Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Obama And Congress Report Card


Guest

How would you grade President Obama's first 100 days?  

61 members have voted

  1. 1. How would you grade President Obama's first 100 days?

    • A
      12
    • B
      17
    • C
      5
    • D
      9
    • F
      12
    • Incomplete
      6
  2. 2. How would you grade Congressional Republicans?

    • A
      1
    • B
      0
    • C
      9
    • D
      16
    • F
      29
    • Incomplete
      6
  3. 3. How would you rate Congressional Democrats?

    • A
      4
    • B
      13
    • C
      14
    • D
      10
    • F
      15
    • Incomplete
      5


Recommended Posts

i just don't believe there is a right or left anymore. D and R are relics from a time when our vote did count . our economy laws and religions are slowly being tailored to fit a different goverment, and its agenda. they are even trying to nationalize our IDs . the presidency of any candidate is little more than a puppet position, with this shadow government pulling the strings . if obama really wanted to make improvments he would regulate wall street. he would impose restrictions on the fed and force them to explain were nearly 10 trillion dallors of american money went , that seemingly vanished with out a trace , money that they could have sank back into unemployment, {since they haven't made a dent in the unemployment rate} instead of giving billions of dallors to car companies to continue building cars we cant afford why not . issue cupons to the american people for say 90% off the price of a new car, we would then in turn take those to a car lot buy the car., and the car lot or company would redeem them to the government for a slice of the bailout pie, allowing car companies to build the cars and keep people employed .

but then the heads of these companies wouldn't beable to pocket it and would have to pay their employees . instead of cutting their jobs and netting a tidy little profit . but the reason he does not do these things is because it doesn't serve the Fed a privately owned bank that has total dominion over our currency and economy . we are heading toward a global government headed from the shadows by buisness men and bankers .

i think one should find it odd that obama sends 30000 troops into afganistan, only months before american geologist find one of the biggest deposits of gold,calbalt , zinc , iron , and several other highly vaulued resources , i think the guesstimated value of with is in the several trillions . i doubt some GI was on patrol and tripped over this varitable gold mine . or a geologist, traipsing about in a war torn country stumbled across this find ?

there is a new world order coming . its being talked about openly . in the the news alls one has to do is look for it. but in case you don't want to waste time researching it your selves .

please for give the title of this video its just the best complied news clips and info. i could find. the only thing i want is for people to look ask real questions don't just take my word for it or these people in these videos or articals research it your self look at what they are doing and get mad about it.

we need to wake up. not just american people but all peoples of the world . before we all wake up one day wearing striped pajamas and a micro chip under our skin. this is the last. i will post to this thread i have said what i wanted to say.

Sakura

Link to comment
  • 3 months later...
Guest ma-head-a-spinnin

It is my experience, that politicians only make laws or policy, which suits the people, who fund their election campaigns.

I fear the power does not belong to the people, but to corporations.

On topic.

I believe Obama has defintely increased America's standing in the EU. And personally, I think the alternative, McCain (sounds like a brand of fries, I know), would have been a disaster. He would probably perpetuate America's 'world cop' policy for ever, and ever. News flash! You are not the only civilised country on the planet, stop forcing your rules onto us. Sheesh!

Link to comment
Guest Melisiris

Though we dutchies can learn a lot about the way the US treats immigrants(except for the "mexican problem" which are mostly guatamalese anyway), the new dutch government will make it near to impossible for me and my american girlfriend to live together in the netherlands(raising the minimum income and minimum age to 24 and other draconian measures to keep out the muslims, but it will hit other immigrants and their dutch partners just as hard), I will have to move to Germany because of it.

I have suspicions that Geert Wilders(right-wing islamophobe that endorses the new goverment and has a very big influence on it now) is somehow linked to the tea party, probably has the same people(or corporations) funding his movement.

Voting for tea-party alligned "politicians" will not do your county any good, like geert wilders will be a disaster for my country. And it will certainly decrease the possibilities for Obama to pass more improvements, he still has two years, FDR had four terms to get you out of the great depression, do not be too impatient. So use your common sense next week.

Link to comment

I have become very jaded in my years of watching politics as usual - the whole concept of a government for the people, of the people and by the people is totally destroyed by the introduction of campaign funding - the advice given to a very wealthy man by his father - you don't ever need to be a politician - you can afford to buy one.

Money runs the world, greed is the only real motivator for most people - so they go into politics and this need for money does not go away - the very liberal salaries of the members of congress with unbelievable pensions should any of them ever decide to leave and give up all of the graft should be enough for anyone - it is definitely enough for them to lose touch with the problems of 90% of the people that they claim to represent.

Their campaigns are funded by corporations, lobbyist and special interest groups who do not 'donate' these funds, they are purchasing votes in Congress plain and simple - that is why nothing changes - the rich are in control and want to get richer so they do, no one wants to get poorer but we are.

If Congress was really there to help us back in the days of a huge period of inflation they would have joined in on the wage and price freeze that President Nixon had imposed on the rest of the country but Congress voted in their annual pay raise proving once again how much they care about anyone but themselves.

Now during this recession while so many are losing their jobs and their homes have they passed on those pay raises - no but you do not hear about it because LBJ while still in the Senate entered a bill into Congress stating that if no vote was taken on Congressional pay raises (in particular Senatorial pay raises - what a shock) that they would go into effect automatically at the end of the session.

You don't hear about any one of them willing to give that up do you.

We have elected royalty and there is really not much difference between birthright and elected royalty in their connection with all of the people living in poverty.

At one point Ronald Reagan stated that no one ever went to bed hungry in the United States - I guess all of the homeless people were well feed while he was in office - so highly revered in the media and by the Republican Party and yet someday when a less biased history is written and his charisma is not being considered he will be one of the worst presidents of the late 20th century - Richard Nixon will be noted for all of the good that he did for the country and in foreign relations - he was responsible for the actions that eventually lead to the destruction of the Berlin Wall but Reagan got the credit because he was the man in office at the time of the event - nothing in politics happens over night and something this major took years.

Harry Truman ended World War II, FDR and Winston Churchill prolonged it by demanding an unconditional surrender from a culture that valued honor above life - don't look for those revelations just yet because revisionist history seems to last a long time - there has never been a war fought for any reasons other than greed and a need for power yet history records the American Revolution as a fight for ideals - no just we wanted to keep the tax money here - the Civil War was fought to abolish slavery - wrong again, a side benefit to so many but the main issues were Federal control over individual states and the price of cotton - yup, power and money just like always.

So how have Obama and Congress done, well they haven't ordered euthanasia for the homeless - so I give him high marks.

With total disgust,

Cynical Sally

Link to comment
Guest Melisiris

I totally understand your disgust. Getting more and more cynical myself, especially these days, but i try not to sink back in apathy, like so many people do(maybe in some decades i will be thinking just like you though). In a way I'd rather be naive than apathetic for now. If everyone turns away from politics it's a garantee that everything only will get worse.

In the case of the liberation of europe i am still grateful to FDR, all alterior motives he had aside. I would have been speaking German now not dutch(though my german is not bad, and now i have to go there) At least i had the chance of growing up in a free and prosperous western european country, such a pity the dutch are busy screwing that up now.

Link to comment
Guest KimberlyF

Melisiris,

Another guarantee that things continue to get worse is to continue to vote in a two party system and pick the lesser of two evils year after year which by definition just means the one who will just guarantee to make things slightly less worse than the other guy but still worse than before. How progressive! I'd rather 'waste' my vote on a third party candidate like the Green party or something and be able to look myself in the mirror than buy into their game. Maybe they can buy me off with a few bones tossed to the LGBT community though. They obviously don'taskdonttell care but as long as a few trinkets fall my way it's better than the other guys!

Kim

Link to comment
Guest Melisiris

At least vote for the lesser evil, but green party or socialist party is fine too in my humble opinion.;)

In the Netherlands we have a multi-party system, though this could not prevent the right wing fascist party cynically called "Party for Freedom" to gain unacceptable influence in the government, they are keeping the condoning coalition parties in a stranglehold. History is repeating itself but this time in a neighbouring country of germany.

Link to comment

At least vote for the lesser evil, but green party or socialist party is fine too in my humble opinion.;)

In the Netherlands we have a multi-party system, though this could not prevent the right wing fascist party cynically called "Party for Freedom" to gain unacceptable influence in the government, they are keeping the condoning coalition parties in a stranglehold. History is repeating itself but this time in a neighbouring country of germany.

Yes, Geert Wilders is an absolute hypocrite. The name of his party is just one example. He promotes freedom (given in our constitution), yet denies it for reasons such as cultural heritage, or having multiple nationalities.

Most recently, the double passports of one of our new ministers, was accepted without any scrutiny.

Couples of years back, both Wilders and Rutte (our new Prime Minister), made quite the ruckus about the double passports of two state secretaries. They were either Dutch-Turkish, or Dutch-Moroccan. Thus, Wilders and Rutte concluded their 'loyalty' was not guaranteed, and they moved for a vote of no confidence.

Luckily, this motion was not carried.

The new minister, who was sworn in a couple of days ago, is Dutch-Swedish. And yet, there's not so much as a beep from Wilders. The opposition has already called both Rutte and Wilders 'hypocrites', over this. Seems being part Swedish would be sufficient proof of 'loyalty', while I fail to see the distinction.

As for the TEA Party Movement, they are just as much populist weasels, as the PVV (Party for Freedom) is, here.

They want tax cuts, yet fail to come up with plans on how to prevent the US government from going bankrupt.

They promote liberty, like there is no tomorrow, yet wish to deny those liberties to non-whites.

They are complaining about the new Health care bill, yet didn't so much as grumble, when Bush jr. did something similar, just lacking fanfare.

Need I go on?

(All right, they oppose Wall Street's grabbing culture. That would be the only thing I agree with.)

I have never been big on the USA, when Bush was in the White House. I never liked the 'America above all' attitude some conservative Americans are throwing our way. And this 'Tea Party', from my perspective, makes a big red flag, next to one yellow flag, since Bush is gone.

(Feel free to tell me I'm wrong...)

You know, I know, that plenty of Americans would call me an utter communist for my views, while I prefer to call myself a socialist.

Anything below your 'Liberals' is a communist, from many Americans' perspectives.

Tiaria

Link to comment
  • Who's Online   8 Members, 0 Anonymous, 118 Guests (See full list)

    • Abigail Genevieve
    • VickySGV
    • violet r
    • Susie
    • MaybeRob
    • SamC
    • Breezy Victor
    • AllieJ
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,023
    • Most Online
      8,356

    Delaney
    Newest Member
    Delaney
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bebhar
      Bebhar
      (41 years old)
    2. caelensmom
      caelensmom
      (40 years old)
    3. Jani
      Jani
      (70 years old)
    4. Jessicapitts
      Jessicapitts
      (37 years old)
    5. klb046
      klb046
      (30 years old)
  • Posts

    • Breezy Victor
      I was ten years old when my mom walked in on me frolicking around my room dressed up in her bra, panties, and some pantyhose. I had been doing this in the privacy of my bedroom for a little while now so I had my own little stash box I kept full of different panties, bras, etc ... of hers. My mom's underwear was so easy for me to come by and she was a very attractive woman, classy, elegant. Well when she walked in on me, she looked at me with disgust and said to me... "If I wanted to run around like mommy's little girl instead of mommy's little boy, then she was going to treat me like mommy's little girl."  She left my bedroom after telling me NOT to change or get dressed or anything and returned with a few of her work skirts and blouses and such. She made me model off her outfits for her and I have to admit ... I LOVED EVERY SECOND OF IT. I felt so sexy, and feminine. And she knew I loved it.  She told me we can do this every weekend if I'd like. It would be OUR little secret. 
    • awkward-yet-sweet
      The usual social ways, of course.  Taking care of my partners and stepkids, being involved in my community.  That makes me feel good about my role.   As for physical validation and gender... probably the most euphoric experience is sex.  I grew up with my mother telling me that my flat and boyish body was strange, that my intersex anatomy was shameful, that no man would want me. So experiencing what I was told I could never have is physical proof that I'm actually worth something.  
    • KathyLauren
      <Moderator hat on>  I think that, at this point we need to get the thread back onto the topic, which is the judge's ruling on the ballot proposition.  If there is more to be said on the general principles of gendered spaces etc., please discuss them, carefully and respectfully, in separate threads. <Moderator hat off>
    • Abigail Genevieve
      People who have no understanding of transgender conditions should not be making policy for people dealing with it. Since it is such a small percentage of the population, and each individual is unique, and their circumstances are also unique, each situation needs to be worked with individually to see that the best possible solution is implemented for those involved. 
    • Abigail Genevieve
      No.  You are getting stuck on one statement and pulling it out of context.   Trans kids have rights, but so do non-trans kids.  That conflict is best worked out in the individual situation. 
    • MaeBe
      I get the concept, I believe. You're trying to state that trans kids need to or should be excluded from binary gender spaces and that you acknowledge that answers to accommodate those kids may not be found through policy. I disagree with the capability of "penetration" as being the operative delimiter in the statement, however. I contest this statement is poorly chosen at best and smacks of prejudice at worst. That it perpetuates certain stereotypes, whether that was the intent or not.   Frankly, all kids should have the right to privacy in locker rooms, regardless of gender, sexuality, or anatomy. They should also have access to exercise and activities that other kids do and allow them to socialize in those activities. The more kids are othered, extracted, or barred from the typical school day the more isolated and stigmatized they become. That's not healthy for anyone, the excluded for obvious reasons and the included for others--namely they get to be the "haves" and all that entails.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Context.  Read the context.  Good grief.
    • MaeBe
      Please don't expect people to read manifold pages of fiction to understand a post.   There was a pointed statement made, and I responded to it. The statement used the term penetration, not "dissimilar anatomy causing social discomfiture", or some other reason. It was extended as a "rule" across very different social situations as well, locker and girl's bedrooms. How that term is used in most situations is to infer sexual contact, so most readers would read that and think the statement is that we "need to keep trans girl's penises out of cis girls", which reads very closely to the idea that trans people are often portrayed as sexual predators.   I understand we can't always get all of our thoughts onto the page, but this doesn't read like an under-cooked idea or a lingual short cut.
    • Ashley0616
      I shopped online in the beginning of transition. I had great success with SHEIN and Torrid!
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Have you read the rest of what I wrote?   Please read between the lines of what I said about high school.  Go over and read my Taylor story.  Put two and two together.   That is all I will say about that.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      "I feel like I lost my husband," Lois told the therapist,"I want the man I married." Dr. Smith looked at Odie, sitting there in his men's clothing, looking awkward and embarrassed. "You have him.  This is just a part of him you did not know about. Or did not face." She turned to Odie,"Did you tear my wedding dress on our wedding night?" He admitted it.  She had a whole catalog of did-you and how-could you.  Dr. Smith encouraged her to let it all out. Thirty years of marriage.  Strange makeup in the bathroom.  The kids finding women's laundry in the laundry room. There was reconciliation. "What do we do now?" Dr. Smith said they had to work that out.  Odie began wearing women's clothing when not at work.  They visited a cross-dressers' social club but it did not appeal to them.  The bed was off limits to cross dressing.  She had limits and he could respect her limits.  Visits to relatives would be with him in men's clothing.    "You have nail polish residue," a co-worker pointed out.  Sure enough, the bottom of his left pinky nail was bright pink  His boss asked him to go home and fix it.  He did.   People were talking, he was sure, because he doubted he was anywhere as thorough as he wanted to be.  It was like something in him wanted to tell everyone what he was doing, and he was sloppy.   His boss dropped off some needed paperwork on a Saturday unexpectedly and found Odie dressed in a house dress and wig.  "What?" the boss said, shook his head, and left.  None of his business.   "People are talking," Lois said. "They are asking about this," she pointed to his denim skirt. "This seems to go past or deeper than cross dressing."   "Yes.  I guess we need some counseling."  And they went.
    • April Marie
      You look wonderful!!! A rose among the roses.
    • Ashley0616
      Mine would be SHEIN as much as I have bought from them lol.
    • MaeBe
      This is the persistence in thinking of trans girls as predators and, as if, they are the only kind of predation that happens in locker rooms. This is strikingly close to the dangerous myth that anatomy corresponds with sexuality and equates to gender.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      At the same time there might be mtf boys who transitioned post-puberty who really belong on the girls' teams because they have more similarities there than with the boys, would perform at the same level, and might get injured playing with the bigger, stronger boys.   I well remember being an androgynous shrimp in gym class that I shared with seniors who played on the football team.  When PE was no longer mandatory, I was no longer in PE. They started some mixed PE classes the second semester, where we played volleyball and learned bowling and no longer mixed with those seniors, boys and girls together.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...