Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Hair Removal


Guest Day / Ducky

Recommended Posts

This is JMO, but I thin that shaving your legs, and whatever else is a waste of time. I would recommend waxing to anyone interested in hair removal (though it is not used on facial hair). SHaving only lasts about a day or two before the itchiness starts. Them, you have a good chance of getting razor burn (those red bumps), and ingrown hairs, not to mention the possibility of cutting yourself (ouch!).

Waxing is a great way to avoid those problems, and it lasts up to 3-4 weeks before any noticable hair regrowth begins. There is normally no itchiness involved, no razor bumps, and if you maintain your skin properly after waxing, there is little chance of getting ingrown hairs, though it can sometimes happen - but rarely, IMO.

You can go to a salon/spa for this if you want to. Sure, its a little expensive, but so worth it. Expect to pay in the range of $60 for a full leg wax, and that will take about 45-50 minutes on average. The cost for other waxing services varies, but you can get a rough idea from this. Eyebrow wax takes like 15 minutes in a good spa, and is only $15 where I go. And they do such a great job. Find a good, reputable spa with experienced esthesticians. You can get it done cheaper in some places, but I find it much nicer to just pay the extra $10-20 and go to a nice, tranquil spa with beautiful decor and so on.

You can also go to a beauty supply store, invest in the necessary materials, and DIY at home. The supplies are really not that expensive, and all you really need is a wax heater ($30-40 for a decent one, up to $120 or so for the best), a high quality wax ($10-14 per 14 oz. can), muslin strips, wooden spatulas to apply the warmed wax with, and some talcum powder. I avoid using the kits that you find in drug stores simply because they are usually contain inferior quality waxes, and use paper strips (the worst, IMO). You heat them in a microwave, but they cool quickly, whether its a roll on type (usually the case for these types of kits), or not. So, you'll find yourself running to the microwave several times before you are through.

If you choose to do it yourself, I would still recommend going to a spa first, just for a few appointments, to observe how the esthestician performs the waxing. There is a method to all this, and its best, and most easily learned by having it done, and observing. This way you will learn to do it properly.

If you choose to do a Brazilian on yourself, then it is most definitely best to go to a spa to have it done, and learn how they do it. If you do any steps incorrectly when it comes to a Brazilian waxing, it can cause some major bruising, and torn layers of skin. And that is not much fun, lol. I've been there, done that, and let me sum it up as this: OUCH!!! And it can take a week or so to improve. Actually, this whole process is less painful then you would think. Sure, there is some degree of pain involved. If I said there isn't, then I would be lying to you. But with Brazilians, the results are also long lasting, and that translates into normally 12-15 days (or a bit longer, depending on how fast your hair grows.) of totally smooth skin 'down there,' with NO itching (YAY!). But I must mention that the wax which is used for Brazilian waxing is different than what is used on your legs, arms, etc (its a 'hard', stripless wax made for this particular use), and the the techniques for application, and removal are different as well. Best to have it done first, then if you want, DIY at home. But again, only use the best, and highest quality products you can find. Gigi makes good waxes and waxing supplies for both 'hard' waxes, and strip waxes like honey wax and more. Expect to pay from $40-50 in a good spa for this service. But again, it is so very worth it. No itching (which is probably the best thing next to the long lasting results). DIY, and it will only cost a few dollars ech time you wax. The biggest thing about Brazilians is the pain factor, I cannot lie. True its not really THAT bad, but yes, it does hurt. Fortunately, the pain only lasts a few seconds for each section of wax removed, but those few seconds can really be on the painful side. I just did my own Brazilian last night. It takes me about an hour or so to do. And now I don't have to worry about it for quite a while again. Nice, baby soft skin is what I have right now 'down there.'

Either way, I still feel waxing is he vest method of hair removal. Sure, laser gets rid of the hair somewhat permanently (from all I have learned about ti, there are still some follow-up treatments from time to time for any slight regrowth which may appear), and it is quite costly. But if thats what you choose to do, then great. Its a great way to go for hair removal. Electrolysis is also costly, and very time consuming. I only need it on my upper lip, and a bit on the chin, so I can get away with half hour appointments every 2-4 weeks, and I'm almost done with it after only 40 or so hours total to date. But I'm a rare case. Normally, this requires a lot more time each session (an hour, two, or even more at about $60 per hour, give or take a little) and also the vast majority of people must go for a long time, and many more hours than I have had to. I've heard of people going - for facial hair removal alone - and being on the table for upwards of three hours ech time, and having to go every week for a few years. I got lucky I guess because I have so little growth to begin with, it has been an easy, and fast process to permanently remove my facial hair. Now leg hair removal is different obviously. Plan on that taking MUCH longer simply because there are so many more hairs to deal with on your legs.

Wel,,thats about all I have to say about this. I've gone on long enough, lol. I hope you found this information useful, and if you have any questions, please feel free to ask.

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...
Guest Rachael

Hi there, this is my first post here but I've got to start somewhere.

Hair removal can be a bit of a pain in all senses of the word. I shave all my body hair every two or three days, and have now become quite expert at it. I used to get razor burn (and there's nothing worse than wanting to look feminine, but ending up looking as if you have some sort of skin disease with angry red marks and spots everywhere). I use a lot of lubrication, baby oil and shaving cream. I also use a Gillete women's razor, which has lubricant and is much better than a normal razor. It is also very important to take your time with the razor strokes and not to overdo it. In the past, I used to go at it very quickly. I take a cold shower to close my skin pores. I'm no expert, but this routine seems to work for me. I get some hair growth on my back and need to get a friend to shave that for me. One of these days I'm going to get some waxing, the problem is the hair has to be long for this to work and I want to have soft feminine skin all the time. For me, hair removal is the main problem in my desire to be feminine: my body already is quite feminine (none of the usual male muscular development) and I have noticeable breasts. When I was attempting to be a "real man" some women who saw me in intimate situations would say that I looked and felt like a woman. Some of them joked that I had bigger breasts than they had. For years, this was a source of some hurt and humiliation for me until I finally understood myself. Now I see it a source of joy and happiness that they think I have the body of a woman, because that's what I want to have. But what gives me even greater pleasure is having men say it too. Anyway, sorry for this long rambling post. Hope I haven't steered the thread too much away from the original topic.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 187 Guests (See full list)

    • Petra Jane
    • MaryEllen
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • Willow
      Good morning    Now @Abigail Genevieve and @Mmindy what makes you so certain I didn’t mean it to say bee itch certificate?  lol. Thanks Mindy. I was asleep when you saw this and fixed it, and yes Abigail, as a moderator I could have fixed it myself, or weren’t you pointing out the irony of that?   I use Alexis as my alarm to get up.  And I set the ringer to be two guys telling me to get up.  I was so sound asleep when they started telling me to get up that it scared me and my first thought were I had over slept.  Since I have a difficult time getting to sleep as early as I have to in order to get enough sleep I at least cut back my normal awake time to get ready.  But now I have to do my hair and get going.   enjoyed my coffee and a little time catching up   see you all later, for its hi ho hi ho it’s off to work I go.   Willow
    • EasyE
      Republicans have long committed grave errors by emphasizing their social agenda and moral issues instead of just focusing on the economy, lowering taxes, keeping the public safe, building a strong national defense, promoting business, touting reasonable immigration policies, etc.   The country would thrive economically under Trump's tax and business policies. That's a fact. Another four years of Biden will run this country into the ground financially (including all of our 401Ks and IRAs). But the GOP continues to play right into the Dems' hands by leading with their moral crusades instead of staying the course and trusting their fiscal policies to win the day... 
    • Carolyn Marie
      https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/hundreds-athletes-urge-ncaa-not-ban-trans-athletes-womens-sports-rcna149033     Carolyn Marie
    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...