Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Not Against The Bible


Guest ConfusionAtItsBest

Recommended Posts

Guest ConfusionAtItsBest

So basically I've been searching the bible and looking to see if I can find anything to support the old "Homosexuality is an abomination!" deal and my search has come up empty, I have noticed Leviticus 18:22 "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." however, that can have many translations, because don't all religious leaders classify the term "mankind" as the race of humans? They have used this many times to say that homosexuality is an abomination, but it's not, you can not help who you are. Example: If I was attracted to someone, I can not help that I find them attractive, someone else may not find them attractive, and they can't help that either, they didn't choose to not be attracted to them, just like I didn't choose to BE attracted to them (a little confusing I know). Another point that I would like to make would be this, if someone is gay, then they do not love them as if they love a woman, they love them as if they were a man. (in the male sense of homosexuality)

I know this is a little confusing lol it made sense in my mind lol. But the point I'm trying to make is that religious leaders are always trying to find some excuse to call something a sin just because it is a little out of the ordinary, and it doesn't look like the "norm" of society. This religious persecution against gay, lesbian, bi, and trans people has got to stop, there are no gains from it, did you know that Judas Iscariot kissed Jesus in the bible, when he pointed out who he was to the roman soldiers, he kissed him St. Mark 14:44-45 44:"And he that betrayed him had given them a token, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is He*; take him, and lead Him* away safely." 45:"And as soon as he was come, he goeth straightway to him, and saith, Master, master; and kissed him." Now I'm not saying that Jesus was gay, or bi. But he openly accepted the kiss from Judas, which must mean that he is accepting of all, whether they be straight, bi, gay, lesbian, or trans. So don't think you are going to hell because you are one of these, you are going to heaven as long as you love and accept Jesus into your heart.

Yours Truly,

CAIB (Confusion At Its Best)

Link to comment
Guest Midoe

Well Confusion At Its Best, I understand completely. I used to use the example of food. Why do you like certain foods? Because they taste good, why does it taste good, because your taste buds send signals to your brain of good feelings, does one have any control of this involuntary process of course not, It's just how one feels. When It comes to feelings we don't choose how to feel, we just feel. Unfortunately a lot (not all nut a lot) of very religious people, tend to be very close minded to anything that will throw their believes into question, and tend to immediately condemn them.

Just some thoughts to add :)

-Midoe

Link to comment
Guest Elizabeth K

Food? Ever read in the Bible about food? Those who are Christian Bible-is-literal, they probably never read those old Hebrew restrictions on preparaion and consumption of foods. It was intended originally as a set of Laws to follow, but seems based upon hygine and common practices of the Biblical times it was written. So today, ANY meat dish with a delicious cream sauce is Bible-literally an abomination.

My confusion about homosexuality related Biblical passages comes from the angels that visited Lot. What went on there apparently caused the Old Testament GOD to lose it - and Lot tried to calm Him down, unsucessfully as it turned out. So why when Lot and his family were allowed to flee, and Lot's wife wife wanted a little peek, she was turned into a pillar of salt? I just seem to think the translations were mishandled here. Just me I guess.

And a woman cutting her hair is an abomination.

And cloven hooved animals are an abomination.

And I really don't see us transgendered people mentioned, but some CALL us an abomination.

So what does abonination really mean and is GOD really so caught up with this corporal world he really keeps tabs? I know He knows of every sparrow that falls, but that invoves a little bird soul. I doubt he marks me as a candidate for hell every time I munch on a pork chop! This chop needs salt - oops, where does this salt originate?

Stupid ruminations over stupid Judician-Christian prejudices. Jesus comands us to LOVE not judge others! And wasn't Jesus Jewish? Are we missing the point here?

Lizzy

Link to comment
Guest April63

Remember that in the Old Testament there is the Law of Moses, which is the letter of the law. It was designed to be strict because the Israelites couldn't follow the simplest of commandments. Really, there are only two: Love God and love everyone else. So one day when Moses went away the Israelites did all sorts of bad things (I think the most famous was worshiping a golden cow). Thus came the Law of Moses.

Jesus fulfilled the law and made it unnecessary to continue to follow it. I take the Bible literally. There are a few parts which are parables. But I believe the Old Testament to be mostly history. But since that law has been fulfilled, I can eat pork :)

Judas kissing Jesus was a sign of respect. I'm pretty sure he didn't kiss his lips, but kissing back then was indeed a sign of respect. It wasn't uncommon for servants to kiss the feet of kings. That passage really has nothing to do with Jesus accepting gay people, sorry. Though Jesus does love each ands every one of us.

In Leviticus 18:22, mankind refers to only men and womankind refers to only women. One of the strange, unique times this happens.

One verse I have yet to see a good argument from is 1 Corinthians 6:9-10: "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God" and Romans 1:26-27: "For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet". Okay, that was actually two. But you can't really say much to these two scriptures, so, well, I don't know.

April

Link to comment
Guest Sarinah

Just a point of clarification. In many european and in almost all middle eastern societies men kiss eachother on the cheek as a greeting, its saying your my brother and I love you as family.

April this article has relatively good arguments for the passage in 1 Corinthians and for a few others.

http://207.152.67.6/gog/pdf/p313_336.pdf

Link to comment
Guest Eagledancer

I am so led to respond with my own thoughts...and these are mine and not a condemnation of other's beliefs. As I was forced as a child to see this world through the eyes of what seemed to be narrow and hypocritical take on such an endless beauty we call life, my mind rebelled. I remember as a young child listening to the good Southern Baptist preachers using this same Bible as justification for segregation, discrimination, and even the justification for slavery. It wasn't until law suits and the such made it not so financial savvy that these scriptures became vague and the teachings were abolished. I remember watching homes destroyed in the name of the Christian God when a young girl would find herself with child and her family disowned her while the young man lied his way into "salvation" - the woman scorned and the man praised. Those "old laws" under the first covenant are still used when it comes to keeping wives subserviant, but they are called "old laws" when people need them to be for justification for their own actions. I remember some questions I had as a child, and these are some of them:

1.) Why did the Bible need translations? As a child in Texas, I knew that a simple translation of words, especially if these words were cultural, was difficult just from Spanish to English, and I had the origin of the word or words in front of me trying desperately to translate. Some things CANNOT be adequately translated and unfortunately suffers a new culture and mindset in the translation. The Bible doesn't say that each person translating the Bible is God sent. It only states the original to come from men of God.

2.) Why didn't God find men who at least knew Jesus? It would have been more believable if the books were actually limited to His 12 disciples.

3.) If Jesus so desperately needed to get His message out then why didn't He just write the Bible? Those long camel rides or walks through the desert surely provided time for something to be jotted down. It was always difficult for me to believe that someone could quote something or someone they never heard much less met. Go into your local Church or place of worship and try quoting someone you've never met and see how far you get.

4.) I was also stumped when I saw that the Bible was to taken as literal when it was convenient but parables when it is not. Also, the Bible is considered "living" or pliable to day-to-day life unless you are gay, lesbian, TG, etc...(Black, Hispanic, Japanese, etc were on the list when I was a kid)

5.) I couldn't understand how the Church could use grape juice to signify wine, but alcohol of any kind was a sin against the Temple of God (the body). Jesus could serve a whole party wine, but my childhood Church questioned that action!

6.) Adultery and divorce were about as sinful as homosexuality is considered now, but that all changed when the divorce rate started going up. The Churches couldn't keep condemning these because low numbers in the pulpits meant low tithes. People don't tend to volunteer to be barraged and cast into the pits of hell, so Churches will lean to what brings people in or at least the money.

If I sound harsh, I don't mean to. There is nothing keeping my Creator from getting messages directly to me, and it is my job to keep my mind and soul open to these messages. I can't understand or feel love if I only feel hate or disregard. I have struggled to find what is right for me. My own interpretation of the need for the second covenant was to remove the bigotry and control of a middle man. I respect the death of Jesus so much that I steer clear of well meaning Mockingbirds for God because I need to see my God as that unconditional, loving Father waiting for His prodigal son to come home. I do read the Bible because it helps to refocus certain aspects of my faith, but I also read writings from Oracles and study the Qabalah as well as other faith based literature. In my time on this earth through more than this life I feel that faith is a search of the soul and is not something that can be obtained with tithes or being spoon-fed from a pulpit. I believe it is important to first love self and then love comes forth from the core. Lastly, the looming question is...does the Bible say that homosexuality, TG, etc.. is an abomination? For every verse that can be used in favor of that argument, there are 100's that can be used against it. There is more talk of love, love , and (did I mention) love then any one sin. I would have to assume that even if one takes the Bible literally then love should dominate which would stop all bashing or condemnation because that can't be done out of true love. Remember, Ye without sin cast the first stone. In short, faith is individual and personal. I just wish that all could respect that. Love to all and Godspeed.

Link to comment
Guest Pól_Eire
So basically I've been searching the bible and looking to see if I can find anything to support the old "Homosexuality is an abomination!" deal and my search has come up empty, I have noticed Leviticus 18:22 "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."

If you're looking for it, Leviticus 20:13 is pretty unequivocal: "The man who has intercourse with a man in the same way as with a woman: they have done a hateful thing together; they will be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

Not much grey area there. I don't like it, but there it is if you wanted to find it.

-Pól

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
Guest androgynous

I'm not religious, but studied it intensively. Jesus only spoke of two laws: honor God and respect your neighbor, because all other laws emanate from those two.

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
Guest Joanna Phipps
Food? Ever read in the Bible about food? Those who are Christian Bible-is-literal, they probably never read those old Hebrew restrictions on preparaion and consumption of foods. It was intended originally as a set of Laws to follow, but seems based upon hygine and common practices of the Biblical times it was written. So today, ANY meat dish with a delicious cream sauce is Bible-literally an abomination.

My confusion about homosexuality related Biblical passages comes from the angels that visited Lot. What went on there apparently caused the Old Testament GOD to lose it - and Lot tried to calm Him down, unsucessfully as it turned out. So why when Lot and his family were allowed to flee, and Lot's wife wife wanted a little peek, she was turned into a pillar of salt? I just seem to think the translations were mishandled here. Just me I guess.

And a woman cutting her hair is an abomination.

And cloven hooved animals are an abomination.

And I really don't see us transgendered people mentioned, but some CALL us an abomination.

So what does abonination really mean and is GOD really so caught up with this corporal world he really keeps tabs? I know He knows of every sparrow that falls, but that invoves a little bird soul. I doubt he marks me as a candidate for hell every time I munch on a pork chop! This chop needs salt - oops, where does this salt originate?

Stupid ruminations over stupid Judician-Christian prejudices. Jesus comands us to LOVE not judge others! And wasn't Jesus Jewish? Are we missing the point here?

Lizzy

We have but 10 commandments, the Hasidim (ultra orthodox Jews) have 600 and some of them to follow. All of which were supposed to have been given to Moses by God at the same time the ten that we know were. They cover nearly every aspect of life, love, living, food preparation, ritual clealiness, days when a woman is unclean, how to cleanse oneself after handling a corpse along with capital punishment for more offences than you thought imaginable.

The early Christians were a sect of Judaism, and would be so today if it wasnt for the split over offering scrifice to the Roman gods and the Emporer. This was something the Jews had far less of a problem with than the Christians and was the parting of ways for the two groups.

That which Christ began in peace, love and truth could not remain thus in the hands of man. Mankind seems incapable of offering the same love to his brother or sister which Christ showed to everyone. 

Render unto Ceasar that which is Ceasar's......

Link to comment

I have always been amazed at translations of the Bible because large parts of it were written in a language which really had no vowels and yet the article 'a' appears - How?

knowing this little tidbit it makes 'the' passage that all Christian Country Clubers (as I have labeled this group) the right, indeed the mandate to ban everyone else from heaven - Jesus said, "I am the way, who so ever believeth in me shall not perish but have everlasting life."

With no 'a' is it not possible that the wrong article was put into this account?

Substitute 'a' for 'the' and you have the meaning changed, now the kingdom of heaven is opened up to all who believe in God, believing in the son means you believe in the father.

Then look to, "not by acts, thoughts or deeds shall man enter the kingdom of heaven but by grace alone."

Oh no, we don't choose who goes to heaven, we have to leave that up to God, but his own son was surrounded by and worked with and saved so many undesirable people - that means heaven isn't a Country Club, we can't exclude anyone - then what is the point?

The point is in heaven everyone is equal and treated like we should have been treating each other all of this time.

Writing was very limited at the time of the teachings of Jesus and almost unheard of prior to that - as to the suggestion that Jesus should have jotted a few things down, where would a carpenter have gone to learn to write - it was a time of oral tradition for the poor - writing was reserved for the Romans and the Pharisees there was no public education you grew up learning a trade by becoming an apprentice, no manuals - nothing written and this continued until the Renaissance in reality but in the meantime the Niacin council gathered and decided which books went in and which didn't.

Even with the Apocrypha of the Catholic Bible added to the Torah - no one has seen the complete Bible since.

They are always finding new bits and pieces but what the council didn't see fit to include was lost to us.

There is an old joke that there were twenty commandments but being Jewish Moses got rid of the thou shalts in favor of the thou shalt nots - there is so much truth in comedy but the Niacin consul wasn't Jewish but they did have in mind how to control the masses.

The Bible can not be taken literally all of the contradictory passages make that impossible - it is a guide, it is a flawed history because all historical accounts are flawed and biased, that's just the way things are.

I hope that I haven't offended anyone with my views they are mine alone but they are based on a lifetime of observing humans - a self destructive lot who rewrite history as needed for the current winners to look good.

Love ya,

Sally

Link to comment
Guest April63
.

The Bible can not be taken literally all of the contradictory passages make that impossible - it is a guide, it is a flawed history because all historical accounts are flawed and biased, that's just the way things are.

It's not all contradictory. Contradictions form due to misinterpretations, but I do agree that somethings may have been lost with all of the translations.

You can take the Bible literally. A lot of people do. You just need to understand it's message... which is pretty big actually. But the short and sweet version is, we're here to experience life with a body and the experience our free will. If we follow the commandments of our Creator, we shall not only improve ourselves in this life, but in the life to come, and we shall experience everlasting happiness :)

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...
Guest Robin Winter

I realize this is an old post, but I've always had an opinion, more towards the homosexuality aspect, and it ties in with what others are saying here. Like Lizzy mentioned, the animals as food laws were written based on practices specific to the time period, and were set for health reasons.

Yes, the bible condemns "men who lie with men" but I think that's because no child could be conceived from such a relationship, and people were also commanded to "go forth, be fruitful and become man". I don't know about the rest of you, but I'd say that's been accomplished. Like many of the laws that were period specific, I don't think that one really applies anymore.

Link to comment
So basically I've been searching the bible and looking to see if I can find anything to support the old "Homosexuality is an abomination!" deal and my search has come up empty, I have noticed Leviticus 18:22 "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." however, that can have many translations, because don't all religious leaders classify the term "mankind" as the race of humans? They have used this many times to say that homosexuality is an abomination, but it's not, you can not help who you are. Example: If I was attracted to someone, I can not help that I find them attractive, someone else may not find them attractive, and they can't help that either, they didn't choose to not be attracted to them, just like I didn't choose to BE attracted to them (a little confusing I know). Another point that I would like to make would be this, if someone is gay, then they do not love them as if they love a woman, they love them as if they were a man. (in the male sense of homosexuality)

I know this is a little confusing lol it made sense in my mind lol. But the point I'm trying to make is that religious leaders are always trying to find some excuse to call something a sin just because it is a little out of the ordinary, and it doesn't look like the "norm" of society. This religious persecution against gay, lesbian, bi, and trans people has got to stop, there are no gains from it, did you know that Judas Iscariot kissed Jesus in the bible, when he pointed out who he was to the roman soldiers, he kissed him St. Mark 14:44-45 44:"And he that betrayed him had given them a token, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is He*; take him, and lead Him* away safely." 45:"And as soon as he was come, he goeth straightway to him, and saith, Master, master; and kissed him." Now I'm not saying that Jesus was gay, or bi. But he openly accepted the kiss from Judas, which must mean that he is accepting of all, whether they be straight, bi, gay, lesbian, or trans. So don't think you are going to hell because you are one of these, you are going to heaven as long as you love and accept Jesus into your heart.

Yours Truly,

CAIB (Confusion At Its Best)

Hi CAIB,

Welcome to the Garden. Re being gay, bi, trans or lesbian. For me acceptance has

zoro to do with the Bible/Religion, no, it has everything to do with common decency ,it

has to do with the lack of Humanity in life today . Did we really evolve?? or was it just a

dream. Oh CAIB, I have a lot in my head re this stuff, just cant get same onto paper,

ya know ??? Please believe me , this woman is by your side. Luv, Viv. :)

Link to comment
I realize this is an old post, but I've always had an opinion, more towards the homosexuality aspect, and it ties in with what others are saying here. Like Lizzy mentioned, the animals as food laws were written based on practices specific to the time period, and were set for health reasons.

Yes, the bible condemns "men who lie with men" but I think that's because no child could be conceived from such a relationship, and people were also commanded to "go forth, be fruitful and become man". I don't know about the rest of you, but I'd say that's been accomplished. Like many of the laws that were period specific, I don't think that one really applies anymore.

Hiya Shilo,

realized a bit late myself , ( oh dear , not for the first time either) but this time I dont mind cos imho

a late opinion here is better than none, loved yours, viv.

Link to comment
Guest Joanna Phipps
If you're looking for it, Leviticus 20:13 is pretty unequivocal: "The man who has intercourse with a man in the same way as with a woman: they have done a hateful thing together; they will be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

Not much grey area there. I don't like it, but there it is if you wanted to find it.

-Pól

Not sure what translation you are using Pól but I recognize the original quote as being from the King James Authorized 1635 translation. I have seen that piece translated differently in many different versions of the bible. With all the different translations it is hard to get a handle on the original meaning and since most of us do not read ancient Greek or ancient Hebrew it is impossible for us to get the original verse in its original context and meaning.

Come to think of it one cannot have intercourse with a man the same way as a woman, just think of the anatomy. :) my feelings

Link to comment

There is a great little book that really helped me: "The Children Are Free" published by Chi Ro Press. You can find it on-line. I keep buying copies and then giving them away and then buying more, LOL. This little paperback examines the "clobber scriptures" in light of what is known about good sound exegesis (interpretation of Scriptures). I had several years of seminary training including study of Hebrew myself so from what I know from my own training the ideas put forth in the book are sound. The book also examines the relationship between David and Jonathon which some of you might find rather amazing in terms of looking at all the Biblical evidence.

Long before I read this book I can remember thinking that the term "eunuch" as it was written in the orginal Hebrew and later in Aramaic meant something different than how we use the word in English to identified males who have had their genitals removed. Reading Matthew 19:12 gives us a clue. When I read of God's love and compassion and inclusion for eunuchs in the O.T. I knew that meant to me, as a male who from the womb was not like other men!

While I was just looking for the above scripture in Matthew I came across this: Matt 12:7 where Jesus is quoting Hosea 6:6--"But if you had known what this means, 'I desire compassion (or mercy), and not sacrifice,' you would not have condemned the innocent." Matthew as a book was written specifically to the Jews of that day (during the years following Jesus' death) and IMO is just as relevant to the Church of Today.

Ricka

Link to comment
Guest Anna_Banana

You have to understand that many of these rules are written by society. Most of Jewish law (if any) was not directly mandated from God. It was established as an attempt to preserve Jewish culture and health. Pigs, for instance, appear to live unhealthily. It was thus common perception that these animals carry harmful diseases. That's why pigs were avoided. If you take a look at the list of animals that wouldn't meet the Jewish standard, you can see why they were avoided. A lot of the animals eat carrion.

You can also come to an easy understanding as to why homosexuality was outlawed. The Jews faced a lot of hardships, being conquered over and over for the majority of their existence, barely surviving as a culture as a result of some of these encounters. Falling under the assumption that homosexuality was a choice, if the majority of Jewish society had turned to homosexuality during these times, procreation would not occur. No procreation = the death of a society. Even if you take out the procreation factor, the Jews may have seen other factors for outlawing it. The physical act that two men would engage in would undoubtedly be seen as potentially harmful. It's no mystery to modern folk that diseases can be transmitted through gay sex. And since men have a long history of engaging with more than one partner, it would be relatively easy to pass on such diseases. Health aside, a lesbian relationship might be seen as a threat to the typically male-dominant Jewish hierarchy. Two women might become empowered and no longer be subservient to male masters.

But obviously the Jewish leaders couldn't just say "don't do this" without having a source of authority to stand behind. Maybe the lesbians like feeling empowered or maybe the guy who eats pigs doesn't seem to be sick. All it takes is a little bit of doubt--just one spark--to tear down the entire legal structure. So you say that God said it, and if you don't follow closely, you'll burn for it. The Jews knew suffering, its simply ingrained into their culture. Almost every incidence was blamed on the failings of Jewish society to do exactly what God demanded. Moses also had quite a bit of clout. He single-handedly held the title of delivering the Jews from captivity. If anyone knew God's will, it was Moses. So if he said God said such and such, that was that, hands down, no questions asked.

.Anna

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 137 Guests (See full list)

    • Abigail Genevieve
    • Adrianna Danielle
    • MaryEllen
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.6k
    • Total Posts
      768k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,014
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Quillian
    Newest Member
    Quillian
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. l.demiurge
      l.demiurge
  • Posts

    • Abigail Genevieve
      By which I mean there is a cultural stereotype of what a man is, and one of what a woman is.  Even worse, of what a transgender person is.   You be you.   I read of a boy who thought he was a girl because he did not adhere to some (rather toxic) conceptions of what it means to be a man, so he decided he was a girl.  He was told he didn't have to conform to stereotype and got happy. "You mean I don't have to transition?" He didn't want to, and was relieved.   Once upon a time if you were transgender they told you either you transition or die.   Incorporate the best of what it means to be a man and the best of what it means to be a woman as much as you possibly can, and let the rest go.  Be fully human. Be alive. Don't conform to some cultural crud.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      On the way back to her desk she was interrupted by six short, urgent conversations that had to be attended to. Then she slipped into the women's room and locked the stall door.  She took a deep breath, then another, and allowed herself to shake for five minutes,  Then deep breathing, ten in and ten out, stretch up, touch the floor, neck rolls and she was fine. She used the toilet and a woman knocked and said, "Taylor, are you okay?"   "Ready to conquer the world!"  on her way out she found her makeup was fine.  Three stalls, two sinks.  If she ever designed a women's room with three stalls, there would be four sinks, with plenty of space to plunk your stuff down between them.   She met a deferential Karen.  "Here is the branding I came up with," she said.  And she went back to working as hard as Brenda and Mary, who looked up worriedly and then went back to the proposal.   Shortly before 5:00 she received an email with the title Consolidation and Compensation.  In it she learned that the position of office manager was eliminated, and the current office manager was to become the chief executive officer. The former CEO, along with the CFO, the chief legal officer, and sundry staff, had been terminated, per the Board of Directors.  Effective immediately everyone would receive a base salary of $20,000 with a commission to be set by the individual's supervisor.  Each supervisor would be given a certain percentage to distribute.  Most functions they had been handled would be outsourced as needed.   "The question of what profit was made last year is frequent enough to be answered.  The company lost over 500,000 in fiscal 2023.  At this point further cuts are not anticipated.  We will be strategically adding positions that will enhance our profits. Hard work is expected of everyone."   Her two web guys had been complaining because their games had been remotely uninstalled.  After the memo came out they were absolutely silent.  That gave her an idea, and after an exchange of emails they were reassigned to maintenance out at the plant, effective tomorrow morning.  There were lots of weeds that needed pulling, if nothing else. That email went out after they left early, for the day.  The maintenance foreman was a no-nonsense type who did not tolerate slacking, and they would learn a thing or two.  This also freed up two spaces for her to put new people.
    • Davie
      Except for this thung thwister: Theophilus Thistle, the successful thistle sifter, in sifting a sieve full of unsifted thistles, thrust three-thousand thistles through the thick of his thumb. Now if, Theophilus Thistle, the successful thistle sifter, in sifting a sieve full of of unsifted thistles, thrust three-thousand thistles through the thick of his thumb, how many thistles can'st thou thrust through the thick of thy thumb . . . in sifting a sieve-full of unsifted thistles? Success to the successful thistle sifter!
    • VickySGV
      You have given you and us a big clue right there.  I hope you have shared this observation with your Endocrinologist and are willing to take their advice about changing that behavior.    Non prescribed herbal or animal supplements can have a negative effect on your body's use of your available hormones.  Also, your genetics are going to be controlling what your body is going to do with your hormones, and again, that is for you to consult with your Endocrinologists.  On this site none of us are licensed medical personnel and we cannot give you advice on your health more than what your doctor can.  We have rules that we enforce against our members advising about "Folk Remedies" because we have had members who have gone that route and badly damaged their health and quality of life.  Only thing I can go anywhere on, is that maybe if you change your expectations of what should happen, you will at least not be in danger of harming yourself from anxiety.
    • Timi
      Hi @violet r!    Thank you so much for sharing. I'm so glad you found this place. I hope you find as much comfort and support here as I have.    -Timi    
    • marysssia
      Hi lovely people,   I'm a 25 yo MtF woman, and I've been suffering from low estrogen issues since October 2023. I completely lost my feminine libido, my breast completely stopped growing, my estrogen levels dropped by a lot (despite NOT decreasing my E dosage) and thus my dysphoria drastically increased. I think it is worth mentioning that, for my health issues, I had been taking ----- Lamotrigine for months & had been on ketogenic diet, and these things seem to be a culprit of my current issue. I weaned off Lamotrigine some time ago and gave up on keto diet, but it still doesn't seem to help. My estrogen is still low (44 ng/ml) and my libido hasn't come back yet. In general, I struggle with my dysphoria so much because of that and, to be honest, I don't know what to do. I've tried so many dietary supplements, yet I didn't get any effects from them. My endocrinologist didn't know how to help me. She only suggested to increase my daily estrogen dose (to 3x per day ------sublingual estrogen tablets and 3x per day ------ estrogen gel applied to armpits or thighs), which I did, without any effect.   Please, help me. Prior to keto diet & Lamotrigine treatment, I'd never had experience like that. I'm basically helpless and have no clue what to do. Having to deal with low estrogen is a horrible experience to me and it affects my life severely.   BTW, my T levels are always within female range.   Do you have any clue what exactly I should do?
    • April Marie
      I love wearing a jeans skirt!! That looks like airport carpet. Safe travels if you're flying!!
    • Maddee
      Flight faraway forthcoming Fabulous forum friends 😊😊🎸🦂
    • Maddee
    • KathyLauren
      One of our cats is polydactyl.  He has 7 toes on each front paw and 5 on each back paw, for 24 toes total.   Another one, an ex-feral who, at the time, was free to roam, climbed 50 feet up a tree without having any thought about how he was going to get down.  His pal climed down backwards, but he couldn't.  He ended up coming down by leaping from branch to branch.  Which nearly gave us heart attacks, because he only has one eye and therefore has no depth perception.   The other ex-feral (both are now indoor cats) obviously does not have those soft pads on his feet.  At night, when we are in bed, we can hear him stomping around the house.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      The two o'clock Onshoring meeting was going well.  Taylor was leading, inviting other people up to speak on their specialties. Aerial photogrammetry and surveying, including the exact boundary, were out for contract signature  Gibson had handled that - Manufacturing was supposed to, but somehow hadn't happened.  Legal issues from Legal. Accounting reported on current costs, including all upkeep, guard salaries, etc.  Manufacturing was supposed to give those numbers, but they hadn't.   The downside was the VP of Manufacturing.  He had arrived at the meeting red-faced, his tie askew, clutching a bottle. It smelled strongly of vodka. He had never done anything in his twenty years of being VP of Manufacturing, and he did not like being asked now.   "Mr. ----, do you have the inventory we asked for?" Taylor asked politely.  VP Gibson had asked him to have his people go through the plant and not only inventory but assess the operational status of every piece of equipment.  They needed to know what they had. "I'm not going to take any f---- orders from a g-d- tra---," he snarled. "God knows what kind of perverts it has dragged into our fair city and bangs every night." "That is completely out of line." That was Gibson.  Taylor controlled herself.  That was a shot at Bob, not just at Taylor.  She was glad Bob was not there to do something stupid.  Had Mrs. McCarthy been talking? What had she said?  Was she given to embellishment?  Taylor took a deep breath. "I'm not sorry.  You f--- can take this stupid onshoring --- and shove it up your -" "That is quite enough."  This was the head of HR. "You can take your sissy ways and sashay -" "You are fired." "You can't fire me." "Oh, yes I can," said the office manager.  The VP took another swig from his bottle. "Try it."  He looked uncertain. "I will have you removed.  Are you going to leave on your own?  I am calling the police to help you leave." And he dialed the number. He stomped out cursing. They heard him noisily go down the hall.  This was the front conference room.  He actually went through security and out the door, throwing his badge on the ground on his way.  The guard picked it up. They could see this through the glass wall. "Can you fire a VP?" "The Board told me that if anyone gives me problems they should be shown the door. Even a VP.  I can fire everyone here. I won't, of course. Those were problems." "Are you alright, Taylor?" She nodded.  "I've heard worse.  Shall we continue?" And they did.   The last item was that certain business people in China had been arrested, and the corporation that had been supporting them all these years had been dissolved.  They were on their own, and the Board was dead serious on straightening things out.  After this meeting, Taylor believed it.  She did not attend the meeting to discuss how to distribute the few duties the VP of Manufacturing had done.  That was ultimately up to the Board.    
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Lunch was at Cabaret, still free.  The place was quiet: it was the sort of place you took a business client to impress them, and the few other people were in business suits.  Most of the legal profession was there.   She told him of the morning's frustrations, breaking her own rule about confidentiality.  She asked Karen how the branding was going, and Karen had snapped back that she had not started on it yet - they had all these proposals.  Taylor had explained that it was important, for the two o'clock meeting, and Karen told her to do it herself.  Karen pointed out that Taylor could not touch her - her uncle was on the Board and her brother was VP of Manufacturing.  Nor would the two computer guys go out to the plant - they were playing some kind of MMORPG and simply not available. If she wanted the pictures, she should go.  Mary prayed an Ave Maria, but both she and Brenda were racing to get the proposal out. The client wanted it Friday for review.   She didn't bring up what Mrs. McCarthy had told her.  She wasn't sure how to approach it.  She thought of telling her of a 'something more comfortable' she had bought in case he ever DID show up at her door. It was in the bottom drawer of her dresser, ready to go.  Instead she talked about moving to a place with a garage.  Several of the abandoned houses had one, and they had been maintained well with China cash.   Bob had finally realized that when he was introduced as Bob, Taylor's boyfriend, that was just how things were done here. Other people had introduced each other in terms of family relationships, which were strong.  Long before you found out anything else about someone, you knew how they were related.  Family kept people from leaving Millville.    "What is the real name of this town, anyway?"   She laughed.  "I am trying to find that out.  It's 'Welcome to Millvale' when you come into town from the north, and 'Welcome to Millville' on the south.  I have counted two other variants."   "What a town. Roosevelt is like that, with the families, but there is only one spelling."  
    • Ashley0616
      Nothing wrong with that. I'm glad that you found what makes you happy! Just curious what does your wife think? If it's too personal I understand.
    • Ashley0616
    • Ashley0616
      – According to a recent survey, the most popular name for a dog is Max. Other popular names include Molly, Sam, Zach, and Maggie.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...