Jump to content
  • Welcome to the TransPulse Forums!

    We offer a safe, inclusive community for transgender and gender non-conforming folks, as well as their loved ones, to find support and information.  Join today!

Coming out in the work place


MisterWatson

Recommended Posts

Hello hello everyone! I come to you all this fine day to ask for some advice!

So, I recently began seeing a gender therapist last Thursday, and, although we will be covering some of the bigger issues I will be facing in the future, there has been one thing that has been bothering me for quite some time now.

Considering the title of this post, I'm sure you all know what this issue is!

Now, regarding coming out in the work place, I'm not necessarily certain on how to do this. All of my coworkers are very understanding and kind to me, and after working with them for a little over six months, I feel as if they know me fairly well, right? But I still worry about how they will handle this, nonetheless.

Regardless, I shall try and move forward! It's just a matter of whether or not I discuss this with HR, my bosses, or both, about my possible transitioning? Or if I should handle this in a different manner?
That, and what exactly should I say?

Any advice? :)

Link to comment

My advice is try to find out the antidiscrimination policy first, hopefully on the website. It may not matter whether or not gender identity is protected, but I know I felt better once I knew that it was. I recommend going to HR first. They're going to have to be brought in anyway. They are the ones that know what the policies are and can provide guidance. Besides they're going to be the first ones your bosses call.

In my case, I went to HR, they didn't really have a policy in place about transition, so they let me take the lead. If I had gone to my bosses, there would have been a lot more back and forth, and probably a good bit of misinformation.

Link to comment

Thank you very much for your advice! I'll definitely take a look into the policies given, it might take some extensive research, but I'm sure it'd be worth it in the end.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, TexasLibraryLady said:

My advice is try to find out the antidiscrimination policy first, hopefully on the website. It may not matter whether or not gender identity is protected, but I know I felt better once I knew that it was. I recommend going to HR first. They're going to have to be brought in anyway. They are the ones that know what the policies are and can provide guidance. Besides they're going to be the first ones your bosses call. In my case, I went to HR, they didn't really have a policy in place about transition, so they let me take the lead. If I had gone to my bosses, there would have been a lot more back and forth, and probably a good bit of misinformation.

Probably the best advice (i.e., going to HR...esp. w/ re: to checking it out in/on the company HR manual first.  Seems prudent...and may effect one's decisions/plans).

Best wishes in transition.

[Personally, I never went to HR myself....[I am in no way advocating that someone else does that...am just stating what I didn't do...I think it's a personal decision that each individual has to decide for himself/herself.].... I had been w/ my employer tor a few years, before I took a month's paid-time-off to have surgery & to recuperate a bit.  Post srs/grs, I continued to work for the same employer until I retired.  It honestly never occurred to me to go to HR; not entirely sure why....I guess I just always thought that if things got out of hand, beyond my ability to deal w/ it....I'd just quit and go to work for someone else.  I did tell a few folks at work, but in retrospect I consider that to be one of the worst decisions I ever made in my life.]

Link to comment
  • Forum Moderator

This is good advice as far as order of precedence.  Once you understand the company policy you can better approach the subject with HR. 

Jani

Link to comment
Guest Lizzie McTrucker

My advice, based on experience, would be to go to HR first. They would also know, or could easily look up, any policies in place. They would be the ones to help navigate a time line for work place transition so people who need to know will know and have someone designated for questions or concerns.

Link to comment

This October will be my thirtieth year here, and I'm still worried! I've told the personnel director, and about a dozen co-workers that I've known forever and believe them to be supportive people. So far I've picked properly because so far, no one except my daughter freaked out.

I've told my personnel director that I intend to complete transition this year and change my name and gender. I intend to just slowly continue. Been on HRT and changing my attire for a year now, now Im starting to feel like accelerating, but I'm also trying to wait for my wife to catch up. Good luck........

Link to comment

Firstly, I apologize for my late reply, I've been sick this past week or so, and just now have been able to keep my eyes open without them watering (finally!)

However, after taking everything into consideration (and thank you all for taking the time to respond to this!) I have decided to turn to HR when it comes to this situation. But, I am unsure of when to do this.

Would it be best if I wait to tell them when I know for certain I have an upcoming surgery to help with my transition/am expecting to take hormones? Or, should I discuss this with them as soon as possible?

Link to comment
  • Admin

Hello, Mr. Watson.  I've been on VC recently and don't think I've met you before this.  So a belated welcome to you.

The advice given above is very good and I could not agree more.  How you handle things depends, in part, on your situation with the company, how open it is to new things (or how open it says it is), how big it is, and how many people you routinely deal with.

In my case, I had a staff of 25 in an organization of over 200, most of whom knew me.  I came out to HR and we formed a working group to plan everything out.  My transition, with one exception, went extremely well, and I owe that to the planning we did.

Based on the fact that you just started seeing a GT, I don't think there is a rush to tell HR.  I would wait until you are a few weeks to a few months from the time you plan to socially transition.  It would cut down on red tape if you didn't transition until you have changed your name, so that Personnel and Payroll won't have legal issues.  But those things can be worked around if all you want to do is an "unofficial" name change.

There is a sub-forum here on Coming Out, with some great threads going back a while.  You can check it out.  There is also lots of stuff online to help provide advice and support, including state by state how-to's on legal name changes.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Carolyn Marie

Link to comment

Thank you very much! I most definitely will wait before telling HR, then. And thank you for the warm welcome!

I am meeting with my gt in a week and a half, and will possibly bring this up to her during the session, I don't doubt she will agree with you all! It won't hurt to wait until the time is right anyhow, they're a big company, but I don't believe them to be adverse in helping me with this change.

Thank you for the help everyone! (and thank you for taking the time to answer this!)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 199 Guests (See full list)

    • Adrianna Danielle
    • MaeBe
    • MomTGDaughter
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      80.7k
    • Total Posts
      768.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      12,024
    • Most Online
      8,356

    JamesyGreen
    Newest Member
    JamesyGreen
    Joined
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alscully
      Alscully
      (35 years old)
    2. floruisse
      floruisse
      (40 years old)
    3. Jasmine25
      Jasmine25
      (22 years old)
    4. Trev0rK
      Trev0rK
      (26 years old)
  • Posts

    • MaeBe
      LGBTQ rights Project 2025 takes extreme positions against LGBTQ rights, seeking to eliminate federal protections for queer people and pursue research into conversion therapies in order to encourage gender and sexuality conformity. The policy book also lays out plans to criminalize being transgender and prohibit federal programs from supporting queer people through various policies. The project partnered with anti-LGBTQ groups the Family Policy Alliance, the Center for Family and Human Rights, and the Family Research Council. Project 2025 calls for the next secretary of Health and Human Services to “immediately put an end to the department’s foray into woke transgender activism,” which includes removing terms related to gender and sexual identity from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” The Trump administration proposed a similar idea in 2018 that would have resulted in trans people losing protections under anti-discrimination laws. [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; The New Republic, 2/8/24] Similarly, the policy book calls for HHS to stop all research related to gender identity unless the purpose is conformity to one's sex assigned at birth. The New Republic explains: “That is, research on gender-nonconforming children and teenagers should be funded by the government, but only for the purpose of studying what will make them conform, such as denying them gender-affirming care and instead trying to change their identities through ‘counseling,’ which is a form of conversion therapy.” [The New Republic, 2/8/24] The policy book’s foreword by Kevin Roberts describes “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children” as “pornography” that “should be outlawed,” adding, “The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.” Roberts also says that “educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Roberts’ foreword states that “allowing parents or physicians to ‘reassign’ the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.” Echoing ongoing right-wing attacks on trans athletes, Roberts also claims, “Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023; TIME magazine, 5/16/22] Dame Magazine reports that Project 2025 plans to use the Department of Justice to crack down on states that “do not charge LGBTQ people and their allies with crimes under the pretense that they are breaking federal and state laws against exposing minors to pornography.” [Dame Magazine, 8/14/23] Project 2025 also calls for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to repeat “its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding ‘gender reassignment surgery’ for Medicare beneficiaries.” The policy book’s HHS chapter continues: “In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023] Going further, Project 2025 also demands that the next GOP administration “reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.” The policy book’s chapter on the Defense Department claims: “Gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service, and the use of public monies for transgender surgeries … for servicemembers should be ended.” [Project 2025, Mandate for Leadership, 2023]   …summaries of what’s within the rest of the document re: LGBTQ+ concerns. A person can believe their gender is fixed but incongruent with their physiology, but the authors and Trump (by his own words) just see the incongruity of an “expressed gender” that conflicts with what was/is in a person’s pants.
    • Mmindy
      Good catch… I took care of it.
    • Sally Stone
      I'm tired of the two-party system.  It has degraded to a system where there are only two diametrically opposed views, neither of which supports me.  I have conservative views regarding big government and government spending but I have very liberal views when it comes to protecting the rights of individuals.  And just elections of the past, I am stuck with two choices, neither of which I support. With only two parties, each with agendas that are off the left and right scales, I am not adequately represented.    Finally, I'm okay with party affiliated politicians running for office using their party views, but once elected to office, they are obligated to support the entire electorate not just the electorate members that voted for them.  Plain and simple, our government system is broken and dysfunctional.  I'll step down from my soapbox now.     
    • Sally Stone
      Thanks Mae.  She was an amazing friend and I grew to love her like a sister.
    • Sally Stone
      I did Ashley.  Non-rev travel was one of the major factors for taking the job.  At the time, US Airways had the best non-rev policy in the industry.  It cost $10 to fly coach and $25 to fly first class.  We flew first class whenever there were seats available.  
    • Abigail Genevieve
      You should have a moderator fix what you meant to write as "birth certificate".  Ooops.   I've gone over that verse and am wholly and completely dissatisfied with the SBC exegesis of it, so much so that it was one of the things that helped me break out of a mindset of guit.  Sometime I may strut by stuff as a Hebraist and show what it really means.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found this   — 450 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con- science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology. From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care. A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov- ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws. Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children.   https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf   First, that is not much, if that is all that is of concern.  Secondly, I have seen all sorts of anti-Trump slander, including the Steele dossier and the lawfare he is now undergoing, to be cynical of any criticism against him, and indirectly this document.    He deserves some of what he is getting, but not all.  Thirdly, I bolded one statement of concern.   I don't think gender identity is subjective.  "Radical actors" is name calling, and there is a lot of that going around.  Maybe I am not seeing everything of concern or reading this right, but i would discuss with the author of this document concerning this.
    • Willow
      Good evening   well I finally finished reading my textbook.  Yeah.  But I still have a lot more to go for the class.     My endocrinologist always asks me about lactation.  And yes I have had some very small amounts of leakage but not on any regular basis.  I figure I blocked the discharge Duce when I pierced my nipples with scare tissue.  But who knows.  I also get asked about mammograms.  I e had my first or baseline and this fall I will need to schedule my second.   As someone in the midst of studying the Old Testament, I can say that I haven’t found any mention of pending damnation for being transgender or intersex.  The closest it comes is a verse that says men should not wear women’s clothing.  Now I don’t know each and everyone’s particulars, but I know I meet the medical definition of female gender, and even in Ohio, a State that until recently refused to allow birth certificates to be changed, I meet the criteria.  Therefore I can only conclude I am not a man wearing women’s clothing.  But there is a somewhat different scholarly explanation of that law that it should not be taken as literally as the haters want.  Mostly men should not pretend to be women to ex ape from their enemies. Or tried to hide from God.     willow
    • Abigail Genevieve
      Well, the left wing has been doing that.    I read a few things while trying to find out what the problem is and liked what I read.  But I am a conservative.    Is there something specific in there that is of concern?  Does it promise somewhere to erase trans folk? That would be problematic.
    • Ivy
      It's a plan to basically completely take over the government by the right wing.
    • Ivy
      I'm actually in Asheville tonight.  Some of the people in the support group invited me for dinner after the meeting.  We're going to get together again tomorrow again. It's been nice, 4 trans women and 1 trans man, together ar a restaurant.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      I found https://www.project2025.org/policy/   I will have to read it.  I have not.  What is of concern?   The link provided earlier goes back to this forum.
    • Abigail Genevieve
      My parents were life long Democrats. 
    • Ivy
      'Nuff said. Yeah I'm not thrilled with Biden either. There are some conservative ideas I'm good with.  And I do feel that the current Democratic party is too cozy with the bankers and wealthy.  But despite all their talk, when it comes down to it, so are the Republicans.  And it's not the Dems calling for our eradication. Unfortunately, I see this election as existential for trans folks.  
    • Mmindy
      Good evening everyone,   @Birdie your CNA Is ill informed about breast and proper bra fitting.   My wife and I are checking out a campground up in Michigan just a little North of Saginaw, MI. We had a great meal at a local tavern serving delicious perch fillet dinner.   We’re going to check out the Saginaw,MI Bay area for summer time activities for when we come back on occasion. We belong to a camping club call Adventure Outdoors and have free camping at their resorts around Michigan and Ohio.   Hugs,   Mindy🌈🐛🏳️‍⚧️🦋    
  • Upcoming Events

Contact TransPulse

TransPulse can be contacted in the following ways:

Email: Click Here.

To report an error on this page.

Legal

Your use of this site is subject to the following rules and policies, whether you have read them or not.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Community Rules

Hosting

Upstream hosting for TransPulse provided by QnEZ.

Sponsorship

Special consideration for TransPulse is kindly provided by The Breast Form Store.
×
×
  • Create New...