda', a movie about a cross dresser named Glen, and has a brief subplot about a transwoman named Anne.

In real life, Ed Wood was a crossdresser, and when Christine Jorgensen became the first recipient of a sex change operation, it made some headlines, so naturally the exploitation film circuit saw a quick buck to make off of it. Wood happened to be in the right place at the right time, and managed to get his first directing job, allegedly using his experience with crossdressing as an asset to make the film. It was shot in 4 days, as these kind of films generally were, for only $20,000 dollars (though I'm not sure it even made that back), and by the time it was released (these films usually only were released in the scuzziest theaters in the deep South) it became clear Wood obviously hijacked the original concept of a sex change operation to make it about it himself and crossdressing.

Wood stars as Glen, and Dolores Fuller (Wood's real life girlfriend at the time) plays his girlfriend Barbara. Wood's going to get married soon, but he just can't tell her his secret about his crossdressing. And...I guess that's the basic plot. But if you watch the movie, it becomes clear there's nothing "basic" about it...hardly a plot to speak of.

The transgendered subplot is about Alan, raised by his mother in a more feminine manner, who identified as a woman by the time she was a teenager. When Alan, now Ann, was drafted to go fight in World War II (they mention she fought with woman's clothing under the uniform, which is another connection to Wood, who said during WWII he was afraid of being injured, and having his women's undergarments discovered at the hospital) who got a sex change operation after the war, and lived happily afterwards. A short, almost unrelated, segment, but very enlightened for a 1950's film (especially a 1950's exploitation film).

Unfortunately, the resolution to Glen's story is more frustrating. He decides to admit it to his girlfriend (good), she decides to stick by him (good), and then they see a councilor who 'cures' Glen of his CDing (bad). My mind wonders if this ending came about because Wood, who did indeed use the film to plead for acceptance of crossdressers and the transgendered, also wanted to overcome his crossdressing, so the ending is wishful thinking. As far as I know Wood was never "cured", there's nothing to cure. Maybe his then-girlfriend Fuller asked for that ending. I couldn't imagine the producers did, they didn't care about any social responsibility, they were probably more upset the film wasn't a sleazier, trashier, soft core porno. Either way, it's regrettable.

All the same, the film is more kind to the trans community than most I can think of. It's not perfectly enlightened, not at all, but it's extremely progressive for 1953, and Wood probably saved it from becoming a sensationalist porno about a transwoman (which are all over the place now, sadly).

More noticeably, for most, isn't just how poorly it's made, but how utterly incomprehensible it is in that poorness. Bela Lugosi is in the film as an all seeing God-like scientist who shouts things such as "PULL THE STRING" over footage of running buffalo (and he does so out of nowhere). And my favorite line from him (there's no context to understand it any better, he says it for seemingly no reason)

"Beware...beware! Beware of the big green dragon that sits on your doorstep; he eats little boys...puppy dog tails, and big, fat snails. Beware, take care...beware!" (Ponder this for the rest of your life)

Some lines do make sense, but are simply oddly written. The narrator is a therapist talking to a cop. When the cop asks him to tell him the story of the crossdresser he knows, the doctor replies with

"Only the infinity of the depths of a man's mind can really tell the story" I really wish they showed the cops reaction to that Serling-esque sentence...

Most importantly, a dream sequence, that lasts nearly 15 minutes (and the movie is only 65 minutes) features the Devil, a BDSM style sex scene (non-graphic...I'm going to assume the producers put this in to please the sexploitation crowd) and a ton of other seemingly unrelated, bizarre things. I can't even describe it properly. No matter how many times I watch it, the scene floors me it's bizarreness. It's among the strangest things in any film ever.

The film is very short, and because it's public domain, can be seen anywhere online, including YouTube. I highly recommend it, but if you see it because of me, you may grow to hate me for it :P

Yes it's "bad", in the traditional meaning of "bad movie" (Leonard Maltin said of it, "possibly the worst movie ever made"). But it's among the most interesting movies you'll ever see, that much is certain, it's got a lot of heart, and I can say it is one of my favorites of the 50's, so as Joe Bob Briggs would say "4 stars, check it out".

Link to comment
Guest Gregg Jameson

Wow, Princessofdarkness, you can write quite a review! :D

You have peaked my interest about this movie, despite bad reviews. I often don't agree with many reviews of movies. I often enjoy films the majority tend to dislike. I don't watch many movies unless it's winter and/or I am wanting to just chill for awhile and have already done my meditations. I will try to watch it in the next week or so.

It's clear you love movies and enjoy sharing your insights about movies.

Such fun to feel your enthusiasm as I read your review.

Nicely done, indeed! :D

Thanks for sharing!

Warmly,

Brad

Link to comment
Guest Kaylee

Hi Princess,

I want to thank you for your post. I was aware of "Glen or Glenda", but have totally forgotten about it. I'm not actually sure if I've seen it all the way through at some point or not. I find it hard to believe it was more than just a comment in film school about Ed Wood.... I've seen too much of it.

I think the Bella Lagosi scenes were mostly footage that had been filmed for something else. Wood had worked with him, and some projects never got finished leaving footage laying around. After he passed away.... Wood used it where ever he could.

I do have "plan 9" in my collection. I can think of more than a few movies that I find far worse. Sometimes those movies just "get" you. Mine would be "Santa Clause Conqures the Martians".... Also on the top 5 worst movies of all time list. It's rediculous... poorly acted.... and just soo funny!

Thanks again for the post. I.think I'm gonna see if I can order it up someplace :)

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

The big green dragon got to me long ago, ahhhhh.....

Thanks for the review, I watched this mornin', good for a few laughs and some serious subjects brought up,

Cyndi -

Link to comment
  • Admin

I first watched "Glen or Glenda" perhaps 25 or 30 years ago. I don't recall how I came to view it, but it fascinated me. At the time I was deep in the closet, too. Yes, its schlocky in its way, as most of Wood's films are, but for those of us living this life, it still resonates. The final scene (no giveaways from me) is still vivid in my mind, and always will be. Thanks for your thoughtful review, Princess.

HUGS

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

I read a book about Ed Wood and read his bio. I believe there's a book about Glen/Glenda somewhere. I agree with you that few in Hollywood have a love for films. Look at all the lousy films out there. I'm drawn to quirky individuals but Ed Wood was trying to come to terms with who he really was. He had courage for what he put out in such a time as the 1950s.

Link to comment
Guest princessofdarkness

Thank you for reading everyone!

Brad: Thank you so much for the kind words. :wub: I hope (or pray) you enjoy it.

@Kaylee: I actually watch 'Santa Claus Conquers the Martians' every Christmas. Along with 'Santa Claus' (1959) which might be even stranger (a mind blowing thought)! :blowup:

@Cyndi: Glad you took on the Ed Wood experience.

@Carolyn: Thank you for your thoughtful comment Carolyn. Hugs!

@gennee: He certainly did. He was interesting above all else. Thanks for reading.

Link to comment

The Bela Lugosi filmed the scenes for Glen or Glend , it was Woods' first movie, Lugosi was near the end of his career but Woods madesseveral films with him, he died before the completion of Plan 9.

Always a fan of B movies and some that should have been much further along in the alphabet.

Besides where else could you watch Tor Johnson 'act'?

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment

I'm so glad you mentioned this on the Forum!

Cyndi watched it, then we got together and she pulled it up again for four of us to watch. It's an amazing piece of work! I will watch it again on my own soon...

Thank you again!

Love, Megan

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I'm so glad you mentioned this on the Forum!

Cyndi watched it, then we got together and she pulled it up again for four of us to watch. It's an amazing piece of work! I will watch it again on my own soon...

Thank you again!

Love, Megan

I laughed even harder the 2nd time. I saw things I'd missed the first time.

C -

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
Guest Razilee

I finally got to watch "Glen or Glenda", having read the commentaries on it and Ed Wood, Jr. I think that he is just about the most courageous filmmaker/actor of all time. You can see his sensitivity and understanding of the subject showing through even if the budget and the talent available was almost non-existant. Most portrayals of crossdressing are done as "comedy". As we all know from experience it is rather quite serious, sometimes a matter of life and death, as the film also pointed out. I will never see a sweater the same again.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 178 Guests (See full list)

    • dianeT68
    • Betty K
    • VickySGV
    • MaybeRob
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,023
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Delaney
    Newest Member
    Delaney
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dillon
      Dillon
    2. Kaylee888
      Kaylee888
    3. lily100
      lily100
      (39 years old)
    4. Luce
      Luce
      (44 years old)
    5. Luke.S
      Luke.S
  • Posts

    • VickySGV
      I am glad your schools are flush with excess spending money, but that is not the situation here in CA.  Back in 1978 an Initiative and Referendum law was passed that limited property taxes severely and basically cut funding from Property Taxes to pennies of the amounts needed to even minimally fund school districts.  Even the U.S. Supreme Court which upheld the law on Federal and Constitutional grounds nevertheless wryly commented in its decision that the state electorate had lost its collective mind in enacting the law.  Our schools are funded through the State's General Fund which receives other tax sources for creating the entire state budget. The General Fund and the legislature try to give  adequate funding  to the primary and secondary school districts as well as college districts and other obligations all from the same limited funds. There are also strict limits on assessing property taxes that actually prevent them from paying for other services directly affecting property ownership which is their proper place, and so even property related services come from our General Fund. Your property tax money seems to be ear-marked for schools which is wonderful and I hope they use it according to your thoughts, but as said we have a different problem out here in CA.  I love my state but do recognize its short comings.  Point of information, the tax law that is creating problems came from the same small area of the state as the proposed referendum on Trans Youth. 
    • VickySGV
      The numbers of those negatively affected are significant and discouraging, but the good news is that "over half" of Trans youth live in safe states, and such states do exist.
    • Maddee
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Seems like a reasonable agreement.  Seattle stays out of Texas, Texas stays out of Seattle.  Weird that the Seattle hospital had a business license in Texas... 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      Seems to me the time and cost is already being spent....on lawsuits.  And schools are absolutely flush with cash, at least around here.  They get enough property taxes, they need to learn appropriate use of funds.  Buy a few less computers and a few more bathrooms, and spend less time on athletics and I'd bet you a hamburger that the issue would be solved in a year.   To me, it seems like the whole bathroom thing is like lancing a boil or a cyst.  A sharp initial pain, and done. People are just resistant to doing it.      I think I could solve most of it...but politicians get too much press off of this to want it solved.   1.  Universal use of individual, gender-neutral, private bathrooms 2.  Universal use of individual, gender-neutral, private spaces for changing athletic clothes 3.  Emphasize co-ed rather than gendered sports.  Focus on physical activity, good sportsmanship, and having FUN.  Lifelong enjoyment, not just competition. 4.  Ban for-profit athletic programs at highschool and college levels, and ban betting/gambling related to athletic programs at educational institutions. 5.  Affirm parental rights consistently, rather than treating it like a salad bar.  That means permitting gender-affirming healthcare with parental consent, AND prohibiting schools keeping secrets from parents.  Adopt the "paperwork principle."  If it is on paper, parents 100% have a right to know about it and be informed on paper, including names/pronouns if such are documented.  If it is verbal only, it is informal enough to be overlooked or discussed verbally if needed.
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.texastribune.org/2024/04/22/texas-trans-health-care-investigation-seattle/     Carolyn Marie
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/transgender-louisianans-say-ve-lost-ally-governors-seat-rcna149082     Carolyn Marie
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/2024-anti-trans-legislation/     Carolyn Marie
    • Carolyn Marie
      It would work better, but the issue will always be time and cost, unless a school district is building a new school.  Districts everywhere are short on infrastructure funds, so it's not a realistic solution in most cases.   Carolyn Marie
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I have always thought that the solution to the bathroom question (as well as improved bathroom quality/privacy for everybody) would be individual, gender-neutral, locking bathrooms.  Not this wacky thing we insist on doing with stalls.  It wouldn't take much more space, really.  And it might actually work better.  Ever notice how there's often a line at the door of the women's room, but plenty of free space in the men's?  Yet the men's and women's bathrooms are usually of equal size/capacity? 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      I'm going to have to stop staying up so late at night...  Its after midnight, so technically morning.  So, Good Morning, y'all.   I got to go to work with my husband for the last two days.  I'm working on the graphics stuff for his company, so he said that nobody would really mind if I hang out.  I usually stay home, but its kind of nice to be somewhere different for a little while.  I spent part of the day at one of the company's installation sites... beautiful weather, so I worked on my laptop sitting under a tree.  And I learned something new - it is amazing how electrical wires are installed underground.  They're put in PVC tubes, and actually pulled through.  By hand!  Apparently a machine would risk breaking the wires somehow, so I watched a line of men literally playing tug-of-war with hundreds of feet of wire.  It was like something out of an old movie - my husband leading a call/response work chant and everybody pulling in a rhythm.    It does give me a bit of self-doubt, though.  Like, if that's what "real men" are doing... maybe I'm a poor-quality imitation
    • Betty K
      Can I just say quickly re the bathroom question, how come no-one ever seems to suggest building more gender-neutral toilets? 
    • Betty K
      With the onslaught of bills targeting trans kids in the US and the current attempt to radically curtail gender-affirming treatment for kids in the UK I think you could just as easily ask why are things so hard for trans kids. Given the volatile political situation around them, I am pleased to hear there are still services attempting to help them.
    • KayC
      @Mia Marie I agree that it seems most of the focus is on Trans Youth.  And maybe that is in part because of protecting Trans Youth from the political environment, and to give them a chance to transition at an earlier age.  Many of our generation have been cloistered for most of our lives by societal exceptions and I think that has made it more difficult to be Visible ... until Now. So I guess my answer is ... Be Visible and seek out, or even start, support groups in your local area.  Planned Parenthood does provide Gender Affirming Care and therapy in most U.S. regions (and they take Medicare!). 
    • KayC
      As a registered CA voter I would be HAPPY to vote against this bill ... BUT as @Carolyn Marie mentioned it has little chance to make the ballot.  Hopefully this will put the Death Knell on the bill.   wrt Parents Rights of notification.  I would agree if there was potential harm to a child, or if the child was involved in potentially harming somebody else.  BUT, that would not be the case in the preponderance of situations.  The decision to Come Out to one's own parents should be up to the individual child only.  If the child does not feel Secure or Safe in their household then it should not be up to the State or School to make that determination. If the child did feel safe and secure they would have probably already come out.  If they haven't ... then the situation seems obvious.  Protect the Child, not the System.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...