Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Perfect "illusion": femininity as armor and the problem of "passing" for transgender women


VickySGV

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

Quick warning one "bad word" is quoted in this article to illustrate one obstacle Trans* women face.  The major interview subjects here are IRL friends of mine and some of the nicest people you can meet.

https://mic.com/articles/154794/perfect-illusion-femininity-as-armor-and-the-problem-of-passing-for-transgender-women#.xJyFNFVXK

This general topic is one that can generate heated debate in some parts of the TG tribe so please make any responses with the idea someone may disagree with you.

 

Link to comment
  • Admin

I hadn't thought of it in precisely those terms, but "femininity as armor" is a good way of putting it.  Also worth calling out from this article is the fact that everyone is the judge of how well we pass, which tends to be frustrating (how's that for an understatement?) at best.  The whole world's a critic, and they all have different tastes.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

Lots of interesting angles there!

Although luckily I have few issues when out I must admit that I have far fewer strange looks and stifled grins if I am dressed fully female than when I am indeterminate.

I do understand the 'feminity is armour' but another thing I find though is that it is easy to overdo the femininity

Tracy

Link to comment
  • Admin

It is a very interesting article, Vicky.  But I take issue with a lot of it.   I think it is filled with over-simplifications and hyperbole, as well as questionable logic and "facts."  Take this, for example:

"The correlation between the rise in violence against trans women and their increasing visibility is clear: With people more aware than ever of trans women, trans women who are not "passable" are more easily identifiable, and therefore in more danger than ever before."

No evidence of such a correlation is given, other than that this year the number of homicides of trans women is up, which might be a trend, or might just as well be an aberration.  The correlation that I've seen over the years I've been looking at this issue is the correlation of homicides to "risky" behavior.  That hasn't changed this year.

Then there is this:

"The reality of daily life for trans women is that their womanhood is challenged, mocked, invalidated and destroyed based on their presentation. Some women see complete submersion into cis-normative standards of feminine beauty as the only way to stay safe, whether from the pain of misgendering or the very real threat of violence and murder..."

Really, all of that is going to happen to you if you don't present as ultra femme and beautiful?  I say "baloney!"  I am anything but beautiful, I dress in jeans and a blouse, don't wear much makeup, almost never wear heels, my walk is anything but ladylike, my nails are short, and my "figure" is non-existent.  But through some apparent miracle, I have never been challenged, mocked, invalidated, destroyed or felt in physical jeopardy.  What is WRONG with me?

Now before you get all worked up, I do not mean to imply that those things don't happen to anyone else, or that is isn't a concern.  But to suggest that it happens to all of us, frequently, and that we should all be afraid every time we leave the house, or feel obligated to spend $20 K on FFS to avoid this fate worse than death, is just nonsense.  Caitlyn Jenner is welcome to her doctored face and expensive wardrobe; I don't need it to feel either safe or happy.

So, IMHO, Ms. Dommu is entitled to her opinion, but I don't share most of it.

Carolyn Marie

 

Link to comment

I found this to be interesting and yes, written with some drama and overstatement or hyperbole.  I just took it as an editorial opinion piece.  I noticed the author's  info at the end and the author doesn't indicate that they are a writer or journalist.  There are a few things like you Carolyn that I take exception to, and a few things that made me think like the statements regarding the claimed differences between older and younger trans women and the alleged rift between gay men and trans women.  And some things definitely got a  "really???" along with an eye roll. 

Link to comment

I think the big thing to take away is that we are all different. I definitely don't view passing as an armor for me, but for me passing is about lessening my dysphoria.

Link to comment

I think this editorial is a good example of why trans* acceptance is so difficult for the general population.  For one thing the rather pedantic and condescending tone, hectoring everyone into some homogenous belief system is not only annoying, it is down right offensive.  Is it not reasonable to ask, just why we must accept the points made by the author as gospel truth?

The other problem that I see is that the universal inclusiveness of the trans* mantra makes it nearly impossible for a reasonable person to understand just what it is that we are being asked, (told) to accept.

1 hour ago, MarcieMarie12 said:

the big thing to take away is that we are all different

Just who is the ubiquitous "we"?  Does this "we" include week-end warriors who dress 'for the fun of it' two nights per month?  Are these the trans women of whom we speak?

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Alejandra said:

Just who is the ubiquitous "we"?  Does this "we" include week-end warriors who dress 'for the fun of it' two nights per month?  Are these the trans women of whom we speak?

Yes it would for some. Some cross-dressers I know have lives like that, where their other life responsibilities prevent them from dressing more often. It also might be that is all they need to be happy with themselves. They have no intention of starting HRT or hormones. But we all come to our decision how best to transition of if to transition based on own personal feelings and life experiences. I don't really think it is a big ask to ask someone to just respect someone.

I do not think of a cross-dresser not on HRT and gets out once a month as a level 1 trans and a transwoman who has had GCS is the perfect 10. We are all transgender, it is a yes/no thing, not a contest to see who gets the highest score with GCS being the point winner. One of the things I like about Laura's is that is welcomes and supports all who fall under the transgender umbrella (and those questioning).

Hugs,

Marcie

Link to comment
  • Root Admin

Just so there's no misunderstanding. Laura's Playground treats all from the occasional cross dresser to post-op men or women with equal respect. No one is to be looked down upon. Anyone who disparages any one group with disrespect will be facing discipline.

MaryEllen

Link to comment

One of the statements in that article kinda caught my attention because it's something that has been on my mind quite a bit.

"Maybe I'm feeling Butch One day and Femme the next"

This is the type of thing that popped into my head months ago and has been bouncing around in there ever since. It's something that I needed to learn early on and something that most all not only need to learn but also need to remember. I know a lot of trans women that feel they have to be ultra femme and transmen that feel they have to be ultra masculine. This isn't the case, simply be yourself. 

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...
Guest noeleena

Hi,

wonder sometimes if some people with in some groups I,v been a member for  some  time   how they  get on this elitist   thinking that some are better than other,s  because they have had surgerys and on hormones ,

and are more feminine  and go all out to pass like women , yet they forget some of us females don't pass as feminine some of us don't look that pretty ether, for that matter,  yet we are born female , oh that does not matter , we don't  pass so are discounted as women, when you,v been on the brunt end of that  you know what its like,

Really it came down to they are so maleish in their attitude they cant see passed themselves  and they wont to be like women

So do we get into who,s the real woman = female here,=  becomes a joke , I cant be bothered with them any more,

I know way trans people are not accepted as true  because a few have made issue,s that were not there in the first place so have gone over board to demand their rights above  others and the sad thing is they wont more rights than those of us who are female , pity  they did not read what our women went through in the  1890,s to 1920,s  maybe had they seen that , though I doubt they would take it on board because they have their own agender,

I don't belive its getting better as all this could have been  so comes down to  being a woman is far more involved than clothes makeup adornments shoe,s and looks , its about  who you are as a person who you are when around others and how you interact   in  what do you show of your self  the real you or is that hidden   , being open is  what makes  and allows other to get to know you and see  are you to be trusted  can be relied on be there when needed and put others before your self  oh dear this is so much of being a woman ,  for some your attitude needs to change to be ... well... just a woman really . is that to much to ask,  for some seems so.

 

heres a ?  .....  because I,m a female - woman  for some of those trans  people I could not interact with them  I had nothing in common their thinking was different  there was nothing there that I could see being female in one family the sister and brother  thought it was the same and I talked at length to find out what  was missing , yes womens clothes were worn and that was it.  to me it was more about being a dresser,  and the sister would be the same,

So being a woman means your thinking is it as a woman or still maleish and in attitude,  now heres one that some will disagree with , your past are you open about it , or do you or have made up a story that would be more inkeeping of a normal womans life, , I,v heard a few and I don't belive a word what they say its all lie,s,  they live a lie and act a lie, why whats there to lose  nothing other than  when your friends find out you,ll be shown the door.

 

|The wording of being true to your self  .... really does only mean that , nothing more and  really nothing ..less ,

is that to hard to accept ,  if it does then  , why play a game of lie,s,  any way a few thought,s  worth thinking about,

 

...noeleena...

 

 

o

 

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

For me the question was never "What does it take to be a woman?"  I mean, I don't think the question makes much sense -- or perhaps I disagree with the underlying assumptions. I am female and that's always been the case, but that didn't prevent the world and often myself from misgendering me.  For me, it's the misgendering that was at the root of my dysphoria.  So the question was always, "What does it take to be consistently and unreservedly gendered female?" 

The answer to that question is not hyperfemininity.  Because, in truth, most women are not hyperfeminine.  And even hyperfeminine women will be stepping out of the shower, or crawling out of bed, without the accoutrements of femininity, and yet they'll still be properly gendered. 

So that's what I went for, and that's what I've gotten.

It took a lot of work.  Electrolysis, facial surgery, and an incredible amount of vocal training.  Hormones, vaginoplasty, breast augmentation.  Growing my hair out.  But that's only the half of it.  The rest is cultural.  Wearing clothes similar to my generational cohort. Being empathic. Being responsive to social expectations -- which doesn't always mean adhering to them, because most women break them, but just about everyone is aware of what those expectations are and what the consequences are to follow them or not (so, like, I don't wear makeup, and it's something I have to answer for).  And, ironically, it took not coming out.  Oh sure, coming out at the beginning of transition got me a lot of female gendering, but not always, not consistently, and certainly not out in the day-to-day public.  No, the best female gendering I get is with people I've only met after transition (except for a few deeply impressive women of transition) and whom I've never told to gender me otherwise. 

Obviously, this flies in the face of what the article is suggesting.  I mean, obviously there are all kinds of women in the world, and women who aren't pretty, who are downright homely, still get gendered female, with no more problems with "safety" than any other woman has to deal with being immersed in a rape culture.  So to conflate "beauty" with "female" for reasons of "safety" is definitely a mistake. 

Gender is constructed first from the observation of embodiment, which is then socially mediated.  The initial observation is automatic and subconscious; this is something people don't really think about.

So, I'm really not sure I agree with "visibility" as a movement, at least as an all-encompassing movement.  I'm completely sympathetic to anyone who identifies first and foremost as trans, and I'm all for making visibility something that's completely socially acceptable, for not everyone has the resources or inclination to do what it takes to elicit female gendering consistently and automatically from everyone else.  Well, I'd kind of like Drucker (and her interviewer, Dommu) to extend the same courtesy to those who identify primarily on the binary.  Statements like "willful denial" are pretty inflammatory.  And like, if I'm dating a guy and he makes it clear he wants me to carry my child, my reaction isn't "this person doesn't know who I am" as Drucker puts it, my reaction is, "This person knows exactly who I am, except for my personal tragedy of being infertile."  (Though now, having turned 50, my reaction would be, "Holy crap, he thinks I'm still in my 30s!") 

I think it's perfectly acceptable to consider "trans" as a permanent identity, or a transitory one.  If we're going to embrace identity politics (and I think we should) then all identities have to be embraced, even cis-normative ones adopted by people who transitioned and since moved on with our lives. 

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...

I haven't read all of the comments here, but I did read the article. It's late, running out of time before I turn back into Cinderella the scullion!

I feel this pressure to be ultra femme already. Sure I can pass without makeup in this rural, hick town. But I doubt I will be able to in an area that sees more transgender people in it! But it is safety to me! Especially someone like me! I still can't be alone in the same room with a man who knows my secret for fear of being assaulted! Someone I've known and trusted as a close friend for a decade who has fully accepted me for being transgender! Mine is an irrational fear brought on by abuse and bullies as a child, but how many of us have the same issues?

One of the first things I plan to look in to is FFS after we sell our house. Luckily my wife is behind me in this. Passing is important to me. But what is more important is being safe. Passing = Safe. Sure this article may be blowing things out of proportion for most of us. But that isn't to say that some of us didn't read it and totally identify with it....

....I've also gone hog wild on voice therapy training CD's (not them, the discs!) ;)

Link to comment
17 hours ago, Cindy Truheart said:

I haven't read all of the comments here, but I did read the article. It's late, running out of time before I turn back into Cinderella the scullion!

I feel this pressure to be ultra femme already. Sure I can pass without makeup in this rural, hick town. But I doubt I will be able to in an area that sees more transgender people in it! But it is safety to me! Especially someone like me! I still can't be alone in the same room with a man who knows my secret for fear of being assaulted! Someone I've known and trusted as a close friend for a decade who has fully accepted me for being transgender! Mine is an irrational fear brought on by abuse and bullies as a child, but how many of us have the same issues?

One of the first things I plan to look in to is FFS after we sell our house. Luckily my wife is behind me in this. Passing is important to me. But what is more important is being safe. Passing = Safe. Sure this article may be blowing things out of proportion for most of us. But that isn't to say that some of us didn't read it and totally identify with it....

....I've also gone hog wild on voice therapy training CD's (not them, the discs!) ;)

Hon, I only wanted to say that I don't think this fear is irrational. 

Link to comment
  • Admin
On 2/20/2017 at 7:48 PM, Cindy Truheart said:

Sure I can pass without makeup in this rural, hick town. But I doubt I will be able to in an area that sees more transgender people in it! But it is safety to me! Especially someone like me!

I actually live in the Los Angeles area, and while I have MANY Trans* friends in the area (including an Admin here at Laura's), because of the sheer number of people here it is in fact safer for us though we may feel like we stand out like a sore thumb.  This post I made a couple of years ago here is something to think about in regard to your wariness of what could happen here. 

http://www.lauras-playground.com/forums/topic/43991-public-vs-picture/

We are still less than six tenths of one percent of the people that are here.  Where you are, you could actually be a higher percentage of the people in your community. 

People, even here, know me by my character as we get to know each other and not by my perfectly female passability and beauty. (Both myths.)  Sure, I have had my share of "chasers" in the past and I was wary of them myself.  I actually had more problems when I was nervous.  Confidence to me is the greater armor I have today as I look in a mirror and say "This is ME!!"  I understand your reaction to prior totally undeserved abuse, I have been there too.  Confidence in myself has opened up, but it has taken time.

Link to comment

Cindy, I hear and understand what you are saying.  I found this comment from the article interesting:  "Is passing even an issue anymore if we simply stop taking the test?"  I would say yes...as long as that test is still being administered by the majority of others.  Cause sometimes your safety DOES depend on it.  Sometimes  your career will depend on it.  Sometimes your housing will depend on it.  Sad, but still a reality of the world we live in.

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I certainly have a desire to "pass" for many reasons.  Safety is one but as Marcie mentions above it is helpful in self acceptance.  If someone spends time looking or knows already i'm sure i will never pass but just being able to walk down the street and not have everyone stare is wonderful armor for everyday life.  I'm fortunate to live on the coast so there is more acceptance.  My small town and community has been great.  I'm a non issue at this point.  As soon as i climb into my van and cross the country that armor unfortunately becomes critical to safety.  This may change in the future but at this point being trans* isn't acceptable to a great many people so i keep my head down and enjoy the freedom i do have.

 

Hugs,

 

Charlize

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

I find that I have to be a bit careful in other areas as where I live is fairly safe, at least in daylight hours but some of the bigger cities in the UK can be far more dangerous. I can confidently go out here with usually only the odd look whereas in some places I have been clocked instantly. Interestingly though it is not always obvious who or where the dangerous people are. With work, where I was obviously feminine, I had no issues whatsoever with anyone in the rough areas of places like Leicester (a much larger city than Lincoln).

I don't think I pass well if I look objectively, but am so used to being dressed and effectively living as such that I don't think about it that much. That is why I need to be careful, but there again - so does a woman!

Tracy

Link to comment

Ironically, I am the exact opposite in that I want to stand out.  I think of myself when I think of the me I want to be, and as one of my therapist says because I even have an unique way of showing the thumbs up sign and grow only my pimy fingernail out that there is nothing I do to be someone else as I am all that I can be.  So the only thing I can be is a flawed human being that is in the process of growing and that is all I want to be.  I want to be me and that is it.

Link to comment
Guest noeleena

  Hi .

Cindy

I know what abuse is like been on the brunt of it I know what its like to be not pretty or sexy, I also know what its like working in the male world and the male talk and for a female to be in that for years it degrades you its a put down and you feel as cheap as dirt from the gutter, live with it for 50 years it effects you your scared for life , point you made being in a room alone with a male, more so if that male wonts sex ,

Im okay im a fighter and can defend myself so I,m not bothered .

I know what that's like as well , this is life in a female world I still have concerns about finding a mate learning about what males expect and wont from a woman this is very scary I,m not sure I,m ready for that, I would like a male relastionship and being  a 69 year old women is very different ,

Even being a female its still not a walk in the park , I talk with my female friends and that is such a help and to know they are there,

Female perspective in a real life living it every day .

...noeleena...

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator
48 minutes ago, viviennemichelle said:

quotes"I look like a man in a dress" there are lots of women in the world that look like that.

Viviennemichelle if you look around as you have, we see there are far more women that lean towards masculine looks than what we believe.   

Link to comment

So it's not the end of the world if people don't like you. I guess that is true because I have found I am happier when I don't demand that everyone like me.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 91 Guests (See full list)

    • VickySGV
    • Timi
    • KayC
    • MomTGDaughter
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • KymmieL
      Well first day is over and now getting ready for bed soon. Work was OK.   Don't know why but I am feeling down. I am heading to bed. Good Night.   Kymmie
    • Adrianna Danielle
      Boyfriend and I our time at my place.Both admit our sex life is good,got intimate for the 2nd time and he is good at it
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Thanks.  I will look those up in the document, hopefully tomorrow.   I always look at the source on stuff like this, not what someone, particularly those adversarial, have to say. 
    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...